Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Dartnode is too disappointing

13»

Comments

  • @lylone said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    Fake line and worse event!
    This is by far the most disappointing merchant and event I have ever experienced. I have been stuck on this page for almost two hours, and several of my friends are facing the exact same problem. Instead of moving forward in the queue, our positions keep getting pushed back. This is completely unacceptable. I strongly urge the community to remove this merchant from the event program and prevent others from having the same terrible experience.

    Cheer up, mate. Seeing your screenshot of the queue line, I honestly think the server gods were actually doing you a massive favor. You should be glad you didn’t pass that checkout page.

    I managed to battle through their broken system and grabbed an instance during the DartDay rush. Want to see what you "missed out" on?

    Here is my fresh YABS disk benchmark on this node:

    • 4k Mixed R/W: 1.6 MB/s (404 IOPS)
    • 1m Mixed R/W: 45 MB/s

    Yes, you read that right. 404 IOPS in 2026. Daniel gave us a beautiful 900Mbps network pipeline, but it seems he paired it with a hard drive stolen from an ancient TiVo. Doing apt update on this machine takes long enough to brew a cup of coffee.

    If you are genuinely still disappointed and absolutely need a server with a great network pipe but the storage performance of a 90s floppy disk, I am more than happy to transfer my invoice/VM over to you via a support ticket.

    Save yourself from the FOMO, you dodged a bullet here!

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2026-05-11                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Jun 17 07:20:56 PM UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2599.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 99.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Snaju Development
    ASN        : AS399646 Snaju Development
    Host       : Snaju Development
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.61 MB/s      (404) | 14.18 MB/s     (221)
    Write      | 1.64 MB/s      (411) | 14.70 MB/s     (229)
    Total      | 3.26 MB/s      (815) | 28.88 MB/s     (450)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 16.31 MB/s      (31) | 21.39 MB/s      (20)
    Write      | 17.68 MB/s      (34) | 23.63 MB/s      (23)
    Total      | 33.99 MB/s      (65) | 45.03 MB/s      (43)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 827 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 854 Mbits/sec   | 643 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 689 Mbits/sec   | 320 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 699 Mbits/sec   | 419 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 881 Mbits/sec   | 469 Mbits/sec   | 37.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 906 Mbits/sec   | 601 Mbits/sec   | 39.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 823 Mbits/sec   | 336 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 830 Mbits/sec   | 462 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 845 Mbits/sec   | 664 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 600 Mbits/sec   | 152 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 698 Mbits/sec   | 439 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 882 Mbits/sec   | 905 Mbits/sec   | 37.8 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 896 Mbits/sec   | 535 Mbits/sec   | 38.8 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 811 Mbits/sec   | 328 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms
    
    Running GB6 benchmark test... *cue elevator music*client_loop: send disconnect: Connection reset
    

    I once came across an even more ridiculous Turkish provider called DPnet. Their hardware was literally 30 years outdated, and they shut down and disappeared just a month and a half after operating.
    Dartnode seems better!Lol…

  • Lol @lylone. At least yours got provisioned, mine is still in the "Waiting in provisioning queue..." since yesterday. I had the same issue during last year's sale too. Hopefully they fix things in time for my pre orders to deploy :neutral:

    yeah, the queueing system is a big mess. I had the same issue in 2024 sales

  • HayzeeHayzee Member

    @lylone said:
    If you are genuinely still disappointed and absolutely need a server with a great network pipe but the storage performance of a 90s floppy disk, I am more than happy to transfer my invoice/VM over to you via a support ticket.

    What plan did you get/pay?

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @lylone said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    Fake line and worse event!
    This is by far the most disappointing merchant and event I have ever experienced. I have been stuck on this page for almost two hours, and several of my friends are facing the exact same problem. Instead of moving forward in the queue, our positions keep getting pushed back. This is completely unacceptable. I strongly urge the community to remove this merchant from the event program and prevent others from having the same terrible experience.

    Cheer up, mate. Seeing your screenshot of the queue line, I honestly think the server gods were actually doing you a massive favor. You should be glad you didn’t pass that checkout page.

    I managed to battle through their broken system and grabbed an instance during the DartDay rush. Want to see what you "missed out" on?

    Here is my fresh YABS disk benchmark on this node:

    • 4k Mixed R/W: 1.6 MB/s (404 IOPS)
    • 1m Mixed R/W: 45 MB/s

    Yes, you read that right. 404 IOPS in 2026. Daniel gave us a beautiful 900Mbps network pipeline, but it seems he paired it with a hard drive stolen from an ancient TiVo. Doing apt update on this machine takes long enough to brew a cup of coffee.

    If you are genuinely still disappointed and absolutely need a server with a great network pipe but the storage performance of a 90s floppy disk, I am more than happy to transfer my invoice/VM over to you via a support ticket.

    Save yourself from the FOMO, you dodged a bullet here!

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2026-05-11                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Jun 17 07:20:56 PM UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2599.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 99.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-49-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Snaju Development
    ASN        : AS399646 Snaju Development
    Host       : Snaju Development
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.61 MB/s      (404) | 14.18 MB/s     (221)
    Write      | 1.64 MB/s      (411) | 14.70 MB/s     (229)
    Total      | 3.26 MB/s      (815) | 28.88 MB/s     (450)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 16.31 MB/s      (31) | 21.39 MB/s      (20)
    Write      | 17.68 MB/s      (34) | 23.63 MB/s      (23)
    Total      | 33.99 MB/s      (65) | 45.03 MB/s      (43)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 827 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 854 Mbits/sec   | 643 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 689 Mbits/sec   | 320 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 699 Mbits/sec   | 419 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 881 Mbits/sec   | 469 Mbits/sec   | 37.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 906 Mbits/sec   | 601 Mbits/sec   | 39.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 823 Mbits/sec   | 336 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 830 Mbits/sec   | 462 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 845 Mbits/sec   | 664 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 600 Mbits/sec   | 152 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 698 Mbits/sec   | 439 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 882 Mbits/sec   | 905 Mbits/sec   | 37.8 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 896 Mbits/sec   | 535 Mbits/sec   | 38.8 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 811 Mbits/sec   | 328 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms
    
    Running GB6 benchmark test... *cue elevator music*client_loop: send disconnect: Connection reset
    

    Wtf is that??

  • @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @lylone said:
    I managed to battle through their broken system and grabbed an instance during the DartDay rush. Want to see what you "missed out" on?

    Here is my fresh YABS disk benchmark on this node:

    • 4k Mixed R/W: 1.6 MB/s (404 IOPS)
    • 1m Mixed R/W: 45 MB/s

    Yes, you read that right. 404 IOPS in 2026. Daniel gave us a beautiful 900Mbps network pipeline, but it seems he paired it with a hard drive stolen from an ancient TiVo. Doing apt update on this machine takes long enough to brew a cup of coffee.

    Make a fork and deploy a copy, in honor of Daniel:
    https://github.com/yoursunny/freaky-fast-digital-coma

  • @AdamWilliam said:
    Their hardware was literally 30 years outdated

    They were running OG pentiums?

  • @TimboJones said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

    Maybe he felt bad for the guy. Imagine chasing after lowend VPS deals to make $1.50 on each.

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited 12:33AM

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

    Maybe he felt bad for the guy. Imagine chasing after lowend VPS deals to make $1.50 on each.

    He said:

    Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    No, he outright supported the scalper since it saved him time. The scalper used a script, a big Fuck You to the humans in the queue.

    Thanked by 1totally_not_banned
  • @TimboJones said:

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

    Maybe he felt bad for the guy. Imagine chasing after lowend VPS deals to make $1.50 on each.

    He said:

    Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    No, he outright supported the scalper since it saved him time. The scalper used a script, a big Fuck You to the humans in the queue.

    So what you mean is that I should just keep queuing for hours and end up with nothing in the end? As a consumer, am I supposed to pay the price for an unreasonable promotional campaign by the company? If you really want to combat scalpers, you should develop an anti-bot script to block them, instead of foolishly blocking normal users like this.
    You should spend more time working on improving the situation rather than wasting time on pointless arguing.

  • @totally_not_banned said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

    Maybe he felt bad for the guy. Imagine chasing after lowend VPS deals to make $1.50 on each.

    $1.5 is essentially meaningless and nothing more than a symbolic charge. As a consumer, I don’t care where I get the product from. If the official promotion were fair and reasonable, no one would turn to scalpers.

  • AdamWilliamAdamWilliam Member
    edited 12:57AM

    @TimboJones said:

    @totally_not_banned said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @AdamWilliam said:

    @Carlin0 said:
    @AdamWilliam your queue has been doubled

    In the end, I spent more $1.50 and bought one from a scalper who was using a script.Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    The script scalping was probably the reason for your issue. Way to support the bad guys!

    Maybe he felt bad for the guy. Imagine chasing after lowend VPS deals to make $1.50 on each.

    He said:

    Its totally worth to save my time🤓

    No, he outright supported the scalper since it saved him time. The scalper used a script, a big Fuck You to the humans in the queue.

    Honestly, you are one of the types of people I dislike the most. It’s like saying that buying a leather bag would cause the extinction of animals. In that case, I’d suggest you stop breathing, because every second you are killing tens of thousands of microorganisms in the air.
    If you really despise scalpers, go deal with them directly. Go and provide effective anti-bot solutions to companies, instead of coming here and dumping meaningless complaints on consumers.
    For me, I simply need to purchase the product. Obviously, I have found a way to save time, and for me that is a success. As for you—so obsessed with scalpers yet unable to do anything about them—you can only keep complaining endlessly here and morally lecturing consumers.
    so poor guy😤

  • twinstartwinstar Member

    Has the $99 product been released yet?

  • @twinstar said:
    Has the $99 product been released yet?

    Yesterday’s event was suspended due to technical issues. At first, it was said it would resume after one hour, but that never happened. Fortunately, I didn’t keep waiting.

Sign In or Register to comment.