Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Black Friday 2022 - Storage and NVMe deals - Page 13
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Black Friday 2022 - Storage and NVMe deals

1101113151631

Comments

  • @ihell said:

    @add_iT said:

    @ravi said:

    @nammdp said:
    Anyone have HK 35$ package want to tranfer? I'm missed sale :D

    You still have chance.

    @hosthatch said:
    Since we're getting tickets about this already....the order page will be available for one hour, at 16:00 CET on 1st December.

    After 17:00 CET, it will not be possible to order these.

    What time if it was on UTC +7

    I would buy it later and set alarm

    CET=UTC+1. So it will be 16+6=22:00 in your timezone

    @Enthralled said:

    What time if it was on UTC +7

    10pm.

    Confirm that here.

    @Arirang said:

    @add_iT said:

    @ravi said:

    @nammdp said:
    Anyone have HK 35$ package want to tranfer? I'm missed sale :D

    You still have chance.

    @hosthatch said:
    Since we're getting tickets about this already....the order page will be available for one hour, at 16:00 CET on 1st December.

    After 17:00 CET, it will not be possible to order these.

    What time if it was on UTC +7

    I would buy it later and set alarm

    It will be 22:00 UTC+7.

    Thanks

    It save my time

    Thanked by 1nammdp
  • Anyone has the idea that should I submit a urgent ticket, my VPS just disconnected from SSH connection and doesn't respond to ping. Reinstallation didn't help.

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Veteran
    edited November 2022

    @JabJab said:
    Okey, sale has ended, there will be encore in December so maybe still a chance.
    @hosthatch what does dedicated next to core means?

    This is from intel:
    2 CPU cores (50% dedicated, burstable up to 200%)
    3 CPU cores (1 dedicated, 2 shared)

    This is from AMD:
    4 CPU cores (200% dedicated, burstable up to 400%)

    Are those dedicated actually dedicated or it's just (how I understand it) a guideline how much CPU you can use without hitting limits/making you guys angry? :) If those are really dedicated how it ends on VM? For example for this 4 CPU - two first cores[0,1] are dedicated and I should pin my stuff to those and 2 last[2,3] are shared? It's random - depends from boot?

    aaaaaaand if those are dedicated - any chance for EPYC in Warsaw before 1st December? :P

    It's mostly the latter: "a guideline how much CPU you can use without hitting limits/making you guys angry"

    My understanding is that the CPU power is dedicated in that the server in theory has enough physical cores for everyone to use their dedicated CPU at the same time with minimal stolen CPU time. However (unfortunately) they do not use processor affinity ("CPU pinning") to actually dedicate a core to your VPS, so you'll still encounter context switching across the physical cores on the server, the same as a regular VPS with no dedicated CPU power. This is common across a lot of providers and is not at all specific to HostHatch.

    Also, as with a lot of providers, they define "cores" in the same way that Linux does, meaning they're actually threads rather than actual cores. This means that "100% dedicated" means one thread, and "200% dedicated" actually refers to one physical core. I'm personally not a fan of this labelling, as a thread is not the same thing as half a core - for example, a CPU with 16 cores / 16 threads is absolutely faster than a system with 8 cores / 16 threads. HyperThreading (two threads per core, like what modern CPUs do) generally only increases performance by around 30-35%, not 100%.

  • @ihell said:
    Anyone has the idea that should I submit a urgent ticket, my VPS just disconnected from SSH connection and doesn't respond to ping. Reinstallation didn't help.

    You should try NoVNC console

  • @ariq01 said:

    @ihell said:
    Anyone has the idea that should I submit a urgent ticket, my VPS just disconnected from SSH connection and doesn't respond to ping. Reinstallation didn't help.

    You should try NoVNC console

    Of course tried. OS was booted, can operate normally, but no Internet. Failed to ping Google.com even DHCP successfully obtained the correct IP address.

  • @ihell said:

    @ariq01 said:

    @ihell said:
    Anyone has the idea that should I submit a urgent ticket, my VPS just disconnected from SSH connection and doesn't respond to ping. Reinstallation didn't help.

    You should try NoVNC console

    Of course tried. OS was booted, can operate normally, but no Internet. Failed to ping Google.com even DHCP successfully obtained the correct IP address.

    click to Console Access in controlpanel and reconfigure the networking

    Thanked by 2ariq01 bdl
  • If stack 2 services from the current sale with the same spec and location, the renewal will be 1 invoice or 2?

  • @ywTech said:
    Amsterdam 2tb

    Wed Nov 30 01:27:03 UTC 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1999.973 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 1.8 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-46-generic
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.83 MB/s      (959) | 56.47 MB/s     (882)
    Write      | 3.85 MB/s      (964) | 56.98 MB/s     (890)
    Total      | 7.69 MB/s     (1.9k) | 113.46 MB/s   (1.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 220.44 MB/s    (430) | 310.66 MB/s    (303)
    Write      | 232.15 MB/s    (453) | 331.35 MB/s    (323)
    Total      | 452.60 MB/s    (883) | 642.01 MB/s    (626)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 7.42 Gbits/sec  | 5.12 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.30 Gbits/sec  | 6.73 Gbits/sec  | 9.02 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 15.0 Gbits/sec  | 8.66 Gbits/sec  | 1.32 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.71 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 79.6 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 2.02 Gbits/sec  | 74.6 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 990 Mbits/sec   | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 843 Mbits/sec   | 1.39 Gbits/sec  | 129 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 689
    Multi Core      | 681
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18972778
    

    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

  • @socialzzz said:

    ...

    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

    you're comparing dedi vs shared (?!)

  • @bdl said:

    @socialzzz said:

    ...

    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

    you're comparing dedi vs shared (?!)

    no this is just general bench mark sites.

  • 1TB Amsterdam yabs, 903GiB usable

    Wed Nov 30 09:33:06 UTC 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 8 hours, 41 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1999.973 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 969.5 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 902.3 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-46-generic
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.86 MB/s     (1.4k) | 59.81 MB/s     (934)
    Write      | 5.85 MB/s     (1.4k) | 60.11 MB/s     (939)
    Total      | 11.72 MB/s    (2.9k) | 119.93 MB/s   (1.8k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 202.34 MB/s    (395) | 336.18 MB/s    (328)
    Write      | 213.09 MB/s    (416) | 358.57 MB/s    (350)
    Total      | 415.44 MB/s    (811) | 694.76 MB/s    (678)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.75 Gbits/sec  | 4.60 Gbits/sec  | 5.91 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.89 Gbits/sec  | 5.24 Gbits/sec  | 9.11 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 13.9 Gbits/sec  | 7.99 Gbits/sec  | 1.48 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 88.3 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 2.54 Gbits/sec  | 73.8 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 1.34 Gbits/sec  | 111 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 129 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.12 Gbits/sec  | 7.46 Gbits/sec  | 5.77 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.28 Gbits/sec  | 5.49 Gbits/sec  | 16.7 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 13.6 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 Gbits/sec  | 1.38 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 88.3 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.54 Gbits/sec  | 2.51 Gbits/sec  | 73.4 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.30 Gbits/sec  | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 111 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 791 Mbits/sec   | 129 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.
    
  • BIngo7BIngo7 Member
    edited November 2022

    Why did others buy later and provision earlier than me @hosthatch
    ps:same area LAX

  • @Kebab said:
    1TB Amsterdam yabs, 903GiB usable

    Wed Nov 30 09:33:06 UTC 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 8 hours, 41 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 1999.973 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 969.5 MiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 902.3 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-46-generic
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 5.86 MB/s     (1.4k) | 59.81 MB/s     (934)
    Write      | 5.85 MB/s     (1.4k) | 60.11 MB/s     (939)
    Total      | 11.72 MB/s    (2.9k) | 119.93 MB/s   (1.8k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 202.34 MB/s    (395) | 336.18 MB/s    (328)
    Write      | 213.09 MB/s    (416) | 358.57 MB/s    (350)
    Total      | 415.44 MB/s    (811) | 694.76 MB/s    (678)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.75 Gbits/sec  | 4.60 Gbits/sec  | 5.91 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.89 Gbits/sec  | 5.24 Gbits/sec  | 9.11 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 13.9 Gbits/sec  | 7.99 Gbits/sec  | 1.48 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.70 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 88.3 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 2.54 Gbits/sec  | 73.8 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 1.34 Gbits/sec  | 111 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 129 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.12 Gbits/sec  | 7.46 Gbits/sec  | 5.77 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 8.28 Gbits/sec  | 5.49 Gbits/sec  | 16.7 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 13.6 Gbits/sec  | 11.6 Gbits/sec  | 1.38 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 88.3 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.54 Gbits/sec  | 2.51 Gbits/sec  | 73.4 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.30 Gbits/sec  | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 111 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 791 Mbits/sec   | 129 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.
    

    Nice 🔥 The network speeds are quite good.

  • @socialzzz said:

    @ywTech said:
    Amsterdam 2tb

    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

    You should probably wait a couple of days and run it again, the servers have probably more load than usual as people are testing them.

  • @zeli said:

    @socialzzz said:

    @ywTech said:
    Amsterdam 2tb

    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

    You should probably wait a couple of days and run it again, the servers have probably more load than usual as people are testing them.

    i have not got mine yet still waiting, just looking yabs people are posting

  • @hosthatch
    I forgot to add this coupon during checkout. Can I request for 5% credit instead?

    Existing customers get a further 5% discount.
    Please use the code "THANKYOU" at check out.

  • @msatt said:

    @oem003 said: I don't think unpaid invoice is the agreement to pay. The online shopping contract will only be established after I pay, and that's when the non-refundable clause take effect. It's not that the provider took my money himself and said that the contract has come into force and you can't refund.

    My understanding would be - If you order (by clicking buy) something and it is provided then you are responsible to pay. Sending and upaid invoice is saying this is what you will be charged (you had already agreed to this by entering in to the order / contract). Your money was taken as per your order and a further invoice should be provided showing payment.

    If an item is in a shopping cart then you are not liable to pay until you say buy in which case you should be charged as above.

    I am no legal expert (even though you seem to think you are) and NOT associated with hosthatch, but to me this is the basis of a contract.

    @TimboJones said:

    @oem003 said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @oem003 said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @oem003 said:
    Fuck HostHatch, it stole my money without agreement, it get the payment info when i pay for one order. and one day later , another order that i wont to pay got paid at a holyshit midnight! has no way to cancel unpaied order, has no way to cancel paied invoice neither.

    Which part did you have trouble understanding? What made you think you could order something and not pay it? You're complaining about something when you don't realize that you're taking away a server someone else will want to buy.

    From OP:

    Can I change my server with the X offer?

    Unfortunately no. All sales are final, and we cannot offer any changes to them. We cannot replace one pending service with another. We also do not provide any refunds for pending orders. Please make sure you are 100% sure before placing an order, as there is very limited capacity available.

    Who give HostHatch the right to take customer's money without his/her agreement? As it just an unpaid invoice, not a complete order. Or you even didn't experience the after-checkout-before-paid period on your online purchase? By the way, what OP said that your mention is only apply to those who DO THE PAY ACTION themself. Not to those FORCED to pay.

    Are you obtuse? The customer did. The invoice was generated as a result of that action. The customer entered into an agreement to pay that invoice when he submitted the order. It's REALLY that simple.

    It was clear, don't order if you don't intend to buy. So we're all gobsmacked that anyone would think otherwise.

    I don't think unpaid invoice is the agreement to pay. The online shopping contract will only be established after I pay, and that's when the non-refundable clause take effect. It's not that the provider took my money himself and said that the contract has come into force and you can't refund.

    You're just wrong. You agreed to purchase the server when you submitted the order. That is the start of the agreement. You are mistaken for a quote, which is no obligation to pay.

    For domain purchases that are non-refundable as well, the domain server creates an unpaid invoice for me when I want buy a domain. At that period, I can choose to continue paying now or wait for a period of time, cancel the order or even wait for the order cancel because of timeout. It will not take my money automatically, although it have my payment information already. I have similar experience of that with other VPS providers. But HostHatch are special, it has unpaid invoice period, but it does not give cancellation or timeout-cancellation, what'more, money taken before timeout will occur. It seem as if I just say I want sign a contract with HH, and HH take money from me, and ctrl-c ctrl-v the signature from another contract, and force me to agree that I signed it, no refund.

    It told you ahead of time there's no cancellations or refunds. This is a promotional deal. You're not talking about a promotional domain deal and even if you were, you didn't say they also had a no cancellations and no refunds policy to compare apples to apples.

    You seem to be arguing that it's perfectly ok if everyone just ordered servers, (reserving them in the system and preventing others from ordering them) and then never paid for them. GTFO. You're a bad customer.

    okeydokey, you're a well-educated customer. Cheer for tradesmen for giving you a good education.
    I've said in another comment, what we argue about is that when will the online shopping contract be established? The click of the "order/checkout" or the "pay". I have no doubt about no cancellations or refunds, I think it is a clause of the contract. I'm not responsible for paying before the contract is established. Except for any clause of law that said that click of "checkout" means contract signed.
    btw, for those payed before goods provided, the provider can set 15min or as fast as they want, and unpaid invoice will cancel after that time, it's easily implemented technically, especially it is a promotional deal. Providers can do many things to release servers reserved in the system, as the servers not provided to anyone yet. But they did nothing, they are happy to see the shiftiness of the contradiction from between the provider and the customer to among the customers.

  • For once, why is there an impulse to buy first, without reading? Why assume if something has worked in other sites will work here?

    Amount of cry babies are just too high...

  • Anyone know how they are calculating the bandwidth? is it monthly, or is it for the whole billing period?

  • raviravi Member
    edited November 2022

    @Kebab said:
    Anyone know how they are calculating the bandwidth? is it monthly, or is it for the whole billing period?

    It should be monthly.

  • @socialzzz said:
    it would seem those epyc cpu's are not as powerful as the old Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 tested my dedi and i got single core performance of 1044

    CPU on storage nodes are capped, you don't get full performance. You're not really supposed to use them for anything besides backups, non intensive tasks, etc. If you want large CPU scores, you should get a NVMe VM and then network it together with the storage VM. I run several "production" sites and services this way.

  • tomletomle Member, LIR
    edited November 2022

    Damn you snooze you lose... Kept thinking too long about it. Was going to get the 1TB storage in Stockholm for 3 years...
    Edit: Ok setting an alarm for tomorrow :)

  • @tomle said: Damn you snooze you lose... Kept thinking too long about it.

    must have been quite the sooze then... or you really slow at thinking ;-) ;-)
    I mean, common this thing was going on 4 days...

    also if you'd take the time to actually read (the last page), you might find your chance how to still get some soon ;-) ;-)

  • Interesting that the same day I got hit with a ddos attack on my host hatch Oslo VPS that I pay 6 bucks a month for.

    there was a slow down in loading webpage for a few hours and about 120 GB bandwidth total consumed. But with a plan of 1 TB per month it was no problem at all.

    Hosthatch might have had some basic DDOS protection at the data center or something, but for sure you have some sort of protection for the most amateur thugs out there attempting to shut you down even on a 6 bucks VPS.

    that is pretty impressive id say!

    @AXYZE said:

    @satoshiscave said:

    @Ght said:
    Its 2023 and still no DDoS Protection , what a shame hosthatch.

    User looking for a DDOS plan with a low cost host like host hatch. You should really look at taking care of this on the DNS layer and or signup for a CDN service...

    No one is going to have advanced unmetered DDOS protection on a 5-6 bucks monthly plan lol

    peace

    OVH, netcup and PHP-Friends on promo are in this budget and have nice unmetered protection.
    Its possible at this budget, but vast majority dont provide it so you shouldnt expect it as default.

    Anyway if you are getting attacked while you have just few bucks for VPS... you probably have wrong priorities in life or wasting your time.

  • satoshiscavesatoshiscave Member
    edited November 2022

    Can anyone share a bench script of the Los Angeles location?

    they are Psychz servers.

    thank you

  • tomletomle Member, LIR

    @Falzo said:

    @tomle said: Damn you snooze you lose... Kept thinking too long about it.

    must have been quite the sooze then... or you really slow at thinking ;-) ;-)
    I mean, common this thing was going on 4 days...

    also if you'd take the time to actually read (the last page), you might find your chance how to still get some soon ;-) ;-)

    Hehe yeah, was looking at ordering it on Friday but then was busy all weekend. Also edited that I saw the opportunity tomorrow, will order then :)

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • Is it only me that IPv6 doesn't work at all in the Zurich location?

  • @nick_ said:
    Is it only me that IPv6 doesn't work at all in the Zurich location?

    Working here.

    $ ping google.com
    PING google.com(zrh04s16-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400a:808::200e)) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from zrh04s16-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400a:808::200e): icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=0.686 ms
    
    Thanked by 1nick_
  • nick_nick_ Member
    edited November 2022

    @Shot2 said:

    @nick_ said:
    Is it only me that IPv6 doesn't work at all in the Zurich location?

    Working here.

    $ ping google.com
    PING google.com(zrh04s16-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400a:808::200e)) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from zrh04s16-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400a:808::200e): icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=0.686 ms
    

    Thanks for confirming. I just opened a ticket. Mine is stuck as seen below while everything is configured properly.

    $ ping google.com
    PING google.com(zrh04s16-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:400a:808::200e)) 56 data bytes
    
  • YABS of my Black Friday — Storage 2 TB, Los Angeles
    Everything looks good, but I wish disk performance was little better.

    root@box:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-11-22                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Nov 30 17:06:31 UTC 2022
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2699.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 1.8 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-19-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.56 MB/s      (391) | 18.13 MB/s     (283)
    Write      | 1.58 MB/s      (396) | 18.63 MB/s     (291)
    Total      | 3.15 MB/s      (787) | 36.76 MB/s     (574)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 71.02 MB/s     (138) | 116.97 MB/s    (114)
    Write      | 74.80 MB/s     (146) | 124.76 MB/s    (121)
    Total      | 145.82 MB/s    (284) | 241.73 MB/s    (235)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 542 Mbits/sec   | 126 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 718 Mbits/sec   | 893 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 991 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 146 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 620 Mbits/sec   | 327 Mbits/sec   | 223 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 683 Mbits/sec   | 56.8 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.66 Gbits/sec  | 1.21 Gbits/sec  | 27.7 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 5.74 Gbits/sec  | 3.60 Gbits/sec  | 0.924 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 870 Mbits/sec   | 488 Mbits/sec   | 126 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.37 Gbits/sec  | 1.23 Gbits/sec  | 137 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 1.15 Gbits/sec  | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 145 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 488 Mbits/sec   | 603 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.10 Gbits/sec  | 1.17 Gbits/sec  | 56.4 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 2.51 Gbits/sec  | 1.60 Gbits/sec  | 27.3 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 6.35 Gbits/sec  | 3.88 Gbits/sec  | 0.897 ms
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 437
    Multi Core      | 467
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18989366
    
    
Sign In or Register to comment.