Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Be aware of NatVPS

24

Comments

  • eskieski Member
    edited January 2025

    They deleted my existing server for "migration" when I asked a question immediately and without any recourse. They then canceled every other unrelated service I had with them and gave me a 1 week(ish) migration window in retaliation for posting about this

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @eski said:
    They deleted my existing server for "migration" when I asked a question immediately and without any recourse. They then canceled every other unrelated service I had with them and gave me a 1 week(ish) migration window in retaliation for posting about this

    They have the right to terminate your contract, and 7 days is reasonable time to move your data somewhere else considering the circumstances.

    Just move somewhere else mate so both you and the company are happier.

    Thanked by 1Araki
  • Regardless, letting everyone here know how terrible they are on this

  • Also, issuing a charge back on my CC because they're only issuing a partial refund for their service cancelation

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    six things mentally strong people do

  • Combination of 1, 2 and 3 = They suck it up, stfu and move on.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • eskieski Member
    edited January 2025

    Yep. @webhorizon is a shitty provider with no ethics. Suck it up. Accept that I've lost money. Move on. And let others know how shitty they are to try to warn them in advance. I've learned my lesson

    Thanked by 1ethanblake87
  • @eski said:
    Yep. @webhorizon is a shitty provider with no ethics. Suck it up. Accept that I've lost money. Move on. And let others know how shitty they are to try to warn them in advance. I've learned my lesson

    Curious, which lesson is that?

  • Don't work with webhorizon

  • AbdAbd Member, Patron Provider

    @eski said:
    Even though you're canceling all my services, this is only about 40% of what I've paid for. I plan of issuing a CC charge back for the remainder if you follow through with cancellation

    Your account had only one transaction in the past 12 months which amounted to $7 , refunded in full. I don't understand where the 40% comes from.
    If you think there is more left , send me a screenshot, will refund it.

    To clarify, we are no scammers and also don't make any profit on $3/yr or $7/yr natvps.net plans.
    You made things difficult for us and I don't wish to have a fight. So issued a refund, you can choose some other provider there are many here!

    I have also addressed your concerns with our team member, Ayyub, and emphasized the importance of clear communication to avoid any future misunderstandings.

    Good luck!

  • M66BM66B Veteran

    @eski said:
    Yep. @webhorizon is a shitty provider with no ethics. Suck it up. Accept that I've lost money. Move on. And let others know how shitty they are to try to warn them in advance. I've learned my lesson

    We're still waiting for the logs.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Maybe OP is looking at original price of the service and not promo and thinks provider owes them extra money

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep
    edited January 2025

    @plumberg said:
    Maybe OP is looking at original price of the service and not promo and thinks provider owes them extra money

    I mean they do talk about multiple services while @Abd says it's one transaction in a 12 month period so no idea what's going on.

    My gut is saying OP is confused about something.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @wadhah said:

    @plumberg said:
    Maybe OP is looking at original price of the service and not promo and thinks provider owes them extra money

    I mean they do talk about multiple services while @Abd says it's one transaction in a 12 month period so no idea what's going on.

    My gut is saying OP is confused about something.

    Possible. Only OP can clear the air here

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @Arkas closes topic and moves to Offtopic.
    It helps ball regeneration.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Nah. This be open. Need popcorn.
    Friday

  • @eski said:
    So just FYI for others: in retaliation for me posting this thread, WebHorizon has just now canceled all my services (including unrelated ones) and decided to delete all of my VPSes and data

    it always like this,if they(vps provider) got exposed they will deleted your vps and data in instant lol

  • AbdAbd Member, Patron Provider

    @wadhah said:

    @plumberg said:
    Maybe OP is looking at original price of the service and not promo and thinks provider owes them extra money

    I mean they do talk about multiple services while @Abd says it's one transaction in a 12 month period so no idea what's going on.

    My gut is saying OP is confused about something.

    OP had multiple natvps services nyc, lax, canada, Switzerland, etc. purchased around 11.01.2024 for one year period. Singapore purchased 27.12.2023

    Of these , US & EU locations were recreated as KVM already and their due dates extended by so next renewal date for them 24.02.2025.

    As SG wasn't recreated in time op paid $7 for SG renewal on 03.01.2025 , after which we recreated it as KVM on 22.01.2025, and extended his due date by 74 days on 23.01.2025 (compensation for 74 days unusability as the reinstall system on ovz7 was borked)

    After this op decided to open this thread on 24.01.2025
    refunded his $7 payment then.
    So while he has multiple services, there's only one payment I could refund.

  • 3 months? For real?

  • webhorizonwebhorizon Member, Host Rep

    @seman said:

    @eski said:
    So just FYI for others: in retaliation for me posting this thread, WebHorizon has just now canceled all my services (including unrelated ones) and decided to delete all of my VPSes and data

    it always like this,if they(vps provider) got exposed they will deleted your vps and data in instant lol

    As op mentioned here, his services are running and we have not deleted any data since the moment he has opened this post. As stated here, he has time until January 31st to move his data to another provider.

  • OK, now since so many people want screenshots to prove I wasn't absolutely making things up, here you go. So I don't post here often, but I've been part of the lowend community for north of 10 years just to clarify this isn't a fly-by-night member posting things. I've actually been a NATVPS customer since 2021. Here's a screenshot of one of my first interactions with them 4 years ago

    I've had quite a few services with them:

    They've never had great service, but they have always been cheap, and I've always known cheap comes with a cost. They've had various outages and downtimes and I've never asked for compensation of any kind.

    I did have 5 different services with NATVPS. Unfortunately, I can't "show lowendtalk" this because NATVPS has just completely closed my account and made it impossible for me to log in and even see the services I'd paid for. Here's that screenshot as proof

    This whole mess got kicked off when Webhorizon was not able to deliver their OVZ services for a number of months. It seems they knew this, which was part of the reason for transitioning away from OVZ to KVM. I don't have an issue with the transition: they announced it in October and although the timelines were generally short and shitty, it again comes with the "low end" price point.

    They did a fair number of kind of dodgy things from there on: services I had paid for got "moved" to new locations. e.g. I had paid for a Switzerland VPS and they closed that location and did not offer a refund: only the option to migrate my VPS to a different location. But again: low price, low quality and all that, so I never complained.

    The service had been generally not available since before October. You can see that in my previous e-mail, and I'm sure I'm not alone in this community. Several VPSes wouldn't start up at all for months: New York VPS, Singapore, Netherlands, and Los Angeles all had been offline for > 1 month. They were low price, so it wasn't the worst and I never complained, but every couple weeks I'd try to log in and start the servers and they wouldn't boot on. Such is life.

    With the KVM migration, I brought this up to them, and that's when they said they'd compensate for the downtime (as shown in the previous screenshot). Then when I re-raised it as part of this, they said "sorry, have a look at our TOS. We're not willing to do anything." And when I posted this thread, that's when they canceled my account.

    It's hard to show anything other than the e-mails I've received because now they've deleted my account and even before then, they deleted ticket responses they'd sent.

  • It's sad that even when VPS providers are wrong ppl still defend it...

  • We will need some more popcorn for this.

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    AI Summary of OP's previous post:

    • Author’s Background: Long-time lowend community member and NATVPS customer since 2021. Shares screenshots as proof.

    • Service Issues: NATVPS was cheap but unreliable, with frequent outages. Author had 5 services, but the account was closed, preventing access.

    • Transition Problems: Webhorizon shifted from OVZ to KVM due to service issues. Author accepted the transition despite short timelines.

    • Unresolved Complaints: Paid services were relocated without refunds, and multiple VPSes were offline for months. NATVPS initially promised compensation but later refused, citing their TOS.

    • Account Closure: NATVPS canceled the author’s account and deleted evidence after the issue was raised publicly.

  • Yep, that sums it up accurately @wadhah

  • @eski @Abd @webhorizon I was curious and checked the PDFs and screenshots that were posted, but is this all the content? In several places, I'm confused due to missing context...

    Ticket #649287 (2024/12/10): https://connelly.casa/compensation.pdf
    (From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279594/#Comment_4279594)

    • OP reported a non-functioning VPS
    • Ayyub asked to wait due to ongoing migration
    • OP mentioned multiple offline VPSs and inquired about compensation
    • Ayyub (apparently) agreed to provide compensation

    Ticket #484161 (2025/01/22): https://connelly.casa/awful-service.pdf
    (From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279600/#Comment_4279600)

    • OP opened a ticket and asked about the progress of migration from Singapore OVZ to KVM
    • Ayyub misunderstood the inquiry as a migration request and deleted the OVZ VPS and created a KVM VPS
    • OP informed Ayyub that the ticket's intent was misunderstood
    • Ayyub apologized for the misunderstanding caused by his assumption
    • (Note: Content is trimmed. From the layout, this seems to be OP's post, but I'm confused as Ayyub's signature is present. Or are there multiple interactions that have been trimmed?)
    • Ayyub instructed to refer to previous emails about KVM migration
    • OP posted a message criticizing the low-quality service and data deletion (I'm confused as Ayyub's signature is present)
    • Ayyub acknowledged the mistake and asked if the apology sufficed
    • OP confirmed whether a refund would be provided based on the previous ticket
    • Ayyub instructed to refer to the Terms of Service (TOS) at https://natvps.net/tos.html
    • OP said: "That is absolutely also not true." (I couldn't interpret the meaning of this statement)
    • Ayyub closed the ticket, stating that further discussion was meaningless since OP had agreed to the TOS

    Ticket #537734 (2025/01/23): https://assets.webhorizon.net/pub/screencapture-clients-natvps-net-2025-01-24-19_26_25-2.png
    (From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279600/#Comment_4279600)

    • OP requested compensation based on Ticket #649287
    • Ayyub asked which part of the ticket was being referred to
    • OP pointed out that the compensation-related correspondence had been deleted and attached a PDF as evidence https://connelly.casa/compensation.pdf
    • OP stated intent to report to LET and OGF
    • OP announced the initiation of a credit card chargeback for lost services
    • Ayyub suggested checking if Hostbill allows ticket reply deletion, and stated that the service would be extended and that OP had agreed to the TOS
    • OP stated intent to report to LET and OGF about the deleted compensation conversation and Ayyub's statement about TOS not obligating compensation
    • OP said: "LET/OGF wrill definitely agree that NatVPS has done the right thing here" (I couldn't interpret the meaning of this statement)
    • Ayyub asked about the duration of downtime
    • OP provided the downtime period
    • Ayyub stated that service extension had already been done corresponding to the downtime period, and confirmed that ticket tampering had not occurred and that he could not verify the absence of replies in the portal

    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279649/#Comment_4279649
    Abd said:
    We've refunded all your payments in the past 12 months (i.e. $7) and will be ending all your natvps services on January 31st. Please ensure you've moved your data elsewhere before this date.

    I understand your frustration, but based on your interactions, we believe it's best to part ways.

    I wish you the best in finding a new provider. :)


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279650/#Comment_4279650
    eski said:
    So just FYI for others: in retaliation for me posting this thread, WebHorizon has just now canceled all my services (including unrelated ones) and decided to delete all of my VPSes and data


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279680/#Comment_4279680
    eski said:
    Even though you're canceling all my services, this is only about 40% of what I've paid for. I plan of issuing a CC charge back for the remainder if you follow through with cancellation


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279693/#Comment_4279693
    eski said:
    They deleted my existing server for "migration" when I asked a question immediately and without any recourse. They then canceled every other unrelated service I had with them and gave me a 1 week(ish) migration window in retaliation for posting about this


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279712/#Comment_4279712
    Abd said:
    Even though you're canceling all my services, this is only about 40% of what I've paid for. I plan of issuing a CC charge back for the remainder if you follow through with cancellation

    Your account had only one transaction in the past 12 months which amounted to $7 , refunded in full. I don't understand where the 40% comes from.
    If you think there is more left , send me a screenshot, will refund it.

    To clarify, we are no scammers and also don't make any profit on $3/yr or $7/yr natvps.net plans.
    You made things difficult for us and I don't wish to have a fight. So issued a refund, you can choose some other provider there are many here!

    I have also addressed your concerns with our team member, Ayyub, and emphasized the importance of clear communication to avoid any future misunderstandings.

    Good luck!


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279738/#Comment_4279738
    Abd said:
    OP had multiple natvps services nyc, lax, canada, Switzerland, etc. purchased around 11.01.2024 for one year period. Singapore purchased 27.12.2023

    Of these , US & EU locations were recreated as KVM already and their due dates extended by so next renewal date for them 24.02.2025.

    As SG wasn't recreated in time op paid $7 for SG renewal on 03.01.2025 , after which we recreated it as KVM on 22.01.2025, and extended his due date by 74 days on 23.01.2025 (compensation for 74 days unusability as the reinstall system on ovz7 was borked)

    After this op decided to open this thread on 24.01.2025
    refunded his $7 payment then.
    So while he has multiple services, there's only one payment I could refund.


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279742/#Comment_4279742
    webhorizon said:
    As op mentioned https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279693/#Comment_4279693 , his services are running and we have not deleted any data since the moment he has opened this post.
    As stated https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279649/#Comment_4279649 , he has time until January 31st to move his data to another provider.


    From https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279744/#Comment_4279744
    (Summary by wadhah)

    • Author’s Background: Long-time lowend community member and NATVPS customer since 2021. Shares screenshots as proof.

    • Service Issues: NATVPS was cheap but unreliable, with frequent outages. Author had 5 services, but the account was closed, preventing access.

    • Transition Problems: Webhorizon shifted from OVZ to KVM due to service issues. Author accepted the transition despite short timelines.

    • Unresolved Complaints: Paid services were relocated without refunds, and multiple VPSes were offline for months. NATVPS initially promised compensation but later refused, citing their TOS.

    • Account Closure: NATVPS canceled the author’s account and deleted evidence after the issue was raised publicly.

  • @seman said:
    it always like this,if they(vps provider) got exposed they will deleted your vps and data in instant lol

    To be honest, in situations like this I don't blame them. If the customer is unhappy, there's always a chance they'll do something EXACTLY like the OP is doing anyway:

    @eski said:
    Also, issuing a charge back on my CC because they're only issuing a partial refund for their service cancelation

    Let's get this clear. The OP received the service for 8 months, but wants a full refund for the year.

    @eski said:
    I looked at this and thought: ok, not good service but at least they're being honest. I asked " will I be compensated for the fact that I've paid for 12 months and only gotten 8-9 months of service"

    Once the user has already started posting threads like this, there isn't really any sensible outcome from the provider other than cutting ties entirely. It's clear the the OP doesn't want to resolve the issue in a way that's beneficial to both parties, but wants to get as much refund as possible whilst causing as much pain to the provider as possible. The provider cancelling the service and proactively refunding pro-rata is allowed by the terms of service and minimises the risk of OP trying to screw them over.

    I'm not defending the level of service here - 3 months outage seems unacceptable, and the interactions with support are almost comically bad, but cancelling the service and pro-rata'd refund for a service that the OP used without issue for 8-9 months seems entirely reasonable.

  • @ralf said:

    @seman said:
    it always like this,if they(vps provider) got exposed they will deleted your vps and data in instant lol

    To be honest, in situations like this I don't blame them. If the customer is unhappy, there's always a chance they'll do something EXACTLY like the OP is doing anyway:

    @eski said:
    Also, issuing a charge back on my CC because they're only issuing a partial refund for their service cancelation

    Let's get this clear. The OP received the service for 8 months, but wants a full refund for the year.

    @eski said:
    I looked at this and thought: ok, not good service but at least they're being honest. I asked " will I be compensated for the fact that I've paid for 12 months and only gotten 8-9 months of service"

    Once the user has already started posting threads like this, there isn't really any sensible outcome from the provider other than cutting ties entirely. It's clear the the OP doesn't want to resolve the issue in a way that's beneficial to both parties, but wants to get as much refund as possible whilst causing as much pain to the provider as possible. The provider cancelling the service and proactively refunding pro-rata is allowed by the terms of service and minimises the risk of OP trying to screw them over.

    I'm not defending the level of service here - 3 months outage seems unacceptable, and the interactions with support are almost comically bad, but cancelling the service and pro-rata'd refund for a service that the OP used without issue for 8-9 months seems entirely reasonable.

    No, I never asked for (or even wanted) a refund except for asking to cover the several months of downtime. I was hoping for about 1/4 of a year extension or refund given that's how much was offline. When I did that, the support person first said basically "yes, just include that in the ticket once we actually get things fixed here" and then later said "actually, no, we're not going to do anything." The support was -- as you say -- comically bad and when I raised this, they then said "actually, what we're going to do is cancel all of your services for complaining in public."

  • Just to be clear: it appears from this thread that there is no disagreement that:
    1. @webhorizon agrees the servers were offline for months
    2. They were unwilling to extend the date of the services until I posted something negative on LET
    3. Webhorizon deleted a VPS immediately and created a new one because they misinterpreted my ticket. Their response was "Can that satisfy your ego"
    4. Webhorizon did completely terminate services in Switzerland even though I had paid already for the year. They offered a new VPS in Canada as a transition
    5. Once I did post something negative on LET, they deleted my account entirely
    6. Webhorizon sees nothing wrong with this and "in shock" per https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4279600/#Comment_4279600 because they think the way they handled this was so great

Sign In or Register to comment.