Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Sharing my refund experience In Crunchbits

13

Comments

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited November 2024

    @Petey_Long said: You do realize this is against the terms of service, correct?

    Is it? Can you quote this part from TOS? I went through the TOS and couldn't find it. Maybe I just overlooked it?

    I don't have two accounts, but I can't imagine sharing my personal account with, for example, my company account, as they have separate billing.
    Can you imagine ordering a service for personal use under the account you manage for your company?

  • @crunchbits said: Ah yes, the classic "The amount of federal subpoenas, general abuse, and entitlement isn't worth $0.89c/mo to us anymore" thus we must be sinking trope. How dare I want to focus on improvements in both support and hardware for product line-ups that aren't treating us like an I-95 rest stop toilet. What a terrible business decision!

    You are fully entitled to discontinue any product line. The yearly agreement does not constitute a lifetime contract.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • @Petey_Long said:

    @TzRpa8 said:

    @Petey_Long said:

    @TzRpa8 said:

    @badhon_raj said:

    @TzRpa8 said:

    I seldom use them, and only use a few GB of data a month. I just want to solve the problem, and I didn't make any excessive demands. But you keep ignoring it.

    creating 6 tickets and pinging every 1-60m is a bit too much.

    I had to refund 6 hosts, and I saw that each ticket could correspond to one vps.

    Yeah there seems to be a lot more to this story than what's being led on here.

    Where did the number 6 come from all of a sudden? I've been seeing "3" throughout the whole thing.

    This is far too convoluted to even be commenting on as an outside spectator. This is just a mess.

    This is what the provider just added. The other account did not have the vps deleted, and the provider did not refund me. It has nothing to do with this topic.

    For clarity's sake...

    @TzRpa8 said: I have two accounts for easy management.

    You said you have two accounts for easy management. You do realize this is against the terms of service, correct?

    I don't know what you are focusing on. If it is not convenient for management, I will put all my VPS in one account, which I bought with Push. If it is against the terms of service, will I use the same IP and the same browser to log in? I have always used the same browser to log in without avoiding anything.

    I just want a response and to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

  • @egoror said:

    @crunchbits said: Ah yes, the classic "The amount of federal subpoenas, general abuse, and entitlement isn't worth $0.89c/mo to us anymore" thus we must be sinking trope. How dare I want to focus on improvements in both support and hardware for product line-ups that aren't treating us like an I-95 rest stop toilet. What a terrible business decision!

    You are fully entitled to discontinue any product line. The yearly agreement does not constitute a lifetime contract.

    I don't know what your focus is. I just want to get a reply as soon as possible, whether it can be restored or not, so that I can save my project immediately.

  • Petey_LongPetey_Long Barred
    edited November 2024

    @Mumbly said:

    @Petey_Long said: You do realize this is against the terms of service, correct?

    Is it? Can you quote this part from TOS? I went through the TOS and couldn't find it. Maybe I just overlooked it?

    I don't have two accounts, but I can't imagine sharing my personal account with, for example, my company account, as they have separate billing.
    Can you imagine ordering a service for personal use under the account you manage for your company?

    Sorry, said ToS, meant AUP

    Please contact Crunchbits should you have any questions about our AUP. We are flexible in how our services can be used, but here is a (non-exhaustive) list of prohibited activites.If you have any questions about your specific use case, it is best to contact us first. We respect your privacy and only wish to set expectations between us appropriately.

    Given these are the repercussions for not following AUP..

    1a. If the violation is an immediately terminable offense as outlined above, the service will be brought >offline and destroyed.
    1b. If the violation is not immediately terminable and can be remedied, the service will be suspended >and brought offline pending contact with the customer.
    2. A Crunchbits staff member will open a support ticket to inform the customer of the abuse and outline >the steps required to restore service.
    3. Upon acknowledgement from the customer in the support ticket, Crunchbits will restore services and >allow a 24 hours for the customer to remedy the issue and prevent further abuses.

    It's better to ask in advance than to beg for forgiveness afterwords.

    But when you have multiple tickets coming from multiple accounts (from AUP)

    1. Resource abuses
      Whether intentional or otherwise, resource abuse is defined as any action or activity that consumes >sufficient system resources to cause harm or negatively affect other equipment and/or customers. >Intentional abuse cases will be terminated immediately with a ban on future services. Unintentional >abuse can happen and we will just suspend the offending services while contacting the owner to allow >a sufficient remedy.

    Essentially DDoS'ing support (multiple tickets+multiple responses before replies - especially on the weekend) does constitute resource abuse.

    But @TzRpa8 - not sure what you're looking to ultimately get out of this but again, assume the server you needed is long gone and start making other plans. You already got a response from @crunchbits

    Nothing else that can be done there. Your options would have been to allow us to recreate and fix it (generally with an apology and some extra time), or accept a refund.

    In the future, if you need (2) accounts, make sure you ask if they allow having two accounts.

    Also, when putting in tickets - don't "update" or do anything to your ticket after you submit it. Wait for a response and then, and only then, respond.

    Anytime you "update" your ticket - it puts you to the back of the queue.

    Unless you need to specify details for each specific service, just open up one ticket and try and get everything that falls under the umbrella of what you're looking to get accomplished summarized and taken care of in one ticket.

    I think everyone involved could have handled things differently but the end result would have been much better had there not been so many moving parts that shouldn't have been moving to begin with.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @badhon_raj said:

    @jar said:

    @badhon_raj said:

    @jar said:
    Thank you for asking, asshole.

    pardon me, but I have to ask.
    @hhq365 is a nobody. you are a respected person here. Why are you picking fight with a nobody and ruining your reputation here?
    why not just ignore trolls like them?

    Who are you?

    Nobody.
    maybe a customer, but apart from that, a nobody.

    oh, and also a well-wisher?

    There’s no such thing as a nobody 💜

  • TzRpa8TzRpa8 Member
    edited November 2024

    @Petey_Long said:

    @Mumbly said:

    @Petey_Long said: You do realize this is against the terms of service, correct?

    Is it? Can you quote this part from TOS? I went through the TOS and couldn't find it. Maybe I just overlooked it?

    I don't have two accounts, but I can't imagine sharing my personal account with, for example, my company account, as they have separate billing.
    Can you imagine ordering a service for personal use under the account you manage for your company?

    Sorry, said ToS, meant AUP

    Please contact Crunchbits should you have any questions about our AUP. We are flexible in how our services can be used, but here is a (non-exhaustive) list of prohibited activites.If you have any questions about your specific use case, it is best to contact us first. We respect your privacy and only wish to set expectations between us appropriately.

    Given these are the repercussions for not following AUP..

    1a. If the violation is an immediately terminable offense as outlined above, the service will be brought offline and destroyed.

    1b. If the violation is not immediately terminable and can be remedied, the service will be suspended and brought offline pending contact with the customer.
    2. A Crunchbits staff member will open a support ticket to inform the customer of the abuse and outline the steps required to restore service.
    3. Upon acknowledgement from the customer in the support ticket, Crunchbits will restore services and allow a 24 hours for the customer to remedy the issue and prevent further abuses.

    It's better to ask in advance than to beg for forgiveness afterwords.

    But when you have multiple tickets coming from multiple accounts (from AUP)

    1. Resource abuses
      Whether intentional or otherwise, resource abuse is defined as any action or activity that consumes >sufficient system resources to cause harm or negatively affect other equipment and/or customers. >Intentional abuse cases will be terminated immediately with a ban on future services. Unintentional >abuse can happen and we will just suspend the offending services while contacting the owner to allow >a sufficient remedy.

    Essentially DDoS'ing support (multiple tickets+multiple responses before replies - especially on the weekend) does constitute resource abuse.

    I really admire you guys. One ticket for one vps refund. Should I know that I have to wait minutes for another ticket to be issued? Should every consumer know how the ticket system works?

  • @crunchbits said:

    @jar said:
    Maybe @crunchbits can confirm but my assumption is that they have a lot of tickets right now relating to the same topic. I’m sure it’s not a case of being intentionally difficult, but please try not to intentionally make things more difficult for them as well by continually opening multiple tickets about the same issue. That is spamming their ticket system and it doesn’t decrease the time it takes them to get through the tickets, rather it maliciously inflates the time.

    Ticket load was high, but manageable. Aside from having stuff leaked inadvertently sooner than our mass-email went out, everything else was prepared.

    This customer opened multiple tickets and selected the same service on each ticket while specifying separate demands. It was processed by different support agents and a mistake was made on our part because once it's terminated it can't be undone. All the while he was pinging the tickets on 1m-60m intervals--hence why you see [MERGED] as staff rolled all of the tickets into one and asked him to calm down.

    Nothing else that can be done there. Your options would have been to allow us to recreate and fix it (generally with an apology and some extra time), or accept a refund.

    EDIT: Forgot, he had 2 different accounts that he was spamming support separately from. 2 become 1. In total 6 separate tickets opened over 2 services.

    @DeadlyChemist said:
    I cancel 2 producs i open 2 tickets
    So the product can be referenced in the ticket

    So this shouldnt happen, but it still does

    Yikes

    What about when the same product is referenced in multiple tickets? 🤔

    @gbzret4d said:
    Since they stopped renewing their offers for a specific lineup I won't give them any money soon, no matter if your accusations are correct or not

    @ascicode said:
    From top to flop provider.

    @JasonM said:
    seems their ship is going down.

    Ah yes, the classic "The amount of federal subpoenas, general abuse, and entitlement isn't worth $0.89c/mo to us anymore" thus we must be sinking trope. How dare I want to focus on improvements in both support and hardware for product line-ups that aren't treating us like an I-95 rest stop toilet. What a terrible business decision!

    Because enough time has passed and enough oddly insanely irate people have removed themselves, anyone with the patience to open a ticket and see what options were open to them were told they got identical specs except +0.5GB RAM, moved to newer Xeon Scalable units (our DIY lineup), an apology for the hassle, and put on pure NVMe disks. They don't have any data loss or have to do anything manual, all FUD. We needed a firewall and filter event, and this was it. I am also sorry that some good/non-abusive customers were caught up in the excessive hype unnecessarily.

    LET needs a Christmas grinch or a heel, and if offering to refund (+1 month extra), fulfill your original term, or give you a significant upgrade is the worst thing that has happened to you here then I am happy to oblige that role. Each passing day my decision is only further cemented when I see how quickly someone using these exact plans since August/September 2023 turns around with either blatantly false or toxic comments and tosses all other goodwill acts under the bus as if they were nothing--very telling.

    Each ticket corresponds to a different vps
    I reiterate that I have checked carefully. It may be a mistake in the ticket system. But this is the fact.
    But you can't see the original records after merging

  • Petey_LongPetey_Long Barred
    edited November 2024

    @TzRpa8 said:

    @Petey_Long said:

    @Mumbly said:

    @Petey_Long said: You do realize this is against the terms of service, correct?

    Is it? Can you quote this part from TOS? I went through the TOS and couldn't find it. Maybe I just overlooked it?

    I don't have two accounts, but I can't imagine sharing my personal account with, for example, my company account, as they have separate billing.
    Can you imagine ordering a service for personal use under the account you manage for your company?

    Sorry, said ToS, meant AUP

    Please contact Crunchbits should you have any questions about our AUP. We are flexible in how our services can be used, but here is a (non-exhaustive) list of prohibited activites.If you have any questions about your specific use case, it is best to contact us first. We respect your privacy and only wish to set expectations between us appropriately.

    Given these are the repercussions for not following AUP..

    1a. If the violation is an immediately terminable offense as outlined above, the service will be brought offline and destroyed.

    1b. If the violation is not immediately terminable and can be remedied, the service will be suspended and brought offline pending contact with the customer.
    2. A Crunchbits staff member will open a support ticket to inform the customer of the abuse and outline the steps required to restore service.
    3. Upon acknowledgement from the customer in the support ticket, Crunchbits will restore services and allow a 24 hours for the customer to remedy the issue and prevent further abuses.

    It's better to ask in advance than to beg for forgiveness afterwords.

    But when you have multiple tickets coming from multiple accounts (from AUP)

    1. Resource abuses
      Whether intentional or otherwise, resource abuse is defined as any action or activity that consumes >sufficient system resources to cause harm or negatively affect other equipment and/or customers. >Intentional abuse cases will be terminated immediately with a ban on future services. Unintentional >abuse can happen and we will just suspend the offending services while contacting the owner to allow >a sufficient remedy.

    Essentially DDoS'ing support (multiple tickets+multiple responses before replies - especially on the weekend) does constitute resource abuse.

    I really admire you guys. One ticket for one vps refund. Should I know that I have to wait minutes for another ticket to be issued? Should every consumer know how the ticket system works?

    Here's how you could have avoided everything that happened, even using 1 ticket per service.

    Ticket #1

    I want to cancel my service with the IP address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, I have backed up all of my important data and feel free to terminate the service and refund at your earliest convenience.

    Ticket #2

    I want to cancel my service with the IP address yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, I have backed up all of my important data and feel free to terminate the service and refund at your earliest convenience.

    Ticket #3

    I want to cancel my service with the IP address zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz, I have backed up all of my important data and feel free to terminate the service and refund at your earliest convenience.

    Then the important part - WAITING!

    Given you submitted your tickets after NORMAL business hours in the US (Friday night AFTER 5pm - yes, you should know how that system works) which ran into the weekend - all you would have had to do is wait until this morning (about the time you had made this post on LET) and you'd have woken up to either an account credit and/or refund and the server that was unintentionally terminated wouldn't have ended up terminated (or at least directly related to your actions - I'm not a psychic)

    What would you have had to do in order to make that happen? Literally nothing after submitting your tickets except be a patient person. Everything would have been processed without ambiguity and everyone would be as happy as they possibly could be given the situation.

    Again, I think both sides could have handled this better but ultimately you were the one who pushed the envelope and it was because of that, things became convoluted and ended up working out poorly for yourself.

    I'm extremely sorry this happened to you but it really could have all been avoided with a little patience.

    Thanked by 2amj TimboJones
  • Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

  • @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited November 2024

    @soulchief said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    Do you mean making customers jump through hoops because they're trying to disqualify them when they should just honor the offers they've sold and used for promotion (which by the way, was not that long ago).

    If they wanted to discount one year, they should have said that then. A whole lot less people would have signed up.

    Thanked by 2Dasabo xwaynedx
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @soulchief said:
    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    We haven't opened the "bait and switch" ticket as our service has 8 months left.
    We'll discuss DIY lineup migration around February, when everything calms down.

  • danblazedanblaze Member
    edited November 2024

    This is a mess.

    I'm sure not everyone understands how WHMCS works - as a customer, I don't like the way it ticket works at all.

    But it would be better for everyone if there was some understanding of this:

    1. multiple replies before customer service responds to a ticket only makes things worse by continually silencing that ticket.

    2. in any case, the way to keep it clear (if these servers are all inside one account) is to use IP addresses to locate the servers, and to make it clear in a ticket which ones are to be refunded and which ones are to be kept. When things get complicated, you need to be careful with your wording and make sure everyone understands what you mean, it's the responsibility of the person who wrote the ticket.

    3. reasonable prodding may be OK, but the best way to do it, is to quote the content of another ticket, not repeat the content, so that no one knows how to put the same thing, sensibly, into the processing queue.

    I'm not trying to point fingers or anything, but when you're dealing with WHMCS, this is really common sense that you should know.

    Thanked by 2TimboJones adly
  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @SirFoxy said:

    @soulchief said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    Do you mean making customers jump through hoops because they're trying to disqualify them when they should just honor the offers they've sold and used for promotion (which by the way, was not that long ago).

    If they wanted to discount one year, they should have said that then. A whole lot less people would have signed up.

    hoops = opening a support ticket to get a better deal at the same price...

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • techdragontechdragon Member
    edited November 2024

    It must be your fault that providers offer unsustainable deals.

    Thanked by 1loay
  • SaahibSaahib Host Rep, Veteran

    Why there is even discussion here, they are probably having influx tickets and many tickets might require manual actions.

    And, they are not running away with your money, they are discontinuing some product and offering refunds. Further, they are not giving deadline, you are free to migrate at your will, they won't just renew on your next due.

    Pointless discussion.

  • @wadhah said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @soulchief said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    Do you mean making customers jump through hoops because they're trying to disqualify them when they should just honor the offers they've sold and used for promotion (which by the way, was not that long ago).

    If they wanted to discount one year, they should have said that then. A whole lot less people would have signed up.

    hoops = opening a support ticket to get a better deal at the same price...

    But as far as I understand, the email that @crunchbits sent out primarily suggested that customers either cancel or migrate to one of the regular VPSes (which were a lot less attractive). Only if you didn't follow those suggestions and contacted support you were given a much better (ready-made) offer. So the conclusion is to disregard any emails @crunchbits sends out and always bother support instead? I am not sure that's a good message to send...

  • @cmeerw said:

    @wadhah said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @soulchief said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    Do you mean making customers jump through hoops because they're trying to disqualify them when they should just honor the offers they've sold and used for promotion (which by the way, was not that long ago).

    If they wanted to discount one year, they should have said that then. A whole lot less people would have signed up.

    hoops = opening a support ticket to get a better deal at the same price...

    But as far as I understand, the email that @crunchbits sent out primarily suggested that customers either cancel or migrate to one of the regular VPSes (which were a lot less attractive). Only if you didn't follow those suggestions and contacted support you were given a much better (ready-made) offer. So the conclusion is to disregard any emails @crunchbits sends out and always bother support instead? I am not sure that's a good message to send...

    Their email was worded in a way to filter out the people they don't want to continue using their product.

    "we’re happy to offer a recurring discount to transition to one of our upgraded VPS products at the end of your term"

    They didn't say what the discount was because they wanted people who read the email to contact them.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @cmeerw said:

    @wadhah said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @soulchief said:

    @SirFoxy said:
    Breaking news: LowEndTalk host bait and switches customers (by the way, this is extra funny cause I remember @crunchbits talking about how the yearly promos were a profitable exception and fit his business model about a year ago).

    At this point, the "Top Provider" tag is more of an inclination of who to avoid. This should surprise nobody if you've been paying attention and have half of a brain. Avoid the grifters.

    Ahh yes the classic "bait and switch by giving customers who can follow instructions an even better product than what they paid for".

    Sign me up for more of crunchbits "bait and switch".

    Do you mean making customers jump through hoops because they're trying to disqualify them when they should just honor the offers they've sold and used for promotion (which by the way, was not that long ago).

    If they wanted to discount one year, they should have said that then. A whole lot less people would have signed up.

    hoops = opening a support ticket to get a better deal at the same price...

    But as far as I understand, the email that @crunchbits sent out primarily suggested that customers either cancel or migrate to one of the regular VPSes (which were a lot less attractive). Only if you didn't follow those suggestions and contacted support you were given a much better (ready-made) offer. So the conclusion is to disregard any emails @crunchbits sends out and always bother support instead? I am not sure that's a good message to send...

    I mean you are not wrong, and i have no idea why any of this started from CrunchBit's side, and i also agree that it isnt the best handling of a situation ever.

    But as a customer I'm still happy enough with the service I have recieved before the discontinuation and I'm willing to "suffer" the 25 seconds it took me to start a ticket to continue being a customer.

    For people that didnt want to continue with them they did offer VERY generous refund policies honestly.

  • zedzed Member
    edited November 2024

    @TzRpa8 said: Should I know that I have to wait minutes for another ticket to be issued? Should every consumer know how the ticket system works?

    I'm not gonna bash either side here since it seems like miscommunication (maybe bad english? maybe rushed support due to current events?), but man the wacko fuckwit rules regarding support tickets we put up with in this lowend vps environment are amusing. Until you're the one putting in a ticket and getting frustrated.

    On more than one occasion I've just gone ahead and cancelled a vps rather than deal with the retarded gymnastics. Oh shit, is that the point? lol!

    Edit: And the inevitable "well you're not getting a refund!!" .. bro keep the 4 dollars and buy a coffee.

  • @TzRpa8

    You’re zhangquvr/Mr.R8?

    Probably another angry user from China. Entitled, too.

  • @itsTomHarper said:
    For me, it all went rather smoothly. I first shredded my storage, then shut the server down, and then went on to apply for a refund. They asked me to post a confirmation that I would lose all my data irrevocably, and I did the same. As I had paid through PayPal Legacy, they asked me to wait for the billing department to refund manually, as automation was not possible. The next day, I got the refund back to my PayPal.

    Same, except I chose to receive a refund as account credit.

    @crunchbits said:

    Because enough time has passed and enough oddly insanely irate people have removed themselves, anyone with the patience to open a ticket and see what options were open to them were told they got identical specs except +0.5GB RAM, moved to newer Xeon Scalable units (our DIY lineup), an apology for the hassle, and put on pure NVMe disks. They don't have any data loss or have to do anything manual, all FUD. We needed a firewall and filter event, and this was it. I am also sorry that some good/non-abusive customers were caught up in the excessive hype unnecessarily.

    Just to clarify @crunchbits , does this mean that some customers got to keep their VPSes at the same billing price and interval? Is it too late to switch to that option, after already having gone with a refund (given that I forfeit said refund)?

  • XrmaddnessXrmaddness Member
    edited November 2024

    @ServerBachelor said:
    Just to clarify crunchbits , does this mean that some customers got to keep their VPSes at the same billing price and interval? Is it too late to switch to that option, after already having gone with a refund (given that I forfeit said refund)?

    Yes and yes, although I'm not sure about getting this offer after having received a refund already. I'm assuming you were one of these:

    @crunchbits said:
    I am also sorry that some good/non-abusive customers were caught up in the excessive hype unnecessarily.

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • @Xrmaddness said:

    @ServerBachelor said:
    Just to clarify crunchbits , does this mean that some customers got to keep their VPSes at the same billing price and interval? Is it too late to switch to that option, after already having gone with a refund (given that I forfeit said refund)?

    Yes and yes, although I'm not sure about getting this offer after having received a refund already. I'm assuming you were one of these:

    @crunchbits said:
    I am also sorry that some good/non-abusive customers were caught up in the excessive hype unnecessarily.

    Fair enough. I’ll ticket them and see what happens.

  • @ServerBachelor said:

    Fair enough. I’ll ticket them and see what happens.

    It's definitely worth a try. Good luck!

    Thanked by 1ServerBachelor
  • typical MJJ behavior.

  • So much for the top provider of LET..

  • @cybertech said:
    typical MJJ behavior.

    I would like to hear your opinion. The service was mistakenly shut down by the provider and I have been waiting for two days but it has not been restored. I don’t know if it can be restored.
    Opening a ticket is accused of abuse

  • @cybertech said:
    typical MJJ behavior.

    Don't embarrass yourself. You XJJ can't even figure out the basic facts

Sign In or Register to comment.