New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
HELP BUILD A BETTER VPN SERVICE
HELP BUILD A BETTER VPN SERVICE
HELP BUILD A BETTER VPN SERVICE
As DP said, you are not eligible for this program.
To everyone else, if you see a "Thank by" from us then you should have a DM in your inbox
Testing with a faster connection - achieving 40% of line rate down (204Mbps on 510Mbps line), and 88% of line rate up (447 Mbps on 510Mbps line).
For comparison, I get around 96% of line rate with @MannDude's IncogNET (Wireguard).
Thank you for this information, very useful. We are looking at WireGuard but just working out how to implement device limits or even it we would want to limit the number of devices for WireGuard.
Surely the easiest way is to limit the number of keys that can be generated, as there can only be one active device per key?
Each WireGuard key does have a built in limit from our understanding of 5 connected devices at one time, so for a limit of 10 devices for instance you would generate 2 keys for 1 client and they would share the keys between devices as they see fit, unlike OpenVPN where technically out of the box it is unlimited devices and you add triggers on connections to count/limit etc.
Connecting more than one device at the same time using the same key is going to cause problems as Wireguard uses the key to determine where to send packages, so there’ll be packet loss as traffic is sent to the wrong device every time the lookup table is updated.
I haven’t tried it personally, but it will likely lead to a terrible experience if it works well at all.
HELP BUILD A BETTER VPN SERVICE
SHITHOUSE
Sorry but you need at least 50 comments on LET to qualify.
We have tested this using a couple devices and it seemed to work fine but part of our investigation into WireGuard will be this in further detail.
Mate, listen to the wind.
Do Wireguard, or don’t bother with LET. LET knows what it wants, and it’s not OpenVPN.
We've had a number of people on LET that said they like the OpenVPN service and we have listened to the feedback and WireGuard is being made a priority and hoping to have something released for testing soon.
They ain’t gonna buy it tho.
That is completely fine, we see LET users as great testers of services such as VPNs and that is the main thing and if things come out in feedback that see LET users want to buy one of our products if it has XYZ features then we will listen and look at options - perfect example WireGuard which we have deployed an instance and testing it.