@jsg While I agree with basically everything above it might be worth noting (although I haven’t followed it for awhile) that TerraHost is owned by a company with huge debt (please correct me if that’s

terrahost?

Also, there's psychology, e.g. @terrahost whom I consider a really fine provider sent me quite many "there is a problem" emails in the past weeks, so after all, they must be pretty b

I'll need to check out routing on that. AMS/FRA are always safe, when I've tried anything else like Oslo from Terrahost routing was wild, when Ive tried Warsaw from WebHorizon it was pretty horrible.

(Quote)

@terrahost is in Amsterdam too I believe.

I thought it is a @terrahost offer, but it isn't.

https://terrahoststatus.com/issue/5ea60900-7fcc-45bf-b9f5-813fbe84974f

https://terrahoststatus.com/issue/5ea60900-7fcc-45bf-b9f5-813fbe84974f

@terrahost having any issues?

I have an amazing server with TerraHost, with fantastic hardware performance.

(Quote)

(Quote)

(Quote)

I get 90ms to netcup and 107ms ping to Terrahost Norway.

Specifically should have good connectivity (latency) to Terrahost (Norway) and Netcup (Vienna).

* Terrahost (Sandefjord and Amsterdam)

(Quote)

That was when you said he used TerraHost for his TOR mirror, which was false, he didn't use TerraHost for his TOR mirror. So no you're not right.

Remember when you were arguing with me about TerraHost and it later came out I was right and when the article was first released KF was in fact running on TerraHost until their upstreams kicked them o