Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Contabo a good choice? - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Contabo a good choice?

2»

Comments

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member
    edited May 2023

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

  • sreekanth850sreekanth850 Member

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

    This one, the official NetCup's app
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.anexia.netcupscp

  • sreekanth850sreekanth850 Member

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:
    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    How's the app?

    Which app you are referring?

    This one, the official NetCup's app
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.anexia.netcupscp

    I don't use mobile for my server management.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.
    Yes, a few years ago it would have been a steal (pun intended), but not anymore.

    Thanked by 1Patriarch
  • BasToTheMaxBasToTheMax Member, Host Rep

    @JabJab said:

    @BasToTheMax said:
    Contabo is pretty good. A lot of people say they over-allocate a lot*, but in the past 24 hours, my average CPU steal number is about 5-10:

    *this is true, but luckily, my vps is on a good node.

    I once had a uptime of over 200+ days, but I restarted my vps due to some kernel updates.

    Yeah, now please show your CPU usage, not only steal.
    If your VM asks for 5% of CPU and has like 5% of steal... then imagine how much it gonna be if you try to use like 40% :D

    CPI usage was averaging about 25-30 %

  • adnsadns Member

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @sreekanth850 said:

    @DigiGoon said:
    do any of you have netcup's dedicated core's YAB?

    also dedicated core means they assign whole thread to the vm right?

    Some time old one

    Base RS 1000 G9.5

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2023-03-24                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Mo 27. Mär 14:25:43 CEST 2023

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 14 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 1996.249 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 7.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 157.3 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-21-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
Net Online : IPv4 & IPv6

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : netcup GmbH
ASN        : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host       : NETCUP-GMBH
Location   : Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt (ST)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 64.10 MB/s   (16.0k) | 2.09 GB/s    (32.7k)
Write      | 64.23 MB/s   (16.0k) | 2.10 GB/s    (32.8k)
Total      | 128.33 MB/s  (32.0k) | 4.19 GB/s    (65.6k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 4.63 GB/s     (9.0k) | 4.59 GB/s     (4.4k)
Write      | 4.87 GB/s     (9.5k) | 4.89 GB/s     (4.7k)
Total      | 9.51 GB/s    (18.5k) | 9.48 GB/s     (9.2k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | --
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.90 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 26.8 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 10.7 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 659 Mbits/sec   | 2.91 Mbits/sec  | 188 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | 395 Mbits/sec   | --
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 385 Mbits/sec   | 660 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 425 Mbits/sec   | 524 Mbits/sec   | --

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 22.0 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 2.13 Gbits/sec  | 38.3 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 2.34 Gbits/sec  | 10.6 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 685 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 188 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | --
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 307 Mbits/sec   | 604 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 435 Mbits/sec   | 774 Mbits/sec   | 156 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1222
Multi Core      | 3886
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/698852

YABS completed in 14 min 5 sec

    Seems like good scores!!!

    For that price its great. And your cores are dedicated.

    I can confirm that. RS1000 g9.5 from 2022 easter. Network, CPU performance unique good and no downtime except my own reboots:D

    I think that they have the best VDS line on this price in the low-end market. Only negative is the bureaucracy with contracts and billing periods.

  • JarryJarry Member

    @Maounique said:
    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.

    Link as proof?

    AFAIK, there is only one alternative with price/performance ratio comparable to contabo: webtropia.com

  • PatriarchPatriarch Member

    @Maounique said:
    I've always wondered why people think Contabo's pricing is so great. Italy is a much more expensive market and we can match their prices at a different quality.
    Yes, a few years ago it would have been a steal (pun intended), but not anymore.

    Yeah, Prometeus also great.

    Thanked by 1Maounique
  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @Jarry said: Link as proof?

    Proof of what? Uptime? Lack of steal? For price, yes:
    https://www.prometeus.net/billing/cart.php?a=add&pid=771

Sign In or Register to comment.