Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Hetzner Cloud: Free 3 cloud servers per user. - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hetzner Cloud: Free 3 cloud servers per user.

245

Comments

  • As a new customer, we kindly request that you provide us with a copy (scan/photo) of your passport or ID card for authentication purposes. You can blur or block out information that is not necessary for authentication.

    Sounds like they won't have me as a tester...

  • Access denied

  • MasonRMasonR Community Contributor
    edited October 2017

    Everything works well so far without a hitch.

    • Signed up for a new Hetzner account, took a minute or two
    • Created a 2gb server in DC3 w/ Debian 9 (took less than a minute to create and boot the VPS)
    • SSH'd in, updated, installed a few packages, created a new user, etc.
    • Took a backup of the VPS (took roughly a minute or so)
    • Took a snapshot of the VPS (took slightly less time than the backup)
    • Assigned a new floating IP to the VPS and modified /etc/network/interfaces to add the new IP as an alias
    • Confirmed new IP is reachable from the public net
    • Created a new VPS in DC8 using the snapshot taken from the first VPS
    • New VPS was up and running in less than a minute
    • Confirmed network connectivity and SSH-ibility to the new VPS
    • Wondered how much doing all of the above would have cost me if pricing wasn't free

    And here's the bench.sh output from both VPS's:

    DC3 2GB VPS:

    System Info
    -----------
    Processor   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    CPU Cores   : 1
    Frequency   : 2194.828 MHz
    Memory      : 1956 MB
    Swap        :  MB
    Uptime      : 10 min,
    
    OS      : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel      : 4.9.0-3-amd64
    Hostname    : debian-2gb-nbg1-1
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is x.x.x.x
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    75.3MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      1.04MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   16.1MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   2.30MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   3.17MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   3.96MB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      8.53MB/s 
    Singapore       Softlayer   10.2MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     93.1MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    167MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 340 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 266 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 280 MB/s
    Average I/O : 295.333 MB/s
    

    DC8 2GB VPS:

    System Info
    -----------
    Processor   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    CPU Cores   : 1
    Frequency   : 2099.998 MHz
    Memory      : 1956 MB
    Swap        :  MB
    Uptime      : 2 min,
    
    OS      : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel      : 4.9.0-4-amd64
    Hostname    : snapshot-1043-debian-2gb-fsn1-dc8-1
    
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is x.x.x.x
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    71.8MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      17.3MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   14.6MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   12.3MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   12.4MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   4.75MB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      8.48MB/s 
    Singapore       Softlayer   9.96MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     97.1MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    208MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 378 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 369 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 455 MB/s
    Average I/O : 400.667 MB/s
    

    Overall, I'm very impressed by the responsiveness and ease of use of their CP. The VPSes seem very snappy and have good network connectivity. Once I come up with a good test use case, I'll put them to through their paces a little more. But my first impression of the platform is that it's pretty solid and neat! The live graphs are a good touch as well.

  • pikepike Veteran
    edited October 2017

    I fucking love hetzner.

  • @bersy, go go go get Hetzner ... now.

    Thanked by 1bersy
  • Let check price after beta period ...

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • maybe hetzner only blocked some asian users, since there is a thread on hostloc with already ~7k views and 112 posts

    Thanked by 2hanoi vimalware
  • @datanoise said:

    As a new customer, we kindly request that you provide us with a copy (scan/photo) of your passport or ID card for authentication purposes. You can blur or block out information that is not necessary for authentication.

    Sounds like they won't have me as a tester...

    Look: All they want is your name, first name, and probably date of birth and that from an official document. The items they want are quite standard; the only point one might feel uneasy about is the "scan of [official id]" part.

    The balance is slightly (mostly psychological though) in their favour but a) I sure that barrier alone keep 95+% of fraudsters away (particularly those who were banned can't simply return with another fake name) and b) is two sided and has advantages for you, too, like the fact that this scheme also binds Hetzner (e.g. they don't have the excuse that you are a fake).

    Thanked by 2pike datanoise
  • Also getting "Account is disabled", but I'm still logged in on the device where I created the account and I was able to start up the servers I created again...

  • Hetzner_OLHetzner_OL Member, Top Host
    edited October 2017

    Thank you for your interest in our beta test for our new cloud product! We are very pleased about being able to offer you this new product at low prices. But it's not quite ready yet. That is why we are still doing our beta test, which is only open to select customers.

    But you can rest assured that soon all of you will be able to get the Hetzner Cloud for yourself. We will announce the official release soon.

    Be patient just a little bit longer. We believe that our Hetzner Cloud will be worth the wait! --Katie, Marketing

    Thanked by 3ehab mtsbatalha thenet
  • Hetzner_OLHetzner_OL Member, Top Host

    @ehab @falzo Thanks for the suggestion. We'll take it under review.
    You will be the first the second one of the first people to know. I am sure if we do anything for BF, we will say something here.

    @fsdguy As you guessed, the ID check is to prevent scamming/spamming. Personal data is deleted after your account is approved.

    To other LETers who are using the beta, thanks for your feedback and keep posting it here. Our team will be grateful for suggestions.

    If you did not get approved for some reason for the beta, please just be a bit patient. You'll have your chance to use the Hetzner Cloud soon enough.

    The prices in the beta are merely placeholders. We will not use real prices until the official product launch. --Katie

  • bsdguybsdguy Member
    edited October 2017

    @Hetzner_OL said:
    @fsdguy As you guessed, the ID check is to prevent scamming/spamming. Personal data is deleted after your account is approved.

    a) my name is bsdguy (not fsdguy).

    b) I took the liberty to format in bold the part of your statement that I think is important for many -> Personal data is deleted after your account is approved.

    I'm wondering though how you bill all John and Jane Does (as you have no personal data anymore). Maybe you meant that the scans are deleted once the account is approved?

    Thanked by 1doghouch
  • @Hetzner_OL amazing experience with it. keep a good job.

  • MasonRMasonR Community Contributor
    edited October 2017

    bsdguy said: I'm wondering though how you bill all John and Jane Does (as you have no personal data anymore). Maybe you meant that the scans are deleted once the account is approved?

    Obviously she meant any verification material required (ID's, utility bills, etc) for verification. Was there really a point to making a fuss over a small detail where the meaning is obvious?... or were you really that upset over her getting your name wrong?

    Edit: Just want to throw out there, bsdguy. I like you and value/appreciate your opinion/input on some matters, but sometimes you can be really petty.

  • As a new customer, we kindly request that you provide us with a copy (scan/photo) of your passport or ID card for authentication purposes. You can blur or block out information that is not necessary for authentication.

    Please would you send the document by fax or as an email attachment to this email address. The document submitted will be deleted in our system with immediate effect after checking it.

    This requirement is only necessary when you place your first order with us.

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited October 2017

    @Hetzner_OL said:
    @ehab @falzo Thanks for the suggestion. We'll take it under review.
    You will be the first the second one of the first people to know. I am sure if we do anything for BF, we will say something here.

    thank you very much, I am counting on it ;-)

    for the cloud servers, geekbenches:

    2GB in Falkenstein:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/4602800

    8GB in Nuremberg:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/4602911

    sadly I don't remember if I chose IO optimized or the other option... it seems that isn't mentioned anywhere on the actual service after it is launched, which one it is. (unless I miss it somehow)

    also, some kind of information about the difference would be great. if IO optimized turns out to be raid 0 or other non replicated stuff. hmm... even OVH switched away from local non-raid SSD in their newer public cloud ranges.

    going to run fio and stuff anyways, so prepare for more wall of texts :-P

    Thanked by 4vovler MasonR mfs ehab
  • bsdguybsdguy Member
    edited October 2017

    @MasonR said:
    Obviously she meant any verification material required (ID's, utility bills, etc) for verification. Was there really a point to making a fuss over a small detail where the meaning is obvious?... or were you really that upset over her getting your name wrong?

    "fuss"? Granted, my attempt to put it in a funny way obviously failed (I'm probably to ugly to be funny) but I am neither angry nor did I mean to pick on her. Kindly note that my emphasis was in favour of her/ @hetzner_OL. I wanted to underline that positive point she had made (while at the same time inviting her to clarify that somewhat).

    As for my name, no I was not angry but wanted to point at it anyway simply because using the correct name helps in spotting when being addressed.

    Thanked by 1MasonR
  • MasonRMasonR Community Contributor

    @bsdguy said:

    @MasonR said:
    Obviously she meant any verification material required (ID's, utility bills, etc) for verification. Was there really a point to making a fuss over a small detail where the meaning is obvious?... or were you really that upset over her getting your name wrong?

    "fuss"? Granted, my attempt to put it in a funny way obviously failed (I'm probably to ugly to be funny) but I am neither angry nor did I mean to pick on her. Kindly note that my emphasis was in favour of her/@hetzner_OL. I wanted to underline that positive point she had made (while at the same time inviting her to clarify that somewhat).

    As for my name, no I was not angry but wanted to point at it anyway simply because using the correct name helps in spotting when being addressed.

    My apologies then. Appears my sarcasm detector had a glitch. I'm notoriously bad at detecting tone from text, hence why I've stopped trying to determine if my wife is mad at me or not when texting :P

    Cheers!

    Thanked by 1Amitz
  • Tried 8GB at Falkenstein. Everything looks good except for backup - couldn't enable it. Snapshots are working fine on the other hand, approximately 3 minutes per snapshot.
    Floating IPs are cool, ping to another Hetzner dedi at DC1 is less than 1ms. Is it possible to have some private LAN within Hetzner with these boxes?

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited October 2017

    for the IOs using fio. I did a test with a bigger file and 8k blocksize to have a look at the max iops... after that did the same again with 64k blocksize to see how diskspeed scales:

    2G instance

    # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=8k --iodepth=64 --size=2G --numjobs=4 --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50
    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    Starting 4 processes
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=4093.2MB, aggrb=67360KB/s, minb=16802KB/s, maxb=16920KB/s, mint=61953msec, maxt=62223msec
      WRITE: io=4098.9MB, aggrb=67454KB/s, minb=16807KB/s, maxb=16948KB/s, mint=61953msec, maxt=62223msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      sda: ios=522274/522940, merge=874/958, ticks=4835904/4342424, in_queue=9179744, util=100.00%
    
    # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=64k --iodepth=64 --size=4G --numjobs=4 --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50
    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=64K-64K/64K-64K/64K-64K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    Starting 4 processes
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=8188.0MB, aggrb=448153KB/s, minb=111723KB/s, maxb=112702KB/s, mint=18612msec, maxt=18709msec
      WRITE: io=8196.0MB, aggrb=448591KB/s, minb=111484KB/s, maxb=113268KB/s, mint=18612msec, maxt=18709msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      sda: ios=129328/129459, merge=357/358, ticks=1421924/1292480, in_queue=2714940, util=99.39%
    

    so around 8.5k iops for read and additional 8.5k iops for write in a 50% mix ... seems quite good to me and the upper limit IO wise.
    in the second test one can see them drop a bit because the overall transferrate of ~440MB/s becomes the limit then - which seems absolutly reasonable.

    8G instance

    # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=8k --iodepth=64 --size=8G --numjobs=4 --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50
    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    Starting 4 processes
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=16381MB, aggrb=337482KB/s, minb=84430KB/s, maxb=84916KB/s, mint=49366msec, maxt=49704msec
      WRITE: io=16387MB, aggrb=337603KB/s, minb=84324KB/s, maxb=85009KB/s, mint=49366msec, maxt=49704msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      sda: ios=2094322/2095070, merge=659/763, ticks=2711596/1391260, in_queue=4108428, util=100.00%
    
    # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=64k --iodepth=64 --size=8G --numjobs=4 --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50
    test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=64K-64K/64K-64K/64K-64K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    Starting 4 processes
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=16351MB, aggrb=365685KB/s, minb=91117KB/s, maxb=91944KB/s, mint=45527msec, maxt=45786msec
      WRITE: io=16417MB, aggrb=367167KB/s, minb=91268KB/s, maxb=92486KB/s, mint=45527msec, maxt=45786msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      sda: ios=261407/262457, merge=202/249, ticks=3741208/2599096, in_queue=6349948, util=100.00%
    

    so, this is interesting. with small 4k blocksize we achieve something around 43k/43k iops read and write and about 330MB/s transfer rate. I'd say this is the IO optimized instance then :-)
    with 64k blocksize IOs drop down to ~6k while the transfer speed does not increase much at all - yeah optimized for small block IO access.

    (I used 8GB files on the bigger one to not let take the cache over the numbers.)

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • @Hetzner_OL Do you know why I'm getting this error? This is not a new account and I have already a few servers.

  • FalzoFalzo Member
    edited October 2017

    just run wget from the 2G instance in falkenstein:

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    Number of cores      : 1
    CPU frequency        : 2099.998 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 1956 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 7:43:58
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.00, 0.10
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.0-3-amd64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name           IPv4 address        Download Speed
    CacheFly            205.234.175.175     66.6MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP        108.61.201.151      276KB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP       106.187.96.148      8.10MB/s
    DO, Bangalore, IN       139.59.44.249       13.9MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN      169.38.65.84        4.95MB/s
    Vultr, Singapore, SG        45.32.100.168       12.8MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG       128.199.210.182     7.46MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG       139.162.23.4        8.11MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG    119.81.28.170       10.9MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG     103.254.153.18      10.6MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN     119.81.130.170      8.21MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN      43.249.36.49        8.90MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS      108.61.212.117      7.39MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS      168.1.1.212     2.97MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS   168.1.65.244        6.79MB/s
    Tele2, Gothenberg, SE       90.130.74.151       37.1MB/s
    Tele2, Kista, SE        90.130.74.149       15.9MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT        159.122.128.84      27.8MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT        37.247.53.10        36.6MB/s
    Tele2, Riga, LV     90.130.74.113       22.2MB/s
    Tele2, Vilnius, LT      90.130.74.117       16.7MB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU   94.242.192.2        55.3MB/s
    Tele2, Frankfurt, DE        90.130.74.155       95.2MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE        108.61.210.117      191MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE       139.162.130.8       233MB/s !!
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE    159.122.69.4        72.6MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE     37.58.58.140        241MB/s !!
    DO, Frankfurt, DE       46.101.201.140      239MB/s !!
    Vultr, Paris, FR        108.61.209.127      155MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR     2001:41d0:a:79c8::1     29.8MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR     5.135.128.81        26.7MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR        188.165.12.106      23.1MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR       62.210.18.40        72.6MB/s
    Tele2, Amsterdam, NL        90.130.74.153       30.2MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL        108.61.198.102      172MB/s
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL     146.185.152.145     101MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL     178.62.219.145      103MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL     5.79.108.33     47.1MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL      213.163.76.200      87.0MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK       108.61.196.101      138MB/s
    DO, London, UK      188.166.152.227     93.8MB/s
    Linode, London, UK      176.58.107.39       118MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK       5.10.97.132     73.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX       169.57.4.116        5.51MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR       169.57.128.148      4.64MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA      67.205.188.39       24.7MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA      162.243.9.77        24.7MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA      138.197.20.252      27.0MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA      108.61.149.182      25.8MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA     50.116.57.237       2.76MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA        107.191.51.12       19.7MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA     108.61.193.166      21.1MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA        50.116.39.117       18.9MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA       104.156.244.232     20.0MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA      108.61.194.105      15.0MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA     67.228.112.250      12.5MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA   207.244.94.80       21.6MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA      108.61.224.175      18.4MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA     50.116.25.154       15.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA      173.192.68.18       14.3MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA       209.58.153.1        16.9MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA     108.61.219.200      14.8MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      138.68.237.46       12.6MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      192.241.209.37      13.3MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA        50.116.14.9     8.37MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187      12.7MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA     138.197.135.163     18.6MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA        192.99.19.165       2.13MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA        24.222.0.194        3.72MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA     169.54.124.180      8.48MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name           IPv6 address        Download Speed
    Linode, Atlanta, GA     2600:3c02::4b       17.9MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, TX      2600:3c00::4b       17.2MB/s
    Linode, Newark, NJ      2600:3c03::4b       15.4MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG       2400:8901::4b       4.91MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP       2400:8900::4b       9.05MB/s
    Softlayer, Paris, FR        2a03:8180:1301:8::4 81.0MB/s
    Softlayer, Tokyo, JP        2401:c900:1001:16::4    4.18MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run) : 630 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 507 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 639 MB/s
    Average I/O speed  : 592 MB/s
    

    watch that Frankfurt speeds... 10 Gbps shared or what is this? connection to ovh sucks compared to that (but that hasn't been better ever since)

    recheck on the 8 GB instance in nuremberg (which is even closer to ffm)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-26xx (Sandy Bridge)
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2194.842 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 7797 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 7:59:10
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.18, 0.51
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.0-3-amd64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name           IPv4 address        Download Speed
    CacheFly            205.234.175.175     103MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP        108.61.201.151      295KB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP       106.187.96.148      8.62MB/s
    DO, Bangalore, IN       139.59.44.249       4.94MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN      169.38.65.84        1.60MB/s
    Vultr, Singapore, SG        45.32.100.168       12.8MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG       128.199.210.182     3.84MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG       139.162.23.4        10.3MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG    119.81.28.170       10.3MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG     103.254.153.18      11.9MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN     119.81.130.170      2.09MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN      43.249.36.49        6.13MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS      108.61.212.117      7.44MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS      168.1.1.212     1.00MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS   168.1.65.244        7.13MB/s
    Tele2, Gothenberg, SE       90.130.74.151       35.2MB/s
    Tele2, Kista, SE        90.130.74.149       17.6MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT        159.122.128.84      5.34MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT        37.247.53.10        29.8MB/s
    Tele2, Riga, LV     90.130.74.113       2.46MB/s
    Tele2, Vilnius, LT      90.130.74.117       30.1MB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU   94.242.192.2        13.4MB/s
    Tele2, Frankfurt, DE        90.130.74.155       191MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE        108.61.210.117      251MB/s !!
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE       139.162.130.8       391MB/s !!
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE    159.122.69.4        80.5MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE     37.58.58.140        243MB/s
    DO, Frankfurt, DE       46.101.201.140      68.4MB/s
    Vultr, Paris, FR        108.61.209.127      147MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR     5.196.90.200        27.1MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR     5.135.128.81        29.2MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR        188.165.12.106      74.1MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR       62.210.18.40        82.2MB/s
    Tele2, Amsterdam, NL        90.130.74.153       4.26MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL        108.61.198.102      216MB/s !!
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL     146.185.152.145     21.0MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL     178.62.219.145      104MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL     5.79.108.33     68.5MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL      213.163.76.200      104MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK       108.61.196.101      161MB/s !!
    DO, London, UK      188.166.152.227     19.4MB/s
    Linode, London, UK      176.58.107.39       124MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK       5.10.97.132     71.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX       169.57.4.116        1.55MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR       169.57.128.148      4.18MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA      67.205.188.39       27.7MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA      162.243.9.77        28.5MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA      138.197.20.252      17.2MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA      108.61.149.182      27.1MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA     50.116.57.237       25.9MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA        107.191.51.12       16.6MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA     108.61.193.166      17.0MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA        50.116.39.117       21.2MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA       104.156.244.232     16.3MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA      108.61.194.105      15.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA     67.228.112.250      12.7MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA   207.244.94.80       23.2MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA      108.61.224.175      13.8MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA     50.116.25.154       17.0MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA      173.192.68.18       2.19MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA       209.58.153.1        4.50MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA     108.61.219.200      11.0MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      138.68.237.46       2.77MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA      192.241.209.37      13.6MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA        50.116.14.9     3.91MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187      12.2MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA     138.197.135.163     9.34MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA        192.99.19.165       1.73MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA        24.222.0.194        3.24MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA     169.54.124.180      10.7MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name           IPv6 address        Download Speed
    Linode, Atlanta, GA     2600:3c02::4b       6.01MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, TX      2600:3c00::4b       17.3MB/s
    Linode, Newark, NJ      2600:3c03::4b       11.9MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG       2400:8901::4b       5.10MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP       2400:8900::4b       2.11MB/s
    Softlayer, Paris, FR        2a03:8180:1301:8::4 75.5MB/s
    Softlayer, Tokyo, JP        2401:c900:1001:16::4    2.13MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run) : 323 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 283 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 278 MB/s
    Average I/O speed  : 294.667 MB/s
    

    now that makes me curious about the price point and what other instances will be available. @Hetzner_OL are there any additional informations you can share? what about additional disks?

    Thanked by 2Amitz vovler
  • last post... iperf between falkenstein and nuremberg:

    # iperf -c 94.x.y.z -i 1 -P 10 |grep SUM
    [SUM]  0.0- 1.0 sec   906 MBytes  7.60 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  1.0- 2.0 sec  1014 MBytes  8.50 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  2.0- 3.0 sec   999 MBytes  8.38 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  3.0- 4.0 sec  1000 MBytes  8.39 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  4.0- 5.0 sec  1.03 GBytes  8.80 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  5.0- 6.0 sec  1.02 GBytes  8.73 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  6.0- 7.0 sec  1002 MBytes  8.40 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  7.0- 8.0 sec   976 MBytes  8.19 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  8.0- 9.0 sec  1.02 GBytes  8.75 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  9.0-10.0 sec  1.02 GBytes  8.74 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  0.0-10.0 sec  9.84 GBytes  8.43 Gbits/sec
    

    and the other way round:

    # iperf -c 88.x.y.z -i 1 -P 10 |grep SUM
    [SUM]  0.0- 1.0 sec   871 MBytes  7.31 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  1.0- 2.0 sec   894 MBytes  7.50 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  2.0- 3.0 sec   932 MBytes  7.81 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  3.0- 4.0 sec   968 MBytes  8.12 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  4.0- 5.0 sec   914 MBytes  7.67 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  5.0- 6.0 sec   933 MBytes  7.83 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  6.0- 7.0 sec   888 MBytes  7.45 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  7.0- 8.0 sec   888 MBytes  7.45 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  8.0- 9.0 sec   883 MBytes  7.41 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  9.0-10.0 sec   902 MBytes  7.56 Gbits/sec
    [SUM]  0.0-10.0 sec  8.86 GBytes  7.59 Gbits/sec
    

    rrrr. fast :-)

  • I asked them to verify my account but no response yet.

  • Maybe everyone running benchmark at the moment, so ...

  • Got it working now on a new account. Didn't submit any payment or ID details, worked for me. Have two 8GB servers in DC3 and one in DC8 running right now. Wondering how much this usually costs now..

  • @Falzo I'm getting 4Gbps upload.

    Fastest as the hell.

    This is amazing!!!

    Thanked by 1Falzo
  • @Hetzner_OL - thx for the trial. So we can plan how to utilize the beta, can you give us a 2 week warning before ending the trial and taking cloud vms away? It could just be posting it in this forum, etc.

  • vovlervovler Member
    edited October 2017

    @Falzo said:
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 391MB/s !!

    Thanked by 1MasonR
  • @Hetzner_OL Thanks for offering the free trial. How long does the beta trial last for?

Sign In or Register to comment.