Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


100 Gbs public port , public speedtest servers , any ideea? Or who want help us :) - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

100 Gbs public port , public speedtest servers , any ideea? Or who want help us :)

1246714

Comments

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2

    @host_c said: So you are LET RO Police now?

    No, he is from LET RO detective department

    The only police are admins and mods team I believe

    Thanked by 3host_c Andreix zmeu
  • @host_c said:

    @Andreix said:

    @host_c said:
    @AndreiX, chatGPT messed up the reply, I did not imply you were part of it, I just underlined my point, my point is with you being a dick, and that there is a pattern.

    If you rub me well, I'll become even bigger for you. In the meantime, you're still a sketchy dude, on Calin's payroll, being happy he can get crumbs from a 20k scam.
    PS: Having GPT write your reply? Talking about skills.

    @Andreix said: So, yeah, I am targeting more the segment I know well.

    So you are LET RO Police now?

    Who are you?
    Rub you, ???? that is sick
    Beside words you show nothing........ Payroll? like mafia style??? LOL :D :D

    You've really mastered the art of dodging the point and resorting to cheap shots. LET RO Police? Nah, I just call it as I see it. And if you're on someone's payroll to help them scrape the crumbs from a scam, well, that's on you.

    Mafia style? Please, let's not get too dramatic here. You're the one trying to discredit with jokes when things get uncomfortable. You can laugh it off all you want, but that won't change the fact that there's a pattern of questionable dealings and associations that you're trying hard to sweep under the rug.

    Thanked by 1techdragon
  • host_chost_c Member, Patron Provider

    @tentor said: No, he is from LET RO detective department

    They should call out Internal Affairs in this case.

  • @host_c said:

    @tentor said: No, he is from LET RO detective department

    They should call out Internal Affairs in this case.

    That's really what I was calling out between you and Calin. Some shady internal affairs.

  • stxshstxsh Member

    I feel like I missed something.. what's going on here? What exactly is @host_c being accused of other than trying to help a fellow local provider "legitimize" themselves?

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • AndreixAndreix Member
    edited October 2

    @stxsh said:
    I feel like I missed something.. what's going on here? What exactly is @host_c being accused of other than trying to help a fellow local provider "legitimize" themselves?

    Well... he's basically Calin's tech guy, PR guy, service provider also.
    Calin doing a shady business with lots of criminal activities allowed.
    host_CHARACTER_HERE knowing this shit and continuing to help him, take his side, write his replies when English is too much for Calin's skills, now he's pussy posing in "I have no business with Calin" type of guy, serious provider and so forth.

    He's just as low morality as the one he constantly helps, knowing he's a shady dude. He's just happy he can get a couple bucks out of Calin's pocket. Origin of the money does not really matter to this "vertical" (ironic) guy.

  • @malignify said:

    @itachikonoha said: According to the rules, once suspended, the power of account of patron provider will decrease to the status of a member. So whatever restriction applies to members, will apply to Calin also.

    Where does it say this? :D

    It was mentioned by one of the admins in Evo Hostings case.

  • malignifymalignify Member
    edited October 2

    @itachikonoha said:

    @malignify said:

    @itachikonoha said: According to the rules, once suspended, the power of account of patron provider will decrease to the status of a member. So whatever restriction applies to members, will apply to Calin also.

    Where does it say this? :D

    It was mentioned by one of the admins in Evo Hostings case.

    But you said according to the rules. So it's not according to the rules but according to some admin? So if admin says they want $7/year deals it automagically becomes a rule for forum and providers? :D

  • MannDudeMannDude Patron Provider, Veteran

    Many people tag Calin anytime some customer comes on this forum requesting something that no one would realistically like to provide service for. Im guilty of doing this too, because its somewhat comical to direct an obvious headache of a customer to someone like Calin. But in the end, he still gets a couple dollars.

    I guess considering his new status here, we should stop doing that, even though it's clearly a joke for everyone who knows his history?

    Only way to prevent this is to ban him outright. Lied about his age for years and two crypro scams with victims that likely learned of him from this very forum. The swap as ram, random ASN swap with 30+ hr outages of even his own site, etc are cause for heavy scrutiny but not banworthy... But using this site to attract victims is pretty bad.

    If not a ban then a vanilla add-on that changes any tagging of his username to a page to highlight it's probably a joke and no one is actually recommending him. One is easier than the other.

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited October 2

    @MannDude said:
    Many people tag Calin anytime some customer comes on this forum requesting something that no one would realistically like to provide service for. Im guilty of doing this too, because its somewhat comical to direct an obvious headache of a customer to someone like Calin. But in the end, he still gets a couple dollars.

    He changed his tactics, he now "Thanks" the posts to get sales :p

  • Looks like someone got mad and took down his website aswell :D

  • defaultdefault Veteran

    Thanked by 1dsbnoob
  • AndreiPerjuAndreiPerju Member, Host Rep

    @Andreix said:

    @tentor said:

    @host_c said: So the sole purpose is to mock the ones you personally do not like, right?

    Personally I find it strange that @Andreix seems to target only Romanians. I might be wrong though because I do not track his messages specifically.

    It's not strange. I can't really mock you, for example, if I don't know Polish market (assumend from your PL in signature).
    @AndreiPerju is Romanian, @AndreiGhesi is also Romanian, but they - as to my knowledge - are representatives of reputable businesses, not just some shady dudes who'd sell their mother for $5/mo.
    So, yeah, I am targeting more the segment I know well.

    What i miss? Another popcorn time?

    Thanked by 1zmeu
  • @malignify said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @malignify said:

    @itachikonoha said: According to the rules, once suspended, the power of account of patron provider will decrease to the status of a member. So whatever restriction applies to members, will apply to Calin also.

    Where does it say this? :D

    It was mentioned by one of the admins in Evo Hostings case.

    But you said according to the rules. So it's not according to the rules but according to some admin? So if admin says they want $7/year deals it automagically becomes a rule for forum and providers? :D

    Yes.

    Unless later, LET as an entity distanced themselves from it.

  • AndreixAndreix Member
    edited October 2

    @AndreiPerju said:

    @Andreix said:

    @tentor said:

    @host_c said: So the sole purpose is to mock the ones you personally do not like, right?

    Personally I find it strange that @Andreix seems to target only Romanians. I might be wrong though because I do not track his messages specifically.

    It's not strange. I can't really mock you, for example, if I don't know Polish market (assumend from your PL in signature).
    @AndreiPerju is Romanian, @AndreiGhesi is also Romanian, but they - as to my knowledge - are representatives of reputable businesses, not just some shady dudes who'd sell their mother for $5/mo.
    So, yeah, I am targeting more the segment I know well.

    What i miss? Another popcorn time?

    Have popcorn in your bunker? Can I visit for the free popcorn for serious business stuff?

  • lirrrlirrr Member

    highenddrama after highenddrama

    when low end deal :'(

    Thanked by 2Calin dsbnoob
  • Hello @Calin ihostart.com is not opening did you switch from 100g premium network to 64k DSL?

  • xvpsxvps Member
    edited October 2

    @xieroxxx said:
    Looks like someone got mad and took down his website aswell :D

    Andreix rants against Romanian providers and DDoS attacks go hand in hand.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • AndreixAndreix Member
    edited October 2

    @xvps said:

    @xieroxxx said:
    Looks like someone got mad and took down his website aswell :D

    Andreix rants against Romanian providers and DDoS attacks go hand in hand.

    I'd be tempted to tbh, but I only have like 60G of aggregated capacity as of now. Can't really saturate a 100G line...
    I'd bet my money more on config screwups by him or his PR guy.

  • kaitkait Member

    @Andreix said: Can't really saturate a 100G line

    Unless its Mikrotik :joy:

    Thanked by 1zmeu
  • @kait said:

    @Andreix said: Can't really saturate a 100G line

    Unless its Mikrotik :joy:

    Can that shit hold over 10G safely?

  • kaitkait Member

    @Andreix said: Can that shit hold over 10G safely?

    8G take it or leave it :joy: jkjk idk.

    Thanked by 1Andreix
  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2

    From AbuseIPDB https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/89.213.174.249 it seems that someone attacks his website for hours already (I just hope that @Calin isn't bruteforcing SSH)

    Yeah I guess someone does reflected TCP flood towards his website IP address:

    listening on eno1.1550, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
    13:25:52.935216 IP 89.213.174.249.80 > 88.218.206.93.40382: Flags [S.], seq 351009048, ack 3638111801, win 28960, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 1563331512 ecr 1591306403,nop,wscale 7], length 0
    13:25:52.935262 IP 88.218.206.93.40382 > 89.213.174.249.80: Flags [R], seq 3638111801, win 0, length 0
    

    UPD. Greynoise https://viz.greynoise.io/ip/89.213.174.249 confirms that it is spoofable traffic (no TCP handshake was completed).

    UPD2. New and more verbose traffic capture:

    tcpdump: listening on eno1.1550, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
    13:32:05.073119 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 57, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60)
        89.213.174.249.80 > 88.218.206.112.3719: Flags [S.], cksum 0x999a (correct), seq 3810564408, ack 1849830867, win 28960, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 662076386 ecr 3654903971,nop,wscale 7], length 0
    13:32:05.073143 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
        88.218.206.112.3719 > 89.213.174.249.80: Flags [R], cksum 0x3034 (incorrect -> 0xd4da), seq 1849830867, win 0, length 0
    13:34:53.220727 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 59, id 4983, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 40)
        89.213.174.249.9506 > 88.218.206.142.22: Flags [S], cksum 0xae7f (correct), seq 3720455749, win 10220, length 0
    13:34:53.220952 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 62, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40)
        88.218.206.142.22 > 89.213.174.249.9506: Flags [R.], cksum 0xd658 (correct), seq 0, ack 3720455750, win 0, length 0
    
  • @tentor said:
    From AbuseIPDB https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/89.213.174.249 it seems that someone attacks his website for hours already (I just hope that @Calin isn't bruteforcing SSH)

    Yeah I guess someone does reflected TCP flood towards his website IP address:

    listening on eno1.1550, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
    13:25:52.935216 IP 89.213.174.249.80 > 88.218.206.93.40382: Flags [S.], seq 351009048, ack 3638111801, win 28960, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 1563331512 ecr 1591306403,nop,wscale 7], length 0
    13:25:52.935262 IP 88.218.206.93.40382 > 89.213.174.249.80: Flags [R], seq 3638111801, win 0, length 0
    

    Shit...
    IP Abuse Reports for 89.213.174.0/24:
    255 reported IPs from this subnet for a total of 5,895 reports

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2

    @Andreix said: 255 reported IPs from this subnet for a total of 5,895 reports

    Don't get me wrong, but those report can be generated by IP Spoofing. But it is not a secret for anyone that Calin is not picky with his customers.

    UPD. Greynoise has seen only a few non-spoofable scanning-related traffic: https://viz.greynoise.io/query/89.213.174.0/24 spoofable:"false"

  • No provider benefits from being involved in or facilitating criminal activities.

    Thanked by 2Andreix zmeu
  • CalinCalin ⚠️ Patron Provider Tag Suspended

    AbuseDB it's a wrong website what show reports ,for example two years ago a Romania Company usage AbuseDB for make advertising

    Anyone possible make fake reports for IPs, and we host lot of free speak websites , so many peoples have free time

    All IPs from this subnet it's 100% legal

    Maybe you understand now how work this websites of reports

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep
    edited October 2

    @techdragon said:
    No provider benefits from being involved in or facilitating criminal activities.

    What benefit do you imply? There (I mean in general, not accusing LET of anything) would be no bulletproof offers available if it was not profitable.

  • @Calin said:
    AbuseDB it's a wrong website what show reports ,for example two years ago a Romania Company usage AbuseDB for make advertising

    Anyone possible make fake reports for IPs, and we host lot of free speak websites , so many peoples have free time

    All IPs from this subnet it's 100% legal

    Maybe you understand now how work this websites of reports

    If you still don't wanna refund the 22k back, at least keep paying the PR guy. I liked it better when you invested in your english standards.

    Thanked by 1bytheWay
  • techdragontechdragon Member
    edited October 2

    @tentor said:

    @techdragon said:
    No provider benefits from being involved in or facilitating criminal activities.

    What benefit do you imply? There (I mean in general, not accusing LET of anything) would be no bulletproof offers available if it was not profitable.

    I clearly stated criminal. I didn't mention if it was or wasn't profitable. Everyone is welcome to their views but I don't believe that playing cat and mouse helps anyone win in a way that matters. If you live at home with your parents, maybe.

    Nothing against bulletproof hosts or no KYC personally. Just don't think running a network with dubious clientele is a long term strategy for success.

    I'm sure you've seen a lot of newer players try to make money in this industry and end up in a position they never accounted for. I hope someone who needs to sell their network (to recoup costs most likely) doesn't get involved in this. That is all.

    Thanked by 2tentor Andreix
Sign In or Register to comment.