Introducing ServerVerify: built with the LowEndTalk community in mind

jbiloh

@gettotheweb said:
Good service! Thanks for this.

Glad you are finding ServerVerify useful.

jbiloh

@jbiloh said:

@AlteredParadox said:
@jbiloh would be handy to see triennial billing as an option, as well as allow setting the price in dollars and cents, even if it just takes that value and rounds it... otherwise i have to do math!

Agreed, will add. Thanks for the suggestion.

Triennial as an option has been added!

AlteredParadox

@jbiloh said:

@jbiloh said:

@AlteredParadox said:
@jbiloh would be handy to see triennial billing as an option, as well as allow setting the price in dollars and cents, even if it just takes that value and rounds it... otherwise i have to do math!

Agreed, will add. Thanks for the suggestion.

Triennial as an option has been added!

Works great!

zejjnt

My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Hayzee

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Same here, does yours also say pending?

AlteredParadox

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

zejjnt

@Hayzee said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Same here, does yours also say pending?

Yup.

@AlteredParadox said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

I get no errors and running nws, yabs and GB6 work fine on their own :S

AlteredParadox

@zejjnt said:

@Hayzee said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Same here, does yours also say pending?

Yup.

@AlteredParadox said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

I've only seen it do this when the benchmark gets interrupted or never finishes.

I get no errors and running nws, yabs and GB6 work fine on their own :S

Weird. Just ran one out of curiosity... completed and went pending with a proper score with no issues for me.

jbiloh

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

jbiloh

@jbiloh said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

This should be fixed now.

jbiloh

We've added a new feature to ServerVerify - full multi language support:

Murv

@jbiloh said: full multi language support

No Persian? You break my heart.

jbiloh

@Murv said:

@jbiloh said: full multi language support

No Persian? You break my heart.

Maybe in the future!

buggedout

@Murv said:

@jbiloh said: full multi language support

No Persian? You break my heart.

No worries, I am sending a new heart !!

zejjnt

@jbiloh said:

@jbiloh said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

This should be fixed now.

Can confirm that it is indeed fixed, thanks

jbiloh

@zejjnt said:

@jbiloh said:

@jbiloh said:

@zejjnt said:
My last 2 benchmarks both completed but show up as 0.0 score and 404 when I click them. I performed them like 4 days ago maybe; anything happen on your end?

Right now there are two things we are working on that are causing this:

1. YABS export to JSON may be currently broken. There is an open item in Github about this.
2. Geekbench has put their scoring behind Cloudflare, so it is not reporting back to YABS properly.

We are hoping those issues get resolved soon.

Meanwhile we are working on a workaround as of today.

This should be fixed now.

Can confirm that it is indeed fixed, thanks

Excellent!

slowservers

I finally got my first yabs! Adding IPv4 sure helped.

If I recall correctly, Geekbench needs 2GB of memory to run, so that's what I used for it.

This is on Loki which has a SSD, so it's a bit more performant on I/O than some of my other hosts (that use Velociraptors.)

I do have one thing I want to test, I/O wise, that could improve performance some if it doesn't negatively impact reliability.

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/6359f48e-f3d4-425c-a1b1-86e5dad8285a

Despite the low speeds, full Monero nodes run and Bitcoin nodes run. And SporeStack is able to operate on this old hardware.

jbiloh

@slowservers said:
I finally got my first yabs! Adding IPv4 sure helped.

If I recall correctly, Geekbench needs 2GB of memory to run, so that's what I used for it.

This is on Loki which has a SSD, so it's a bit more performant on I/O than some of my other hosts (that use Velociraptors.)

I do have one thing I want to test, I/O wise, that could improve performance some if it doesn't negatively impact reliability.

https://serververify.com/benchmarks/6359f48e-f3d4-425c-a1b1-86e5dad8285a

Despite the low speeds, full Monero nodes run and Bitcoin nodes run. And SporeStack is able to operate on this old hardware.

Welcome to ServerVerify!

Your snail logo/banner made me laugh.

jbiloh

Heads up to hosting providers on ServerVerify

We’ve just rolled out a new reciprocal backlink badge feature for providers who have claimed their profile.

Add the ServerVerify badge to your website and, once detected, ServerVerify will automatically establish a follow backlink back to your provider profile within 24 hours. Free SEO juice for participating providers.

To find the feature:

• MY PROVIDERS
• Select the provider you control
• Scroll down to the “Backlink Badge” section

You can customize the badge style/colors and simply paste the embed code onto your site.

Once our system detects the badge and confirms the link is not marked nofollow, the reciprocal follow link will automatically activate on your ServerVerify profile page.

Would love feedback from providers as we continue improving the platform.

jbiloh

Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

AlteredParadox

ALL THE YABS

Jord

@jbiloh said:
Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

That's because he has nothing better to do

AlteredParadox

@Jord said:

@jbiloh said:
Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

That's because he has nothing better to do

Hi @jord

Jord

@AlteredParadox said:

@Jord said:

@jbiloh said:
Amazing that @AlteredParadox has submitted over 500 benchmarks to ServerVerify.

That's because he has nothing better to do

Hi @jord

Hi @AlteredParadox

oloke

@jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

jbiloh

@oloke said:
@jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

Agreed, working on it.

jbiloh

@jbiloh said:

@oloke said:
@jbiloh isn't the 240 char limit to write a review of hosting provider a bit low? This ain't twitter after all.
I would suggest increasing that limit at least a couple times.

Agreed, working on it.

Max review length has been doubled to 500 characters.

Thanks for sharing your suggestion.

digisumo

Can we search per location. I want to see and filter what server performing well in a certain location but couldn't find the feature.

Epidermal2026

1. In detail view / single benchmark: click on location or
2. Use advanced search and select location (Don't forget to click the search button after setting your filters).

Using advanced search is recommended when a location has several entries (e.g., "Frankfurt am Main" has 3 different entries).

jbiloh

@digisumo said:
Can we search per location. I want to see and filter what server performing well in a certain location but couldn't find the feature.

I'll look to see how we can improve this. Great suggestion.