Velox media under new management

VeloxMedia · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:
Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

30 days not immediately. You even stated it here. Please cite where it says immediately.

The text states:

"The personal data should be adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary for the purposes for which they are processed. This requires, in particular, ensuring that the period for which the personal data are stored is limited to a strict minimum."

Also please show me a single case where someone has data stored and wants it deleted and we haven't. We keep requesting for this info.

The onus is not on us to request you to delete it.

You have obtained the PII without a legal business reason to have it, and you have not obtained our consent to use or store it. You are required by law to delete it.

Pop a ticket with your account info and we'll delete it asap. We need to know which are EU/UK customers and GDPR required

You have to request consent, it is illegal to assume consent without notifying the data subject.

Sorry, but you have no legal option other than e-mail all customers acquired from Lewis informing them of the situation.

You could try e-mailing only the ones you know to be EU/UK citizens, but if you make a mistake and miss any, then you will still be violating the law. It's safest to e-mail everybody.

How's that e-mail going by the way, you said it'd only take you 10 minutes. Wasn't that over 24 hours ago now?

So 30 days is perfectly fine. No where immediately see how you keep adding things that aren't true?

Again we've already started the process of deleting the data, lots more deleting to come so no worries there.

No need to make any announcements or anything even right?

Wrong.

please explain

VeloxMedia · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@forest said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:
Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

30 days not immediately. You even stated it here. Please cite where it says immediately.

The text states:

"The personal data should be adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary for the purposes for which they are processed. This requires, in particular, ensuring that the period for which the personal data are stored is limited to a strict minimum."

Also please show me a single case where someone has data stored and wants it deleted and we haven't. We keep requesting for this info.

The onus is not on us to request you to delete it.

You have obtained the PII without a legal business reason to have it, and you have not obtained our consent to use or store it. You are required by law to delete it.

Pop a ticket with your account info and we'll delete it asap. We need to know which are EU/UK customers and GDPR required

You have to request consent, it is illegal to assume consent without notifying the data subject.

Sorry, but you have no legal option other than e-mail all customers acquired from Lewis informing them of the situation.

You could try e-mailing only the ones you know to be EU/UK citizens, but if you make a mistake and miss any, then you will still be violating the law. It's safest to e-mail everybody.

How's that e-mail going by the way, you said it'd only take you 10 minutes. Wasn't that over 24 hours ago now?

So 30 days is perfectly fine. No where immediately see how you keep adding things that aren't true?

Again we've already started the process of deleting the data, lots more deleting to come so no worries there.

No need to make any announcements or anything even right?

Come on man, please. Step back. Arguing here will only make things worse. I still want you to succeed, but you have to stop falling back into this or the drama will just get worse.

Worse? This is entertaining. Well delete all these accounts and start fresh. Solve everyone's problems.

Thats gonna be fun to watch!

Agree! Just sent first batch of notices to accounts

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@AlteredParadox said:

@x0x0x said:

@AlteredParadox said:
but i thought his LET account was in the hands of andrew from legal!?!

Andrew from legal department, Eric from illegal department. They work hand in hand.

Didn't we have the FBI at somepoint too!?

Yeah, IIRC they recommended Eric extort customers for $2500/m each to keep using their $4/y server, or something like that. I don't think anybody wanted to do that and so the FBI lost interest.

The DC ended up paying it. Instead of us absorbing the costs we're moving services off them and onto our own DC.

It's another case where LET just caused pain for the DC and themselves as now they're stuck with a high bill and losing us as a client, and we're moving most of our services from them to our hardware. Forcing users to change locations.

What dc?

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
If their service is active and they chargeback without popping a ticket telling us then yes it's marked as fraud. If they tell us then no. If we terminate the account then no.

Idk why this is so complicated I've already explained this. The system checks for active service and if there's a chargeback it'll terminate the service then file a fraud. If we terminate the service then it's not active...

You keep asking the same questions then get upset I don't keep answering them. Then complain you don't have time. You're not very good at time management. No wonder why you charge so little and still don't have time to deal with actual problems

No, that's all good. Thanks for confirming that is still your policy.

@VeloxMedia
Can you please answer these last 2 questions? You skipped a page past them, so I presume you must have overlooked them.

Can you confirm again whether you believe these people filing chargebacks are or are not your customers?

Final question, one that I haven't asked before...
If you terminate the service of someone who bought one of these deals and hasn't read this thread or discord, and then they chargeback because the service was terminated without any notifications, do you believe that to be fraud as well?

You're too busy remember.

Why would someones service be terminated without notification? Even when we terminate or suspends them it notifies them.

Notification in advance my man... You do send it but the email timing is off...

As for notification.... New dump incoming.

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@jsg said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@Wise said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@x0x0x said:

@AlteredParadox said:
but i thought his LET account was in the hands of andrew from legal!?!

Andrew from legal department, Eric from illegal department. They work hand in hand.

Andrew and everyone else has constantly said shut everything down and yo> @Mainfrezzer said:

@VeloxMedia said:

If their service is active and they chargeback without popping a ticket telling us then yes it's marked as fraud. If they tell us then no. If we terminate the account then no.

Idk why this is so complicated I've already explained this. The system checks for active service and if there's a chargeback it'll terminate the service then file a fraud. If we terminate the service then it's not active...

How can they have an account with you if you didnt take over the company as you stated here?

@VeloxMedia said:
We didn't buy a company, lewis still has the "company" and all the obligations. Just because I have a name doesn't mean I have a company or the liabilities.

How can you terminate a service for someone that you state yourself is not a customer to "your" company, that seems clearly impossible.

@VeloxMedia said:

We would but our provider tag is still suspended for zero reason. As such we have zero intention of providing any sales or supporting this site in any way. We'll be having massive promotions on other sites soon.

What do you mean with "our provider tag"? This isnt "your" account.

Its almost like..........

Please read the past 100 pages. This has been repeated at least 100 times

Might want to change your signature as you are not “uk based “

No need we don't sell here

Why you're still promoting on your signature?

He can put in his sig whatever he damn pleases as long as it's not illegal or against LET's rules.
And he certainly doesn't need to justify his sig to you!

It is like not... Totally legal?

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@tfgp99 said:

@VeloxMedia said: we're compliant

You? Compliant? Where? Evidences here.

Check the ICO website. We even posted the link on here to make it easier.

You are so compliant that the name of Lewis is still there! Don't even try lying to us.

Is that public or

Yes it is.

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
Gotcha, I'll stick with my team of attorneys with law degrees who specialize in GDPR.

OK, good luck with that.

Yupp. So on to @Saragoldfarb why won't you look into that?

I have real work to do during the day, and my spare time is already spoken for with another time sensitive task.

Guess you don't actually care about GDPR and people's rights. Just the double standard.

I do very much care about GDPR. However, I only have so much time, and it's already set aside for gathering all the evidence against you into a suitable format to be handed over to ICO at the appropriate time.

I haven't seen the thing you claim Sara has done, so I have no opinion on whether it is infringing or not. However, from what you said earlier, and knowing that you are a US citizen, it's unlikely the GDPR will be relevant.

The hypocrisy

Yes, you are rather good at it, aren't you?

You haven't seen the multiple posts from him with the discord dumps? Including every image with PII from a private server?

Also the fact he stated it's his company server that he has attorney on retainer

Links please.

Never gonna happen. He know it's hosted at VeloxSomething.... My exact words.

Why are you hiding it now?

Hiding? I'm not...

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@tfgp99 said:

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

So much legal implications with this statement....

And I paid with cryptocurrency.

May i ask you, and don't get me wrong, that's why you still support this provider? that you can't even ask for a chargeback?
I believe everyone here wanted what was best for him and the business, but his attitude led everyone to start complaining. He is still lying for costumers, we cannot see any transparency in here.

@forest ... What's the money you'd be out of when this thing collapses?

schrauger · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@AlteredParadox said:
whoever made the saragoldfarb sticker wins the internet today

What? Sticker? Where?

I'm almost caught up from page ~50, where I left for a couple days.

I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

Also, here's a message saying Velox is cancelling all LET services.

Apologies if the information is out of date. Apparently things are still in flux, which as we all know is one characteristic everyone hopes for in a service provider.

forest · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

So much legal implications with this statement....

And I paid with cryptocurrency.

May i ask you, and don't get me wrong, that's why you still support this provider? that you can't even ask for a chargeback?
I believe everyone here wanted what was best for him and the business, but his attitude led everyone to start complaining. He is still lying for costumers, we cannot see any transparency in here.

@forest ... What's the money you'd be out of when this thing collapses?

Not too much (and my costs are spread around ~35 VPSes at the moment). It's around $50 I think, but I'm also on a tight budget and every dollar counts. So all I can hope for is that Eric does the right thing and isn't gullible enough to fall for the taunts.

tfgp99 · January 9

@schrauger said: I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

That was after she was timed out.
Only @VeloxMedia can tell us who added it.
I can confirm the sticker is still there.

ralf · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
If their service is active and they chargeback without popping a ticket telling us then yes it's marked as fraud. If they tell us then no. If we terminate the account then no.

Idk why this is so complicated I've already explained this. The system checks for active service and if there's a chargeback it'll terminate the service then file a fraud. If we terminate the service then it's not active...

You keep asking the same questions then get upset I don't keep answering them. Then complain you don't have time. You're not very good at time management. No wonder why you charge so little and still don't have time to deal with actual problems

No, that's all good. Thanks for confirming that is still your policy.

@VeloxMedia
Can you please answer these last 2 questions? You skipped a page past them, so I presume you must have overlooked them.

Can you confirm again whether you believe these people filing chargebacks are or are not your customers?

Final question, one that I haven't asked before...
If you terminate the service of someone who bought one of these deals and hasn't read this thread or discord, and then they chargeback because the service was terminated without any notifications, do you believe that to be fraud as well?

You're too busy remember.

Yes, I'm about to finish up for the day, so it'd be nice to know these answers before I go.

The people filing these chargebacks for the LET deals - are they your customers? I believe you previously said you don't consider them to be.

Why would someones service be terminated without notification? Even when we terminate or suspends them it notifies them.

OK, so you're going to send them an e-mail confirming that the service is being terminated. That's good news, at least they will know what's happening. When that happens, and they file a chargeback, do you plan to report them all as fraud?

How many times do I have to keep explaining the same thing over again?

Just once. You haven't ever answered the second question. This is the third time now that I've asked it, but you still haven't answered it. It's quite a simple question:

When you cancel the services of the customers that joined under Lewis, and they file a chargeback, do you plan to report them all as fraud?

I keep explaining the process. you just don't understand it. Why is it so hard for you to understand. Re-read the 110 pages for your answers you seek

You have never answered this question because I have never asked it before (although this is the fourth time now you have failed to answer it). There are no answers to be found in previous pages.

Previously you have said you have marked everybody as fraud if they did a chargeback but hadn't informed you.

If want to know what happens after you cancel all of the LET users who bought while Lewis was selling, and who you don't consider customers. When you cancel their services, a significant number will probably chargeback due to the cancelled contract with Lewis. Do you plan to flag all of those chargebacks as fraud.

A simple yes or no is sufficient.

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@tfgp99 said:

Absolutely!

Just opened a bottle. Finally finished work.

Sharing is caring It might cure my tiredness from the day and my headache.

I hope it will. Been a long week. Lots of work, snow was beautiful but a bitch to travel... Will be enjoying the weekend

tfgp99 · January 9

I've seen someone that messaged that sticker, it wasn't Sara and i totally can confirm it, if she was timed out. After all, the same person who messaged it, it will be the same person who have added it, right? (I didn't even realized that a sticker was added).

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

Just for clarification, are you still automatically marking every chargeback as fraud?

Because if you're doing that after specifically informing users that you are cancelling their service and requesting users to chargeback, then you will be acting fraudulently yourself.

I imagine Stripe will have an opinion on that which might affect your credibility with them.

He using an alt account with payment processor.

You can't use an alt account with payment processors.... you need legal tax id information

Sure thing.

dedicados · January 9

congratulations, you give him good ideas:

_As of December 21, 2025, Velox Media Inc. has assumed management of the resources previously provided by Lewis. Please note that your existing agreement is with Lewis and not with our organization; therefore, we are unable to honor that agreement moving forward.

Your account is scheduled to expire on January 15, 2026. You may choose to renew your services at a rate of $4 per month. If you do not renew by this date, your data will be permanently deleted.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. As we do not own or have access to the financial infrastructure prior to December 21, 2025, we recommend contacting your bank to request a refund for any payments made before that date. Please be assured that any services purchased after December 21, 2025 will continue to function as expected.

Velox Media Inc. is a newly established corporation dedicated to delivering exceptional service and support. We greatly appreciate your understanding and cooperation during this transition.

Eric Banks
Velox Media inc.
301 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219_

dedicados · January 9

@VeloxMedia said: Agree! Just sent first batch of notices to accounts

fuck you.

emperor · January 9

@dedicados said: congratulations, you give him good ideas:

Dont tell me you didn't knew this was coming.. He just needed justification so he wont be the bad guy here.. Renewals are coming for the servers and they are dry.. Hence the drama all this days..

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:
Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

30 days not immediately. You even stated it here. Please cite where it says immediately.

The text states:

"The personal data should be adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary for the purposes for which they are processed. This requires, in particular, ensuring that the period for which the personal data are stored is limited to a strict minimum."

Also please show me a single case where someone has data stored and wants it deleted and we haven't. We keep requesting for this info.

The onus is not on us to request you to delete it.

You have obtained the PII without a legal business reason to have it, and you have not obtained our consent to use or store it. You are required by law to delete it.

Pop a ticket with your account info and we'll delete it asap. We need to know which are EU/UK customers and GDPR required

You have to request consent, it is illegal to assume consent without notifying the data subject.

Sorry, but you have no legal option other than e-mail all customers acquired from Lewis informing them of the situation.

You could try e-mailing only the ones you know to be EU/UK citizens, but if you make a mistake and miss any, then you will still be violating the law. It's safest to e-mail everybody.

How's that e-mail going by the way, you said it'd only take you 10 minutes. Wasn't that over 24 hours ago now?

So 30 days is perfectly fine. No where immediately see how you keep adding things that aren't true?

Again we've already started the process of deleting the data, lots more deleting to come so no worries there.

No need to make any announcements or anything even right?

Wrong.

please explain

Ask your legal team why. I don't work for free, especially not for people who have stolen our money.

forest · January 9

@dedicados said:
congratulations, you give him good ideas:

_As of December 21, 2025, Velox Media Inc. has assumed management of the resources previously provided by Lewis. Please note that your existing agreement is with Lewis and not with our organization; therefore, we are unable to honor that agreement moving forward.

Your account is scheduled to expire on January 15, 2026. You may choose to renew your services at a rate of $4 per month. If you do not renew by this date, your data will be permanently deleted.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. As we do not own or have access to the financial infrastructure prior to December 21, 2025, we recommend contacting your bank to request a refund for any payments made before that date. Please be assured that any services purchased after December 21, 2025 will continue to function as expected.

Velox Media Inc. is a newly established corporation dedicated to delivering exceptional service and support. We greatly appreciate your understanding and cooperation during this transition.

Eric Banks
Velox Media inc.
301 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219_

People here have been goading him into deleting everyone's data for days, and he finally fell for it. At this point, even when the community was the one wronged in the beginning, I'm not sure who I'm more angry at.

tfgp99 · January 9

@dedicados said:
congratulations, you give him good ideas:

_As of December 21, 2025, Velox Media Inc. has assumed management of the resources previously provided by Lewis. Please note that your existing agreement is with Lewis and not with our organization; therefore, we are unable to honor that agreement moving forward.

Your account is scheduled to expire on January 15, 2026. You may choose to renew your services at a rate of $4 per month. If you do not renew by this date, your data will be permanently deleted.

We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. As we do not own or have access to the financial infrastructure prior to December 21, 2025, we recommend contacting your bank to request a refund for any payments made before that date. Please be assured that any services purchased after December 21, 2025 will continue to function as expected.

Velox Media Inc. is a newly established corporation dedicated to delivering exceptional service and support. We greatly appreciate your understanding and cooperation during this transition.

Eric Banks
Velox Media inc.
301 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219_

He knows how to send emails? Im surprised!

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@VeloxMedia said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@forest said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:
Under the GDPR, any PII data concerning EU/UK citizens can only be held for justifiable business reasons established in the law and with the consent of the data subject. Any PII data needs to be deleted as soon as possible, and at a maximum of 30 days after that business use has ended.

Eric has stated multiple times that anyone who bought a server from Veloxmedia before he took over is not his customer. If this is true, he has no justifiable business reason to hold that data and it must be deleted immediately.

Eric's insistence that we are not his customers is exactly the reason he must delete our data.

30 days not immediately. You even stated it here. Please cite where it says immediately.

The text states:

"The personal data should be adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary for the purposes for which they are processed. This requires, in particular, ensuring that the period for which the personal data are stored is limited to a strict minimum."

Also please show me a single case where someone has data stored and wants it deleted and we haven't. We keep requesting for this info.

The onus is not on us to request you to delete it.

You have obtained the PII without a legal business reason to have it, and you have not obtained our consent to use or store it. You are required by law to delete it.

Pop a ticket with your account info and we'll delete it asap. We need to know which are EU/UK customers and GDPR required

You have to request consent, it is illegal to assume consent without notifying the data subject.

Sorry, but you have no legal option other than e-mail all customers acquired from Lewis informing them of the situation.

You could try e-mailing only the ones you know to be EU/UK citizens, but if you make a mistake and miss any, then you will still be violating the law. It's safest to e-mail everybody.

How's that e-mail going by the way, you said it'd only take you 10 minutes. Wasn't that over 24 hours ago now?

So 30 days is perfectly fine. No where immediately see how you keep adding things that aren't true?

Again we've already started the process of deleting the data, lots more deleting to come so no worries there.

No need to make any announcements or anything even right?

Come on man, please. Step back. Arguing here will only make things worse. I still want you to succeed, but you have to stop falling back into this or the drama will just get worse.

Worse? This is entertaining. Well delete all these accounts and start fresh. Solve everyone's problems.

Thats gonna be fun to watch!

Agree! Just sent first batch of notices to accounts

Didn't get one.

VeloxMedia · January 9

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@ralf said:

@ralf said:

@VeloxMedia said:
If their service is active and they chargeback without popping a ticket telling us then yes it's marked as fraud. If they tell us then no. If we terminate the account then no.

Idk why this is so complicated I've already explained this. The system checks for active service and if there's a chargeback it'll terminate the service then file a fraud. If we terminate the service then it's not active...

You keep asking the same questions then get upset I don't keep answering them. Then complain you don't have time. You're not very good at time management. No wonder why you charge so little and still don't have time to deal with actual problems

No, that's all good. Thanks for confirming that is still your policy.

@VeloxMedia
Can you please answer these last 2 questions? You skipped a page past them, so I presume you must have overlooked them.

Can you confirm again whether you believe these people filing chargebacks are or are not your customers?

Final question, one that I haven't asked before...
If you terminate the service of someone who bought one of these deals and hasn't read this thread or discord, and then they chargeback because the service was terminated without any notifications, do you believe that to be fraud as well?

You're too busy remember.

Yes, I'm about to finish up for the day, so it'd be nice to know these answers before I go.

The people filing these chargebacks for the LET deals - are they your customers? I believe you previously said you don't consider them to be.

Why would someones service be terminated without notification? Even when we terminate or suspends them it notifies them.

OK, so you're going to send them an e-mail confirming that the service is being terminated. That's good news, at least they will know what's happening. When that happens, and they file a chargeback, do you plan to report them all as fraud?

How many times do I have to keep explaining the same thing over again?

Just once. You haven't ever answered the second question. This is the third time now that I've asked it, but you still haven't answered it. It's quite a simple question:

When you cancel the services of the customers that joined under Lewis, and they file a chargeback, do you plan to report them all as fraud?

I keep explaining the process. you just don't understand it. Why is it so hard for you to understand. Re-read the 110 pages for your answers you seek

You have never answered this question because I have never asked it before (although this is the fourth time now you have failed to answer it). There are no answers to be found in previous pages.

Previously you have said you have marked everybody as fraud if they did a chargeback but hadn't informed you.

If want to know what happens after you cancel all of the LET users who bought while Lewis was selling, and who you don't consider customers. When you cancel their services, a significant number will probably chargeback due to the cancelled contract with Lewis. Do you plan to flag all of those chargebacks as fraud.

A simple yes or no is sufficient.

I've explained in great detail how the process works on how we are noticed if a chargeback occurs and if it's marked fraud or not. Done this multiple times.

You keep asking the same questions in different ways that are all explained by the simple process. So if you're confused please review all 110 pages and pull all my info I've already given then compile it, because it's in there multiple times.

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@schrauger said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@AlteredParadox said:
whoever made the saragoldfarb sticker wins the internet today

What? Sticker? Where?

I'm almost caught up from page ~50, where I left for a couple days.

I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

Also, here's a message saying Velox is cancelling all LET services.

Apologies if the information is out of date. Apparently things are still in flux, which as we all know is one characteristic everyone hopes for in a service provider.

Good thing I was wearing one of my bestest outfits!

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

So much legal implications with this statement....

And I paid with cryptocurrency.

May i ask you, and don't get me wrong, that's why you still support this provider? that you can't even ask for a chargeback?
I believe everyone here wanted what was best for him and the business, but his attitude led everyone to start complaining. He is still lying for costumers, we cannot see any transparency in here.

@forest ... What's the money you'd be out of when this thing collapses?

Not too much (and my costs are spread around ~35 VPSes at the moment). It's around $50 I think, but I'm also on a tight budget and every dollar counts. So all I can hope for is that Eric does the right thing and isn't gullible enough to fall for the taunts.

Alright, I feel you. That's serious money for some people.

Saragoldfarb · January 9

@tfgp99 said:

@schrauger said: I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

That was after she was timed out.
Only @VeloxMedia can tell us who added it.
I can confirm the sticker is still there.

So now he's hosting my intellectual property?

deafcon · January 9

If any of you pay this dude again, I'm not going to feel sorry.

tfgp99 · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@schrauger said: I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

That was after she was timed out.
Only @VeloxMedia can tell us who added it.
I can confirm the sticker is still there.

So now he's hosting my intellectual property?

yes

forest · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@forest said:

@Saragoldfarb said:

@VeloxMedia said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@225thinker said:

@VeloxMedia said:

You have 100x more of a case in suing LET because they facilitated the transaction by approving Lewis as a provider.

Now he's trying to divert focus to LET ownership/management itself. Sounds like he is now trying to invite a ban at this stage of the failing scam.

If LET does that, hopefully they will also ban all the associated logins that have been used in this scam/attempted additional scam as well. (A little log review will clearly reveal their interconnection -- common VPNs and maybe even some more telling slip-ups in the heat of the moment.)

The only character he won't truly focus his venom on is "Lewis" for some reason. You know, the guy who became exhausted from collecting all the money from those Tom Harper-pimped BF pre-paid annual deals before he even paid his January monthly server renewals.

A Gold Star for the first person to correctly figure out why that is.

A little while ago when it was "Andrew" that posted on the VeloxMedia account. I asked @DP an extremely simple question. Was the geo location different vs the one supposedly behind the "Eric" personality. Didn't get an answer.

I think this has been an exercise in data mining, coercion (remember the 1000 bucks to fix a ddos issue?), high effort trolling and outright attempting to rug pull once it's a little too late. Along with the emotional powered threats of culling everyone who came from LET (because the majority called it out and we're not happy with the unprofessional behavior).

I still think for the betterment of everyone. A ban should happen now, triggering the culling so everyone capable can do charge backs/disputes now rather than later. Anyone who paid in crypto is obviously shit out of luck. Of course this thread would explode with activity and then people can start raising complaints with the relevant bodies as the evidence is all in this wonderful 100 plus large thread.

People should chargeback. We're terminating LET orders

So much legal implications with this statement....

And I paid with cryptocurrency.

May i ask you, and don't get me wrong, that's why you still support this provider? that you can't even ask for a chargeback?
I believe everyone here wanted what was best for him and the business, but his attitude led everyone to start complaining. He is still lying for costumers, we cannot see any transparency in here.

@forest ... What's the money you'd be out of when this thing collapses?

Not too much (and my costs are spread around ~35 VPSes at the moment). It's around $50 I think, but I'm also on a tight budget and every dollar counts. So all I can hope for is that Eric does the right thing and isn't gullible enough to fall for the taunts.

Alright, I feel you. That's serious money for some people.

The thing is, I still want him to succeed. I'm even happy to purchase upgrades since the service itself is really nice. I want this to go well, and I want him to do the right thing.

forest · January 9

@Saragoldfarb said:

@tfgp99 said:

@schrauger said: I'm still in the discord, so here's a screenshot for you :-)

That was after she was timed out.
Only @VeloxMedia can tell us who added it.
I can confirm the sticker is still there.

So now he's hosting my intellectual property?

I imagine Discord has a ToS that states that anything you upload to them becomes their intellectual property.

tfgp99 · January 9

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Velox media under new management

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Velox media under new management

Comments