Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

24h limited NVMe & Storage deals in EU, APAC and US

1679111220

Comments

  • @itachikonoha said:
    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    I'm probably not veteran by any means, but I have 5 Hosthatch servers going back a few years now.

    In all that time, I have had 4 tickets. 1 was for a network issue due to a failed router that they fixed in a few hours. 1 was for a (marked low-priority) bug report in their control panel, which they acknowledged. 1 was opened by them when they wanted to move people to a newer host with better RAID-10, and you were given a new machine concurrent with the old for 14 days while you transferred your data.

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    And the 4th ticket was form 3 weeks ago, still hasn't been replied to, even though the issue sorted itself out after about 10 days. I just noticed that it's been silently closed, still without reply, which is a bit crap, but I'm not unduly bothered unless the issue reoccurs.

    So, definitely not exceptions being made for existing users.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    I think maybe, the class of people you class as veterans are simply less work for them. They buy a service at much lower prices than anywhere else, read the notice about slow provisioning and support, but don't really mind when it's provisioned because they have other servers anyway, when it is provisioned it typically just works with zero issues, they don't need support, and they're happy.

    There is another class of people, who I'll just label "enthusiastic". They're eager to get going with their new server. Every other day, they're thinking "where is it? where is it?" They maybe start opening tickets, despite knowing that it slows the provider down and knowing that support for these LET deals is done on a "when there's really nothing else for the support staff to do" basis, but then get upset when they don't get an immediate reply. And then maybe complain about the slow speeds on storage servers, when really what can you expect on a machine full of spinning 7200 rpm drives that's just been provisioned and being hammered for yabs by every man and his dog.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    I can't remember if Hosthatch have been quite this fussy about it, but certainly other providers have done similar. But they did state, two business weeks, the offer was in the middle of a long holiday, and also state that support is extremely limited. Even if they don't put you to the back of their queue for wasting support time, every ticket they have to reply to slows down delivery of all remaining VPS for everyone else. Just wait. You'll get it eventually. Even worse case and it gets lost in the system (I think I've heard of that once in several years), the guy who runs it is a good guy - he'll still make sure you get your machine. But just wait until the message that everything should have been delivered, before you start hassling him.

    Also, read other posts on the forum. The owner has had some medical work done in the last month, and he was very hands-on before, so that will inevitably have impacted on support times if he's actually taking some well needed rest. He does have several people helping out, but still it's something to bear in mind while you're waiting.

    I guess the TLDR is "just be patient". Hassling them won't make it any faster, if anything it'll slow things down for everyone.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    Thanked by 1dev_vps
  • @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    very well said.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @Freek said:

    @hosthatch said:

    @Freek said:

    @ralf said:
    Yeah, I did click order on it because I wanted more than the 5TB and was sure it'd change on the next screen. But now I have an invoice that I kind of hope won't be honoured because I don't want to rip them off, but also now I'm wary about getting another for the 5+2 deal instead in case I end up with 2 servers!

    The pricing for this offer was wrong twice; first it was set too low (which I realized after placing my order) and later it was adjusted too high. As I was unsure of how to proceed, I politely opened a ticket to request clarification. I refrained from bumping the ticket during the two weeks it was open, knowing that HH really discourages doing so.

    After two weeks of silence, I finally received a reply today asking if I had paid the invoice. No, I hadn’t, as I was unsure what to do, hence the ticket in the first place. Now I’ve been told the offer is no longer valid.

    I’m left wondering what would have happened if I had paid the invoice, as HH wasn’t very forthcoming about it. With the ticket now closed, I can’t even respond to seek further clarification.

    I understand your frustration. There was a short period of time where the pricing was half the advertised price here, but this was corrected shortly after. As a token of our appreciation for your patience, I'd be happy to offer the advertised price on this thread for you - even though the promotion is already over.

    You can reply to closed tickets, that is not a problem. We are just not going to offer half the price for a plan that is already very highly discounted. This is what you asked for in the ticket, and were politely refused for.

    Thank you for your response. I appreciate the clarification and the kind gesture of offering the advertised price from this thread.

    You are absolutely right; it is possible to reply to closed tickets. However, I wasn’t aware that I needed to manually re-open the ticket to do so. This wasn’t clear to me at the time, but I’ve learned something new today! :)

    For transparency, I’d also like to clarify for the public audience that this is the first time the initial deal has been offered to me. In the ticket, my request was indeed to honor the originally billed price (because, let’s face it, I can’t resist a great deal!), but this was declined, and no alternative offer was presented at that time.

    Thank you again for taking the time to address this matter. I hope this clarification is helpful to everyone following the thread.

    Best regards.

    I'll just say this.

    Imagine if this ticket was related to interruption of service (on a promotional package).

    I had only one ticket (in last two+ years) related to interruption of service and it was answered in hours and taken care of.

    Things are sailing (pun intended) smoothly with HostHatch VPS.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    which part from the offer post was not clear for you

    The setup time is 10 working days (2 weeks). Most will get delivered much earlier.
    Some may get slightly delayed.

  • Premium

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-17                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Dec 18 15:21:28 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7R13 48-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2650.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 45.0 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-51-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HostHatch
    ASN        : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
    Host       : HostHatch, LLC
    Location   : Stockholm, Stockholm County (AB)
    Country    : Sweden
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 188.37 MB/s  (47.0k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 188.87 MB/s  (47.2k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 377.25 MB/s  (94.3k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.49 GB/s     (6.8k) | 4.76 GB/s     (4.6k)
    Write      | 3.67 GB/s     (7.1k) | 5.08 GB/s     (4.9k)
    Total      | 7.16 GB/s    (14.0k) | 9.84 GB/s     (9.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.58 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 28.8 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.28 Gbits/sec  | 7.17 Gbits/sec  | --
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | --
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 148 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.77 Gbits/sec  | 2.67 Gbits/sec  | 93.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 638 Mbits/sec   | 998 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.30 Gbits/sec  | 3.14 Gbits/sec  | 27.3 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.76 Gbits/sec  | 8.62 Gbits/sec  | 23.3 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.69 Gbits/sec  | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 93.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 772 Mbits/sec   | 1.15 Gbits/sec  | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec  | 148 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.77 Gbits/sec  | 2.63 Gbits/sec  | 92.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 639 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1571
    Multi Core      | 2814
    
  • @dev_vps said: NVMe can have variant disk io and more so based on what neighbors are doing

    I tested 4K reading and writing in several periods over 2 days, and they were basically at the same level. In fact, according to my experience using HH's VPS, 4K read and write speeds are usually relatively stable, that is, the speed is what it was when I first bought it, and the speed will not decrease or increase exponentially during daily use.

  • @i12h said:
    Judging from the reply to the ticket, @hosthatch ignored the test results I provided. It seems they didn’t even have time to investigate.

    I'm not minimizing the issue you raised, but keep in mind that your new VPS might have been created on one with many new users and has a high IO load for this reason.

    Is the performance of your workload greatly affected by the storage performance? Or are you just surprised at the difference you see?

    @dev_vps said:
    NVMe can have variant disk io and more so based on what neighbors are doing

    Absolutely. Any benchmarks posted here are just a snapshot of performance within a narrow time period. You would need a collection of them over a longer period in order to come to any general conclusions about server performance.

    For guaranteed performance, a dedicated server is the way to go.

  • @aj_potc said: Is the performance of your workload greatly affected by the storage performance? Or are you just surprised at the difference you see?

    Of course there is an impact. I tried to reinstall the system through the control panel, and the reinstallation time was the longest HH has ever experienced. I value 4K read and write because I want to run MySQL with applications. I tested the performance of MySQL, and the test result is also several times lower than that of the same region.

  • @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    which part from the offer post was not clear for you

    The setup time is 10 working days (2 weeks). Most will get delivered much earlier.
    Some may get slightly delayed.

    but here it says something different.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    You are delaying delivery by resetting the timer just because someone raised a ticket regarding it.

    That's totally a BS practice in my opinion. You can silently close it, choose not to address it .... which would have been valid in these circumstances. But resetting the delivery time? That fussyness doesn't seem professional in my eyes.

  • You guys 4K reading: 124 MB/s ⬆️
    Mine: 41 MB/s ⬇️ (2 days different time slot testing did not exceed this speed)

    A 3x difference. I've been using HH for years. I didn't buy it to run scores, and I didn't expect a VPS to be anything like a dedicated server.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    which part from the offer post was not clear for you

    The setup time is 10 working days (2 weeks). Most will get delivered much earlier.
    Some may get slightly delayed.

    but here it says something different.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    You are delaying delivery by resetting the timer just because someone raised a ticket regarding it.

    That's totally a BS practice in my opinion. You can silently close it, choose not to address it .... which would have been valid in these circumstances. But resetting the delivery time? That fussyness doesn't seem professional in my eyes.

    why are you opening ticket when delivery time expectations were set at the time of order?

    Opening a ticket for non-issue is not prudent and shows your impatience.

    You can silently close it, choose not to address it

    This is utter non-sense.

    Thanked by 1ralf
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited December 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    which part from the offer post was not clear for you

    The setup time is 10 working days (2 weeks). Most will get delivered much earlier.
    Some may get slightly delayed.

    but here it says something different.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    You are delaying delivery by resetting the timer just because someone raised a ticket regarding it.

    That's totally a BS practice in my opinion. You can silently close it, choose not to address it .... which would have been valid in these circumstances. But resetting the delivery time? That fussyness doesn't seem professional in my eyes.

    why are you opening ticket when delivery time expectations were set at the time of order?

    Opening a ticket for non-issue is not prudent and shows your impatience.

    You can silently close it, choose not to address it

    This is utter non-sense.

    I am not a hosthatch customer. I left that ship (stopped from buying) during the last time debacle when another customer raised the issue of support which was neither mentioned during their advertise here in LET nor in the products page. Only since then, I am seeing the issue of support (lack of) in the products page and in the ad.

    The support clause says that promotional packages won't receive the preferential support. But it doesn't say that your wait time will be reset if you raise a ticket.

    According to their own t&c in the ad and products page, not getting a reply in ticket is valid but delaying the server for raising ticket is out of their contract.

    Being impatient is not void of the contract. neither T&C allows it as punishment against those customers

  • @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Discounted yes.

    But my main objection was resetting the timer for raising a ticket. That's an intended punishment so as to avoid raising of ticket. If a person raises multiple, I can understand that. But for 1?

  • This is a storage vps — heavily discounted

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited December 2024

    @itachikonoha said:
    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Check my post above.

    There are very few providers whose storage vps is powerful enough to run windows server.

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited December 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    This is a storage vps — heavily discounted

    The current offer I saw was (BF and the deal before that) $115 for 5 TB for a year.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted because hostc and hostbrr also around the same price (even <100$) with not that much straightjacketed support (at least not resetting the timer only because someone raised a ticket.)

    Thanked by 1mandala
  • bassettsbassetts Member
    edited December 2024

    @itachikonoha said:

    @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Discounted yes.

    But my main objection was resetting the timer for raising a ticket. That's an intended punishment so as to avoid raising of ticket. If a person raises multiple, I can understand that. But for 1?

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

  • @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Check my post above.

    There are very few providers whose storage vps is powerful enough to run windows server.

    To be honest @dev_vps I do not have the same appeal level for windows server for one reason. Horses for courses.

    These people are not buying these servers because these are powerful (.... yet unreliable according to hosthatch's own admission IIRC). If it is storage server, their main requirement is storage. If it doesn't run windows server, most wouldn't complain because that's not something they expect in the first place.

    But they expect at least a minimal level of support.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    This is a storage vps — heavily discounted

    The current offer I saw was (BF and the deal before that) $115 for 5 TB for a year.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted because hostc and hostbrr also around the same price (even <100$) with not that much straightjacketed support (at least not resetting the timer only because someone raised a ticket.)

    This storage server has 4x vCore and 4 GB memory plus 10 gig data port and private networking with another compute vps

    hostc and hostbrr both are premium A+++

    And hostc is 10 out 10 for me.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @bassetts said:

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

    I will start a new seasonal host.
    Original price. $1m/ gb

    Discounted 99.9999%.

    Heavily discounted, yes technically the truth.
    Reality, probably not.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Check my post above.

    There are very few providers whose storage vps is powerful enough to run windows server.

    To be honest @dev_vps I do not have the same appeal level for windows server for one reason. Horses for courses.

    These people are not buying these servers because these are powerful (.... yet unreliable according to hosthatch's own admission IIRC). If it is storage server, their main requirement is storage. If it doesn't run windows server, most wouldn't complain because that's not something they expect in the first place.

    But they expect at least a minimal level of support.

    I think you need to re-read the condition about the timer reset. It's only if you open a ticket enquiring about the delivery time of the server. If you have a genuine reason to open a ticket (I can't see what that would be before the server is provisioned myself) then the timer isn't reset.

  • @itachikonoha said:
    The current offer I saw was (BF and the deal before that) $115 for 5 TB for a year.

    Or $190 for 7TB for 2 years. That beats pretty much everyone except:

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted because hostc and hostbrr also around the same price (even <100$) with not that much straightjacketed support (at least not resetting the timer only because someone raised a ticket.)

    I disqualified them from my selection because their companies are too new for me to feel safe with them. Also, I'm wary of any company that's ignores DMCA complaints.

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited December 2024

    @ralf said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    The current offer I saw was (BF and the deal before that) $115 for 5 TB for a year.

    Or $190 for 7TB for 2 years. That beats pretty much everyone except:

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted because hostc and hostbrr also around the same price (even <100$) with not that much straightjacketed support (at least not resetting the timer only because someone raised a ticket.)

    I disqualified them from my selection because their companies are too new for me to feel safe with them. Also, I'm wary of any company that's ignores DMCA complaints.

    You disqualify hostbrr and hostc?

  • @plumberg said:

    @bassetts said:

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

    I will start a new seasonal host.
    Original price. $1m/ gb

    Discounted 99.9999%.

    Heavily discounted, yes technically the truth.
    Reality, probably not.

    HostHatch's full price services are not unreasonable at all and they provide a quality service. Your example really doesn't hold up.

  • @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Discounted yes.

    But my main objection was resetting the timer for raising a ticket. That's an intended punishment so as to avoid raising of ticket. If a person raises multiple, I can understand that. But for 1?

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

    When we say discount, we compare products across different providers. NOT in the same provider for a reason.

  • @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Check my post above.

    There are very few providers whose storage vps is powerful enough to run windows server.

    To be honest @dev_vps I do not have the same appeal level for windows server for one reason. Horses for courses.

    These people are not buying these servers because these are powerful (.... yet unreliable according to hosthatch's own admission IIRC). If it is storage server, their main requirement is storage. If it doesn't run windows server, most wouldn't complain because that's not something they expect in the first place.

    But they expect at least a minimal level of support.

    I think you need to re-read the condition about the timer reset. It's only if you open a ticket enquiring about the delivery time of the server. If you have a genuine reason to open a ticket (I can't see what that would be before the server is provisioned myself) then the timer isn't reset.

    I understood that part. My question in the previous post was, Is this "punishment" for raising multiple tickets or even just 1 ticket can reset it?

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @bassetts said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @i12h said:
    F.Y.I

    4k read/write of CM 2024 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 40.36 MB/s   (10.0k) | 603.65 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Write      | 40.43 MB/s   (10.1k) | 606.82 MB/s   (9.4k)
    Total      | 80.79 MB/s   (20.1k) | 1.21 GB/s    (18.9k)
    

    VPS as a reference - Black Friday 2023 - AMD Compute 4 GB - T2 - Tokyo

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 209.35 MB/s  (52.3k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 209.90 MB/s  (52.4k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 419.26 MB/s (104.8k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
    

    HostHatch Ticket Reply:

    We use different NVMes in different servers, all of them are enterprise grade NVMes and we do not make guarantees of any specific performance.

    I'll never understand why hosthatch is preferred by many veteran users even after these kind of issues where their reply are like this (not even escalating the issue).

    To me, it seems like for old users, hosthatch makes exceptions due to long standing relationship but new users often get the short end of the stick.

    Two different extremes seems to be existing at the same time.

    Opening tickets to inquire about the delivery timing will reset the two week timer. Support time is extremely expensive, please use it with care.

    If this is true and not sarcasm, I've no words.

    These packages are heavily discounted and HostHatch make it very clear what the delivery time will be. The rule to not open tickets during the provisioning window is because support time is expensive and they've already set expectations on how long it will take to provision. As can be seen in this thread people still open tickets and ask where their server is despite it being so clear in the OP.

    They also make it very clear that these deals are not for production use and the level and speed of support provided will differ from what you'd get if you bought a standard, non-discounted, service from them.

    I think it's more than fair, I am paying a lot less for the services in this thread than their standard services. Expecting the same level of support and response times is unreasonable. If I need that I'll go buy one of the services available for full price.

    I wouldn't call it heavily discounted. For storage servers, better options are out there.

    Discounted yes.

    But my main objection was resetting the timer for raising a ticket. That's an intended punishment so as to avoid raising of ticket. If a person raises multiple, I can understand that. But for 1?

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

    When we say discount, we compare products across different providers. NOT in the same provider for a reason.

    You're comparing different provider's offerings, not their discounts. That is absolutely not how a discount works.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    But they expect at least a minimal level of support.

    As I mentioned before, I have raised only one ticket in last two+ years with HH and it was resolved in hours on same day.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @bassetts said:

    @plumberg said:

    @bassetts said:

    You can only compare to HostHatch prices when saying how discounted it is. The 5TB plan was $115/yr, full price for that on their site is $20/mo so $240/yr. That is a heavy discount.

    Would you say a $60k car being sold for $30k wasn't heavily discounted just becaues you can buy other cars for $30k? :lol:

    If you don't like the rule about the timer reset then don't buy, or buy and don't open a ticket. There is no need to open a ticket during the provisioning time given so it's a complete non-issue.

    I will start a new seasonal host.
    Original price. $1m/ gb

    Discounted 99.9999%.

    Heavily discounted, yes technically the truth.
    Reality, probably not.

    HostHatch's full price services are not unreasonable at all and they provide a quality service. Your example really doesn't hold up.

    It's all subjective at the end for pricing. What you are seeing is the updated pricing. Earlier it was much inflated.

    Yes. They definitely provide quality service.
    But @hosthatch has admitted they need to up the notch on support and they have shown significant improvements.

    It's not the best support yet I think they are on thr pathway to get there.

    Sometimes, even with full priced packages sometimes things can be missed / delayed.

    Most of the times, support has been responsive in less than a few hours. But there are other situations where tickets auto close/ there is radio silence.

This discussion has been closed.