New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Except not true, many people tried.
I am sure some built a business around it. Buying discounted servers during flash sales, for the purpose of reselling (transferring) it later.
Makes complete sense to me, this is much akin to cybersquatting with .com domain names a few years ago and is still going strong.
Buy something in the hopes it will either go “sold out” or “discontinued” anytime soon, rarity increases market value exponentially.
Resell and make profit, this is pretty basic even outside of our digital world.
No you can't, already attempted, request denied, no matter the country account.
@rm_ @Shot2
This maybe true only for OVH branded servers. However, I have successfully transferred KS and SYS servers in the past. The process is smooth as long as the two parties have accounts in the same country and open tickets confirming the intent to transfer.
got E3-SSD-1-32 in RBX3, but very slow speed to US. good speed if from US to RBX3
Hello! Any news about 8700k with optane drives?
I see it disappeared from labs.
We will propose new generation instead of 8700k. Nothing before february/ march though
@ninzo59 Can you have a look? This network issue has been persistent for almost 2 weeks now. I was waiting to have it fixed, but nothing has changed, except both me and @emilio911 are being told that nothing is wrong with our server. Of course, because the problem is with a network equipment or routing.
For two weeks, iperf from external network looks like this:
While my KS server has this in the same DC (on a 100 mbit line)
Definitely I cannot work with 1000ms pings..
Start: 2018-11-29T20:16:22+0000
HOST: x Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|-- 198.27.x.x 0.0% 10 0.6 185.4 0.4 976.9 346.6
2.|-- be102.bhs-d2-a75.qc.ca 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0
3.|-- 10.95.81.10 0.0% 10 13.1 2.8 1.0 13.1 3.8
4.|-- be100-1323.nwk-5-a9.nj.us 0.0% 10 9.1 9.5 9.0 11.6 0.9
5.|-- UnAssigned170.nyiix.net 0.0% 10 9.3 10.1 9.3 16.2 2.1
6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- 165.227.34.241 0.0% 10 13.4 13.5 13.4 13.9 0.2
wtf
They just replied the following.
They are telling me the same as well.
iperf -c proof.ovh.ca -P 5 -r
shows 750 mbps while
iperf -c iperf.ovh.net -P 5 -r
shows 25 mbps.
My Kimsufi does 90+ in both directions to France.
deleted (got mixed up, sorry)
It works, select rescue64 and reboot.
If anyone looking to cancel their STOR-48T or STOR-72T servers give me a shout.
It has not been opened for more than 13 working days, exceeding the opening time marked on the website.π_π
@zsero @ninzo59 I got an email from a "supervisor" who still denies everything. He thinks I'm complaining about the I/O speed and asks me for the 100th time for some tests in "rescue mode".
I've let them access my machine in Rescue mode, and shown the results to the French server. They fixed something with the QoS settings of the switch and now it's better. Also, they've given me some sysctl values for tuning the network.
Right now, I get 33.8MB/s on
wget http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip
, and I'm generally quite happy now.I didn't test my server since last week. You think they fixed it for everyone, or just for you?
I think probably for everyone.
For me, I get 9MB/s on the Black Friday one and 21MB/s on the one I had previously. I'm not sure what to think about this.
Try these ones:
If it's still not good, put it in rescue mode and explain the problem with iperf to france.
Thanks! Does these ones work in "rescue mode" too?
Yes
Still no real improvement from those guys. They are still giving me the runaround. Still got lower speeds with Europe and Asia. I'm wondering if they purposely dumped these slow servers on us for "Black Friday".
wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin (Tokyo, Japan, Asia):
14,3MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 3.96MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)
wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin (London, UK, Europe):
27.9MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 4.66MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)
wget http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin (Haarlem, NL, Europe):
98.6MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 15.2MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)
Right now I get the following values, both servers are in BHS1:
wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
old server: 6.26 MB/s
new server: 603 KB/s
wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
old server: 11.1 MB/s (100 mbps line max)
new server: 2.26 MB/s
wget http://mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin
old server: 11.2MB/s (100 mbps line max)
new server: 4.20 MB/s
@emilio911, the leaseweb mirror is actually a geolocated IP, probably yours were using wdc1 as well. If you open/wget https://mirror.leaseweb.com/ you'll see what mirror is being used.
Now I realised why is bandwidth so expensive on Google Cloud:
wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin 17.6 MB/s
wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin 27.3MB/s
wget http://mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin 173MB/s
How's that? It's not that much better than my BHS6 (except for the third one).