Black Friday 2021 - NVMe and Storage deals - Deploy in 16 global locations (APAC/EU/US)

yoursunny · February 2022

@TimboJones said:

@yoursunny said:

@EasyCompany251 said:

@yoursunny said

Try just plain old TCP. Rsync uses SSH which is generally TCP.

TCP is not a reliable reflection of L3 network performance.
You should always measure with UDP.

You need both to get more information on the problem at hand.

Fine then.

HostHatch Chicago storage from Nexril Dallas over TCP:

IPv4 ingress (cubic): 430Mbps
IPv4 egress (bbr): 725Mbps
IPv6 ingress (cubic): 506Mbps
IPv6 egress (bbr): 672Mbps

$ iperf3 -c 193.29.63.xxx -t 60
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-60.00  sec  3.00 GBytes   430 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-60.02  sec  3.00 GBytes   430 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 193.29.63.xxx -t 60 -R
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-60.02  sec  5.07 GBytes   725 Mbits/sec  12595             sender
[  5]   0.00-60.00  sec  5.07 GBytes   725 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 2605:4840:3:xxxx::1 -t 60
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-60.00  sec  3.53 GBytes   506 Mbits/sec  142             sender
[  5]   0.00-60.03  sec  3.53 GBytes   506 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 2605:4840:3:xxx::1 -t 60 -R
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-60.02  sec  4.70 GBytes   672 Mbits/sec  12060             sender
[  5]   0.00-60.00  sec  4.70 GBytes   672 Mbits/sec                  receiver

HostHatch Chicago storage from WebHorizon New York (ShockHosting Piscataway NJ) over TCP:

IPv4 ingress (unknown congestion control): 487Mbps
IPv4 egress (bbr): 724Mbps
IPv6 ingress (unknown congestion control): 524Mbps
IPv6 egress (bbr): 569Mbps

$ iperf3 -c 193.29.63.xxx
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   585 MBytes   491 Mbits/sec    5             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.04  sec   583 MBytes   487 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 193.29.63.xxx -R
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.04  sec   866 MBytes   724 Mbits/sec  5203             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   863 MBytes   724 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 2605:4840:3:xxxx::1
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   628 MBytes   526 Mbits/sec  20903             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.05  sec   627 MBytes   524 Mbits/sec                  receiver

$ iperf3 -c 2605:4840:3:xxxx::1 -R
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.03  sec   681 MBytes   569 Mbits/sec  4989             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   678 MBytes   569 Mbits/sec                  receiver

the_doctor · February 2022

@cybertech said:
on that note, how's the STO storage users, any issues on your end? I have high IOWait on my VPS that affects single file upload speeds.

My Stockholm BF2020 servers are blazing fast (hardware and network), BF2021... not so much.

Not horrible though, but my BF2020 were and still are probably the best deals I've ever gotten for a price/performance ratio.

cybertech · February 2022

@the_doctor said:

@cybertech said:
on that note, how's the STO storage users, any issues on your end? I have high IOWait on my VPS that affects single file upload speeds.

My Stockholm BF2020 servers are blazing fast (hardware and network), BF2021... not so much.

Not horrible though, but my BF2020 were and still are probably the best deals I've ever gotten for a price/performance ratio.

i have one in LAX from aug 2021 deal. initially same issues, but they migrated me and it has been amazing ever since.

this STO box has suddenly improved a little; am gonna let it settle longer and leave it be if it works reasonably ok, since its below $2/TB

default · February 2022

Something tells me we will see some HostHatch service transfers in the coming weeks.

aj_potc · February 2022

I've also noticed the change in drive space calculation from binary to decimal.

It gets especially noticeable as the volume sizes increase. My new "5TB" storage server only has about 4.6TB of usable space.

2bluesc · February 2022

@aj_potc said:
I've also noticed the change in drive space calculation from binary to decimal.

It gets especially noticeable as the volume sizes increase. My new "5TB" storage server only has about 4.6TB of usable space.

If you're going to complain about it, you should be precise about it. If they advertised "5TB" then it looks like you in fact received 5 TB.

If a tool in the OS reports 4.55 "TB" then this is a bug and that software should be updated to report "TiB" which is correct.

5 TB (base 10) -> 4.55 TiB (base 2)

aj_potc · February 2022

@2bluesc said:
If you're going to complain about it, you should be precise about it. If they advertised "5TB" then it looks like you in fact received 5 TB.

If a tool in the OS reports 4.55 "TB" then this is a bug and that software should be updated to report "TiB" which is correct.

5 TB (base 10) -> 4.55 TiB (base 2)

What is so imprecise about my complaint?

They switched from using binary to decimal calculations of disk size. They didn't change their notation, which was always "TB". Simply put, 5 TB in a new VM is not the same as 5 TB in an old one.

As you know, only hard drive manufacturers use the decimal version of "TB". Usage reported by OS tools is always reported using binary (base 2).

foitin · February 2022

@aj_potc said:

@2bluesc said:
If you're going to complain about it, you should be precise about it. If they advertised "5TB" then it looks like you in fact received 5 TB.

If a tool in the OS reports 4.55 "TB" then this is a bug and that software should be updated to report "TiB" which is correct.

5 TB (base 10) -> 4.55 TiB (base 2)

What is so imprecise about my complaint?

They switched from using binary to decimal calculations of disk size. They didn't change their notation, which was always "TB". Simply put, 5 TB in a new VM is not the same as 5 TB in an old one.

As you know, only hard drive manufacturers use the decimal version of "TB". Usage reported by OS tools is always reported using binary (base 2).

Did you get your VM 's RAM allocated in GB instead of GiB?

Falzo · February 2022

@foitin said:

Did you get your VM 's RAM allocated in GB instead of GiB?

Mem: 4041452

Disk /dev/vda: 1,8 TiB, 1999542157312 bytes, 3905355776 sectors

aj_potc · February 2022

@foitin said:
Did you get your VM 's RAM allocated in GB instead of GiB?

RAM on this VM shows as:

MemTotal: 3056512 kB

So it's slightly short of 3 GiB, but bigger than 3 GB.

Hard to say what they intended, but looks to me like RAM is provisioned closer to the "standard" base 2 interpretation of what a gigabyte is.

yoursunny · February 2022

@default said:
Something tells me we will see some HostHatch service transfers in the coming weeks.

Something tells me we will see HostHatch deadpool in the coming decades.

VayVayKa · February 2022

@aj_potc said:
They switched from using binary to decimal calculations of disk size. They didn't change their notation, which was always "TB". Simply put, 5 TB in a new VM is not the same as 5 TB in an old one.

So now instead of 5 TiB they give 5TB. As stated in the offer. Do I understand correctly?

lentro · February 2022

Anyone seeing downtime in Chicago? All my 4 Chicago VMs are down right now.

2bluesc · February 2022

My Chicago server went down a few minutes ago and now I can't reach https://cloud.hosthatch.com

I can't even open a ticket, I just get Cloudflare CDN errors about not being able to reach the origin server.

Anyone having issues?

aRNoLD · February 2022

my tokyo down, no reinstall btn, no iso load section shown.
what happened?

emptyPD · February 2022

Chicago server down same as yours.

jon617 · February 2022

My Chicago went down too. HH control panel is up, but submitting a ticket is broken 😞 submitting a ticket just worked.

contactwajeeh · February 2022

My Chicago server is down as well

emptyPD · February 2022

did someone get response from support ?

emptyPD · February 2022

https://twitter.com/HostHatch/status/1492540387625521152

alvin · February 2022

Chicago server down time > 2022-02-12 15:26:00 UTC+0

contactwajeeh · February 2022

It's back up for me..

default · February 2022

jon617 · February 2022

Back 😅

kheng86 · February 2022

Yes, Chicago VPS keeps going up and down

kalimov622 · February 2022

@kheng86 said: Yes, Chicago VPS keeps going up and down

Mine has been stable for hours now, are you still having issues?

KenobisVPS · February 2022

@kheng86 said:
Yes, Chicago VPS keeps going up and down

Before or today?

rchurch · February 2022

ISO mounting is not working at manage.hosthatch.com and support has not responded for 24 hours, and these guys want to the server to paid for.

What is the use of a server you can't use?

andrewn · February 2022

@rchurch said:
ISO mounting is not working at manage.hosthatch.com and support has not responded for 24 hours, and these guys want to the server to paid for.

What is the use of a server you can't use?

have you heard back from them yet? I'm waiting for days now
@hosthatch @HostHatch_Kelvin

chocolateshirt · February 2022

@andrewn said:

@rchurch said:
ISO mounting is not working at manage.hosthatch.com and support has not responded for 24 hours, and these guys want to the server to paid for.

What is the use of a server you can't use?

have you heard back from them yet? I'm waiting for days now
@hosthatch @HostHatch_Kelvin

It is an old issue, since BF 2020, it is just a glitch, timing is the key.. dont forget start/stop the vps after mounting the iso..

you can have a success after several times trying it.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Black Friday 2021 - NVMe and Storage deals - Deploy in 16 global locations (APAC/EU/US)

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Black Friday 2021 - NVMe and Storage deals - Deploy in 16 global locations (APAC/EU/US)

Comments