Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › NEW! AlphaRacks Website - Feedback Requested (giving away 10x $25 to 10 LET MEMBERS!) - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

NEW! AlphaRacks Website - Feedback Requested (giving away 10x $25 to 10 LET MEMBERS!)

124678

Comments

  • pepa65pepa65 Member

    I usually enlarge the font on my end, but a larger default size would be better for most.

    Thanked by 1alpharacks
  • yummyyummy Member

    In fact, I think that the change from the original is not big,but I like purple very much.

    Thanked by 1alpharacks
  • alpharacksalpharacks Member
    edited November 2018

    Thanks for the feedback. We will be exporting a list of users who replied to this thread and randomizing it on random.org in the next few minutes.

    For those who haven't left feedback yet, here's the last chance. For those who have, thank you. It's greatly appreciated and our web developer is all over it as we speak.

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • alpharacksalpharacks Member
    edited November 2018

    OFFICIAL WINNERS:

    Here we go guys! Here is the result that was randomized by random.org! If you are the 10 on that list, you are eligible for free $25 AlphaRacks credit. PM me with your registered email on your AlphaRacks account to claim your $25 account credit. If you don't already have an account with us, register for one here first, then PM me with the email you used to register.

    Please understand that this will be low priority due to our crazy Cyber Monday sale but I will do my best to have the credits issued within 24 to 48 hours.

    image

    Thanked by 3JabJab JohnMiller92 slimbro
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member

    Congrats to all winners. On a side note, you may want to check the list of users you generate next time to randomise... half of them weren't even on it.

    Thanked by 2eol bharatwaj
  • donlidonli Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Congrats to all winners. On a side note, you may want to check the list of users you generate next time to randomise... half of them weren't even on it.

    Apparently someone stopped after putting in 20 names.

    Thanked by 3eol Saragoldfarb sayem314
  • wtfcookwtfcook Member

    @donli said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:
    Congrats to all winners. On a side note, you may want to check the list of users you generate next time to randomise... half of them weren't even on it.

    Apparently someone stopped after putting in 20 names.

    That's pretty pathetic.

  • JohnMiller92JohnMiller92 Member

    1 > @Saragoldfarb said:

    Congrats to all winners. On a side note, you may want to check the list of users you generate next time to randomise... half of them weren't even on it.

    What do you mean? I checked them all, they posted

  • donlidonli Member

    @JohnMiller92 said:
    1 > @Saragoldfarb said:

    Congrats to all winners. On a side note, you may want to check the list of users you generate next time to randomise... half of them weren't even on it.

    What do you mean? I checked them all, they posted

    The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Thanked by 3eol Saragoldfarb sayem314
  • pepa65pepa65 Member

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

  • murutamuruta Member

    good

  • alentoalento Member, Host Rep

    I am not one for design as much as I am for functionality. That said, it looks good.
    I can't offer anything that hasn't already been mentioned in this thread.

  • georgedatacentergeorgedatacenter Member, Patron Provider

    has what it should have, simple and direct

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    Thanked by 9angstrom donli eol wtfcook JohnMiller92 pepa65 bharatwaj uptime sayem314
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    Good detective work. :smile:

    Disappointed in AlphaRacks: was it so hard to put everyone on the list, as they had promised?

    Thanked by 6Saragoldfarb rm_ eol pepa65 MikePT sayem314
  • eoleol Member
    edited November 2018

    EDIT:
    ...

  • wtfcookwtfcook Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    Well, I guess we just expected too much(them being decent). Probably the same for their hosting from what I have read in their offer threads.

    Thanked by 3eol rm_ sayem314
  • JohnMiller92JohnMiller92 Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    My name isn't even there, wtf?

    Thanked by 1pepa65
  • eoleol Member

    @JohnMiller92 said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    My name isn't even there, wtf?

    Nor mine.

    Thanked by 1pepa65
  • wtfcookwtfcook Member

    @eol said:

    @JohnMiller92 said:

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @pepa65 said:

    donli said: The unedited post showed that only 20 names were submitted to the randomizer and many people that posted weren't on the list of 20.

    Really?? How do you know? How did you get access to the unedited post? Could it be reposted??

    https://i.imgur.com/om37E0S.png

    My name isn't even there, wtf?

    Nor mine.

    Time for pitchforks?

    Thanked by 2eol pepa65
  • JohnMiller92JohnMiller92 Member
    edited November 2018

    Okay, since I'm in a nice mood today. I will give AlphaRacks the benefit of the doubt.

    What happened is he probably used the In this Discussion table listing on the right side. Except, there's different results for each page. I think he used the one on Page 2.

    Should have cumulated them from all pages?

    In any event, that was def not a fair drawing lol. We didn't even get RNG'd on...

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb pepa65
  • wtfcookwtfcook Member

    No comment on this @alpharacks ?

    Thanked by 1eol
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited November 2018

    JohnMiller92 said: I think he used the one on Page 2.

    The list on Page 2 doesn't include both FAT33 and FAT32 (someone too eager to win?) as we see in the picture.

  • JohnMiller92JohnMiller92 Member
    edited November 2018

    @rm_ said:

    JohnMiller92 said: I think he used the one on Page 2.

    The list on Page 2 doesn't include both FAT33 and FAT32 (someone too eager to win?) as we see in the picture.

    Oh, good catch. FAT33 isn't even a user are they?
    edit: Nvm, found him https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/2906826/#Comment_2906826

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @rm_ said:

    The list on Page 2 doesn't include both FAT33 and FAT32 (someone too eager to win?) as we see in the picture.

    Calm down guys, FAT33 is definitely not me and I have no idea why he appeared at the first place

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member

    @JohnMiller92 said:
    Okay, since I'm in a nice mood today. I will give AlphaRacks the benefit of the doubt.

    What happened is he probably used the In this Discussion table listing on the right side. Except, there's different results for each page. I think he used the one on Page 2.

    Should have cumulated them from all pages?

    In any event, that was def not a fair drawing lol. We didn't even get RNG'd on...

    Yeah, could easily be an honest mistake. That's what my initial thought was anyway.

  • HarzemHarzem Member

    @FAT32 said:

    Calm down guys, FAT33 is definitely not me and I have no idea why he appeared at the first place

    You will be FAT 33 next year if you don't exercise and eat less this year.

    Thanked by 4eol JohnMiller92 Saragoldfarb sayem314
  • armandorgarmandorg Member, Host Rep

    Your last design was better, although this one is cleaner.

  • JabJabJabJab Member

    @JohnMiller92 said:
    What happened is he probably used the In this Discussion table listing on the right side. Except, there's different results for each page. I think he used the one on Page 2.

    Page number makes no diff for my results, they are always the same for me. Looks like 20
    last posters decided on theirs first post timestamp?

  • JohnMiller92JohnMiller92 Member
    edited November 2018

    Page number makes no diff for my results, they are always the same for me. Looks like 20
    last posters decided on theirs first post timestamp?

    Each page has diff results for me, not sure

    edit: Looking at them now again, seems like they are the same on each page. Weird, wasn't like that when I mentioned it earlier

This discussion has been closed.