New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
I did indeed. Thanks, I'll hopefully have some time over Christmas to look into it some more.
I almost shat my pants.
I think the leaders normally end up arrested for child abuse though
Yah, since we are on that topic and you did mention about voice cloning efficiency, let me tell you both index and F5 are great at it. They can even clone your voice with almost 100% accuracy with just a 12 second audio clip. But, to have better, you need to have atleast 1 hour dataset ready
Yah, now that I think of it, it's a common theme with succ societies. They either get caught embezzling funds or turn out to be mega perverts into all things unimaginable
The further north you are the larger the seasonal difference in sunset and sunrise times.
What happens if we're not ready and he falls?
Also, while we are at it, also check the preferred duration of dataset audio per sentence of the model you choose. I wasted days training with long duration audio when some models specifically need every audio clip to be specific duration range.
Yah, learned that in geography. Iirc, more land in north being a factor as well I guess.
Make sure you set a Bas drop alarm. That way you can never miss. If you still miss him, you can always chase him on your mountain bike
No, that'd be
Sdrauger for that diagram. It's trippy
Hello,I would like to double the bandwidth.
Invoice #5204581223
Thanks!
That's the thing. The king has to side with the current government, even though his view is frequently different. Actually Charles was always been pretty good for decades before he became king championing various social action concerns.
The interesting situation is that he has the power to put on the emergency brakes to stop the government changing the status quo. So if governments keep on doing normal things, there's no issue, he just keeps saying yes to everything, even if he personally disagrees with it - because it'll have been debated by both the house of commons and house of lords, and generally laws are reasonable if they survive both. Not always, but usually. For something completely radical that changes fundamental law to pass, it'd have been debated a lot by both current politicians and the lords (effectively retired politicians who tend to resist change), and so whether you personally agree with it or not, it's probably a good compromise of all viewpoints.
If the king ever did step in to veto something, it'd effectively be saying that he doesn't trust that whole process, and generally people think it'd lead to chaos, but certainly making a stark question of who SHOULD have the ultimate power - the king or the government - and so that would either lead to the monarchy being removed, or it'd lead to the government being replaced and another general election is called. Because the stakes for the monarch are so high, I think it's useful to keep this emergency brake, because it's not going to get used unless there's a serious problem with the government that can't just be dealt with in the normal way. That's why I gave Trump's executive proclamations as an example. That just wouldn't be tolerated in the UK, except under very narrow circumstances such as wartime and needing to make an immediate decision. Even though, those decisions would be scrutinised and heavily debated afterwards, and if they were bad could lead to a vote of no confidence, which triggers a general election if the threshold is passed.
Hello,I would like to double the bandwidth.
Invoice #19766103
Thanks!
Got it. Yes, looking at it from that angle, that definitely is a good safety to have incase of some volatile government taking charge. And yes, it also depends on the king or the royal family's stance at the time. So I guess, I am just asking if giving such a veto power (provided I understand that this will be used only in the case of an extreme emergency in an ideal situation) to monarchy, who are there only because of their birth into a royal family is the correct approach. I mean they aren't voted in or anything.
But, I definitely understand what you are saying though. Since the royal family has a huge stake in keeping UK and it's government stable, they won't do anything detrimental.
Let them feel FEAR!
Chess rules!
You should have some preventative chicken soup if you like the soup
I hope that wasn't Santa's elf that just did that.
Wrath of the god of rats.
Reguards rules
That's definitely a good idea. Let me see if I can whip up some
The one that was following sara all night yesterday?
Tough on crime, I like it.
Here we sometimes crush expensive cars that are driving around but haven't been taxed. Good to have one rule and apply it consistently even if it occasionally produces results that seem undesired.
I wouldn't advise eating your electronics. Silicon chips aren't real chips.
Stop eating electronics. Salt is for food.
Okay ralf, I am gonna take a w> @ralf said:
Oh it's there in UK as well? I saw some other country where the LEA just crush cars used by drug smugglers and ganglords that were either used to smuggle drugs internationally or were smuggled themselves internationally. Definitely a pain to watch
I don't even trust myself.
Are you sure. My friend tried silica gel that come switch laptops and such. Haven't seen him since then. Wonder what happened !