Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Contabo a good choice?

2»

Comments

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member
    edited May 2023

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

  • @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

  • @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

    This one, the official NetCup's app
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.anexia.netcupscp

  • @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

    This one, the official NetCup's app
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.anexia.netcupscp

    I don't use mobile for my server management.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.
    Yes, a few years ago it would have been a steal (pun intended), but not anymore.

    Thanked by 1Patriarch
  • @JabJab said:

    @BasToTheMax said:
    Contabo is pretty good. A lot of people say they over-allocate a lot*, but in the past 24 hours, my average CPU steal number is about 5-10:

    *this is true, but luckily, my vps is on a good node.

    I once had a uptime of over 200+ days, but I restarted my vps due to some kernel updates.

    Yeah, now please show your CPU usage, not only steal.
    If your VM asks for 5% of CPU and has like 5% of steal... then imagine how much it gonna be if you try to use like 40% :D

    CPI usage was averaging about 25-30 %

  • adnsadns Member

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:
    do any of you have netcup's dedicated core's YAB?

    also dedicated core means they assign whole thread to the vm right?

    Some time old one

    Base RS 1000 G9.5

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mo 27. Mär 14:25:43 CEST 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 14 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 157.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-21-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    Net Online : IPv4 & IPv6
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : netcup GmbH
    ASN        : AS197540 netcup GmbH
    Host       : NETCUP-GMBH
    Location   : Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt (ST)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 64.10 MB/s   (16.0k) | 2.09 GB/s    (32.7k)
    Write      | 64.23 MB/s   (16.0k) | 2.10 GB/s    (32.8k)
    Total      | 128.33 MB/s  (32.0k) | 4.19 GB/s    (65.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.63 GB/s     (9.0k) | 4.59 GB/s     (4.4k)
    Write      | 4.87 GB/s     (9.5k) | 4.89 GB/s     (4.7k)
    Total      | 9.51 GB/s    (18.5k) | 9.48 GB/s     (9.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | --
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.90 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 26.8 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 10.7 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 659 Mbits/sec   | 2.91 Mbits/sec  | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | 395 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 385 Mbits/sec   | 660 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 425 Mbits/sec   | 524 Mbits/sec   | --
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 22.0 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 2.13 Gbits/sec  | 38.3 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 2.34 Gbits/sec  | 10.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 685 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | --
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 307 Mbits/sec   | 604 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 435 Mbits/sec   | 774 Mbits/sec   | 156 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1222
    Multi Core      | 3886
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/698852
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 5 sec
    

    Seems like good scores!!!

    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    I can confirm that. RS1000 g9.5 from 2022 easter. Network, CPU performance unique good and no downtime except my own reboots:D

    I think that they have the best VDS line on this price in the low-end market. Only negative is the bureaucracy with contracts and billing periods.

  • JarryJarry Member

    @Maounique said:
    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.

    Link as proof?

    AFAIK, there is only one alternative with price/performance ratio comparable to contabo: webtropia.com

  • @Maounique said:
    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.
    Yes, a few years ago it would have been a steal (pun intended), but not anymore.

    Yeah, Prometeus also great.

    Thanked by 1Maounique
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @Jarry said: Link as proof?

    Proof of what? Uptime? Lack of steal? For price, yes:
    https://www.prometeus.net/billing/cart.php?a=add&pid=771

Sign In or Register to comment.