Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Alternatives to MXroute

1567911

Comments

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @DrNutella said:

    @Levi said:

    @Protocol903 said:
    Maybe namecrane?

    They are not reliable enough for email.

    In all my years I have quietly watched @Francisco
    Because I am surprised the way he acts and stands up his businesses. Some people may call it lazy. Some may call it unreliable. I look at and say “that’s exactly what I would do, and be polite and respectful in address my customers concern with humility because that’s what I owe them”.

    A good business makes mistakes. A good business learns. A good business responds to all concerns with respect. I respect @Francisco way of running his business. It works.

    Honestly big cloud providers have worse performance metrics with issues MONTHLY and I know this because I have over half a dozen enterprise emails in different orgs as an advisor. And honestly @Francisco outperforms them all just by being available. The others are not.

    I bash many hosts here for how they treat customers but I have never had less than a good thing to observe from @NameCrane .

    I recommend you re-evaluate.

    Thanks for the kind words. We'll keep working to improve, just wish smartermail wasn't so RAM hungry, but maybe I can find some .NET tweaks :)

    Levi, or anyone for that matter, that has questions about cranes either for their current needs or later when we're doing domains are more than welcome to message or email. I'm still hoping to see some domains go up this month, but we need to get the site a bit further along :)

    Francisco

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @JosephF said: Which location is US1 and which is US2?

    Both are in Vegas. We only have 2 mail locations, the # just represents the node ID :)

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1JosephF
  • @Francisco said:

    @Tange said:
    @Francisco

    Hi Fran, i read on your page that your do not allow bulk mail and you have 600 per hour limit, i have a small forum, not big one, ~3000 members, can i use your service to send emergency mails to them? i can do like 300 mails per hour and finished in 10 hours.

    is that bulk mail?

    That's generally fine. Bulk is more so aimed at spammers and cold emailing.

    We have plenty of people that use us for transactional emails and things like that.

    And @MaxTakeba too.

    Francisco

    Appreciated.

  • JosephFJosephF Member

    @Shazan said:
    I still believe the best and easiest solution for the mail is using a shared hosting account with a reputable provider.

    Why?

  • emperoremperor Member
    edited April 10

    @JosephF said:

    @Shazan said:
    I still believe the best and easiest solution for the mail is using a shared hosting account with a reputable provider.

    Why?

    Most of them use relay for outgoing, which makes them cheaper with bigger space + you can host your own websites + dns hosting. Reputable is hard to find, we just choose to believe which are, and which are not.

  • A lot of Direct Admin packages use mailbaby as a relay. In terms of money yes, this is pretty affordable.

  • I suggest you all try OpenSMTPD if you want a simple mail server for your domain. Postfix is very complicated, and Mailcow runs on Docker. Not everyone likes Docker (I don't). Would it make sense to create a tutorial and post it here?

  • ralfralf Member

    @Samoht999 said:
    I suggest you all try OpenSMTPD if you want a simple mail server for your domain. Postfix is very complicated, and Mailcow runs on Docker. Not everyone likes Docker (I don't). Would it make sense to create a tutorial and post it here?

    No. Setting up a mail server isn't difficult. The difficulties are because other sites don't trust your machine to send them mail, and at that point it's irrelevant what software you're running on it.

    Thanked by 2tentor 225thinker
  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited April 10

    @ralf said:

    @Samoht999 said:
    I suggest you all try OpenSMTPD if you want a simple mail server for your domain. Postfix is very complicated, and Mailcow runs on Docker. Not everyone likes Docker (I don't). Would it make sense to create a tutorial and post it here?

    No. Setting up a mail server isn't difficult. The difficulties are because other sites don't trust your machine to send them mail, and at that point it's irrelevant what software you're running on it.

    Plenty of decent relays for delivery to choose from though.

    We use MailBaby for shared hosting and have been experimenting with some relay options for our mail service, with the caveat that using them will require lower limitations than the comically large limits people here may be used to, but no one really needs hundreds of emails per hour anyway unless they're doing transactional mail or spam. (Neither of which is our focus)

    Current reiteration is relying on MailBaby for that, too, but have enjoyed SMPT2Go and MxRoute as a failback choice for relaying outbound.

  • ralfralf Member

    @MannDude said:
    We use MailBaby

    It's interesting because in my mind, tools like that seemed designed to send spam, so I'd have thought there was a higher likelihood of mail sent through servers that promote bulk mailing to be blocked by recipients... although obviously they're only successful in business if they actually reliably deliver, so I guess it must work enough of the time.

  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited April 10

    @ralf said:

    @MannDude said:
    We use MailBaby

    It's interesting because in my mind, tools like that seemed designed to send spam, so I'd have thought there was a higher likelihood of mail sent through servers that promote bulk mailing to be blocked by recipients... although obviously they're only successful in business if they actually reliably deliver, so I guess it must work enough of the time.

    Unsure. All I know is that in the five years or so of using the service, I can probably count on one hand how many times we've had a ticket where someone was like, "Hi, my emails aren't going to a recipients inbox." and there was at least one or two times where the pre-loaded credit I put on the account was used up and the issue was billing related. (Don't worry, that was years ago, and the account stays topped up pretty well now and I have better email filters in place to make billing alerts like that prioritized for viewing in the flood of general business emails I get day to day)

    I think most providers shared hosting services use mailbaby or similar, it's cheap and works well.

    Thanked by 2skimply153 ralf
  • emperoremperor Member
    edited April 10

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

  • @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • emperoremperor Member
    edited April 10

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort i guess.. something like backup

    Thanked by 3whynotlearn tentor ralf
  • @emperor said:

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort u guess.. something like backup

    Honestly, but then why would people use MXRoute then if they can use mail.baby direclty then?

    I suppose that jar must have had bought the ip addresses but are the costs of ipv4 are able to reap themselves off with MXRoute and still turn a profit.

    And if jar is renting these ips then even then I am unable to understand say very minor operation costs of 75-80$ for the ip themselves each month

    in that much money you can send like 3 million messages monthly, I am not sure if enough messages are sent by MXRoute

    My point is, if the reputation of mailbaby is good enough in such sense that even MXRoute uses it as last resort, then doesnt it make more sense financially to use mailbaby even for someone like MXRoute in some way or am I wrong about anything?

    And does mail.baby have their own mails/ips or what exactly?

  • JosephFJosephF Member
    edited April 10

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort u guess.. something like backup

    Honestly, but then why would people use MXRoute then if they can use mail.baby direclty then?

    I suppose that jar must have had bought the ip addresses but are the costs of ipv4 are able to reap themselves off with MXRoute and still turn a profit.

    And if jar is renting these ips then even then I am unable to understand say very minor operation costs of 75-80$ for the ip themselves each month

    in that much money you can send like 3 million messages monthly, I am not sure if enough messages are sent by MXRoute

    My point is, if the reputation of mailbaby is good enough in such sense that even MXRoute uses it as last resort, then doesnt it make more sense financially to use mailbaby even for someone like MXRoute in some way or am I wrong about anything?

    And does mail.baby have their own mails/ips or what exactly?

    I'm speculating (I don't even know if they use mail.baby) but I would assume it is the other way. First it tries to go through mail.baby. That usually works. But if it doesn't they use their own IPs. Which means if mail.baby works, great. If not, they still get the message through with their own. So it is a level above mail.baby, and will work even if mail.baby doesn't.

    Thanked by 1whynotlearn
  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort u guess.. something like backup

    Honestly, but then why would people use MXRoute then if they can use mail.baby direclty then?

    I suppose that jar must have had bought the ip addresses but are the costs of ipv4 are able to reap themselves off with MXRoute and still turn a profit.

    And if jar is renting these ips then even then I am unable to understand say very minor operation costs of 75-80$ for the ip themselves each month

    Please let me know where we can get a /24 for that price. The cheapest I pay for a lease is 1000EUR per year. ;)

    And I agree with you partly. If you're technically inclined to manage a VPS, keep it secure, don't mind paying for a quality / reputable provider so it stays online most of the time, then you can install your own mailserver and have outbound mail route through MailBaby. Receiving mail is easy. Receiving only the mail you want to receive, in theory, isn't really difficult (Spam filters may need some tweaking)... MailBaby is only $1/mo + $0.20 per 1,000 emails so within reason for normal usage. But in that scenario you're paying for a VPS, and a separate invoice for a relay. You still need to update and patch the server as needed, and in-bound spam protection is going to be "stock" and still need tweaked.

    With MXRoute and other companies, you just sign up, pay one (often small) fee for a crazy amount of resources (Like who the hell is actually using more than like 10GB of email storage? But everyone offers 100GB+...) and that's it. You set up your DNS records and you're good to go. You're sending/receiving mail using your domain and not worrying about things like server maintenance and stuff.

    Just less headache, I guess. The expression, "Different strokes for different folks" comes to mind.

    Thanked by 1whynotlearn
  • @JosephF said: I'm speculating (I don't even know if they use mail.baby) but I would assume it is the other way. First it tries to go through mail.baby. That usually works. But if it doesn't they use their own IPs. Which means if mail.baby works, great. If not, they still get the message through with their own. So it is a level above mail.baby, and will work even if mail.baby doesn't.

    Oh gotcha, so firstly they use mail.baby and then secondly they use their own IP's

    but now it raises me the question to all the people who said MXRoute is one and unique in their price point.

    So if MXRoute themselves are (for the most part) just using mail.baby, from my understanding, there becomes nothing too much special about them.

    I don't understand then to all the people who said that MXRoute is one and only thing at that price point. I mean alternatives shouldn't be so hard to get/create if all MXRoute did (for the most part) was use mail.baby, please feel free to correct me though but that's my current opinion

  • whynotlearnwhynotlearn Member
    edited April 10

    @MannDude said: Please let me know where we can get a /24 for that price. The cheapest I pay for a lease is 1000EUR per year. ;)

    I mean 70-80$*12 = 960$-ish so I suppose that those aren't that far off I suppose, I had searched it on gemini to get a rough figure and it suggested me IPXO. I am sure that you know infinitely more about this space so I can be wrong but still I suppose that the ballpark figure of ip lies around this number

    You are sort of right @MannDude about all of this but man, I always thought that Mail was a very significantly harder problem to solve so this all came to me as a bit of shocker

    Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong but if I were to design infra about something like this, I mean either I would use @onidel / @Hetzner_OL for the servers similar to how MXroute did.

    @MannDude said: (Like who the hell is actually using more than like 10GB of email storage? But everyone offers 100GB+...)

    I suppose that there are ways to optimize for something like this? Like using hourly billing solutions and then scaling up and down the storage as needed.

    I mean, yes, most people wouldn't be interested in doing all of this hassle I suppose I completely agree with you on that, but I had always assumed that this was solving some immensely crazy problem of Mail which requires year to solve. I am a bit surprised to know that MXRoute uses a normal api themselves for the most part.

    It shouldn't be that hard for other people to create an MXRoute competitive alternative. So in that sense, I am a bit surprised to see lack of competition in the area.

    Thanked by 2MannDude onidel
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited April 10

    @MannDude said:

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @whynotlearn said:

    @emperor said:

    @ralf said: must work enough of the time

    even mxroute use them

    wait what? I thought that they had their own IP's?

    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort u guess.. something like backup

    Honestly, but then why would people use MXRoute then if they can use mail.baby direclty then?

    I suppose that jar must have had bought the ip addresses but are the costs of ipv4 are able to reap themselves off with MXRoute and still turn a profit.

    And if jar is renting these ips then even then I am unable to understand say very minor operation costs of 75-80$ for the ip themselves each month

    With MXRoute and other companies, you just sign up, pay one (often small) fee for a crazy amount of resources (Like who the hell is actually using more than like 10GB of email storage? But everyone offers 100GB+...) and that's it. You set up your DNS records and you're good to go. You're sending/receiving mail using your domain and not worrying about things like server maintenance and stuff.

    Basically gen X and correspondence. It's not rare to receive 10..20MB attachments.
    I don't even know how much email is on my old yahoo. When the counter exceed 99999, I stopped looking, wait. Was it 9999?
    Also, some corpos rely on them for communication since the 90s.

    Thanked by 1MannDude
  • JosephFJosephF Member
    edited April 10

    @whynotlearn said:

    @JosephF said: I'm speculating (I don't even know if they use mail.baby) but I would assume it is the other way. First it tries to go through mail.baby. That usually works. But if it doesn't they use their own IPs. Which means if mail.baby works, great. If not, they still get the message through with their own. So it is a level above mail.baby, and will work even if mail.baby doesn't.

    Oh gotcha, so firstly they use mail.baby and then secondly they use their own IP's

    but now it raises me the question to all the people who said MXRoute is one and unique in their price point.

    So if MXRoute themselves are (for the most part) just using mail.baby, from my understanding, there becomes nothing too much special about them.

    I don't understand then to all the people who said that MXRoute is one and only thing at that price point. I mean alternatives shouldn't be so hard to get/create if all MXRoute did (for the most part) was use mail.baby, please feel free to correct me though but that's my current opinion

    But MXRoute is better. Becuase even if mail.baby fails, MXRoute succeeds in delivering the message.

  • @JosephF said: But MXRoute is better. Becuase even if mail.baby fails, MXRoute succeeds in delivering the message.

    True but its not that big of a deal because if mail.baby fails you can try to use other SES perhaps even say Amazon Ses/Scaleway Ses, maybe even a single Namecrane account might handle those off-chance cases xD.

  • JosephFJosephF Member
    edited April 10

    @whynotlearn said:

    @JosephF said: But MXRoute is better. Becuase even if mail.baby fails, MXRoute succeeds in delivering the message.

    True but its not that big of a deal because if mail.baby fails you can try to use other SES perhaps even say Amazon Ses/Scaleway Ses, maybe even a single Namecrane account might handle those off-chance cases xD.

    MXRoute is one all inclusive solution. What you're describing now is a mismash soup of multiple providers you need to manually setup to work with each other.

    Thanked by 1MannDude
  • @JosephF said: MXRoute is one all inclusive solution. What you're describing now is a mismash soup of multiple providers you need to manually setup to work with each other.

    I am saying that creating something like MXRoute itself might feel mismash now but its certainly possible.

    I am not advocating for an average person to do this so much as saying or maybe even realizing out loud that MXRoute alternatives shouldn't be that hard to be created while being price competitive.

    just food for thought I suppose.

  • zedzed Member

    @whynotlearn said:

    @JosephF said: MXRoute is one all inclusive solution. What you're describing now is a mismash soup of multiple providers you need to manually setup to work with each other.

    I am saying that creating something like MXRoute itself might feel mismash now but its certainly possible.

    I am not advocating for an average person to do this so much as saying or maybe even realizing out loud that MXRoute alternatives shouldn't be that hard to be created while being price competitive.

    just food for thought I suppose.

    it's super easy, that's why there's 50 alternatives and none of us paid jar to do it. stop posting for a while man.

    Thanked by 2cxg 225thinker
  • DataRecoveryDataRecovery Member
    edited April 10

    @JosephF said:
    I'm speculating (I don't even know if they use mail.baby) but I would assume it is the other way. First it tries to go through mail.baby. That usually works. But if it doesn't they use their own IPs.

    No, the one below is correct. First option is MXroute's own IPs:

    @emperor said:
    Yes they have, they include it for the last resort i guess.. something like backup

    IIRC, mail.baby (or some similar provider) is the third option to try if the first two were bounced.

    But I also don't remember for sure, was reading that quite some time ago.

    Try sending something to yourself from MXroute to see the originating IP.

    @rpqu said: Basically gen X and correspondence. It's not rare to receive 10..20MB attachments.

    I would say it's gen Z.

    And good if it is actually attachment. I.e. they know what a file is and how to select/attach it.

    More frequently it's an image copy-pasted right in the middle of the text, and good if their "AI-assisted cloud software" doesn't convert a 48 Mpix photo into .PNG

    Also that copy-paste could be a screenshot of a photo opened in "Gallery" or similar app.

  • @DataRecovery said: No, the one below is correct. First option is MXroute's own IPs:

    Okay now, I am a bit confused as to which way it is. I also believe it might be MXRoute's ip's first themselves because if not, then yea it becomes too simple which I don't think to be the case as otherwise yeah more competitors would be there than there currently are (essentially @NameCrane is the only decent one that I know of aside from shared hosting)

    It would be beneficial if someone can clearly tell which way it is.

    @DataRecovery said: I would say it's gen Z.

    As someone gen-z I would say that most of my generation barely uses E-mail and sometimes i have seen it be used for sending files quickly but mostly, sadly I have seen most chats on centralized platforms like whatsapp,instagram, telegram maybe discord etc.

    E-mail is mostly used for either responding back to some professional query or for OTP/verification purposes.

    And oh btw 99.9% (my point being quite significant amount) of people use gmail.

    Thanked by 1mustafamw3
  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @MannDude said:
    Receiving only the mail you want to receive, in theory, isn't really difficult (Spam filters may need some tweaking)...

    I would like to add that this can be very easy solved using aliases and self hosting anonaddy https://github.com/anonaddy/docker. With this setup, email address leak poses little impact and no actual spam filtering is needed - the leaked alias used for a specific breached service could be rotated with a new one, and old being disabled for good. This way, no spam reaches your inbox and no actual filters tweaking needs to be done ;)

  • @whynotlearn said: It would be beneficial if someone can clearly tell which way it is.

    No AI, fully natural intelligence, found 100% manually :)
    https://docs.mxroute.com/docs/general/ip-reputation.html

    Mail.baby is a backup (seemingly) after two attempts with own IPs.

    @whynotlearn said: but mostly, sadly I have seen most chats on centralized platforms like whatsapp,instagram, telegram maybe discord etc.

    Totally correct.

    If you can, at least try moving them to Telegram - the only sane messenger these days.

    If necessary, mention that it's possible to store files there and access them easily from all of your devices.
    Tech-savvy ones can also send files to themselves (and others) with simple cURL request.

    @whynotlearn said: And oh btw 99.9% (my point being quite significant amount) of people use gmail.

    True.

    I know a guy (not a guy actually, he's older than me), whose rather young daughter said she doesn't want a her_first_name@last_name.tld inbox (the guy owns the domain), since "a free email is enough".

    Thanked by 1whynotlearn
  • @DataRecovery said: If you can, at least try moving them to Telegram - the only sane messenger these days.

    I have moved one of my friends to signal. That was enough for me lol, most others cant be convinced so much but yeah, I personally prefer signal/matrix > Telegram > whatsapp.

    @DataRecovery said: I know a guy (not a guy actually, he's older than me), whose rather young daughter said she doesn't want a her_first_name@last_name.tld inbox (the guy owns the domain), since "a free email is enough".

    :heartbreak:

Sign In or Register to comment.