New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
average server verify "manually verified" review
I am the primary approver. I love seeing the activity.
It's the same helpdesk backend when it comes to support tickets and contact forms.
With benchmark approvals I am the one doing most of them right now.
I am looking into this right now. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Seems we have a bug here, working to fix that now.
This has been fixed.
Thank you for pointing out this bug to us.
Suggestion; when viewing reviews and sorting by highest it would make more sense (to me) to sort by number of reviews rather than alphabetic order of provider name.
Grouping reviews for each provider and using a modal or similar to expand and show the individual reviews would also make it much more practical.
@jbiloh another one for ya:
Mine: https://serververify.com/benchmarks/79930742-6ea8-48f4-87ea-68670917f0b5
Scraped: https://serververify.com/benchmarks/79930742-6ea8-48f4-87ea-68670917f0b5
They're certainly not drastically different, 12.5 vs 12.6, but again - if its the exact same data, should it not have the exact same score?
Also, it seems a little silly to have LET scrapes that are identical to submissions in the first place - is there some way to compare the yabs results themselves, and if something identical already exists discard the scrape? Or maybe make the scrape wait a bit before posting and then do said check, if the scrape is happening before the serververify submission gets approved?
Looking into this one now.
Does this mean I win? I guess I can stop uploading benchmarks now.
Congrats on the launch, Jon! It’s about time we had a centralized 'source of truth' for benchmarks instead of digging through years of forum pages.
One quick question regarding the data: will there be a 'Recency Filter'? Since providers often cycle their hardware, it would be great to see results specifically from the last 3-6 months. This would prevent legacy E5-Xeon scores from skewing the averages for their newer Ryzen or EPYC deployments. Any plans for that?
Awesome! Congrats.
You should win a prize as our first to that level.
Send me your PayPal address for a little gift!
Any suggestions for higher tiers?
This is an excellent suggestion, thank you.
Would you like to see a time filter or a check box or some other presentation for this concept?
I'm terrible at naming things, but based on the current tiers, Claude came up with: 500+ Legendary Contributor, 750+ Mythic Contributor, 1000+ Benchmark Titan, and I like it.
@BilohBucks will be promptly transferred
btw @jbiloh i kinda like this leaderboard
hope it will stay this way for long
I kneel @onidel .
There's still room for improvement, though
That’s awesome news/
We've added a lot of features since the initial release.
We've added another tier at 500 submissions.
PS: You still need to send me your PayPal address for a little prize for being awesome and ServerVerify's #1 benchmark contributor right now!
I messaged it to you when you asked last time I think, I’ll send it again tho!
Depends, I guess. The number of my reviews can be multiplied by at least 30 because my reviews contain almost always 30+ benchmark runs. So I actually ran well over 1000 benchmarks (vs. his 244).
My main point though is not to take part in a pissing contest but rather that single (or a few) benchmark runs are basically all but worthless due to the fact that VPS performance by their very nature constantly change. That is why I (almost) always do (avg) 30+ runs over at least a full 24 hr period. Even that at the end of the day is just "a single glimpse" but at least one can see the spread and derive a meaningful guess (best case, worst case, etc.).
@jbiloh would be handy to see triennial billing as an option, as well as allow setting the price in dollars and cents, even if it just takes that value and rounds it... otherwise i have to do math!
Agreed, will add. Thanks for the suggestion.
Yeah triennial billing would actually be nice, and making people backsolve weird rounded pricing by hand is some real caveman UX.
I don't want to be a caveman!!
We will get this fixed in the next update, coming soon.
hahaha ok I believe you
@jbiloh can I get an update on the ticket #RUG-358375, please
Good service! Thanks for this.
Why is "Raw Benchmark Report (YABS)" not even the actual YABS benchmark results? For example, https://serververify.com/benchmarks/9fed2f42-7ab3-44ee-abd7-8f2c9e0b9a9e. There are certainly more than just this. If it isn't YABS, why even mention it?
Help me better understand.