Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Hypervisor V2 - A Lightweight KVM Control Panel for Low-End & High-End Alike!

BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

Hey LET community!

We’re thrilled to launch Hypervisor V2, a lightweight, feature-packed KVM control panel designed to simplify VM management—whether you’re running a low-end homelab or a high-performance cloud. No bloat, no nonsense—just tools hosters actually need.

🔥 Why Hypervisor V2?

Hoster-Centric Design: Built by active hosting providers who understand your pain points.
24/7 Dedicated Support: Our team (real humans!) is available round-the-clock via tickets + live chat.
Migration Assistance: We’ll help migrate your clusters (minimal downtime, fees for large deployments).

Key Features

  • Intuitive UI: Clean dashboard for VM ops (start/stop, rebuild, resize, hotplug).
  • Low Resource Use: Runs smoothly on modest hardware.
  • Multi-Node Control: Manage all KVM servers from one panel.
  • Automated Backups: Set-and-forget VM backups.
  • Template Library: Pre-loaded OS templates (AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, Debian, Windows + Cloudbase-init) + custom ISOs.
  • API & Automation: Integrates with WHMCS, HostBill, etc.
  • Cloud-init & Better Logging: Debug faster, deploy easier.
  • Two-Factor Auth (2FA): Extra security layer.

Tech Stack

Laravel, InertiaJS, NodeJS, Socket.IO, and Bash—modern, scalable, and maintainable.

Pricing

  • Starting at just $2/month (competitive for LET!).

Why Trust Us?

"We’re not just another dev team—we’re hosters ourselves. Hypervisor V2 solves the problems we’ve faced daily."

🔗 Links:
- Documentation
- Sign Up Now

Questions? Ask below! We’re here to help.

Thanked by 2minitor reyokh
«13

Comments

  • xmokxmok Member

    Automation via API is the feature I always look for first.
    Unfortunately, your API page isn't loading for me:
    https://api.hypervisor.io/

    +1 for the stack. Rock-solid.

    Thanked by 1nezam05
  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @xmok said:
    Automation via API is the feature I always look for first.
    Unfortunately, your API page isn't loading for me:
    https://api.hypervisor.io/

    +1 for the stack. Rock-solid.

    We will make it live this week

  • ManishPantManishPant Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2

    @BharatB Nice work, UI looks good.

    One Suggestion offer 30 days free trial to test the system

    Edit: Any ETA to add Blesta/Clientexec support

    Thanked by 1khalequzzaman
  • HostDZireHostDZire Member, Patron Provider

    @BharatB

    First of all, congratulations on launching your own Panel.

    Price/Instance means per VM price?
    Unlimited plan is for Per Node, right? in which we can create unlimited Vps in that Node.
    So, per Node cost with no VM limit is $16

    Correct me if i am wrong.

  • webcraftwebcraft Member

    What's the difference to VirtFusion? I see more similarities than differences (also design-wise).

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @webcraft said:
    What's the difference to VirtFusion? I see more similarities than differences (also design-wise).

    No where near or equal to VF unfortunately

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @HostDZire said:
    @BharatB

    First of all, congratulations on launching your own Panel.

    Price/Instance means per VM price?
    Unlimited plan is for Per Node, right? in which we can create unlimited Vps in that Node.
    So, per Node cost with no VM limit is $16

    This is correct

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @ManishPant said:
    @BharatB Nice work, UI looks good.

    One Suggestion offer 30 days free trial to test the system

    Edit: Any ETA to add Blesta/Clientexec support

    Can be provided via Ticket as of now

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Patron Provider

    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @nohavps said:
    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

    No we dont

  • Any ETA for Paymenter/Blesta?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @BilohBucks said:
    Any ETA for Paymenter/Blesta?

    Paymenter is being written, should be live in the next 2 hours or so.

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @BilohBucks said:
    Any ETA for Paymenter/Blesta?

    https://github.com/Paymenter/Paymenter/pull/846

    Pull requested has been initiated, once they accept it should be available to use.

    However, you can copy the code of the file to your installation as well and use it right away.

    For any issues, please get back to us.

  • That was fast, thanks. Will take a look

  • MannDudeMannDude Host Rep, Veteran

    @BharatB said:

    @nohavps said:
    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

    No we dont

    You should.

    Has there been any 3rd party security audits?

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited July 3

    Hi there,

    First of all congrats! This marked needs diversity - as much as it can get!

    Second, if someone wants to do you dirty, they sure will. It does not take more than 2-3 hours to patch a Ioncube or SG loader to dump all data from bytecode, and if someone is really really interested, even those obfuscation methods can be reversed to original strings. Loaders themselves carry the "instruction" to decode encoded shit.

    My suggestion is you should go the opensource way. Not like FOSS, but something like Blesta 90% of code to be open and just keep 2-3-10 files closed source just for licensing.
    Publish the source on github where users can contribute to the software development (and get some kind of benefits from that: free license, reduced pricing for contributors... etc.).

    It is highly unlikely your product will race (commercially speaking) with SolusVM, VirtFusion, Virtuozzo... heck even with Virtualizor when users already have those well-established solutions and on top of that -> Proxmox - which is a f*cking flawless piece of software, even in it's free/community version.

    You don't have enough credibility yet and, as @MannDude raised the issue, no security audits from a 3rd party users can trust.

    Those being said, wish you a lot of success with your software!

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 3

    @MannDude said:

    @BharatB said:

    @nohavps said:
    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

    No we dont

    You should.

    Has there been any 3rd party security audits?

    Security audit is in progress

    As for demo we are offering 30 day money back, basically acts as a trial.

    We are getting a ISO 27001 audit done, if you have suggestions on others do let me know.

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited July 3

    @BharatB said:

    @MannDude said:

    @BharatB said:

    @nohavps said:
    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

    No we dont

    You should.

    Has there been any 3rd party security audits?

    Security audit is in progress

    As for demo we are offering 30 day money back, basically acts as a trial.

    We are getting a ISO 27001 audit done, if you have suggestions on others do let me know.

    Not really.
    For an enterprise, sure. It's not a lot.
    For a user which has like a 20$/mo dedi... may be 1/4 or even half of their budget for renewing their dedi. You presented this software on LowEndTalk afterall, not HighEndTalk.

    Why not do like a 7-day instant trial on installation? Limit to IP & Machine HWID so they can't renew unless paid license is purchased.

    Thanked by 1Ticaga
  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @Andreix said:

    @BharatB said:

    @MannDude said:

    @BharatB said:

    @nohavps said:
    Do you have any live demos to see what the options look like?

    No we dont

    You should.

    Has there been any 3rd party security audits?

    Security audit is in progress

    As for demo we are offering 30 day money back, basically acts as a trial.

    We are getting a ISO 27001 audit done, if you have suggestions on others do let me know.

    Not really.
    For an enterprise, sure. It's not a lot.
    For a user which has like a 20$/mo dedi... may be 1/4 or even half of their budget for renewing their dedi. You presented this software on LowEndTalk afterall, not HighEndTalk.

    Why not do like a 7-day instant trial on installation? Limit to IP & Machine HWID so they can't renew unless paid license is purchased.

    Will be done today :)

    Thanked by 1Andreix
  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran

    @Andreix said:
    Hi there,
    It is highly unlikely your product will race (commercially speaking) with SolusVM, VirtFusion, Virtuozzo... heck even with Virtualizor when users already have those well-established solutions and on top of that -> Proxmox - which is a f*cking flawless piece of software, even in it's free/community version.

    May I ask why it doesn't have potential to compete with established players, what do you see missing in there other than your view of making it FOSS and Audits ?

    You don't have enough credibility yet and, as @MannDude raised the issue, no security audits from a 3rd party users can trust.

    Credibility building takes time, we have @Francisco as Domain Registrar now, he started from LET, hopefully he is credible enough now or let me know how to build credibility which is credible for you?

    Thanked by 1nohavps
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited July 3

    @Saahib said:

    @Andreix said:
    Hi there,
    It is highly unlikely your product will race (commercially speaking) with SolusVM, VirtFusion, Virtuozzo... heck even with Virtualizor when users already have those well-established solutions and on top of that -> Proxmox - which is a f*cking flawless piece of software, even in it's free/community version.

    May I ask why it doesn't have potential to compete with established players, what do you see missing in there other than your view of making it FOSS and Audits ?

    You don't have enough credibility yet and, as @MannDude raised the issue, no security audits from a 3rd party users can trust.

    Credibility building takes time, we have @Francisco as Domain Registrar now, he started from LET, hopefully he is credible enough now or let me know how to build credibility which is credible for you?

    I think it's pretty obvious why: The solution is not proven.
    Remember when Softaculous launched Virtualizor? A lot of dudes were using SolusVM, which lacked a lot of features Vtz advertised, but because it was a new solution, users were not really jumping to migrate, but they rather waited to see how things were going.

    Some migrated from SolusVM to Vtz and soon realized they need to migrate back.

    So yeah, at this stage I don't see it as a direct (or even indirect) competitor to any solutions. Me personally I wouldn't use it due to closed source and not enough users to act as "sacrifice material" for potential breaches. Things may change in 10-15 years.

    Now, regarding @Francisco don't know the dude outside of LET. Can't comment on his trustworthiness even more that I am not a client.
    However, from the looks of it, he seem to be doing a good job.

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 3

    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

  • Is it built on top of laravel?

  • BharatBBharatB Member, Patron Provider

    @itachikonoha said:
    Is it built on top of laravel?

    Yes

    Thanked by 1Ticaga
  • @BharatB said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    Is it built on top of laravel?

    Yes

    Will the customer be allowed to modify partial codes if required to suit their need?

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited July 3

    @BharatB said:
    I think the thread is derailing a bit, I agree with @Andreix on his views, @Saahib thanks for pitching in, I believe Ive been here long enough for people to trust my company, since 2016 its roughly been 10 years I guess, so yeah I’m patient enough to see how things play out.

    You confuse two things: Your company with your (company)'s product.
    For example: I may sell web hosting for 20 years and people know my web hosting service is good. I may have 200.000 clients for web hosting.

    However, if I start offering CDN or Object storage hosting, I doubt 10.000 customers from those 200.000 I already have for web hosting, will dump Fastly and Cloudflare to use my CDN service.

    Real number may be 100-200-1.000 clients at most, that decided to "give it a try".

    So, there's not really a question if your company is trusted, but if your product is trusted. If your coding skills and your product's security are considered "safe" enough to switch from a well-established product like SolusVM or Virtuozzo, to your "1-2-3" years old product.

    Look what happened with SolusVM - since I kept giving it as an example - as soon as Plesk took over it, people started to switch to other solutions. Some didn't like Plesk as a company, some didn't like the new SolusVM direction and some chose the new virtualization product that one of SolusVM original developers launched on the market.

    Why? I guess they trusted him and his skills - which were "proven" over the years.

    This is what I really meant.

    PS: 2015 here. I won. :P

    Thanked by 3Frameworks Ticaga adly
  • LeviLevi Member

    A bash in commercial software? At least python. Aside of this, tech stack looks very heavy and complex.

  • @Levi said:
    A bash in commercial software? At least python. Aside of this, tech stack looks very heavy and complex.

    Looks exactly like virtfusion to be honest.

    Thanked by 1Ticaga
  • AndruAndru Member

    Hmmm, on your webpage:

    thousands of administrators who trust Hypervisor for their virtualization

    Not nice to lie, sorry.

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Patron Provider
    edited July 3

    Why choose a external dashboard instead of integrating it like Virtualizor and SolusVM do?

    Virtfusion is almost the same with more options.

    I'm not critical; I think these dashboards are perfect.

Sign In or Register to comment.