Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Please do not use OVZ6

2»

Comments

  • @Maounique said:

    @vba said: is this correct way to do ?

    If you are ok with using the proxmox itself (which is based on Debian)

    https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Configuration

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @Walken said:
    Why would someone use OpenVZ instead of cheap KVM? It's 2022, you can afford a KVM.

    Who cares what you say :joy:

  • Yes, use OpenVZ9

  • So let me stir the pot a little. @jerry_me looks like you been caught red handed fibbing or is there a plausible explanation for this. If you chose not to answer then be it. I will close the thread and move it to the endless abyss.

  • EthernetServersEthernetServers Member, Patron Provider

    @kuroneko23 said:
    Yes, use OpenVZ9

    Running software that's in Alpha isn't the best idea.

    I wouldn't yet trust OpenVZ 8 either.

    OpenVZ 7 is fine though.

  • angstromangstrom Moderator, Veteran

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    So let me stir the pot a little. @jerry_me looks like you been caught red handed fibbing or is there a plausible explanation for this. If you chose not to answer then be it. I will close the thread and move it to the endless abyss.

    Yes, @jerry_me should react in some way after starting such a thread, because otherwise it'll be hard to take him/her seriously after this.

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep

    @EthernetServers said:

    @kuroneko23 said:
    Yes, use OpenVZ9

    Running software that's in Alpha isn't the best idea.

    I wouldn't yet trust OpenVZ 8 either.

    OpenVZ 7 is fine though.

    ovz7 is good enough for now, you can still use operating systems that arent eol

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @bruh21 said:
    ovz7 is good enough for now, you can still use operating systems that arent eol

    There's no io_uring on that kernel, limiting the I/O performance.

    The openat2 syscall is also missing, which reduces performance when you need permission-checked access to many files.

    Thanked by 1cybertech
  • @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

    Moderator banned!
    What's happening?

  • edited February 2022

    @yoursunny I banned myself! I need a break also! Maybe I need to go do a pushup!

  • saw that too and was amused for a while no definitely just kidding

  • ploxhostploxhost Member, Patron Provider

    Pretty sure you also need to be using an EOL OS in order to run openvz 6 as well. Good ole centos 6 😛

  • hostnamastehostnamaste Member, Patron Provider

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

    @PieHasBeenEaten : Thank you very much mate for taking such a bold decision.

  • Wow.Another drama begin. But it's not weekend yet.

  • @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    I banned myself! I need a break also!

    Wait, that's illegal.

    Thanked by 1PieHasBeenEaten
  • Wait, now OP is banned.

  • So now people ban themselves because of... OVZ6?

    Thanked by 1PieHasBeenEaten
  • Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

  • @afn said:
    Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

    Lying about Host giving OP an OVZ6, but it was actually a KVM.
    Lying that OP only got an hour of Abuses notification before the VPS was shutdown, but OP was actually given more than a month of notice.

  • @afn said:
    Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

    I guess you didn't read the thread.

    Thanked by 2angstrom skorous
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

  • edited February 2022

    @default said:
    So now people ban themselves because of... OVZ6?

    The OS has become self-aware and is not banning people. It's more advanced than anyone could have imagined.

  • @Maounique said:

    @vba said: is this correct way to do ?

    Yes but it lacks a lot of other info.
    If you are ok with using the proxmox itself (which is based on Debian)
    then you do something like this:
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
    iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/24 -o vmbr0 -j MASQUERADE
    That is enough to so NAT in the whole of host.
    You do make a new bridge with 10.0.0.254/24 (or any other RFC 1918 "net") for the containers and VMs alike.
    The containers will have IP like 10.0.0.x/24 and 10.0.0.254 as gateway.
    In order to forward ports:
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d [your ipv4] -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.xx
    Then you create containers or VMs and bridge them to vmbr1.
    For a range of ports:
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i vmbr0 -p udp --dport 64000:65000 -j DNAT --to 10.0.0.3:61000-62000
    You can use 192.168.1.x for example, I use 10.0.0.x because is shorter.

    thanks, i just got my ds and will try this using proxmox ve 7.
    can you confirm this willl work for KVM also?
    i trying to build a shared ipv4 kvm and dedicated ipv6 for nat vps

This discussion has been closed.