Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CharityHost.org: USA Texas VDS 1 @ $5 usd/mo and VDS 2 @ $10 usd/mo: 1 Gbps unlimited

1235715

Comments

  • edited September 2024

    @mw said:
    wait not a recurring discount? $10 is crazy then

    72 month discount is not enough?

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @mw said:
    wait not a recurring discount? $10 is crazy then

    72 month discount is not enough?

    how long have you been trading? more than a year? when asking a customer to pay up front to a host they just heard about, its a bit of a hard sell unless the host has been around for a while

  • @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    the price is $10, $5 is not recurring

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    not to mention GB6 score is three times for one vCore

    — I do teach AP calculus

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @mw said:
    wait not a recurring discount? $10 is crazy then

    72 month discount is not enough?

    That's not $5/month but $180/3years equals $5/month. You should not advertise that way Big host such as Godaddy do.

  • edited September 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

  • edited September 2024

    @mw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    the price is $10, $5 is not recurring

    No it's not recurring. Not claiming that either. Again, you can purchase ahead for up to 3 years. We guarantee 30 days money back, but we are amicable. If you pay ahead, and want a cancellation due to sensible circumstances we will consider a prorated refund.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

    That VDS has much more powerful Ryzen 9950x cpu vCore, more memory and more storage that is NVMe faster

    and just $8 per month recurring

    one Dedicated vCore AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
    6 GB DDR5 RAM
    75 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    20000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
    

    Which offer is better?

    Thanked by 2yoursunny mijo
  • mcsmcs Member
    edited September 2024

    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    Thanked by 2zed yoursunny
  • edited September 2024

    @mcs said:
    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    That is just like your opinion man. CharityHost.org LLC is a legal entity and in good formation and standing.

    I have personally been in the hosting industry since 2010. CharityHost.org came from another web host that brought it's customers with it, lost none. The goal is to support humanitarian causes and provide top notch hosting services and support to customers.

    Who do you represent?

  • @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

    That VDS has much more powerful Ryzen 9950x cpu vCore, more memory and more storage that is NVMe faster

    and just $8 per month recurring

    one Dedicated vCore AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
    6 GB DDR5 RAM
    75 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    20000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
    

    Which offer is better?

    @CharityHost_org

    Thanked by 1mijo
  • how long has charityhost been trading

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:
    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    That is just like your opinion man. CharityHost.org LLC is a legal entity and in good formation and standing.

    I have personally been in the hosting industry since 2010. CharityHost.org came from another web host that brought it's customers with it, lost none. The goal is to support humanitarian causes and provide top notch hosting services and support to customers.

    Who do you represent?

    Such statements are all over the place. Provide facts that you are an old company and have rebranded. Provide reviews of your company, if it has been on the market for a year, then there should be company reviews and reviews on TrustPilot and so on. Well, and ultimately, show the license in an adequate way so that it is understood where you came from and so on. Well, and finally - if the goals are humanitarian, no one collects money through the provision of services of this kind, partners are found and servers are provided for free. How open source projects exist and the same free VPN. Even a purely psychological professional will not write excuses, but will immediately show the facts and explain how and what. You will not convince me. And I would still recommend all forum members to stay away from this supplier so as not to lose money.

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • edited September 2024

    @mcs said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:
    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    That is just like your opinion man. CharityHost.org LLC is a legal entity and in good formation and standing.

    I have personally been in the hosting industry since 2010. CharityHost.org came from another web host that brought it's customers with it, lost none. The goal is to support humanitarian causes and provide top notch hosting services and support to customers.

    Who do you represent?

    Such statements are all over the place. Provide facts that you are an old company and have rebranded. Provide reviews of your company, if it has been on the market for a year, then there should be company reviews and reviews on TrustPilot and so on. Well, and ultimately, show the license in an adequate way so that it is understood where you came from and so on. Well, and finally - if the goals are humanitarian, no one collects money through the provision of services of this kind, partners are found and servers are provided for free. How open source projects exist and the same free VPN. Even a purely psychological professional will not write excuses, but will immediately show the facts and explain how and what. You will not convince me. And I would still recommend all forum members to stay away from this supplier so as not to lose money.

    We dont need a massive marketing budget, and 10 sales/marketing people to run a web hosting company the right way. But you can do that and scam customers bait switch them all day and night to buy things they never get delivered on performance, stability and support they promised - total bait switch burn.

    SpectroHost.com -> CharityHost.org

    You say free? There is no such thing as free lunch brother. Find this and be it legit, share.
    Open Source != Free. At least not most of the time. They make revenue from licensing and enterprise support or the project is funded by a wealthy company that needs the product, not you or me, a very well funded company. If we had funding from wealthy entities or the governement, believe me, it would be free for charities/ngo/nonprofits/schools. But that's not the situation, for us to stay afloat and provided lifetime 50% discount to those humanitarian causes we need to gather revenue from for-profits, and we hope some day we can provide larger free and at-cost services whilst registered as a 501(c)(3)

  • @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

    That VDS has much more powerful Ryzen 9950x cpu vCore, more memory and more storage that is NVMe faster

    and just $8 per month recurring

    one Dedicated vCore AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
    6 GB DDR5 RAM
    75 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    20000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
    

    Which offer is better?

    You asked if there is a better offer.
    Here it is.

    Want to comment ?

    Thanked by 1mijo
  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:
    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    That is just like your opinion man. CharityHost.org LLC is a legal entity and in good formation and standing.

    I have personally been in the hosting industry since 2010. CharityHost.org came from another web host that brought it's customers with it, lost none. The goal is to support humanitarian causes and provide top notch hosting services and support to customers.

    Who do you represent?

    Such statements are all over the place. Provide facts that you are an old company and have rebranded. Provide reviews of your company, if it has been on the market for a year, then there should be company reviews and reviews on TrustPilot and so on. Well, and ultimately, show the license in an adequate way so that it is understood where you came from and so on. Well, and finally - if the goals are humanitarian, no one collects money through the provision of services of this kind, partners are found and servers are provided for free. How open source projects exist and the same free VPN. Even a purely psychological professional will not write excuses, but will immediately show the facts and explain how and what. You will not convince me. And I would still recommend all forum members to stay away from this supplier so as not to lose money.

    We dont need a massive marketing budget, and 10 sales/marketing people to run a web hosting company the right way. But you can do that and scam customers bait switch them all day and night to buy things they never get delivered on performance and stability they promised.

    SpectroHost.com -> CharityHost.org

    You say free? There is no such thing as free lunch brother. Find this and be it legit, share.
    Open Source != Free. At least not most of the time. They make revenue from licensing and enterprise support or the project is funded by a wealthy company that needs the product, not you or me, a very well funded company. If we had funding from wealthy entities or the governement, believe me, it would be free for charities/ngo/nonprofits/schools. But that's not the situation, for us to stay afloat and provided lifetime 50% discount to those humanitarian causes we need to gather revenue from for-profits, and we hope some day we can provide larger free and at-cost services whilst registered as a 501(c)(3)

    I know that in Wyoming there are no restrictions on the type of licenses and any commercial enterprise can be opened - for the provision of services, for the sale of goods, including food and household products; a business operating in the areas of tourism, education, culture, educational activities; a company producing information products, software and electronics, for website development. Other popular US businesses are no less in demand, including the financial sector, cargo delivery, etc.

    In addition to the fact that Wyoming entrepreneurs are already exempt from paying many taxes and fees, they can count on some tax incentives. For example, there is a concept of exemption from sales tax in manufacturing. This means that if you are engaged in the sale or lease of equipment that is used in manufacturing processes, you will not have to pay sales or use tax. Electricity consumption in manufacturing is also not taxed. The state has relatively small registration fees and fees for filing an annual report. In addition to saving on this expense item, entrepreneurs can benefit from numerous programs aimed at stimulating business, or try to get a grant to develop their business. The state also has a developed corporate lending system.

    You already have complete savings, what are you collecting money for then? And charity, as correctly noted, is carried out through trust funds or through special bank accounts for specific organizations without intermediaries.

  • Dam this back and forth is getting just as crazy as the debate lmao

    Thanked by 1CharityHost_org
  • edited September 2024

    @mcs said: nefit from numerous programs aimed at stimulating business, or try to get a grant to develop their business. The state also has a developed corporate lending system.

    I guess you are not into giving donations huh? What is your point again? Would you be interested in grant writing and pitching to wealthy entities to donate? We do not have an inhouse expert for that, it's not my domain either.

    CharityHost.org has costs incurred for support, software licenses, hardware and colocation costs.

    I personally have 2 jobs, CharityHost.org and DevSecOps engineering for startups and government contracts. So yep, we are dual band here as a startup!

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @mcs said:
    Unlike a General or Limited Partnership, the creation of a limited liability company guarantees its founders full protection of their personal assets. This means that if the company incurs debt obligations or even legal proceedings, the liability of its founders is limited to the amount that was invested in the business.

    There is no minimum paid-up share capital in Wyoming, meaning there is no limit on the amount; You need at least one founder and one director, who are not necessarily residents of the state; You must have a registered address (office) in the state; You will also need to appoint a registered agent

    the director or founder of the company may not be a resident of the United States; state taxes are among the lowest in the country; registration takes a minimum of time, since there is no need to hold meetings of the company's participants, as well as to collect authorized capital above a certain limit; it is possible to issue shares in exchange for "any value", without limiting the volume and value of securities; information about the founders remains confidential.

    Conclusion: most likely, your pre-paid money will go into the pocket of this provider and you will not be able to do anything about it in the future. There are more than 60% of such bankrupt companies in Wyoming, this is the cheapest state for opening companies and also the most problematic for debt repayment and the like. Considering everything written by the provider in this thread, unprofessionalism and red flags are immediately noticeable - this is just a new HXServers, as noted earlier

    That is just like your opinion man. CharityHost.org LLC is a legal entity and in good formation and standing.

    I have personally been in the hosting industry since 2010. CharityHost.org came from another web host that brought it's customers with it, lost none. The goal is to support humanitarian causes and provide top notch hosting services and support to customers.

    Who do you represent?

    Such statements are all over the place. Provide facts that you are an old company and have rebranded. Provide reviews of your company, if it has been on the market for a year, then there should be company reviews and reviews on TrustPilot and so on. Well, and ultimately, show the license in an adequate way so that it is understood where you came from and so on. Well, and finally - if the goals are humanitarian, no one collects money through the provision of services of this kind, partners are found and servers are provided for free. How open source projects exist and the same free VPN. Even a purely psychological professional will not write excuses, but will immediately show the facts and explain how and what. You will not convince me. And I would still recommend all forum members to stay away from this supplier so as not to lose money.

    We dont need a massive marketing budget, and 10 sales/marketing people to run a web hosting company the right way. But you can do that and scam customers bait switch them all day and night to buy things they never get delivered on performance, stability and support they promised - total bait switch burn.

    SpectroHost.com -> CharityHost.org

    You say free? There is no such thing as free lunch brother. Find this and be it legit, share.
    Open Source != Free. At least not most of the time. They make revenue from licensing and enterprise support or the project is funded by a wealthy company that needs the product, not you or me, a very well funded company. If we had funding from wealthy entities or the governement, believe me, it would be free for charities/ngo/nonprofits/schools. But that's not the situation, for us to stay afloat and provided lifetime 50% discount to those humanitarian causes we need to gather revenue from for-profits, and we hope some day we can provide larger free and at-cost services whilst registered as a 501(c)(3)

    Okay, the domain is old, but you can buy a domain and this is not proof that the same person is the founder of two companies. People can check the alias and redirect - when it was installed on your new site and say exactly how long your new company has existed and when the redirection to the new resource was made. So far, there is still little reason to believe that everything is ok in your case.

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

    Yes, absolutely
    I can list many offers that are better than this.

    Thanked by 2mijo mcs
  • :lol: Buy a domain to redirect.... Man are you into conspiracy theories that much or have you just been burnt that many times by web hosts?

  • edited September 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

    Yes, absolutely
    I can list many offers that are better than this.

    PM me those. No room here for that. This is proper offer. You already broke the rules to post other offers on a legit offer.

  • @Raspi_dude said:
    Dam this back and forth is getting just as crazy as the debate lmao

    there is no dispute here, just say provide the information fully and that's it. For 10 years of the old company's existence, there is not a single link on the Internet from third-party resources referring to the old domain. Ok, the site was like this from 2014 to 2024. But this in no way shows the level of the company, both old and new, and secondly, it is in no way possible to assess the level and quality of the service simply from a description, even approximate, from reviews, as can be done with many other even new providers. Well, it is clear that even if one person tries and says that everything works ok, there is no guarantee that such providers will not disappear later. On this forum, this has happened 5-6 times with such problems over the past year. Everyone decides for themselves what to do and everyone has their own opinion, but if there are facts, then you can apologize right there to the person if he explains everything, I admit it

  • edited September 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

    That VDS has much more powerful Ryzen 9950x cpu vCore, more memory and more storage that is NVMe faster

    and just $8 per month recurring

    one Dedicated vCore AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
    6 GB DDR5 RAM
    75 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    20000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
    

    Which offer is better?

    You asked if there is a better offer.
    Here it is.

    Want to comment ?

    Yes. Dont break the offer discussion rules! I have not flagged you yet, but what you are doing blatantly rude, unprofessional and against LET rules. Post it in the proper channels.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited September 2024

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

    Yes, absolutely
    I can list many offers that are better than this.

    PM me those. No room here for that. This is proper offer. You already broke the rules to post other offers on a legit offer.

    I did not post any offer. Just replied to your question.

    Do not ask if you don’t like the answer. Simple

    @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @doghouch said:
    My YABS seems to line up with @CharityHost_org's results.


    YABS
    [root@test Geekbench-6.3.0-Linux]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Sep 11 03:22:24 AM CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2299.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 54.0 GiB
    Distro     : Oracle Linux Server 9.2
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-102.110.5.1.el9uek.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.81 MB/s  (55.2k) | 468.13 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 221.39 MB/s  (55.3k) | 470.60 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 442.20 MB/s (110.5k) | 938.74 MB/s  (14.6k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 502.92 MB/s    (982) | 535.64 MB/s    (523)
    Write      | 529.64 MB/s   (1.0k) | 571.32 MB/s    (557)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 849 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 862 Mbits/sec   | 743 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 736 Mbits/sec   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 686 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 919 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 36.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 835 Mbits/sec   | 845 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 849 Mbits/sec   | 861 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 748 Mbits/sec   | 112 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 687 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 905 Mbits/sec   | 914 Mbits/sec   | 34.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 821 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1172                          
    Multi Core      | 1161                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7711073
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 19 sec
    

    Not bad, but a bit on the expensive side (the recurring price is $10/month). I guess if the support ends up being 'better' than average, I wouldn't mind.

    (don't need another idling VPS)


    Recurring price
    billing

    Yes, but you can purchase up to 3 years with this discount. Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    Absolutely
    $8 vds from a provider ending with Brr is a much better offer.

    I have shared the info, since you asked

    $8 < $5 ? Oh boy now we need simple mathematics again. :lol:

    $8 monthly recurring price
    $80 per year

    Now, please compare.

    — I do teach AP calculus

    :lol: How cute. 80 / 12 months? Please teach learn simple elementary arithmetic.

    That VDS has much more powerful Ryzen 9950x cpu vCore, more memory and more storage that is NVMe faster

    and just $8 per month recurring

    one Dedicated vCore AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
    6 GB DDR5 RAM
    75 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    20000 GB Bandwidth @ 10 Gbps
    

    Which offer is better?

    You asked if there is a better offer.
    Here it is.

    Want to comment ?

    Yes. Dont break the offer discussion rules! I have not flagged you yet, but what you are doing blatantly rude, unprofessional and against LET rules. Post it in the proper channels.

    You do remember that you asked for it, right?

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that? Please, let me know.

    If you wanted it in DM’s, you should have said so

    Thanked by 2Marx TimboJones
  • edited September 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

    Yes, absolutely
    I can list many offers that are better than this.

    PM me those. No room here for that. This is proper offer. You already broke the rules to post other offers on a legit offer.

    I did not post any offer. Just replied to your question.

    Do not ask if you don’t like the answer. Simple

    Really? Yes you did. I asked you to PM me if anything. I am open and curious to competition, and am friendly about it. But you seem to be poised to push down my offer regardless. If you have a better host, then happy for you really, I hope you have the best situation and support that life can offer with a host. I am not claiming we are the most performant, but we are stable, reliable and quite performant for the value and cost. Also I am yet to find a host that will extend support like we do!

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    Can you find a better solutions for VDS in USA for that?
    Please, let me know.

    Yes, absolutely
    I can list many offers that are better than this.

    PM me those. No room here for that. This is proper offer. You already broke the rules to post other offers on a legit offer.

    I did not post any offer. Just replied to your question.

    Do not ask if you don’t like the answer. Simple

    Really? Yes you did. I asked you to PM me if anything.

    Everyone can see what you wrote in your post.

    Thanked by 1mijo
  • edited September 2024

    @Arkas I'm chiming out for now! All can PM me if anything! Honestly exhausted of the trolling! Good night!

    Thanked by 2zed WhiteRoseG
This discussion has been closed.