New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Black Friday 2021 - NVMe and Storage deals - Deploy in 16 global locations (APAC/EU/US)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
From the docs:
If you have servers on the old manage and the new cloud panel. Message I received from Mike today:
The new private network is available only on the servers that are included in cloud.hosthatch.com platform.
We are slowly moving over our previous servers into the new platform as well, so it will be possible for them to communicate in the near future.
The new panel on cloud.hosthatch.com now shows allowed bandwidth per server. It had been missing until now. Doesn't yet show used bandwidth, though. Also some locations allow adding ipv6 now, Chicago for one.
Regarding the private network, will vlan allow a secure dialogue between servers (of the same site)?
Or will it be necessary to add a wireguard layer on top ?
Unclear, I'd assume it's a private network but not encrypted as it passes through HostHatch's infrastructure. If you want guaranteed encryption I think you need to take matters in to your own hands.
I've had good success with Innernet built on top of WireGuard at least until Psychz DDOS blocks my inbound traffic.
It work for me. I just enabled IPv6 recently and here is the YABS:
their boxes are just fucking awesome for the price.
where were those who complained want to dispose of them? looking for STO 1TB flash deal
How to see how much traffic has been used? How much traffic is left?
This feature should be available on their cloud panel soon. Meanwhile, use
vnstat.It's your own VLAN so yes. No one else shares it.
This is only for servers available inside cloud.hosthatch.com.
Private network is available in all locations now. IPv6 still has a few locations left.
Really bummed out with this. Been in contact with hosthatch without any real solutions. They switched some routes around but with no improvement. Initially I thought it was an issue of moving files from Hosthatch to my home computer on a residential 300/300 connection but seems like that is not the issue. They even moved me to another node but again with no improvement.
As another test, I got a BUYVM machine and tried rsyncing some large files (from Hosthatch to BUYVM). No difference - transfers top out at 10MB/s and then immediately fall back to like 3-4 MB/s over and over.
Any thoughts @Hosthatch? Ticket #481786
This is HostHatch's Chicago storage servers I'm talking about.
They can fix it, it's been resolved with my storage server since I wrote that post, no issues since. Be sure to ask them to raise the Psychz DDoS threshold... to what level they never shared.
Hopefully my write-up helps! It was very frustrating to work through.
Yeah I mentioned DDoS. HostHatch said DDoS protection is completely off....
Anyone with a Chicago VPS seeing VM-x/AMD-V enabled? Seeing a lot of the other datacenters with this enabled, but none of my Chicago VPS have it enabled.
Disabled on my Chicagos. Both SSD and Storage boxes.
Shameless bump.......you there @hosthatch?
those who got provisioned on the new beta panel, how do you manage to do custom ISO install?
My SG VPS connection time from Mumbai is 700ms which seems too high. The SSL negotiation time is ~210ms. Any idea what the issue could be? Created a ticket, but no response in ~24 hours.
I have MaxKVM SG VPS, and its connection time from Mumbai is ~200ms. So, something is wrong with the HH setup. Singapore is not that far from Mumbai.
Who is your ISP? I have ACT and it used to be <50ms before now it is around 200ms as well. My friend who use Jio gets <50ms even now.
Edit: used > instead of <
Check https://dnstools.ws/ping/103.167.150.1/?workers=in
I used webpagetest with Chrome Desktop.
If you are after better latency, you have to do a bit of research about your ISP's upstream and it's submarine cable landing points. Then using peering database, select a provider that has connectivity there. My latency with both leaseweb & OVH is approx. 100ms but with other Singapore providers, I get more.
https://share.getcloudapp.com/qGurOYe0
did you manage to upload any iso like netboot?
No, not tried
yeah doesnt work for me
I am from Bihar (Airtel), and my HH (Singapore) VPS has <75 ms
And almost same for MaxMKV (Singapore) VPS.
Definitely something up with HostHatch Chicago. Going from BuyVM NY to Hosthatch Chicago is like 70 MB/s while vice versa it's under 10MB/s.....
`Server listening on 5201
Accepted connection from BUYVM, port 53468
[ 5] local HOSTHATCH port 5201 connected to BUYVM port 53470
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 62.8 MBytes 527 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 79.3 MBytes 666 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 76.8 MBytes 644 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 75.6 MBytes 634 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 77.3 MBytes 649 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 76.7 MBytes 643 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 73.6 MBytes 617 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 76.6 MBytes 642 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 76.8 MBytes 645 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 75.1 MBytes 630 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-10.02 sec 1.74 MBytes 690 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 752 MBytes 630 Mbits/sec receiver
Server listening on 5201
Accepted connection from BUYVM, port 53472
[ 5] local HOSTHATCH port 5201 connected to BUYVM port 53474
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 29.4 MBytes 247 Mbits/sec 218 605 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 23.5 MBytes 197 Mbits/sec 62 460 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.4 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec 18 354 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.3 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec 29 277 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec 0 309 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 8.55 MBytes 71.7 Mbits/sec 30 125 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 4.87 MBytes 40.9 Mbits/sec 9 114 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 4.87 MBytes 40.9 Mbits/sec 25 107 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.87 MBytes 40.9 Mbits/sec 0 140 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 7.40 MBytes 62.1 Mbits/sec 0 172 KBytes
[ 5] 10.00-10.02 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 172 KBytes
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 126 MBytes 106 Mbits/sec 391 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec receiver`
I just did a test from HostHatch Chicago -> HostHatch New York and can confirm the poor speed in that direction.
Ping is fine (about 20ms), and MTRs don't show any obvious packet loss to me. From Chicago to NY, the route goes through GTT and Telia. In the reverse direction, it's NTT the whole way.
I've seen similar things happen at other locations. Sometimes they last for a few days, and other times for weeks or months. For instance, the Stockholm location has been painfully slow to some German networks for several weeks now.
A couple of times I've reported these issues to HostHatch, but I've never made any progress that way. I assume that's because they can't figure it out, or they can't get their upstream providers to do anything about it.
Yep. I did an MTR as well and the routing is via GTT Chicago and GTT New York both ways. Ping is fine and no packet loss.
Does HostHatch run its own internal network between locations? Seems strange that they would have such problematic slow network speeds within their own network.
Wow that sucks. I can say the same in the last couple of weeks with my own support ticket. I got them to switch the routes around and to move me to another node in Chicago - no difference. Sigh.....
What also surprises me is that not more people have complained... I assume people are using these storage servers for storage so when you move data in and out of HostHatch you are bound to see these slow transfers...