New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Our experience with aurologic: fair warning if you're a customer
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
are you planning to write 15 reviews for them on TrustPilot also?
If they send us a shirt, we'll write a review and post a squat video.
Our biceps aren't as big as @Rubben , but our videos are energetic.
We are hoping @Rubben reveals how he got such big biceps, and we want to see his quads to verify he didn't skip leg days.
beating men
Need step by step tutorial.
You sign a contract and pay monthly. How often you pay is not related to what the cancellation period is. If your initial contract expires on 24st of December and you request a cancellation then, you need to pay for 90 more days. Not 30 days, not 1 year. Meaning the minimum you can pay with what you agreed to is 15 months. That's my understanding from the screenshots.
In any case, I see aurologic's behaviour as extremely unprofessional and would avoid them. When such misunderstandings happen, you either eat the costs or settle on some middle ground. And make sure your checkout page, your ToS and your panel are clear enough not to confuse people (like what is clearly happening in this thread), unless your intention is to confuse people.
Using the debt collector as the agreement decipher of the contract? Fuck off. They're the worst scum and makes you look bad using that in justification.
Agreed. Otherwise, the term "minimum" has zero fucking relevance.
If "minimum" wasn't there, it would be clear it is ALWAYS 12 months. And why the word "renewal" when you mean "payment"?
In the rest of the world, having a minimum term of 12 months with 1 month renewal means you HAVE to have the service a minimum of 12 months, and after the minimum is reached, no required term.
So worst case, he'd owe 3 months service from any point after 12 months.
You're definitely making shit harder to understand.
Edit: @OP, settle for three months. The renewal shit is wrong and if being forced to pay 12 months, I'd go to court, too. But the cancellation of 90 days isn't ambiguous, pay the three months offer.
Which kid are going to get spanked today?
IDK need review my contract asap.
Scary Germans
Bruh he might be 20 but you’re 12
Alexander looks young and superior
Also, yeah, that info is public, but how did you first come across his name? As in, how did you know what to search for?
It very much looks like you’re sharing private information and justifying it by having found a public source for it.
We actually didn't know that was him until you doxed him. Just saying.
Nice doxing. Massive warning.
but the imprint is still missing on the @AS203446 website
where can this be found?
What makes you believe they need one in the first place?
Technically a UK company right?
Just dogshit insane that it's been 6 pages already.
The image on the website is more than three years old, just saying..
its ok u handsome
Nope, he himself doxed his name in a screenshot he posted. And that seems to have been what @jh_aurologic googled for.
Btw, re "impressum", I'm not sure but I guess that's limited to .de domains. But maybe it's Germans who have a website, maybe someone who knows better will chime in.
No thats not Limited to.de Domains.
And a british Limited He has is also no excuse as the director is in Germany.
Its complicated
Anyway. The imprint Thing is Just another stupid half assed rule that only comes from Germany. Does any other country have that?
He clearly did not mean to, I can't speak for him but with enough time and patience, if you go through all comments of most members with 10k+ comments, you'll be able to find out a lot over time. Most probably had the occasional slip-up. Doesn't magically make it right to bring it up to everyone's attention, especially with points about your age, where you work and at what hours you respond, trying to frame it as someone not doing their regular job properly. It's dishonest and it's weird coming from a provider.
But yes, I do agree with you that maybe doxing isn't the right word, but I still find it wrong - at least far from professional.
Would you see Hetzner or OVH go to a thread here and insult someone based on their age and question if they actually work their hours at their main job? Hell no.
Edit: And this is why I tend to avoid LET providers for production usage. They tend to do shit like this. They tend to make it personal or at least entertain the idea of it being personal.
My focus was only on "doxing" (or not) and to a lesser degree on the "impressum" thing.
But I agree, some of @jh_aurologic's moves were at the very least not gentleman-like. OTOH, it's probably not easy to stay all calm and polite when a provider opens LET and finds what basically, at least in their view, is being bashed and/or an attempt to push them into something via the "court of public opinion".
can we pin this
The post is a warning for everyone to check their contracts with said company, not a call for court of public opinion
I wouldn't call jh_aurologic's actions doxing, although it's concerning that he shares totally unrelated information here.
Sir this isn't some m****/irc/discord/jabber/xmpp/email/whatever-the-fuck-the-protocol-is chat.
please dont say the m word
sivir warning
internet warrior behavior, buyer beware
where is the imprint / impressum @AS203446
I don't see any relevance to discuss this in this thread.