New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
RackNerd forced DC migration, refused prorated refund.
This discussion has been closed.

Comments
How sketchy. How does a provider sell services with an contract but not have a contract with their provider as long?
Then they won't refund... Unless you complain loud enough???
No, please just fucking shit RackNerd
I have a suggestion: For VPSs migrating from DC2 to DC3, offer them an option:
Extend the expiration date of affected VPSs by one month (after a flash sale, existing users will have more options, allowing them to make cost-effective choices—whether to abandon the service or renew, etc. VPSs with less than one month remaining will automatically have their validity extended by one month).
Add an extra migration quota (if they've never migrated before, they'll have two migration opportunities).
Give users one week to consider; otherwise, option one will be the default.
Many purchased VPSs specifically for the DC2 data center; a forced migration would disappoint many. I think this would be a consolation prize after the migration (the final interpretation rests with the provider).
2027/2028 at the latest.
Huh, nodeseek user lmfao.
They promised




direct link ?
https://t.me/racknerd_promo
Search: “优化”, Events like Black Friday and Easter are always posted here on time. This appears to be an official channel, and the descriptions are written in Chinese.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3563566#Comment_3563566
Sure. I submitted a ticket and went back and forth with them, but they cannot refund to the original payment method. So I can only share my thoughts here.
It feels like there is no customer choice. Somehow it even feels like this is my fault.
to be honest, DC02 was the only reason I chose RackNerd since 2021.
I already bought and tried another DC03 service before to supprt Racknerd. I truly do not want to keep two DC03 services. But it seems I have no choice.
This practice of forcing migrations with nothing more than an email is undoubtedly frustrating. At the same time, the VPS provider lacks the capacity to address the various issues users face as a result of these forced migrations. We purchased your services because we trusted you; you should be ensuring a positive customer experience. Even if a migration is necessary, you should be able to address the dissatisfaction it causes. Simply sending an official excuse is irresponsible.
They're obviously a scam who has no idea how to manage their customers. Seems all hosts on here are all just trash and scams
I've had servers (from other providers) that have switched countries multiple times while I've had them. Switching data centre isn't a big deal. And at the end of the day, you're still getting the location and service you paid for.
And this is a lot of complaining when most of the customers are $10 - $12 per year.
During their promotion, RackNerd set different prices for the two data centers, with DC2 being the more expensive option. This clearly shows they know the two locations aren't just "both in LAX" — there are real differences between them.
So, it means their Chinese marketing team did it. Their resellers most likely copy-paste this as well
You're ok with providers moving services to other countries then just ignoring when you complain unless you complain loud enough
I think the mjjs have a point here. It seems that Racknerd sold DC2 as a differentiated service. They didn't buy service in LA, they bought service in DC2. Clearly it was a decision because DC2 had China optimized routing. Racknerd can't deliver that differentiated service any more, so they need to make it right with these customers somehow. I'm not here to say what making it right looks like. Clearly these folks are a large part of their business, so they need to consider what this going to do reputationally. However, it's pretty clear that people here making buying decisions solely based on price, and will defend providers who have fucked over others as long as their service is working.
Technically, depending on who provides said optimised routes, they can also be moved over to DC3. That'd resolve pretty much all the bitching here if I'm not wrong?
if the connectivity in the 2 datacenters are different and the services are thus advertised and priced differently and the customers therefore purchase accordingly, what are you even saying?
people absolutely should complain when they don't get what they paid for regardless of your opinion of the price point.
anyway i assume @dustinc will handle the issue appropriately, seems like they do a fair amount of business with the nodeseekers. hopefully it's not too many requiring compensation, for everybody's sake.
If I were Racknerd, I'd 100% be doing whatever I could to get the upstream from DC2 into DC3, but who knows if that is possible.
Bro, they can't even honor contracts... Do you really think they can afford to actually buy network or any infrastructure??
They're just another trash provider that's all over this site.
give them a chance to fix it man.
i do not think they will fix anything. we have to take the dc03 shit. and i have two...
@dustinc
You said you can do credit, why not just refund? If the service never switched owner that should be possible.
They already said they wouldn't prorate refund OP. Only now he complained loud enough they might? Any decent company wouldn't need to
Hi All -- it is still very much all hands on deck on our side, so do excuse my brevity, but I did want to clarify one point here.
I looked into the ticket that OP messaged me about, and the story being presented here is not fully aligned with what I’m seeing. Our team did offer a prorated account credit option in that ticket, and this was offered to OP via ticket before this thread was created. By the way, after reviewing the service history, the original order itself appears to have been for San Jose, not Los Angeles DC-02 and the product OP ordered was never available for DC-02 selection to begin with. At some point, via a support ticket request by the customer it looks like an exception was made by our team in good faith, and the service was later accommodated in DC-02 to help the customer out. So there is a bit more account-specific history here than what is being presented publicly. With that said, we still offered a prorated account credit option, and to be clear, this is not a matter of someone needing to “complain loud enough” on LET in order for us to work with them.
As mentioned earlier, we have already been working with customers on a case-by-case basis, including moving services to other in-stock datacenter locations where available, and reviewing prorated account credit requests where appropriate. This remains our stance. These situations do need to be reviewed case by case, as not every service/account is structured the same way. As most here know, we’ve run different promotions over the years, flash sales, renewals, upgrades, customers push transferring services across different accounts, etc - so it is not always as simple as treating every situation identically from the outside.
We understand there may be some confusion, and we’re here to clarify and work through it with customers directly. Our team has been highly responsive through tickets despite the workload, and customers are welcome to continue working with us there. As always, I can also be reached directly at dustin[@]racknerd[.]com if someone feels their situation needs my attention. We do our best to go above and beyond for our customers, but every account is different and at times needs to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. In this particular case, we do believe the prorated account credit option offered was reasonable.
We understand that not everyone will view this situation the same way, and that’s fair. Facility moves are never fun, especially for users who selected a specific deployment location years ago for their own reasons. At the same time, our priority has been service continuity -- keeping customers online, maintaining Los Angeles-based service delivery, and completing this transition in a way that supports customers long-term. We are continuing to work with customers, review reasonable requests, and handle each situation as fairly as we can.
By the way, the DC-03 network is not something we consider “done” or final. We have already made improvements with Lumen/Crown Castle, and the network will only continue improving from here. We are actively reviewing feedback, MTRs, routing behavior, and future carrier expansion opportunities.
Also worth mentioning, this migration project is not yet fully completed. We still have additional physical migration batches scheduled after the Memorial Day holiday next week, so our team remains fully focused on getting through the remaining work as smoothly as possible.
As always, we appreciate the customers who have been patient and constructive with us throughout this process. We’ll continue doing our best to support everyone through it.
@dustinc all services, included shared/reseller on DC02 will be migrated to DC03?
Hi @elmago -- shared/reseller hosting services are not in Los Angeles DC-02, and have not for quite some time, so this is not impacted.
Due to power constraints in Los Angeles DC-02 at the time, we had already moved forward with deploying our upgraded Ryzen/NVMe/CloudLinux 9 shared/reseller hosting platform in a different LA facility at the time:
https://blog.racknerd.com/racknerd-unveils-next-generation-shared-reseller-hosting-platform-powered-by-ryzen-nvme-and-cloudlinux-9/
That helped us better support the shared/reseller hosting side of the business from a power and scalability standpoint. As such, as an indirect result of that project already being completed, shared/reseller hosting customers are already taken care of, and the current physical migration work being discussed here is focused on the other remaining services in Los Angeles DC-02.
I feel like lately there's just been a flood of mjj posts that: have zero patience, never ask "hey, can we look into this" and always just assume the absolute worst and instantly blast/blame the provider without any discussion / chance for anything to be fixed. That's where I'd 100% agree with the comments about screaming loudly enough and throwing tantrums. Maybe its a language barrier / cultural thing, but holy crap do a lot of these style of posts come off like something a 10 year old would write. If the DC02 servers were advertised specifically as having a China Optimized route, and are moving to something that doesn't, yeah, that sucks and IMO racknerd should offer a refund, but as seems typical of these threads, it's sounding like there's more to the story here anyway. Am not a racknerd customer at present, so no skin in the game... but I feel like OP and a lot of other posters in these style threads would get a lot further having a bit more of a calm conversation and not immediately starting with a huge blame game blow up about how awful and unfair everything is.
You should take the credits. If you indeed ordered in San Jose , even charge back would not be in your favor. Provider can just move you to San Jose at this point and be done with you.