Charityhost.org Review - Provider or Dominator!!!

TimboJones

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

ServerBachelor

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

suyadi92

@CharityHost_org said:

@hyperblast said: the relationship was first and lastingly disturbed by your snooping. that is beyond question and above all!

You are wrong. Seeing public domain data is not snooping.

What did you looking for when you snooped into his pants?

TimboJones

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

I do disagree. He didn't deny it or try and hide it, he felt like he had the right to and defending his actions.

ServerBachelor

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

I do disagree. He didn't deny it or try and hide it, he felt like he had the right to and defending his actions.

I don't think we disagree, per se. People aren't saying that CH is denying what he did; they're criticizing him for insisting that he was right for doing so, even after numerous people expressed their disagreement.

TimboJones

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

I do disagree. He didn't deny it or try and hide it, he felt like he had the right to and defending his actions.

I don't think we disagree, per se. People aren't saying that CH is denying what he did; they're criticizing him for insisting that he was right for doing so, even after numerous people expressed their disagreement.

I'm only arguing this isn't a "-gate". Everyone and their dog and grandma agrees the snooping was wrong.

ServerBachelor

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

I do disagree. He didn't deny it or try and hide it, he felt like he had the right to and defending his actions.

I don't think we disagree, per se. People aren't saying that CH is denying what he did; they're criticizing him for insisting that he was right for doing so, even after numerous people expressed their disagreement.

I'm only arguing this isn't a "-gate". Everyone and their dog and grandma agrees the snooping was wrong.

Fair enough. Though the "-gate" thing has lost a lot of its context-dependent meaning anyhow. If saying "CharityGate" is a more convenient way to describe what happened than "the CharityHost snooping incident," I'm fine with it.

DrNutella

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@ServerBachelor said:

@TimboJones said:

@DrNutella said:

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

-Gate is for cover ups that make the cover up worse than the crime, not generic scandals. That doesn't appear to apply here.

Feel free to disagree, but CH trying to drown out criticism by responding to EVERYONE with name calling definitely does more to harm his reputation and worsen the situation than the original controversy, IMO.

Lots of shady hosts out there. Not a lot of hosts spending hours upon hours on end to childishly spar with the very people they're trying to sell to.

I do disagree. He didn't deny it or try and hide it, he felt like he had the right to and defending his actions.

I don't think we disagree, per se. People aren't saying that CH is denying what he did; they're criticizing him for insisting that he was right for doing so, even after numerous people expressed their disagreement.

I'm only arguing this isn't a "-gate". Everyone and their dog and grandma agrees the snooping was wrong.

Fair enough. Though the "-gate" thing has lost a lot of its context-dependent meaning anyhow. If saying "CharityGate" is a more convenient way to describe what happened than "the CharityHost snooping incident," I'm fine with it.

Key word is “balls”. Gate is just the earned title. Thank you.

nghialele

What kind of tantrum will CH throw today?

ServerBachelor

@nghialele said:
What kind of tantrum will CH throw today?

“Trustpilot wouldn’t censor reviews on my behalf : (“

I’m pretty sure the review I featured here was also flagged for a while, but reinstated.

nghialele

@ServerBachelor said:

@nghialele said:
What kind of tantrum will CH throw today?

“Trustpilot wouldn’t censor reviews on my behalf : (“

Trustpilot is attacking us LOL

dragonballz2k

@CharityHost_org When is the face reveal happening? Most drama hosts end up with one.

ServerBachelor

I just found out that if you search “charityhost trustpilot” this thread is the second result on Duckduckgo

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=charityhost+trustpilot&t=ffip&ia=web

The SEO is working!

ServerBachelor

@dragonballz2k said:
@CharityHost_org When is the face reveal happening? Most drama hosts end up with one.

There’s a reason he’s crashing out on LET instead of spending the night out lol

cybertech

i heard xanax helps

apart from a sincere apology

nghialele

This is interesting, this is @bdspice original review which is flagged.

PineappleM

“Illegal or harmful content”

Really stretching the definition of “harmful” now aren’t they? I mean every business will obviously see every 1 star review as harmful…

RIYAD

@PineappleM said: Really stretching the definition of “harmful” now aren’t they? I mean every business will obviously see every 1 star review as harmful…

It's not only harmful content; it's also HARAM content.

somik

@RIYAD said:
It's not only harmful content; it's also HARAM content.

That is a good one!

@nghialele said:
This is interesting, this is @bdspice original review which is flagged.

Well, his bad review is harmful to @CharityHost_org 's "business". And dont believe trustpilot reviews. They are still a company who is in it for the profit. So they are more willing to side with the host rather then reviewer. If you are in doubt, search for " review forum" for more organic reviews. See this google search for example:

https://www.google.com/search?q=CharityHost+review+forum

nghialele

This is another good review that is shown and thanked by the crybaby.

https://www.trustpilot.com/users/674f102b45d87b5ba5097aa9

nghialele

Somebody have VPS with them please crontab a YABS for every 15-20mins

TimboJones

@nghialele said:
Somebody have VPS with them please crontab a YABS for every 15-20mins

Some yabs takes over 20 minutes.

nghialele

@TimboJones said:

@nghialele said:
Somebody have VPS with them please crontab a YABS for every 15-20mins

Some yabs takes over 20 minutes.

That's why I said so xD

JasonM

I'm entering CharityHost.org in my public list of blacklisted web hosts. enough of their drama.

cybertech

@JasonM said:
I'm entering CharityHost.org in my public list of blacklisted web hosts. enough of their drama.

you will be labelled as toxic member by him

ServerBachelor

@cybertech said:

@JasonM said:
I'm entering CharityHost.org in my public list of blacklisted web hosts. enough of their drama.

you will be labelled as toxic member by him

Oh, the horror! Anyways.

bdspice

Omg. I cant believe how desperate a provider can be. He report my trustpilot review. Here you can see which 3 word he report to change. None of them are false or incorrect still he cant take bad review.

10thHouse

@bdspice said:
Omg. I cant believe how desperate a provider can be. He report my trustpilot review. Here you can see which 3 word he report to change. None of them are false or incorrect still he cant take bad review.

Reviews are just currency to @CharityHost_org

Unfortunately for him, they come with even more strings attached.

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/204985/charityhost-bribes-customers-for-5-star-reviews-on-trustpilot

bdspice

I think this is the time to take action LET admins @jbiloh @FAT32...

10thHouse

@bdspice said:
I think this is the time to take action LET admins @jbiloh @FAT32...

@raindog308 @DP