Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Introducing ServerVerify: built with the LowEndTalk community in mind

1…212223242527»

Comments

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @gettotheweb said:
    Good service! Thanks for this.

    Glad you are finding ServerVerify useful. :)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    @jbiloh would be handy to see triennial billing as an option, as well as allow setting the price in dollars and cents, even if it just takes that value and rounds it... otherwise i have to do math! :D

    Agreed, will add. Thanks for the suggestion.

    Triennial as an option has been added!

    Thanked by 1AlteredParadox
  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    @jbiloh said:

    @jbiloh said:

    @AlteredParadox said:
    @jbiloh would be handy to see triennial billing as an option, as well as allow setting the price in dollars and cents, even if it just takes that value and rounds it... otherwise i have to do math! :D

    Agreed, will add. Thanks for the suggestion.

    Triennial as an option has been added!

    Works great!

  • zejjntzejjnt Member

    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

  • HayzeeHayzee Member

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Same here, does yours also say pending?

  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

  • zejjntzejjnt Member

    @Hayzee said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Same here, does yours also say pending?

    Yup.

    @AlteredParadox said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

    I get no errors and running nws, yabs and GB6 work fine on their own :S

  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    @zejjnt said:

    @Hayzee said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Same here, does yours also say pending?

    Yup.

    @AlteredParadox said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

    I get no errors and running nws, yabs and GB6 work fine on their own :S

    Weird. Just ran one out of curiosity... completed and went pending with a proper score with no issues for me.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

    1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
    2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

    We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

    Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

    1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
    2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

    We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

    Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

    This should be fixed now.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    We've added a new feature to ServerVerify - full multi language support:

  • MurvMurv Member, Megathread Squad

    @jbiloh said: full multi language support

    No Persian? You break my heart.

    Thanked by 2oloke buggedout
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @Murv said:

    @jbiloh said: full multi language support

    No Persian? You break my heart.

    Maybe in the future!

    Thanked by 1Murv
  • buggedoutbuggedout Member

    @Murv said:

    @jbiloh said: full multi language support

    No Persian? You break my heart.

    No worries, I am sending a new heart !!

    Thanked by 2Murv oloke
  • zejjntzejjnt Member

    @jbiloh said:

    @jbiloh said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

    1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
    2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

    We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

    Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

    This should be fixed now.

    Can confirm that it is indeed fixed, thanks :)

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @zejjnt said:

    @jbiloh said:

    @jbiloh said:

    @zejjnt said:
    My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

    Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

    1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
    2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

    We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

    Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

    This should be fixed now.

    Can confirm that it is indeed fixed, thanks :)

    Excellent!

  • slowserversslowservers Member, Host Rep

    I finally got my first yabs! Adding IPv4 sure helped.

    If I recall correctly, Geekbench needs 2GB of memory to run, so that's what I used for it.

    This is on Loki which has a SSD, so it's a bit more performant on I/O than some of my other hosts (that use Velociraptors.)

    I do have one thing I want to test, I/O wise, that could improve performance some if it doesn't negatively impact reliability.

    https://serververify.com/benchmarks/6359f48e-f3d4-425c-a1b1-86e5dad8285a

    Despite the low speeds, full Monero nodes run and Bitcoin nodes run. And SporeStack is able to operate on this old hardware.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @slowservers said:
    I finally got my first yabs! Adding IPv4 sure helped.

    If I recall correctly, Geekbench needs 2GB of memory to run, so that's what I used for it.

    This is on Loki which has a SSD, so it's a bit more performant on I/O than some of my other hosts (that use Velociraptors.)

    I do have one thing I want to test, I/O wise, that could improve performance some if it doesn't negatively impact reliability.

    https://serververify.com/benchmarks/6359f48e-f3d4-425c-a1b1-86e5dad8285a

    Despite the low speeds, full Monero nodes run and Bitcoin nodes run. And SporeStack is able to operate on this old hardware.

    Welcome to ServerVerify!

    Your snail logo/banner made me laugh.

    Thanked by 1slowservers
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Heads up to hosting providers on ServerVerify

    We’ve just rolled out a new reciprocal backlink badge feature for providers who have claimed their profile.

    Add the ServerVerify badge to your website and, once detected, ServerVerify will automatically establish a follow backlink back to your provider profile within 24 hours. Free SEO juice for participating providers.

    To find the feature:

    • MY PROVIDERS
    • Select the provider you control
    • Scroll down to the “Backlink Badge” section

    You can customize the badge style/colors and simply paste the embed code onto your site.

    Once our system detects the badge and confirms the link is not marked nofollow, the reciprocal follow link will automatically activate on your ServerVerify profile page.

    Would love feedback from providers as we continue improving the platform.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

    Thanked by 3oloke buggedout AlteredParadox
  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    ALL THE YABS

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @jbiloh said:
    Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

    That's because he has nothing better to do :joy:

  • AlteredParadoxAlteredParadox Member

    @Jord said:

    @jbiloh said:
    Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

    That's because he has nothing better to do :joy:

    Hi @jord

    Thanked by 2Jord oloke
  • JordJord Moderator, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @AlteredParadox said:

    @Jord said:

    @jbiloh said:
    Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

    That's because he has nothing better to do :joy:

    Hi @jord

    Hi @AlteredParadox

    Thanked by 2AlteredParadox oloke
  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    @jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
    I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @oloke said:
    @jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
    I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

    Agreed, working on it.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:

    @oloke said:
    @jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
    I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

    Agreed, working on it.

    Max review length has been doubled to 500 characters.

    Thanks for sharing your suggestion.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • digisumodigisumo Member

    Can we search per location. I want to see and filter what server performing well in a certain location but couldn't find the feature.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • Epidermal2026Epidermal2026 Member
    edited May 23
    1. In detail view / single benchmark: click on location or
    2. Use advanced search and select location (Don't forget to click the search button after setting your filters).

    Using advanced search is recommended when a location has several entries (e.g., "Frankfurt am Main" has 3 different entries).

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @digisumo said:
    Can we search per location. I want to see and filter what server performing well in a certain location but couldn't find the feature.

    I'll look to see how we can improve this. Great suggestion.

Sign In or Register to comment.