Charityhost.org Review - Provider or Dominator!!!

CharityHost_org

@lala_th said: Provider's Response (CharityHost_org):

This is hyper bias. That is only half the truth.

CharityHost_org

I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

cybertech

i'm really glad everyone's happy about this so all the more reason to keep going woohoo

itachikonoha

@CharityHost_org said:
This is what I call Class A witch hunt backfiring. SEO dont care honestly. You should revise how you deal with your own toxicity. My suggestion from human to human (or bots I guess), is to tone down the attacking and insisting on it. Ask questions, get answers, respectfully it works. We are sensible, but we loathe being attacked. It's simple following the LET golden rule. If we were defensive, it's due to insults and blatant disrespect, it's hard to stomach that, not because of questioning. Anyway, this made it to TOP google search for 'CharityHost.org reviews'. You can see that we have good SEO by far. Our customer base are good customers that trust us and we trust them, we respect their privacy and when requested we troubleshoot with their permission granted access.

Note: We did not run to LET breaking AUP and expose anything about the issue to make this 'our own doing'. We are happy to work out issue with customers off LET as well.

That's exactly how SEO works. You should be afraid of this initial boost because once the algorithm rectifies itself, it will penalise the entity heavily.

The more you get boost, the more negative review from LET comes in, more penalization when the algo does adjustment.

This is a worrying sign for you.

zed

Give him a day or two to see this reverse psychology isn't working and he'll throw another tantrum. Much entertainment.

lirrr

bro gonna crash out again

CharityHost_org

(https://i.postimg.cc/kXGdHcz0/ch-brave-ai-reviews.png "")

@lirrr said:
bro gonna crash out again

Bro here you go.

CharityHost_org

@itachikonoha said: That's exactly how SEO works. You should be afraid of this initial boost because once the algorithm rectifies itself, it will penalise the entity heavily.

The more you get boost, the more negative review from LET comes in, more penalization when the algo does adjustment.

This is a worrying sign for you.

This does not. I'm just having honest conversation responding to comments and question. The rest are doing all the work. The algo will do what it does. It doesn't matter really. Just because it's many against 1, does not ever mean the many are correct. Often its quite the opposite. This mass effect is collective behavior, does not mean it's correct. It's less that .001% of the active members.

CharityHost_org

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

itachikonoha

@CharityHost_org said:

@itachikonoha said: That's exactly how SEO works. You should be afraid of this initial boost because once the algorithm rectifies itself, it will penalise the entity heavily.

The more you get boost, the more negative review from LET comes in, more penalization when the algo does adjustment.

This is a worrying sign for you.

This does not. I'm just having honest conversation responding to comments and question. The rest are doing all the work. The algo will do what it does. It doesn't matter really. Just because it's many against 1, does not ever mean the many are correct. Often its quite the opposite. This mass effect is collective behavior, does not mean it's correct. It's less that .001% of the active members.

Positive or negative, the SEO rectifies itself after a while when it sees a trend. I can see Google putting more emphasis on trust pilot now, but if parameter changes to LET, it will penalize heavily until it again rectifies itself to bring it again towards some what positive.

itachikonoha

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

You ignited the fire by asking him to leave positive comment.

You should have had left it before that point.

s0n1c

@CharityHost_org said:
This is what I call Class A witch hunt backfiring. SEO dont care honestly. You should revise how you deal with your own toxicity. My suggestion from human to human (or bots I guess), is to tone down the attacking and insisting on it. Ask questions, get answers, respectfully it works. We are sensible, but we loathe being attacked. It's simple following the LET golden rule. If we were defensive, it's due to insults and blatant disrespect, it's hard to stomach that, not because of questioning. Anyway, this made it to TOP google search for 'CharityHost.org reviews'. You can see that we have good SEO by far. Our customer base are good customers that trust us and we trust them, we respect their privacy and when requested we troubleshoot with their permission granted access.

Note: We did not run to LET breaking AUP and expose anything about the issue to make this 'our own doing'. We are happy to work out issue with customers off LET as well.

massive copium

CharityHost_org

@s0n1c said:

@CharityHost_org said:
This is what I call Class A witch hunt backfiring. SEO dont care honestly. You should revise how you deal with your own toxicity. My suggestion from human to human (or bots I guess), is to tone down the attacking and insisting on it. Ask questions, get answers, respectfully it works. We are sensible, but we loathe being attacked. It's simple following the LET golden rule. If we were defensive, it's due to insults and blatant disrespect, it's hard to stomach that, not because of questioning. Anyway, this made it to TOP google search for 'CharityHost.org reviews'. You can see that we have good SEO by far. Our customer base are good customers that trust us and we trust them, we respect their privacy and when requested we troubleshoot with their permission granted access.

Note: We did not run to LET breaking AUP and expose anything about the issue to make this 'our own doing'. We are happy to work out issue with customers off LET as well.

massive copium

Yea check this out. Thanks

https://browsermedia.agency/blog/can-bad-pr-be-good-for-seo/

mw

bro is doing mental gymnastics to try sleeping better at night, but if your sales data is line go up, keep at it, it clearly works ig

CharityHost_org

Oh bro bro bro! I aint your bro you know? You are just a silly person, playing the opponent.

After all, it's all about checking this out, you probably have not even tried it and still attack regardless: https://charityhost.org

bdspice

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

There is full video of the ticket. You were demanding. I never insult your stuff or you here or there. I think i should insult you because you deserve it. After resolve the problem, why you suspend me giving reason of violate aup which was already solved 2 weeks ago? Because you are such an idiot. Get well soon mentally.

jnd

@mw said:
bro is doing mental gymnastics to try sleeping better at night, but if your sales data is line go up, keep at it, it clearly works ig

The funniest thing is that all of these messages come from account called Charityhost but there's little charitable behavior to be seen.

ServerBachelor

@jnd said:

@mw said:
bro is doing mental gymnastics to try sleeping better at night, but if your sales data is line go up, keep at it, it clearly works ig

The funniest thing is that all of these messages come from account called Charityhost but there's little charitable behavior to be seen.

If you look at the intervals of his replies, that dude is crashing OUT. Literal nonstop commenting for hours on end.

barbaros

@ServerBachelor said:

@jnd said:

@mw said:
bro is doing mental gymnastics to try sleeping better at night, but if your sales data is line go up, keep at it, it clearly works ig

The funniest thing is that all of these messages come from account called Charityhost but there's little charitable behavior to be seen.

If you look at the intervals of his replies, that dude is crashing OUT. Literal nonstop commenting for hours on end.

At this point he is just pleasuring himself with reading all the negative views about his service.

nghialele

@ServerBachelor said:

@jnd said:

@mw said:
bro is doing mental gymnastics to try sleeping better at night, but if your sales data is line go up, keep at it, it clearly works ig

The funniest thing is that all of these messages come from account called Charityhost but there's little charitable behavior to be seen.

If you look at the intervals of his replies, that dude is crashing OUT. Literal nonstop commenting for hours on end.

He goes after every comment.

Mik3y326

@CharityHost_org said:
This is what I call Class A witch hunt backfiring. SEO dont care honestly. You should revise how you deal with your own toxicity. My suggestion from human to human (or bots I guess), is to tone down the attacking and insisting on it. Ask questions, get answers, respectfully it works. We are sensible, but we loathe being attacked. It's simple following the LET golden rule. If we were defensive, it's due to insults and blatant disrespect, it's hard to stomach that, not because of questioning. Anyway, this made it to TOP google search for 'CharityHost.org reviews'. You can see that we have good SEO by far. Our customer base are good customers that trust us and we trust them, we respect their privacy and when requested we troubleshoot with their permission granted access.

Note: We did not run to LET breaking AUP and expose anything about the issue to make this 'our own doing'. We are happy to work out issue with customers off LET as well.

Mate, I am following this drama since some days (as neutral as possible). I am telling you straight in your face: You are a god damn first class hypocrite. Yes, you worry about your reputation, almost every business does. But your incident handling is shit. Instead of clarifying properly and respectfully, you chose to throw fucking thermite into a small campfire, causing an all out forest fire. Now you cant handle the backlash?

Stop talking about privacy, as you allready fucked this up, you go through your customers data, there is no going back from this statement. Dont care about the reason why you do this. This is a huge break of trust. I dont know if you can comprehend how big of a fucking deal this is.

You are acting like you are the victim here, to be honest you fucked up so hard, that being the victim is the only role left you can publicly take. The greatest part of LET is the tight community as well as the moderation here, allowing us to communicate as open as possible. And yes, this means that there is the possibility of a shitstorm. If you cant handle that, you should not provoke the members here with arrogant statements.

Now, there are two possibilities left: You continue acting like a spoiled brat, that has only received an Audi instead of a Bugatti for his super sweet sixteen, or you take responsibility, apollogize, move on and let bigons be bigons, so this drama can be gone.

As for @bdspice.. Mate.. Next time just use something like rclone to encrypt your data.

nghialele

@Mik3y326 said:

@CharityHost_org said:
This is what I call Class A witch hunt backfiring. SEO dont care honestly. You should revise how you deal with your own toxicity. My suggestion from human to human (or bots I guess), is to tone down the attacking and insisting on it. Ask questions, get answers, respectfully it works. We are sensible, but we loathe being attacked. It's simple following the LET golden rule. If we were defensive, it's due to insults and blatant disrespect, it's hard to stomach that, not because of questioning. Anyway, this made it to TOP google search for 'CharityHost.org reviews'. You can see that we have good SEO by far. Our customer base are good customers that trust us and we trust them, we respect their privacy and when requested we troubleshoot with their permission granted access.

Note: We did not run to LET breaking AUP and expose anything about the issue to make this 'our own doing'. We are happy to work out issue with customers off LET as well.

Mate, I am following this drama since some days (as neutral as possible). I am telling you straight in your face: You are a god damn first class hypocrite. Yes, you worry about your reputation, almost every business does. But your incident handling is shit. Instead of clarifying properly and respectfully, you chose to throw fucking thermite into a small campfire, causing an all out forest fire. Now you cant handle the backlash?

Stop talking about privacy, as you allready fucked this up, you go through your customers data, there is no going back from this statement. Dont care about the reason why you do this. This is a huge break of trust. I dont know if you can comprehend how big of a fucking deal this is.

You are acting like you are the victim here, to be honest you fucked up so hard, that being the victim is the only role left you can publicly take. The greatest part of LET is the tight community as well as the moderation here, allowing us to communicate as open as possible. And yes, this means that there is the possibility of a shitstorm. If you cant handle that, you should not provoke the members here with arrogant statements.

Now, there are two possibilities left: You continue acting like a spoiled brat, that has only received an Audi instead of a Bugatti for his super sweet sixteen, or you take responsibility, apollogize, move on and let bigons be bigons, so this drama can be gone.

As for @bdspice.. Mate.. Next time just use something like rclone to encrypt your data.

Mate you might be listed as another one of us.

bdspice

@Mik3y326 said:

@CharityHost_org said:

As for @bdspice.. Mate.. Next time just use something like rclone to encrypt your data.

thanks for your advice. this community teach me so many good things like this. so some bad experience like CH should be accepted as a lesson. When you learn to accept your mistake, criticism, troll with happy face to correct your mistake, you will be one step ahead in real life. I think @CharityHost_org should be more calm and learn to accept situation. Get well soon @CharityHost_org

TimboJones

@Mik3y326 said:
As for @bdspice.. Mate.. Next time just use something like rclone to encrypt your data.

Or just use a provider where porn is not against the rules, pretty much every other provider.

zed

@TimboJones said: Or just use a provider where porn is not against the rules, pretty much every other provider.

Amusing coincidence that kicked all this off. I imagine he would have found some other TOS feature to boot a contest winner for using lots of resources anyway though, just from watching his personality vomit all over these threads.

ServerBachelor

@zed said:

@TimboJones said: Or just use a provider where porn is not against the rules, pretty much every other provider.

Amusing coincidence that kicked all this off. I imagine he would have found some other TOS feature to boot a contest winner for using lots of resources anyway though, just from watching his personality vomit all over these threads.

Not a bad assessment.

DrNutella

@itachikonoha said:
Is it safe to assume that, this issue became so big that it tainted the name of the provider?

@CharityHost_org said:

@CharityHost_org said:
I asked @bdspice to add commentary that the issue was resolved. I was asking, not demanding. And yes he continued to insult our staff in tickets. That's enough derision. The review is what it is. The whole experience is bad when people do not respect each other, and resort to insults, attacking, and mocking = this is toxic. Yes, it generate traffic and SEO, but it's a side effect of the interactions.

How come no one picks apart this? Any comments?

Because you haven’t apologized to the community for snooping and haven’t promised to never do it again. Also your AUP is absurd to use as an excuse to terminate service if anyone says anything negative.

Please change your username to CharityGate as it’s fitting

zed

Would be pretty awesome if @CharityHost_org started hosting email in response to this drama.

DrNutella

@zed said:
Would be pretty awesome if @CharityHost_org started hosting email in response to this drama.

They would be worse than Google and the NSA. You’re screwed. ALT F4 life.

tentor

@DrNutella said: They would be worse than Google and the NSA.

Depends on your viewpoint. You don't know how much backdoors in encryption would CH implement either