Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

100 Gbs public port , public speedtest servers , any ideea? Or who want help us :)

13468914

Comments

  • xrzxrz Barred
    edited October 2024

    no words :D tick-tock

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • Thanked by 1ehab
  • xrzxrz Barred
    edited October 2024

    @Calin said: we can't find public 100 Gbs speedtest servers, does anyone have an idea of ​​some servers with iperf for 100 Gbs tests?

    you dont need to look for 100G servers, 100G servers will find you and test your crap network :D

    omnomnom

  • ExonHostExonHost Member, Host Rep

    He should not allow to discuss this type topic after scamming 20k.

    Thanked by 2Andreix RIYAD
  • @Arkas close this crap. Members ddos’ing rich idiot. That’s not how we make lulz…

    Thanked by 1tentor
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    Thanked by 1zmeu
  • zmeuzmeu Member
    edited October 2024

    @Andreix If my activity was moved out to South Africa - can I use now a (dirty) versions of WHMCS ?

  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @zmeu said:

    @Andreix If my activity was moved out to South Africa - can I use now a (dirty) versions of WHMCS ?

    Until you save ~ 22k in nulled software, you should be safe.

  • @Levi said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @Andru said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @sillycat said:

    I'm not sure who will get that email, but it won't be Calin for sure.

    LMFAO

    220 dweb.five-host.com ESMTP Exim 4.98 Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:23:18 +0300

    Doesn't 220 imply there is a mail server on that host but doesn't necessarily mean the mail server actually accepts any mail for that domain? Having no MX Records or DMARC is not a good look for a domain designed to handle abuse reports.

    He can make email forward at his domains registrar. No mx required for that.

    They just put their own MX records.

  • no need to receive emails cuz we have alot active customers from let

  • @Calin said:

    @DP said: I believe the community is more eager to hear about the status of refund

    Hello , yes I'm agree with this , but I have a client who recently purchased a 100 Gbs network from us, and we were just looking for some 100 Gbs speedtests, this was the client's request, that's why I asked here...

    I can't stop all my activity now because of a possibly malicious crypto client

    I'f it's a problem this thread it's fine to be close! Thanks and sorry!

    this is some cheap ways to mask-promote yourself while scamming people for over 20k.

    Thanked by 2aneesh120 10thHouse
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @DP said:
    Seriously, don't say anything unless you want to talk about the $20k.

    Meaning "we do not (yet?) ban you, but you are limited to 1 topic only and otherwise have to stay silent (incl. re baseless allegations from haters)"?

    Did I get that right, is that what you as an admin told him?

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited October 2024

    Pardon my frank language but LET seems to increasingly decay into a shithole, albeit (I presume) a shithole with lots of views and clicks, thanks to user-hunting, willy nilly allegations, almost whole pages full of nothing but dirt, etc.

    And now, @DP, a (deservedly) well respected admin leaves any semblance of neutrality, fairness, and objectivity aside and basically ties @Calin down and gags him while taking away the last limit in the haters and "fun" marauders way. Basically he put a "he's fair game. Enjoy hunting" tag on Calin.

    @Calin

    I think you should leave LET, at least for the time being, and return only once the bank problem is resolved and you either refund gossd or deliver the product they paid for. You screemingly obviously can't expect even a modicum of fairness here but are basically fair game for the "fun" marauders.
    Unfortunately you are not completely innocent. Maybe in the matter itself (I still think that gossd abused you and played dirty) but you at the very minimum were stupid and careless enough to play their game. Also, making lots of marketing noise à la "We don't care about DMCA and similar" wasn't exactly the smartest strategy.

    Plus, not providing at least once a week an update on the status with the bank, turned - not at all surprisingly! - against you.

    Whatever, no matter whether you did or did not what your haters allege, you have no chance here anymore.

    IMO the only sensible way for you is to pull out from LET, let things cool down, wait for your bank to free the money and then return to LET with proper proof that you solved the issue by either refunding or providing the service.
    And even then, in case you still intend to use LET for promos and such, you very, very likely will not experience fair play and a fair chance. And don't expect apologies after having proven innocent! "fun" marauders don't apologize; what they are after is victims, marauding, and destroying as long as it's for free. Whether they destroy businesses and/or LET is not something they care about. At all.

    AFAIC I'm currently not anymore interested in services/products you provide. Not because I think that you are a scammer (I don't) but because you have shown again and again that you are unlikely to be consistent (in how you run your business and services) and also very unlikely to stay and deal professionally in/with a crisis.

    Feel free to terminate my VPS. Sorry.

    Thanked by 2c1vhosting Shade
  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited October 2024

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4016767/#Comment_4016767

    • Calin will get his provider tag back
      - GoSSD will curse calin in this forum until he gets warned/banned by the mods
      - This thread will be the best guide in the entire hosting industry about "How to get away with scamming over $20k USD".
      - GoSSD will never see his money again, and neither will his client.
      - Calin will use the money to expand his DIY datacenter/bunker and traveling.
      - There will be sales thread once this thread has died down or locked by mods.
      - Calin will get ddos attacked by the original client later on, or worse if the original client is involved with organized crime.
      - Users wont give a shit because everyone loves drama

    • This will repeat at least once by the end of 2026.

    Thanked by 2Levi aneesh120
  • mcsmcs Member
    edited October 2024

    @MannDude said:
    Many people tag Calin anytime some customer comes on this forum requesting something that no one would realistically like to provide service for. Im guilty of doing this too, because its somewhat comical to direct an obvious headache of a customer to someone like Calin. But in the end, he still gets a couple dollars.

    I guess considering his new status here, we should stop doing that, even though it's clearly a joke for everyone who knows his history?

    Only way to prevent this is to ban him outright. Lied about his age for years and two crypro scams with victims that likely learned of him from this very forum. The swap as ram, random ASN swap with 30+ hr outages of even his own site, etc are cause for heavy scrutiny but not banworthy... But using this site to attract victims is pretty bad.

    If not a ban then a vanilla add-on that changes any tagging of his username to a page to highlight it's probably a joke and no one is actually recommending him. One is easier than the other.

    Everything you described is really true and many things happened with this provider during its presence on the forum. And this cannot be attributed only to the inability to run a business or improper management, some points are already more inclined to the fact that a person deliberately evades resolving issues properly. Even if this is not direct fraud, it is deception of the user in any case and failure to comply with the obligations assumed. As for the last payment in cryptocurrency, any such problem, especially with $ 20,000, can be solved in any European country in 1-2 weeks, but not more than a month as @Сalin solves. The claims of the affected client are quite justified and according to any contract, the delay in delivery of the service to the client is not in favor of the provider - in addition to the refund of money for the service, he must pay a penalty and interest for using the money in this case, and it does not matter for what reason, according to his decision to withdraw money to the bank, they were blocked. Even if the client did not provide him with how he claims payments where the cryptocurrency came from, all issues with the bank can be resolved if you have a company for providing services and you took money even to your personal account. Therefore, everything that Kalin is doing now is continuous excuses and no desire to do anything specific. According to the fact that many members of the community have spoken out with open criticism of this provider, there are grounds and a completely justified reaction. Of course, with an attack on the site and network by users of this forum, if any, this is not quite an appropriate and correct decision, but sometimes users are infuriated by the impudence and inaction of the person from whom they demand a well-deserved solution to the issue. Although I do not support such a method of solving issues. It is necessary to create a separate thread on the forum and control such providers, and completely on the part of the administrators and moderators of this forum to take action and influence such providers so that they resolve reasonable complaints from customers. They pay money for the right to participate in this forum and receive payments from clients from this forum to the administration of this forum and although the amount is small, there should be some additional responsibility for the opportunity to advertise themselves to such a decent audience. Generally speaking, they could have already introduced a security deposit, in case of problems with the provider, so that it would act as at least partial insurance for the victims. And not only put the tag temporarily suspended, specifically remove from the forum and that's it, but have a connection with the person who suffered to understand whether the situation is ultimately resolved or not. If the issues are resolved, they should properly raise the issue with the audience of expert users of this forum about the return of this provider to the forum if the provider wants it from further. It was also possible to improve the verification of providers who come en masse to the forum by moderators and the forum administration in advance.

    Thanked by 2aneesh120 Andreix
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited October 2024

    @host_c said:
    @Not_Oles , @angstrom , @Arkas

    I think that this tread will serve no good, @Calin definitely needs to fix he's mess before announcing anything.

    Also, my compatriot @Andreix needs to get he's shit together.

    Saw this earlier, but didn't say anything then.

    @Andreix said:

    @host_c said:
    @AndreiX, chatGPT messed up the reply, I did not imply you were part of it, I just underlined my point, my point is with you being a dick, and that there is a pattern.

    If you rub me well, I'll become even bigger for you. In the meantime, you're still a sketchy dude, on Calin's payroll, being happy he can get crumbs from a 20k scam.
    PS: Having GPT write your reply? Talking about skills like: "Hey GPT! Andreix is making me upset! Give me something to combat."

    Hey @Andreix!

    Just letting you know that we're receiving flags on your posts. So, please take it very, very easy! Maybe I could please recommend that you please stop posting in this thread?

    I see five warnings on your profile! The Mod Team may take further action after review.

    Thanks! Best wishes and kindest regards,

    Tom

    Thanked by 2host_c yoursunny
  • Others people gets flagged, warns or even bans for less - but trolling with $20K in your pocket you get only a fancy ignore. Kindly take some actions? Or at least close this thread.

    Thanked by 2aneesh120 techdragon
  • @zmeu said:
    Others people gets flagged, warns or even bans for less - but trolling with $20K in your pocket you get only a fancy ignore. Kindly take some actions? Or at least close this thread.

    Hello,
    Kindly pay the provider tag fee so you can scam 20k$ and call it malicous crypto and walk away without much warning and then upgrade your equipment add 100g backbone travel enjoy and chill in your life.!

    Thanked by 2BlaZe techdragon
  • @mcs said:

    Everything you described is really true and many things happened with this provider during its presence on the forum. And this cannot be attributed only to the inability to run a business or improper management, some points are already more inclined to the fact that a person deliberately evades resolving issues properly. Even if this is not direct fraud, it is deception of the user in any case and failure to comply with the obligations assumed. As for the last payment in cryptocurrency, any such problem, especially with $ 20,000, can be solved in any European country in 1-2 weeks, but not more than a month as @Сalin solves. The claims of the affected client are quite justified and according to any contract, the delay in delivery of the service to the client is not in favor of the provider - in addition to the refund of money for the service, he must pay a penalty and interest for using the money in this case, and it does not matter for what reason, according to his decision to withdraw money to the bank, they were blocked. Even if the client did not provide him with how he claims payments where the cryptocurrency came from, all issues with the bank can be resolved if you have a company for providing services and you took money even to your personal account. Therefore, everything that Kalin is doing now is continuous excuses and no desire to do anything specific. According to the fact that many members of the community have spoken out with open criticism of this provider, there are grounds and a completely justified reaction. Of course, with an attack on the site and network by users of this forum, if any, this is not quite an appropriate and correct decision, but sometimes users are infuriated by the impudence and inaction of the person from whom they demand a well-deserved solution to the issue. Although I do not support such a method of solving issues. It is necessary to create a separate thread on the forum and control such providers, and completely on the part of the administrators and moderators of this forum to take action and influence such providers so that they resolve reasonable complaints from customers. They pay money for the right to participate in this forum and receive payments from clients from this forum to the administration of this forum and although the amount is small, there should be some additional responsibility for the opportunity to advertise themselves to such a decent audience. Generally speaking, they could have already introduced a security deposit, in case of problems with the provider, so that it would act as at least partial insurance for the victims. And not only put the tag temporarily suspended, specifically remove from the forum and that's it, but have a connection with the person who suffered to understand whether the situation is ultimately resolved or not. If the issues are resolved, they should properly raise the issue with the audience of expert users of this forum about the return of this provider to the forum if the provider wants it from further. It was also possible to improve the verification of providers who come en masse to the forum by moderators and the forum administration in advance.

    I read everything this guy wrote, an action plan that maybe the mods can look into.

  • mcsmcs Member

    @Dazzle said:

    @mcs said:

    Everything you described is really true and many things happened with this provider during its presence on the forum. And this cannot be attributed only to the inability to run a business or improper management, some points are already more inclined to the fact that a person deliberately evades resolving issues properly. Even if this is not direct fraud, it is deception of the user in any case and failure to comply with the obligations assumed. As for the last payment in cryptocurrency, any such problem, especially with $ 20,000, can be solved in any European country in 1-2 weeks, but not more than a month as @Сalin solves. The claims of the affected client are quite justified and according to any contract, the delay in delivery of the service to the client is not in favor of the provider - in addition to the refund of money for the service, he must pay a penalty and interest for using the money in this case, and it does not matter for what reason, according to his decision to withdraw money to the bank, they were blocked. Even if the client did not provide him with how he claims payments where the cryptocurrency came from, all issues with the bank can be resolved if you have a company for providing services and you took money even to your personal account. Therefore, everything that Kalin is doing now is continuous excuses and no desire to do anything specific. According to the fact that many members of the community have spoken out with open criticism of this provider, there are grounds and a completely justified reaction. Of course, with an attack on the site and network by users of this forum, if any, this is not quite an appropriate and correct decision, but sometimes users are infuriated by the impudence and inaction of the person from whom they demand a well-deserved solution to the issue. Although I do not support such a method of solving issues. It is necessary to create a separate thread on the forum and control such providers, and completely on the part of the administrators and moderators of this forum to take action and influence such providers so that they resolve reasonable complaints from customers. They pay money for the right to participate in this forum and receive payments from clients from this forum to the administration of this forum and although the amount is small, there should be some additional responsibility for the opportunity to advertise themselves to such a decent audience. Generally speaking, they could have already introduced a security deposit, in case of problems with the provider, so that it would act as at least partial insurance for the victims. And not only put the tag temporarily suspended, specifically remove from the forum and that's it, but have a connection with the person who suffered to understand whether the situation is ultimately resolved or not. If the issues are resolved, they should properly raise the issue with the audience of expert users of this forum about the return of this provider to the forum if the provider wants it from further. It was also possible to improve the verification of providers who come en masse to the forum by moderators and the forum administration in advance.

    I read everything this guy wrote, an action plan that maybe the mods can look into.

    As an option, if the administration wants, it is also possible to implement a subscription for certain users of this forum in the form of a regular donation of at least $ 0.5-1 per user per month at will. So that this subscription would give additional privileges to the user in purchasing any service from specific providers with whom the administration of this forum would agree. Or, for example, have an additional discount on the service of 5%, or receive additional bonuses regardless of the special offers of providers - for example, additional bandwidth, RAM or hard drive space. From this money, an insurance fund could be easily formed, which in the event of fraud could again be divided between the affected users of this forum, honestly and transparently according to reasonable requests in critical cases. This may not always be enough, since the amounts of losses can be different - but in total it is also a good solution. And it will increase recognition and trust in this forum even more. It was high time to introduce such regulations, since I consider this forum to be of high quality, although not without shortcomings.

    Thanked by 2aneesh120 host_c
  • @mcs said:

    As an option, if the administration wants, it is also possible to implement a subscription for certain users of this forum in the form of a regular donation of at least $ 0.5-1 per user per month at will. So that this subscription would give additional privileges to the user in purchasing any service from specific providers with whom the administration of this forum would agree. Or, for example, have an additional discount on the service of 5%, or receive additional bonuses regardless of the special offers of providers - for example, additional bandwidth, RAM or hard drive space. From this money, an insurance fund could be easily formed, which in the event of fraud could again be divided between the affected users of this forum, honestly and transparently according to reasonable requests in critical cases. This may not always be enough, since the amounts of losses can be different - but in total it is also a good solution. And it will increase recognition and trust in this forum even more. It was high time to introduce such regulations, since I consider this forum to be of high quality, although not without shortcomings.

    Oops, my i m not support this

    Thanked by 3Mumbly tentor Peppery9
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2024

    @Not_Oles said:

    @host_c said:
    @Not_Oles , @angstrom , @Arkas

    I think that this tread will serve no good, @Calin definitely needs to fix he's mess before announcing anything.

    Also, my compatriot @Andreix needs to get he's shit together.

    Saw this earlier, but didn't say anything then.

    @Andreix said:

    @host_c said:
    @AndreiX, chatGPT messed up the reply, I did not imply you were part of it, I just underlined my point, my point is with you being a dick, and that there is a pattern.

    If you rub me well, I'll become even bigger for you. In the meantime, you're still a sketchy dude, on Calin's payroll, being happy he can get crumbs from a 20k scam.
    PS: Having GPT write your reply? Talking about skills like: "Hey GPT! Andreix is making me upset! Give me something to combat."

    Hey @Andreix!

    Just letting you know that we're receiving flags on your posts. So, please take it very, very easy! Maybe I could please recommend that you please stop posting in this thread?

    I see five warnings on your profile! The Mod Team may take further action after review.

    Thanks! Best wishes and kindest regards,

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    I would like to officially ask you one thing, just to make things clear for me.
    I understood that commenting anything about LET supporting criminals would get me banned eventually.
    However, if I pay for a provider tag, am I safe to scam people here? Not necessarily a 22k hit in one go, I could try to get smaller amounts from multiple people.
    So, could you assure me I won't get banned for scamming and you will try to take my side and cover me, just like you do for Calin?

    I am asking this question with all the seriousness. I need to know what kind of people and providers are "safe" from bans here.

    Thanks a lot! Really appreciate your time!

    PS: I can guess who's frustrated enough to flag my posts. Maybe he should use that energy to move to a proper DC, instead of a RCS-RDS basement dataroom.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited October 2024

    @Andreix said:

    @Not_Oles said:

    @host_c said:
    @Not_Oles , @angstrom , @Arkas

    I think that this tread will serve no good, @Calin definitely needs to fix he's mess before announcing anything.

    Also, my compatriot @Andreix needs to get he's shit together.

    Saw this earlier, but didn't say anything then.

    @Andreix said:

    @host_c said:
    @AndreiX, chatGPT messed up the reply, I did not imply you were part of it, I just underlined my point, my point is with you being a dick, and that there is a pattern.

    If you rub me well, I'll become even bigger for you. In the meantime, you're still a sketchy dude, on Calin's payroll, being happy he can get crumbs from a 20k scam.
    PS: Having GPT write your reply? Talking about skills like: "Hey GPT! Andreix is making me upset! Give me something to combat."

    Hey @Andreix!

    Just letting you know that we're receiving flags on your posts. So, please take it very, very easy! Maybe I could please recommend that you please stop posting in this thread?

    I see five warnings on your profile! The Mod Team may take further action after review.

    Thanks! Best wishes and kindest regards,

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    I would like to officially ask you one thing, just to make things clear for me.
    I understood that commenting anything about LET supporting criminals would get me banned eventually.
    However, if I pay for a provider tag, am I safe to scam people here? Not necessarily a 22k hit in one go, I could try to get smaller amounts from multiple people.
    So, could you assure me I won't get banned for scamming and you will try to take my side and cover me, just like you do for Calin?

    I am asking this question with all the seriousness. I need to know what kind of people and providers are "safe" from bans here.

    Thanks a lot! Really appreciate your time!

    PS: I can guess who's frustrated enough to flag my posts. Maybe he should use that energy to move to a proper DC, instead of a RCS-RDS basement dataroom.

    Only if you can make it look like "failed transaction" or something similar so its not 100% obvious at first glance, that you just ran with the money.

    Thanked by 1Andreix
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @stefeman said:
    Only if you can make it look like "failed transaction" or something similar so its not 100% obvious at first glance, that you just ran with the money.

    This time I am not kidding at all. If I as a user and more, as a provider, can not trust mods to do their job in a fair way, according to one's gravity of actions, then I should "raise my guard" so to speak to any action I make on LET.
    Right now, just as a regular user I fear that any transaction I may do via LET could result in money loss. Could be $1 could be $22k.

    If @Not_Oles (and probably the rest of staff) cares more to ban users that act as an "integrity advisor" and point out there's a scammer lurking around and potentially making more victims, than to ban the scammer itself, I want to know if that's the case, so I can become a scammer; which looks a more safer option for what I can tell from all events here, than struggling to offer a serious, secure and reliable service and relationship to (potential) clients.

    So, yeah, my question is serious, not a mockery or a joke, to which I would expect an official statement from @Not_Oles that would represent the whole staff position on situations like that.

    Thanked by 1default
  • bkjbkj Member
    edited October 2024

    @Calin said:

    @DP said: I believe the community is more eager to hear about the status of refund

    Hello , yes I'm agree with this , but I have a client who recently purchased a 100 Gbs network from us, and we were just looking for some 100 Gbs speedtests, this was the client's request, that's why I asked here...

    I can't stop all my activity now because of a possibly malicious crypto client

    I'f it's a problem this thread it's fine to be close! Thanks and sorry!

    Idk if the client knows, but that isn't even a well way to test anything. It just sounds cool on paper "cool, now let's speedtest our 100G shall we?" But it's too much bandwidth for anything "single" (idk, single application, single server, single port, single whatever)

    I'm not even sure what are the proper use cases of a 100G port directly to a server. (Excluding anything AI and GPU or other training things, I'm aware they can use a lot of network bandwidth but that's under special category anyway)

  • I need DMCA unrecongized I P. Pls 10000Giggabitties. uwu

  • xvpsxvps Member
    edited October 2024

    @Andreix said:

    @stefeman said:
    Only if you can make it look like "failed transaction" or something similar so its not 100% obvious at first glance, that you just ran with the money.

    This time I am not kidding at all. If I as a user and more, as a provider, can not trust mods to do their job in a fair way, according to one's gravity of actions, then I should "raise my guard" so to speak to any action I make on LET.
    Right now, just as a regular user I fear that any transaction I may do via LET could result in money loss. Could be $1 could be $22k.

    If @Not_Oles (and probably the rest of staff) cares more to ban users that act as an "integrity advisor" and point out there's a scammer lurking around and potentially making more victims, than to ban the scammer itself, I want to know if that's the case, so I can become a scammer; which looks a more safer option for what I can tell from all events here, than struggling to offer a serious, secure and reliable service and relationship to (potential) clients.

    So, yeah, my question is serious, not a mockery or a joke, to which I would expect an official statement from @Not_Oles that would represent the whole staff position on situations like that.

    -

    @Raindog404 said:
    :warning: Last Warning: Stop wasting LET staff's time with stupid demands.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited October 2024

    @Andreix said:

    @stefeman said:
    Only if you can make it look like "failed transaction" or something similar so its not 100% obvious at first glance, that you just ran with the money.

    This time I am not kidding at all. If I as a user and more, as a provider, can not trust mods to do their job in a fair way, according to one's gravity of actions, then I should "raise my guard" so to speak to any action I make on LET.
    Right now, just as a regular user I fear that any transaction I may do via LET could result in money loss. Could be $1 could be $22k.

    If @Not_Oles (and probably the rest of staff) cares more to ban users that act as an "integrity advisor" and point out there's a scammer lurking around and potentially making more victims, than to ban the scammer itself, I want to know if that's the case, so I can become a scammer; which looks a more safer option for what I can tell from all events here, than struggling to offer a serious, secure and reliable service and relationship to (potential) clients.

    So, yeah, my question is serious, not a mockery or a joke, to which I would expect an official statement from @Not_Oles that would represent the whole staff position on situations like that.

    They cant really ban him since its ongoing dispute. Both parties are in active contact with LET helpdesk based on hearsay. Banning him now would make him lose motivation to solve and respond to the case here and in LET helpdesk.

    They are also aware that most users here want this drama to continue for shits and giggles. Why ruin the fun.

    Thanked by 2Arkas jsg
  • AndreixAndreix Member, Host Rep

    @stefeman said:

    @Andreix said:

    @stefeman said:
    Only if you can make it look like "failed transaction" or something similar so its not 100% obvious at first glance, that you just ran with the money.

    This time I am not kidding at all. If I as a user and more, as a provider, can not trust mods to do their job in a fair way, according to one's gravity of actions, then I should "raise my guard" so to speak to any action I make on LET.
    Right now, just as a regular user I fear that any transaction I may do via LET could result in money loss. Could be $1 could be $22k.

    If @Not_Oles (and probably the rest of staff) cares more to ban users that act as an "integrity advisor" and point out there's a scammer lurking around and potentially making more victims, than to ban the scammer itself, I want to know if that's the case, so I can become a scammer; which looks a more safer option for what I can tell from all events here, than struggling to offer a serious, secure and reliable service and relationship to (potential) clients.

    So, yeah, my question is serious, not a mockery or a joke, to which I would expect an official statement from @Not_Oles that would represent the whole staff position on situations like that.

    They cant really ban him since its ongoing dispute. Both parties are in active contact with LET helpdesk based on hearsay. Banning him now would make him lose motivation to solve and respond to the case here and in LET helpdesk.

    They are also aware that most users here want this drama to continue for shits and giggles. Why ruin the fun.

    So they will let him be for 10 years and watch closely if he refunded the amount, every day for the 10y timeframe.

Sign In or Register to comment.