Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Some deals for Compute and RAID10 storage

124678

Comments

  • loayloay Member

    @emgh said:

    @nobizzle said:

    @emgh said:

    @loay said:
    Invoice #434932

    :s

    I call it "Generation RackNerd"

    Yeah. Fitting name.

    Haha, he actually delivered my last order after I posted my comment. It may be a coincidence, but I wanted to promote this post anyway.

    Thanked by 2emgh Janeytc
  • ralfralf Member

    Awesome deal! I missed the last one, so really glad I managed to catch this one!

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:
    Awesome deal! I missed the last one, so really glad I managed to catch this one!

    What did you get?

  • OujiOuji Member

    I want to get, but they are very expensive for idling (very cheap for using, though). I will debate in the next 12 hours.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
    edited September 2024

    @Ouji said:
    I want to get, but they are very expensive for idling (very cheap for using, though). I will debate in the next 12 hours.

    4 GB RAM in Stockholm paid biannually is expensive in regards to amount paid now, but monthly it's not that expensive of an idler.

    And you get double stuff!

    Thanked by 1Ouji
  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @emgh said:

    @Ouji said:
    I want to get, but they are very expensive for idling (very cheap for using, though). I will debate in the next 12 hours.

    4 GB RAM in Stockholm paid biannually is expensive in regards to amount paid now, but monthly it's not that expensive of an idler.

    And you get double stuff!

    m y i m want SG :'(

    Thanked by 2emgh bdl
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @sh97 said:

    @emgh said:

    @Ouji said:
    I want to get, but they are very expensive for idling (very cheap for using, though). I will debate in the next 12 hours.

    4 GB RAM in Stockholm paid biannually is expensive in regards to amount paid now, but monthly it's not that expensive of an idler.

    And you get double stuff!

    m y i m want SG :'(

    singleporne expens lokation

    Regards

    Thanked by 1sh97
  • whoocwhooc Member

    Invoice #435178

  • bdlbdl Member

    @whooc said:
    Invoice #435178

    no

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited September 2024

    I REALLY wanted to buy a storage server from hosthatch but $115 is way over my budget..... (sigh) Waiting if more promotions pop up.

  • OujiOuji Member

    @emgh said: 4 GB RAM in Stockholm paid biannually is expensive in regards to amount paid now, but monthly it's not that expensive of an idler.

    Mine would be storage, but regardless, for usage is very cheap. I already have a 2TB/$40yr in Chicago, so getting a another one would be good too, but I already have 21TB at home and a home server, so I'm not sure I need the additional 14TB and also the fact that if I wanted to do anything with it, I'd need to get the 24GB NVMe for at least 2x dedicated CPU.

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2024

    I'm seeing the 24gb NVME compute instance only with a quarterly price (USD45 per quarter), but not with an annual price tag. What's it that I'm doing wrong in the panel?

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @OhJohn said:
    I'm seeing the 24gb NVME compute instance only with a quarterly price (USD45 per quarter), but not with an annual price tag. What's it that I'm doing wrong in the panel?

    Choose OS, then billing options show up

    Thanked by 1OhJohn
  • aaxaaaaxaa Member

    YABS of my "13th anniversary promotions" NVMe 24GB plan Stockholm

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mon Sep  9 21:12:21 UTC 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 131 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 6 @ 2899.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 23.7 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 270.6 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Kernel     : 5.15.0-46-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : HostHatch
ASN        : AS63473 HostHatch, LLC
Host       : HostHatch, LLC
Location   : Stockholm, Stockholm County (AB)
Country    : Sweden

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 113.49 MB/s  (28.3k) | 945.59 MB/s  (14.7k)
Write      | 113.79 MB/s  (28.4k) | 950.56 MB/s  (14.8k)
Total      | 227.28 MB/s  (56.8k) | 1.89 GB/s    (29.6k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.39 GB/s     (2.7k) | 1.30 GB/s     (1.2k)
Write      | 1.47 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.39 GB/s     (1.3k)
Total      | 2.86 GB/s     (5.5k) | 2.69 GB/s     (2.6k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 7.21 Gbits/sec  | 1.15 Gbits/sec  | 26.8 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 12.2 Gbits/sec  | 2.90 Gbits/sec  | 19.9 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 5.47 Gbits/sec  | 527 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.79 Gbits/sec  | 301 Mbits/sec   | 194 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 152 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.65 Gbits/sec  | 679 Mbits/sec   | 96.4 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.46 Gbits/sec  | 264 Mbits/sec   | 216 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 7.27 Gbits/sec  | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 26.9 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 12.5 Gbits/sec  | 3.04 Gbits/sec  | 20.3 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 4.33 Gbits/sec  | 421 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.96 Gbits/sec  | 313 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 351 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.95 Gbits/sec  | 660 Mbits/sec   | --
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.52 Gbits/sec  | 275 Mbits/sec   | 216 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1155
Multi Core      | 4647
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7694771

YABS completed in 13 min 56 sec

    mpstat

    21:12:10     CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal  %guest  %gnice   %idle
21:12:10     all    1.80    0.00    0.43    0.01    0.00    0.06    0.00    0.00    0.00   97.70
    Thanked by 1maverick
  • OujiOuji Member

    @OhJohn said:
    I'm seeing the 24gb NVME compute instance only with a quarterly price (USD45 per quarter), but not with an annual price tag. What's it that I'm doing wrong in the panel?

    When you select your distro and version you should be able to see the recurrence

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • nullnotherenullnothere Member
    edited September 2024

    Aaaannnnnd it's gone.

    https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/5763866/sale-finish

    Says there's still time though.

    @hosthatch - maybe extra time "straggler" time... there's a LOT of reading to do (and popcorn to eat) - I'm still trying to catch up on some missing $22.5K

  • include_fishermaninclude_fisherman Member

    Sale ended :(

  • DylhostDylhost Member

    Throughput NordVPN AMS > STO Hosthatch > Cloudflare > my other servers ~450Mb/s

    (I use this setup so I can use Cloudflare Zerotrust between servers)
    Currently Bullethost ironically holds the record, maxing out their 1Gbps due to their good Cloudflare peering and Amsterdam location. It appears Hosthatch Cloudflare peering in STO is the bottleneck for the above

  • DylhostDylhost Member 
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 67.86 MB/s   (16.9k) | 281.55 MB/s   (4.3k)
Write      | 68.05 MB/s   (17.0k) | 283.03 MB/s   (4.4k)
Total      | 135.91 MB/s  (33.9k) | 564.58 MB/s   (8.8k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 431.98 MB/s    (843) | 318.56 MB/s    (311)
Write      | 454.94 MB/s    (888) | 339.77 MB/s    (331)
Total      | 886.93 MB/s   (1.7k) | 658.34 MB/s    (642)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed   | Ping                                                                      
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----         | ----                                                                      
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.60 Gbits/sec  | 3.83 Gbits/sec   | 26.6 ms                                                                  
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.30 Gbits/sec  | 5.75 Gbits/sec  | 20.1 ms                                                                  
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 3.36 Gbits/sec  | 101 ms                                                                   
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 743 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 191 ms                                                                   
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy | 288 ms                                                                              
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 2.07 Gbits/sec | 92.0 ms                                                                    
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 625 Mbits/sec   | 807 Mbits/sec | 214 ms                                                                     

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed    | Ping                                                                     
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----   | ----                                                                            
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.71 Gbits/sec  | 3.43 Gbits/sec   | 26.6 ms                                                                  
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.50 Gbits/sec  | 5.74 Gbits/sec | 20.0 ms                                                                   
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.63 Gbits/sec  | 2.00 Gbits/sec | 101 ms                                                                  
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 760 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 191 ms                                                                  
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 283 ms                                                            
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 91.9ms                                                            
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 646 Mbits/sec   | 896 Mbits/sec   | 214 ms

    (Formatting wack because I changed Putty size half way through and had to fix it manually)

  • DylhostDylhost Member

    @bdl said:

    @Dylhost said:

    @bdl said:

    @remy said:
    What do I do now?

    Instant noodles :(

    Serves me right for browsing LET today :(

    I plan ahead, always instant noodles for months prior to Black Friday!

    Providers are missing an opportunity to include instant noodles WITH their deals - eg: pay for triennial payment, get 2x instant noodles

    For triennially I'd want Maggi branded instant noodles specifically. Biannually 2x instant noodles any brand.

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • danblazedanblaze Member

    @hosthatch

    A clear answer would be close to zero, but we also accept some usage above that from time to time, on our discretion. For more than that, there are Compute VMs with powerful CPUs and clearly defined limits.

    I'm a little confused by this comment, is there a relatively clear limit here?

    Previously, I've been your Los Angeles storage customer for a year now, and overall, it's clear that we're in good hands together, and my use cases don't exceed your fair-use requirements.

    On the other hand, however, I acquired a max-spec Stockholm storage, and I'm trying to install a Minio or music self-hosting service, and turn off anything that might cause high loads - such as the ffmepg program.

    Yes, I certainly know what a storage server is and isn't, and I'm obviously not going to use it for any service that requires a lot of CPU processing.

    But are there any clearer boundaries here? Or does the above make sense for my use case?

    You know, if I use have a 4-core 16G server, it would not make sense to just buy another server and use NFS mounts - I'm not saying it's not valid, but as a user I would expect to at least run some lightly loaded services.

    Looking forward to your reply.

    Thanked by 1Ouji
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member

    @danblaze said:
    @hosthatch

    A clear answer would be close to zero, but we also accept some usage above that from time to time, on our discretion. For more than that, there are Compute VMs with powerful CPUs and clearly defined limits.

    I'm a little confused by this comment, is there a relatively clear limit here?

    Previously, I've been your Los Angeles storage customer for a year now, and overall, it's clear that we're in good hands together, and my use cases don't exceed your fair-use requirements.

    On the other hand, however, I acquired a max-spec Stockholm storage, and I'm trying to install a Minio or music self-hosting service, and turn off anything that might cause high loads - such as the ffmepg program.

    Yes, I certainly know what a storage server is and isn't, and I'm obviously not going to use it for any service that requires a lot of CPU processing.

    But are there any clearer boundaries here? Or does the above make sense for my use case?

    You know, if I use have a 4-core 16G server, it would not make sense to just buy another server and use NFS mounts - I'm not saying it's not valid, but as a user I would expect to at least run some lightly loaded services.

    Looking forward to your reply.

    I agree with this. The comment was very vague in the first place.

    From the previous posts, it seems like hosthatch refers to buy two servers.

    One for compute and other for storage in the same location so that the storage drive could be added to the compute instance.

    This is actually redundant and doesn't make much sense. Just allow a storage drive as secondary to the compute instance. Increase the per tb price while reducing the cost of cpu and ram which won't be required at all. Both side gets what they wanted.

    Thanked by 2MaxTakeba zakkuuno
  • bdlbdl Member

    @itachikonoha said:
    This is actually redundant and doesn't make much sense. Just allow a storage drive as secondary to the compute instance. Increase the per tb price while reducing the cost of cpu and ram which won't be required at all. Both side gets what they wanted.

    @hosthatch 's business - @hosthatch 's rules

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member

    @bdl said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    This is actually redundant and doesn't make much sense. Just allow a storage drive as secondary to the compute instance. Increase the per tb price while reducing the cost of cpu and ram which won't be required at all. Both side gets what they wanted.

    @hosthatch 's business - @hosthatch 's rules

    I have stated an opinion. I have seen other providers accommodating various suggestions. Some times it is worth it to mention.

  • ArirangArirang Member

    I expected for US 8GB deals to come, but to not do. Wait for next deals.

  • danblazedanblaze Member
    edited September 2024

    @itachikonoha said:

    @danblaze said:
    @hosthatch

    A clear answer would be close to zero, but we also accept some usage above that from time to time, on our discretion. For more than that, there are Compute VMs with powerful CPUs and clearly defined limits.

    I'm a little confused by this comment, is there a relatively clear limit here?

    Previously, I've been your Los Angeles storage customer for a year now, and overall, it's clear that we're in good hands together, and my use cases don't exceed your fair-use requirements.

    On the other hand, however, I acquired a max-spec Stockholm storage, and I'm trying to install a Minio or music self-hosting service, and turn off anything that might cause high loads - such as the ffmepg program.

    Yes, I certainly know what a storage server is and isn't, and I'm obviously not going to use it for any service that requires a lot of CPU processing.

    But are there any clearer boundaries here? Or does the above make sense for my use case?

    You know, if I use have a 4-core 16G server, it would not make sense to just buy another server and use NFS mounts - I'm not saying it's not valid, but as a user I would expect to at least run some lightly loaded services.

    Looking forward to your reply.

    I agree with this. The comment was very vague in the first place.

    From the previous posts, it seems like hosthatch refers to buy two servers.

    One for compute and other for storage in the same location so that the storage drive could be added to the compute instance.

    This is actually redundant and doesn't make much sense. Just allow a storage drive as secondary to the compute instance. Increase the per tb price while reducing the cost of cpu and ram which won't be required at all. Both side gets what they wanted.

    It's not actually a complaint about them.

    Since I don't intend to run overly CPU-intensive programs, I wasn't too worried about this (because of previous good experiences in LA), but when Hosthatch made it clear I had some misgivings instead.

    If I had known from the beginning what use cases were appropriate and what were not, I might have been more careful.

    After all, I don't want to use it and find out that the CPU has additional limitations imposed on it.

    Seriously considering the price per TB, that's actually a pretty generous offer.But it would be good for everyone if there was some clarity about the abuse policy.

  • bdlbdl Member

    SALE OVER

    SEE YOU BF

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @bdl said:
    SALE OVER

    SEE YOU BF

    See you too boyfriend

  • bdlbdl Member

    @emgh said:

    @bdl said:
    SALE OVER

    SEE YOU BF

    See you too boyfriend

    <3 lots of moaning about both missing this deal and saying it's too expensive until then <3

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @bdl said:

    @emgh said:

    @bdl said:
    SALE OVER

    SEE YOU BF

    See you too boyfriend

    <3 lots of moaning about both missing this deal and saying it's too expensive until then <3

    Yes🥰❤️

Sign In or Register to comment.