Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!

BharatB · July 2025

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:

@Andreix said:
So, it's SOUNDARYA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED or Readydedis, LLC who develops and maintain the product?

Both are my entities, SIPL is Indian RD is American

So, let me rephrase:
Who is legally responsible in case of a serious data breach or catastrophic security issues? The indian company or the american one?

The Indian one

Levi · July 2025

India? Now, all is clear… Why in India software development is so difficult? I mean do you have any automated testing? Regression testing for future releases? Or just go live and fck it?

Andreix · July 2025

@BharatB said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:

@Andreix said:
So, it's SOUNDARYA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED or Readydedis, LLC who develops and maintain the product?

Both are my entities, SIPL is Indian RD is American

So, let me rephrase:
Who is legally responsible in case of a serious data breach or catastrophic security issues? The indian company or the american one?

The Indian one

So, where does it say it on the product website? Do people have to guess that your indian entity is responsible for thier and thier client's data?

https://i.imgur.com/ccMYrvr.png

BharatB · July 2025

RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Andreix · July 2025

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

nohavps · July 2025

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Andreix · July 2025

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

nohavps · July 2025

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Andreix · July 2025

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

nohavps · July 2025

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

Andreix · July 2025

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

I guess we have very different definitions of the word "bad".
For example - and just as an example - something bad is an insult: nohavps is an idiot.

An analysis, for example is not something bad: I think nohavps lacks the knowledge for basic terminology.

I am near my quota limit for this thread?!

nohavps · July 2025

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

I guess we have very different definitions of the word "bad".
For example - and just as an example - something bad is an insult: nohavps is an idiot.

An analysis, for example is not something bad: I think nohavps lacks the knowledge for basic terminology.

I am near my quota limit for this thread?!

Just understand this:

"Without me you can do nothing." - John 15:5

Let the project develop. You're not a potential client, apparently. You've already explained your points, okay, very well. Let others see if they're interested in the panel or not.

I don't have to get into these discussions. I'm just telling you, what's the point of only looking for bad things instead of good ones?

Andreix · July 2025

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

I guess we have very different definitions of the word "bad".
For example - and just as an example - something bad is an insult: nohavps is an idiot.

An analysis, for example is not something bad: I think nohavps lacks the knowledge for basic terminology.

I am near my quota limit for this thread?!

Just understand this:

"Without me you can do nothing." - John 15:5

Let the project develop. You're not a potential client, apparently. You've already explained your points, okay, very well. Let others see if they're interested in the panel or not.

I don't have to get into these discussions. I'm just telling you, what's the point of only looking for bad things instead of good ones?

Maybe because I would like to have a product without all those "bad" things?! Unless I am banned from ever purchasing the product... in this case I wouldn't give a f.

Saahib · July 2025

@Andreix, if you have good intention then hopefully you also understand that product is in early stages, its rewrite from V1. Let the product get mature and I am sure your suggestions about security and clarity will be sorted in coming future.

More competition, more choices are always good in market. I believe that more user should adopt it to make it better.

Perhaps you should try it and point out bugs and issue and help it to get better.

TimboJones · July 2025

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

I guess we have very different definitions of the word "bad".
For example - and just as an example - something bad is an insult: nohavps is an idiot.

An analysis, for example is not something bad: I think nohavps lacks the knowledge for basic terminology.

I am near my quota limit for this thread?!

Just understand this:

"Without me you can do nothing." - John 15:5

Am I the only one that instantly thinks this?

"I just whupped your ass" -Austin 3:16

Saahib · July 2025

@TimboJones said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@nohavps said:

@Andreix said:

@BharatB said:
RD operates as a sister concern and holds the authority to distribute licenses for the software. The software’s liability falls under the jurisdiction where it is developed, tested, and released.

Since RD manages license distribution, the maintenance, lifecycle, and client data associated with these licenses are subject to US jurisdiction. This ensures that users have the appropriate avenues to raise concerns should any issues arise.

From a legal standpoint, as the owner, I retain accountability for both the software and its distribution. The decision to use RD for licensing is primarily driven by the flexibility of payment methods available in the US, including Stripe, PayPal, Wise, and Bitcoin—options that facilitate smoother transactions for our clients.

@Andreix, I’d like to better understand your perspective. Given that your initial comments do not indicate an interest in the product or its roadmap, nor do you appear to be a potential client, I’m curious about the intent behind your engagement on this thread. Constructive feedback is always welcome, but if your aim is simply to criticize without contributing meaningfully, I’d appreciate clarity on your position.

Am I not allowed to engage in this thread if I am not a client or willing to become one?
I believe I raised valid points related to the product itself and how me (as a visitor) see your product.

I have not said you did bad or good, I only gave you my perspective on your product, since you opened this thread for all members of LET (where I also qualify since 2015).

With the last message(s) I wanted to emphasize of the fact that your product users, besides they may want to - they have the right to have disclosed (hence your obligation) who is responsible for the security of their data.

Like it or not, different countries have different general standards in different industries. I might feel safe with US or EU standards, but not feel safe with UK, IN or XYZ country. I should know what to expect before making the purchase. Your should clearly disclose that American LLC is only selling licenses and ultimately an indian company is the real developer, as it is confusing.

PS: You are offering a 30 day Trail on your homepage.

Calm down, leave him alone. We all deserve a chance. What he's done isn't something many of us can do, and we depend on panels like Virtualizor, SolusVM, etc.

Just a few details are missing, and I think it will be a great option.

Well, I just expressed my thoughts related to this topic. Feel free to do the same if you have suggestions for him.

I think "leaving him alone" or communist-like approval without criticism is a guaranteed road to failure for anyone.

You only criticized the project, I think it's fine, we can all express ourselves, but you only published bad things. You already expressed your points, ready, go ahead and let's let the project develop and we'll see how it went.

Can you please highlight 5 bad things I expressed in this thread related to the project? I could find none.

Well, look at just three pages. I won't enter into a discussion, as I told you. Let the topic develop, not just your opinions. It's only Monday to start discussions.

I guess we have very different definitions of the word "bad".
For example - and just as an example - something bad is an insult: nohavps is an idiot.

An analysis, for example is not something bad: I think nohavps lacks the knowledge for basic terminology.

I am near my quota limit for this thread?!

Just understand this:

"Without me you can do nothing." - John 15:5

Am I the only one that instantly thinks this?

"I just whupped your ass" -Austin 3:16

tbh, not a WWE fan, didn't made much sense untill did a quick search.

srch07 · July 2025

I am begining to feel, we need a user block feature within LET for an individual peace of mind. So, that I can just block a few user comments from being shown in the thread and enjoy my coffee.

BharatB · July 2025

https://docs.hypervisor.io/administration/billing-integrations/blesta

We have launched the Blesta module for use.

DigiRDP · July 2025

Congratulations! You and your team have put in so much hard work to enhance Hypervisor, and it's finally here!

BharatB · August 2025

We're slashing the price of our Unlimited VM Hypervisor Licenses to just $12/month!

Benefits
Lifetime Pricing Lock: If you purchase during this period, you'll keep this rate forever, no future price hikes!
Early Adopter Perks: Be among the first to secure this exclusive deal before prices go up.
Free Migration Service: Moving away from virtualizor? We will help you with the migration, however, unless your clients setup qemu-ga and cloudinit most of functionality would not work.

Perfect for:
Developers needing scalable virtualization
Businesses looking for cost-effective cloud solutions
Anyone who wants unlimited VMs at an unbeatable price

Claim Your Discount Now → Order Now

Note: This is a limited promotion valid until our extensive roadmap is completed. Standard pricing of $16/mo will apply to new customers once this roadmap is acheived.

BharatB · September 2025

https://docs.hypervisor.io/blog/2025/07/pre-release-v1-0-3

This version ships with alot of fixes and a few feature additions

[Feature] Global Admin API with limited functionality has been released at https://docs.hypervisor.io/api/.
[Feature] Self Provisioning feature is added, now a user can be assigned resource packs allowing for end user deployments, . A very sleek walkthrough of this feature has been released at https://docs.hypervisor.io/feature-guides/self-provisioning/
[Feature] CPU Mode now has the option to use KVM supported custom CPU models.
[Feature] Client side instance listing has a new sleek look
[Bug Fix] A few UI state updates were not working, these have now been fixed.
[Bug Fix] Backup frequency of management server was not beign respected, this is now fixed.
[Bug Fix] In billing modules SSO wouldn't work or throw an error if User wasn't created, this now throws an error via API.
[Bug Fix] Offline migrations when not using ip revoke and not having a network payload would error out on completion, this is now fixed.
[Bug Fix] Translations on multiple actions are now fixed and working.
[Bug Fix] VNC button would work even when vnc was disabled, this is now fixed.
[Bug Fix] Fixes for UI bugs on dark mode and light mode.

BharatB · October 2025

https://docs.hypervisor.io/blog/2025/10/beta-release-v1-0-4/

We are excited to announce the beta release of our hourly billing feature for the hypervisor control panel! This update transforms how you manage cloud infrastructure billing, introducing a flexible, usage-based system that gives yours end-users unprecedented control over their cloud spending. A comprehensive guide has been released https://docs.hypervisor.io/feature-guides/cloud-service/

[Feature] Locations - Organize hypervisors into logical groups for better resource management and pricing strategies.
[Feature] Plan Groups - Categorize service plans (high compute, high storage, etc.) for easier catalog management.
[Feature] Flexible Pricing Display - Show pricing as monthly, hourly, or both to give customers transparency.
[Feature] Service Control - Enable/disable individual cloud services as needed.
[Feature] Balance Management - Configure negative balance thresholds, suspension rules, and control whether instance creation requires positive balance.
[Feature] Low Balance Notifications - Automatically alert users when credits are running low to prompt top-ups.
[Feature] Multi-Currency Support - Display pricing and manage billing in multiple currencies for global reach.
[Feature] Centralized Usage Reports - Per-user usage reports provide complete visibility into resource consumption and costs.
[Feature] Credit Management - Full credit logs with audit trail and ability to manually add credits from admin panel.
[Info] Integration via WHMCS and HostBill modules coming soon for automated credit purchases.

Andru · October 2025

@BharatB Hmm.. I think I will give a try. Some guides, eg. Proxmox to hypervsior, virtualizor to hypervisor, etc.. will help.

BharatB · October 2025

@Andru said:
@BharatB Hmm.. I think I will give a try. Some guides, eg. Proxmox to hypervsior, virtualizor to hypervisor, etc.. will help.

We are offering to help with migrations manually at this point, as

Virtualizor relies on tinkering with the filesystem by mounting the image on the host node and making changes
Proxmox OS based on debian, does not use libvirt under the hood, so again not compatible with our codebase, however the disk images can be used directly without any modifications by doing inplace copy again our disk images of the newly created vms.

nohavps · October 2025

Hello,

Excuse me, is there any major company that uses your services today? We'd like to see the experiences of providers who use your services.

BharatB · October 2025

@nohavps said:
Hello,

Excuse me, is there any major company that uses your services today? We'd like to see the experiences of providers who use your services.

I dont think we have onboarded any major level customer yet, we are in talks with an Australian one and are adding relevant features for them in order to help with onboarding.

Protocol903 · October 2025

@BharatB You should add a lifetime or yearly cheap option for non commercial use or atleast 30 days~ ish trial for the same.

BharatB · October 2025

@Protocol903 said:
@BharatB You should add a lifetime or yearly cheap option for non commercial use or atleast 30 days~ ish trial for the same.

30 days trials gets activated automatically upon installation, lifetime doesnt make sense to me, however, yearly can be done if interested please open a support ticket

Cryptominer937 · October 2025

To me lifetime makes sense for
Lifetime per Version for homelap or private use (No billing system integration)
Example V2 Lifetime costs $75
But when V3 releases they would need a new license for another $75 or allow them to just continue using V2 at their own risk.

Alexxx · October 2025

Nice product! I’ll recommend it on the Nodeloc community.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!

Comments