Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Please do not use OVZ6 - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Please do not use OVZ6

2»

Comments

  • @Maounique said:

    @vba said: is this correct way to do ?

    If you are ok with using the proxmox itself (which is based on Debian)

    https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Configuration

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @Walken said:
    Why would someone use OpenVZ instead of cheap KVM? It's 2022, you can afford a KVM.

    Who cares what you say :joy:

  • Yes, use OpenVZ9

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    So let me stir the pot a little. @jerry_me looks like you been caught red handed fibbing or is there a plausible explanation for this. If you chose not to answer then be it. I will close the thread and move it to the endless abyss.

  • EthernetServersEthernetServers Member, Patron Provider

    @kuroneko23 said:
    Yes, use OpenVZ9

    Running software that's in Alpha isn't the best idea.

    I wouldn't yet trust OpenVZ 8 either.

    OpenVZ 7 is fine though.

  • @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    So let me stir the pot a little. @jerry_me looks like you been caught red handed fibbing or is there a plausible explanation for this. If you chose not to answer then be it. I will close the thread and move it to the endless abyss.

    Yes, @jerry_me should react in some way after starting such a thread, because otherwise it'll be hard to take him/her seriously after this.

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep

    @EthernetServers said:

    @kuroneko23 said:
    Yes, use OpenVZ9

    Running software that's in Alpha isn't the best idea.

    I wouldn't yet trust OpenVZ 8 either.

    OpenVZ 7 is fine though.

    ovz7 is good enough for now, you can still use operating systems that arent eol

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @bruh21 said:
    ovz7 is good enough for now, you can still use operating systems that arent eol

    There's no io_uring on that kernel, limiting the I/O performance.

    The openat2 syscall is also missing, which reduces performance when you need permission-checked access to many files.

    Thanked by 1cybertech
  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

    Moderator banned!
    What's happening?

  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep
    edited February 2022

    @yoursunny I banned myself! I need a break also! Maybe I need to go do a pushup!

  • saw that too and was amused for a while no definitely just kidding

  • ploxhostploxhost Member, Patron Provider

    Pretty sure you also need to be using an EOL OS in order to run openvz 6 as well. Good ole centos 6 😛

  • hostnamastehostnamaste Member, Patron Provider

    @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    @jerry_me see you logged on today! Why can’t you just own up? Really this is a kinda dickish thing to do! Well I am going to give you sometime to think about your actions. Maybe next time just tell the truth or don’t even open a thread like this.

    @PieHasBeenEaten : Thank you very much mate for taking such a bold decision.

  • Wow.Another drama begin. But it's not weekend yet.

  • @PieHasBeenEaten said:
    I banned myself! I need a break also!

    Wait, that's illegal.

    Thanked by 1PieHasBeenEaten
  • Wait, now OP is banned.

  • So now people ban themselves because of... OVZ6?

    Thanked by 1PieHasBeenEaten
  • Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

  • @afn said:
    Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

    Lying about Host giving OP an OVZ6, but it was actually a KVM.
    Lying that OP only got an hour of Abuses notification before the VPS was shutdown, but OP was actually given more than a month of notice.

  • @afn said:
    Why was OP banned, I don't get it?

    I guess you didn't read the thread.

    Thanked by 2angstrom skorous
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

  • edited February 2022

    @default said:
    So now people ban themselves because of... OVZ6?

    The OS has become self-aware and is not banning people. It's more advanced than anyone could have imagined.

  • @Maounique said:

    @vba said: is this correct way to do ?

    Yes but it lacks a lot of other info.
    If you are ok with using the proxmox itself (which is based on Debian)
    then you do something like this:
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
    iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/24 -o vmbr0 -j MASQUERADE
    That is enough to so NAT in the whole of host.
    You do make a new bridge with 10.0.0.254/24 (or any other RFC 1918 "net") for the containers and VMs alike.
    The containers will have IP like 10.0.0.x/24 and 10.0.0.254 as gateway.
    In order to forward ports:
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d [your ipv4] -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.xx
    Then you create containers or VMs and bridge them to vmbr1.
    For a range of ports:
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i vmbr0 -p udp --dport 64000:65000 -j DNAT --to 10.0.0.3:61000-62000
    You can use 192.168.1.x for example, I use 10.0.0.x because is shorter.

    thanks, i just got my ds and will try this using proxmox ve 7.
    can you confirm this willl work for KVM also?
    i trying to build a shared ipv4 kvm and dedicated ipv6 for nat vps

This discussion has been closed.