New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
$1100-1200 for 64 GB here.
Discounted price lists generally hover with a 10-20% ( well 20% off not on RAM for sure, or nvme or drives
) , sincerely, it makes 0 difference at that price point.
Also, those are Consumer Products, just look at the ENTP line, fuck me
.
Ordering hardware is kinda out of the option for a Provider, as we do have to pile up spare parts, well, that would be the sane thing to do.
For individuals, yes, I would not upgrade my system yet.
And since the price is this high on some parts/SKU, I prefer the 24-48 Mo warranty if I pay it's weight in gold.
EDIT:
And now for the daily meme:
Hmmmmmmm..............
~ 17.19 / GB
so 4.18 TB would be ~72K USD......
Linear pricing says 4.18 TB RAM ≈ $72k.
I see no flaws in this logic.

Anyone buying?
don't you dare sell RAM my business critical systems are using, i warn
unless...
we get to share the profit? we pretend service never happened, i take 200% refund, you take the rest of the profits...?
we meet again later, during the warmer part of this year, somewhere in the carribean, drinking pina colada, relaxing while looking at scantily clad females...
sound like a plan! where do i sign?
Let's assume you unload 2TB DDR5 ram. $36K. Then, you buy used E5-v2server for $500 (~256GB) + 5*1 TB nvme @ $200. So, 24 server.
Edit:
So, @host_c .How good is my calculation?
Deal
Let me put the lawyer department on the paperwork, might take a bit
E5-V2, lol, and here I am trying to wipe out the E5-V4 we still have.

OK, fellas, nice, now, let's get back to actual work.
PS: YESS, fully agreed on the Warmer part of that equation.
I assumed ramflation will last longer than 24 months.
Ha, Lewis@VeloxMedia .co.uk lore
Not to interrupt whatever the fuck you're talking about but since this thread was about Deluxhost, is it ok if I ask: do you think Delux will use the word recurring again after this episode?
No more De-lux now.
recurring**subject to change based on availability, opex, capex, geopolitics, economic warfare, force majeure (flood, riots, earthquake, nuclear warfare, wildfire, pandemic, etc)Even if they use it, I doubt they will get any sympathy or interest from regulars on LET. But MJJs will still buy it, and complain (check Delux thread)
Someone mentioned in another thread that recurring isn't a lifetime guarantee, and that's absolutely true and fair but if it doesn't happen at least once how is it recurring?
Does that equal scam?
Except of opex and capex sounds like force majeure examples
Haha, I could always count on you for rebuttal.This is going to change consumer behavior for sure.
At first it's the price increase when renewing service. Next, perhaps some host may demand price increase for the remaining contract or just sunset their business. Inevitably, this is going to erode trust over the feasibility of triennial, even the annual plan, as hosts could no longer absorb opex capex increase.
While skhron's profitability is based on traditional model, that's high customer retention. Many of the host use the prepaid payment to fund more hardware acquisition. Let's say yours is 20-30% times three (assuming 3 years life cycle), their's is 9% times three times how many time they could roll over the triennial plan. So, their cycle will grind to halt.
All things considered, I think customer will prefer monthly billing when there is a good chance their host may demand extra payment for the remaining period of contract.
i agree with you. first it was VeloxMedia, now DeluxHost and this scams will get more broader in coming months esp from hosts which are new and have sold triennail/annual plans specially made for LET users.
Lewis's VeloxMedia is exit scam because he flee. Deluxhost business model is similar, but they hadn't abandoned their customer, so it's not a scam, yet.
Customer did agreed upon the term which allow the hosts to modify the TnC. Unilateral decision without offering remedies (refund) is unfair business practice at best, scam at worst.
They're offering compensation bonus
So many words in this email, you could spend a few more to clarify whether it's a 1-year addon or recurring.
Sharing yet more resources on already oversold nodes. What could possibly go wrong....
That's decent at least. Doesn't change the misuse of "recurring" imo but opinions and assholes etc.
I bought this promo vps for that price, i dont want to have a compencation option. I just want to have the same price. Hope that delux would just close their business
Don't know which plan you have, but you also have the option of one euro off the new price; that will also make the price difference less.
Am I happy with the higher prices? No. I still think that recurring should basically be recurring - not raising prices at the first moment you can. On the other hand it's good that they do something to prove that they listen.
Most importantly: your last part is just an a-social expression. "If I can't have what I want, I want all the other customers to suffer". You still have an option: don't renew.
I think delux sweetened the pill a bit. I hope they will get their act together cause they genuinely look like nice guys trying their best. But their buisness model was like a ponsi scheme. Overselling at bf prices all year long, hopping for plenty of idlers, and puttings the money on new unsuitable servers, without any proper precautions for abuse. They got about 2000 new customers from their let offers in two years time, half of them sending tickets every other day. With the new hardware prices they cant expand any more and they have to deal with the shit they got themselves in. So they started cutting corners (network downgrade) and raising prices on servers.
Not a very optimistic situation since the customers who actually wanted to use their servers realized that these where only sold for a very light use (see idling) and people who just wanted a cheap vps now watch these getting not that cheap. Their storage servers that have a monthly billing cycle are still available as people realise that 98% iowait is only good for a storage box and give up.
Anyhow, i'm curious to see where all this goes from here.
edit.
ps. I do have a couple of servers with them that I am planning to renew when time (hopefully) comes. I also have a couple that I won't.
I don't like the price increase after first cycle but this extra upgrade did make me feel a bit better. The IOWAIT is a problem though, I'm hoping the upcoming change from SSD to NVMe will help that.
Disappointed even further, the "compensatory bonus" is not applicable if you received a bonus from their LET threads. Why bother to send the compensation bonus email @DeluxHost to customers who aren't eligible?
I was going to renew based on the previous email, but this makes my choice simpler.
the "compensatory bonus" is not applicable if you received a bonus from their LET threads.
>
>
You simply can't get the same bonus. You have to get a different one which isn't bad since you can always have the €1 discount. We do critisize them but lets make it fair.
exactly this is where deluxhost's calculations went wrong. Not only deluxhost but many other new hosts who tried to oversell during black friday deals later found those unsustainable in long-run. Then the best choice they had is to increase prices when they already advertised a particular offer as recurring. Now I understand if a reputable and old host adds $2/yr to their plan citing hike in RAM/hardware and other costs IF they've sold like legit vps have 1CPU, 1GB RAM, 20GB SSD, for $15 or $20 a year. But new hosts selling vps at dirt-cheap pricing and throwing away huge resources in that asking for a price increase just after the BF deals gets over (and chargeback period comes to an end) and start cutting corners and raising prices on server just sounds simply as scam. Not a big scam but still it is.
I listed the other bonuses in preference order as offered and support closed the ticket with response:
They also silently deleted my other compensation tickets for my other VPSs.
That's not correct according to their own rules they stated; same bonus should be same bonus and not "a" bonus. @DeluxHost - explain?
DelooksHost = makes an offer, then delooks for more for same.