New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
What exact term did I violate?
https://avoro.eu/en/tos/
§2
translated:
And they even gave a reason.
Let's discuss it. Who are we afraid of here? Let's get a clear explanation of the ads so other people won't be scammed.
What?
Which ads?
I don't see anyone who was scammed here.
So, aside from this vague term, which could cover anything up to nuclear war, I haven't violated anything?
Also, what is There is no general right to use the service ?
They are free to not do business with anyone they don't like, but whether you violated anything can only @dataforest answer.
Then why do you make statements on their behalf, did they hire you as a secretary?
Theres your answer.
I never made any statement on their behalf and am not associated with them.
Reflect your behaviour
What is it then?
"They are free to not do business with anyone they don't like"
Why do you answer on behalf of this company? Maybe they do not think this way.
How are you responsible for this company, and how are you affiliated with it?
This way?:
Lukas Secretary, give me a tea please
Then you might violate data privacy laws in Germany and Europe
I gave you the ticket number.
And you used it to block account of the customer.
With this one line you have exposed your region where it is expected that a secretary will prepare tea/coffee.
Let's change it:
Lukas, prepare me the documents for filling bankruptcy after this thread
{gniddiK}
That is simply a fact you can see in the quoted TOS paragraph, also according to german law both the seller and the customer are entitled to not enter into a contract (Vertragsfreiheit).
It is irrelevant how they think about it as it simply is a fact.
As I said, I am not associated/affiliated with @dataforest, I am just a customer of them, and have no advantages by posting anything in their favour. If doubts about that exist, I will be happy to prove it to a trusted member of LET.
If you call them scammers and then say them who you are, I'd say it's your fault when they then don't want to do business with you anymore.
It is important to take medicines on time.
Bankruptcy documents are prepared by lawyers, not by secretaries.
Not needed, LET is not our target group.
And:
It's dataforest GmbH, beschränkte Haftung = limited liability.
Any provider who does this is not serious.
It is pathetic, petty, and, most importantly, inadequate.
Never do business with such providers
Even small providers would never do something like this.
And the big ones... well, just read how people criticize them on forums?
hostgator, namecheap, hetz, hostinger just open directory and see
Did you take today?
Bankruptcy documents are now prepared by ChatGPT which is what I'll be doing if LeaseWeb sends me a massive bandwidth overage bill because someone happens to DDoS me.
You called them scammers, which is "Üble Nachrede" (Defamation, see § 186 StGB), which in Germany could be punished with imprisonment for up to two years or a fine. I'd say it's absolutely appropriate what they did.
They are a small provider.
Why stir up old bs?
I'm sure this is same with OVH Cloud and AWS and other big clouds.
Always double check before agreeing into a contract.
Stop, he rented from Avoro and his products were deactivated - without collection - and deleted after 7 days. This is just another attempt to somehow make us look bad and he wonders why we don't want to rent to him anymore
Ah. Sorry my bad.
I referenced that for contract based php-friends company.(Since he pulled it from the old comments)
No problem in selling a contract based service, just read the terms and contract before agreeing and you're good to go.
as for dataforest, they hold all rights to terminate anyone for any reason as stated in their ToS. You agreed to that when you made the purchase.
No active servers has been suspended or deleted, only the inactive account due to his accusations.
Thank you for the clarification!
LET court has evaluated the situation between the provider (represented by @dataforest) and the customer (represented by @online7237) in this thread, and weighted all the LET witness testimonies.
LET court considers the provider's use of the word "dedicated" misleading.
From now on forward, providers who wish to use the word "dedicated" for non dedicated resources - either on their website, in their offers or marketing materials, - must amend it with an asterisk and a statement similar to this:
This rule applies to individual resource (vCPU cores, IOPS, bandwidth) and to whole packages marketed as "VDS" or "virtual dedicated server".
LET court considers the customer's point hypocritical.
The customer complained about false advertising, while knowingly ordering the service to do false advertising: ordering many servers to fake decentralisation for a crypto network.
LET court considers this use case abusive to all providers, and to the internet as a whole.
From now on forward, orders with similar purpose are not entitled to any refund from any provider on LET.
LET court rules the following way between the provider (represented by @dataforest) and the customer (represented by @online7237):
Thank you @dataforest and @online7237 for bringing your issue to LET court!
Farewell!
What a bullshit
Just to be clear again - and for the last time. Without exception, we have won the Paypal cases that we did not close ourselves and refunded the OP in accordance with the agreements. Everything else is just shit talking. Have a look at the other providers who have not even created a partial refund for this (the cup from Germany), but there is no such thread. This forum doesn't seem to be able to form an objective opinion - what a shame!
The fact that this thread is/was not moderated is the next issue, especially when a moderator makes fun of it.