New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
@seriesn , anyone selling Popcorn ?
Let me guess. You paid for service, abused it, got your account suspended, and now you're saying you were scammed? Just a wild guess.
I paid for a vdedicated vps with 10TB bandwidth limit, say how i abuse ? Im not doing port scan or anything like that. I will post a review soon plz then give me an objective feedback
Ahh.....
I guess if mod choses to split to it's own thread, it's their call. But here you go,
Hello Friend ( @vinsanrock),
I kinda figured you would be posting on this forum as well. For the sake of typing, I will refer you as OP for this response,
Here is the TLDR; version.
I used speedtest.net through your vps to a nearby west los angel server and some in AU Brisbane servers, all had very slow (single thread) upload speed.
Plz help me fix thanks.
Please note, OP is connecting from LA. OP claimed that speed test result he checked using speedtest.net was showing drasticly lower single threaded performance.
Since there's no throughput issue on our end and everything looked good. First idea was to see if somehow OP's port speed got limited by some software.
Note: OP's VM was on shared Gbit so some of the result might be "slightly" less vs this. But not as bad as OP claimed on the ticket. Anywho, OP was kind enough to share a screenshot of the result, which of course showed 0 issue and closely mimicked hostnodes result. To which, I was given the most epic response,
But I wouldn't directly keep on rudely blaming the company who is trying to work with me. But nah, not our friend here. We are the root cause behind him loosing millions and millions of dollar. Cool cool.
Quick note, OP signed up on May 29th, our refund policy is 48 hours, but anyone that knows me here, knows I don't like to mess with peoples money and I understand $1 is a lot of money is some country.
Fine, sent him a direct payment via PayPal (For math nerds, initial service quote was $60/month or $600/year. Since the service is being canceled before the end of billing term, the refund amount was based on Total amount paid ($600)-Total cost of service for the used up service ($60x4). ). This was also explained to OP.
But no sir, our OP wants to get refunded based on the discounted annual rate, while canceling mid cycle and while being out of the refund period.
Thanks to years of experience, I had a gut feeling that the OP would try and file a dispute, so like anyone with a decent brain, I sent the money via Paypal as Good purchase and not to "friend", cause ya know, gotta protect my hard earned money.
Lo and behold, PayPal dispute.
Op, Your service wasn't deleted but rather suspended after you opened a dispute with paypal, despite us actually sending you $360 back as we explained. I/We told you that if you cancel the dispute, we will reactivate the service (check your email, in case you haven't) You can't have everything your way. Oh and ah, the comment that makes it all worth the drama,
Right. I mean hey, us responding to tickets and managing all the aspects of servers and other part of business, which consumes time is free, am I right?
If anyone else feels like "We stole" someones hard earned money, (remember we are a business too), please feel free to correct me. I consider myself pretty pro-consumer and I built the brand with customer service as one of the core belief (without losing money of course).
All I am going to say is, if OP had put the same amount of effort in assisting us with troubleshooting instead of sending paragraphs and essays about how we are responsible for everything that is wrong in the world, on our helpdesk, paypal dispute and now this thread (I mean, OP literally signed up to lodge a complaint, instead you know, actually working with us on troubleshooting), we wouldn't be here reading his post nor my long ass response.
Wouldn't want to share the screenshots of our convo, but you know, I guess, OP will do the honor, since OP said,
Why would you not just perform a part refund for the initial transaction? Sure it would help with the dispute now... Whereas now you have the initial transaction and you have the new transaction which I guess you'll open a dispute yourself to the customer but I'm not sure I understand the purpose of this since you still have a percentage that you could lose the dispute for the second transaction and lose the dispute for the initial transaction which would mean you would get double losses for no reason.
Sure it would have been better to just refund the amount from the initial transaction so that its recorded into PayPal.