Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › [OVH/SYS] Black friday launched ! (Recurring offers on dedicated servers) - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[OVH/SYS] Black friday launched ! (Recurring offers on dedicated servers)

12346»

Comments

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    Xei said: That's neat I didn't know that.

    Except not true, many people tried.

    Thanked by 1Xei
  • SteveMCSteveMC Member

    @Xei said:
    That's neat I didn't know that. I wonder if people are holding onto their flash sales from years ago.

    I am sure some built a business around it. Buying discounted servers during flash sales, for the purpose of reselling (transferring) it later.

    Thanked by 1PINGAPAC
  • PINGAPACPINGAPAC Member

    @SteveMC said:

    @Xei said:
    That's neat I didn't know that. I wonder if people are holding onto their flash sales from years ago.

    I am sure some built a business around it. Buying discounted servers during flash sales, for the purpose of reselling (transferring) it later.

    Makes complete sense to me, this is much akin to cybersquatting with .com domain names a few years ago and is still going strong.

    Buy something in the hopes it will either go “sold out” or “discontinued” anytime soon, rarity increases market value exponentially.

    Resell and make profit, this is pretty basic even outside of our digital world.

    Thanked by 1SteveMC
  • Shot2Shot2 Member

    @saibal said:

    @Ponury_Typ said:
    You cant transfer kimsufi/sys servers.

    Yes, you can. Both parties need to be on the same country account and raise tickets.

    No you can't, already attempted, request denied, no matter the country account.

  • saibalsaibal Member

    @rm_ @Shot2

    This maybe true only for OVH branded servers. However, I have successfully transferred KS and SYS servers in the past. The process is smooth as long as the two parties have accounts in the same country and open tickets confirming the intent to transfer.

  • ramonwapramonwap Member

    got E3-SSD-1-32 in RBX3, but very slow speed to US. good speed if from US to RBX3

  • tsofttsoft Member

    @ninzo59 said:

    Hello! Any news about 8700k with optane drives?
    I see it disappeared from labs.

  • ninzo59ninzo59 Member, Host Rep

    @tsoft said:

    @ninzo59 said:

    Hello! Any news about 8700k with optane drives?
    I see it disappeared from labs.

    We will propose new generation instead of 8700k. Nothing before february/ march though

    Thanked by 1tsoft
  • zserozsero Member

    @ninzo59 Can you have a look? This network issue has been persistent for almost 2 weeks now. I was waiting to have it fixed, but nothing has changed, except both me and @emilio911 are being told that nothing is wrong with our server. Of course, because the problem is with a network equipment or routing.

    For two weeks, iperf from external network looks like this:

    [  3]  0.0- 5.0 sec  10.1 MBytes  17.0 Mbits/sec
[  3]  5.0-10.0 sec  3.88 MBytes  6.50 Mbits/sec
[  3] 10.0-15.0 sec  3.62 MBytes  6.08 Mbits/sec
[  3] 15.0-20.0 sec  2.00 MBytes  3.36 Mbits/sec
[  3] 20.0-25.0 sec  3.12 MBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
[  3] 25.0-30.0 sec  4.62 MBytes  7.76 Mbits/sec
[  3] 30.0-35.0 sec  3.00 MBytes  5.03 Mbits/sec
[  3] 35.0-40.0 sec  3.25 MBytes  5.45 Mbits/sec
[  3] 40.0-45.0 sec  5.00 MBytes  8.39 Mbits/sec
[  3] 45.0-50.0 sec  3.75 MBytes  6.29 Mbits/sec
[  3] 50.0-55.0 sec  4.50 MBytes  7.55 Mbits/sec
[  3] 55.0-60.0 sec  5.00 MBytes  8.39 Mbits/sec
[  3] 60.0-65.0 sec  4.50 MBytes  7.55 Mbits/sec
[  3] 65.0-70.0 sec  5.50 MBytes  9.23 Mbits/sec
[  3] 70.0-75.0 sec  4.50 MBytes  7.55 Mbits/sec
[  3] 75.0-80.0 sec  5.12 MBytes  8.60 Mbits/sec
[  3] 80.0-85.0 sec  5.12 MBytes  8.60 Mbits/sec
[  3] 85.0-90.0 sec  5.00 MBytes  8.39 Mbits/sec
[  3] 90.0-95.0 sec  4.62 MBytes  7.76 Mbits/sec
[  3] 95.0-100.0 sec  5.38 MBytes  9.02 Mbits/sec
[  3] 100.0-105.0 sec  3.00 MBytes  5.03 Mbits/sec
[  3] 105.0-110.0 sec  1.88 MBytes  3.15 Mbits/sec

    While my KS server has this in the same DC (on a 100 mbit line)

    [  3]  0.0- 5.0 sec  5.75 MBytes  9.65 Mbits/sec
[  3]  5.0-10.0 sec  4.25 MBytes  7.13 Mbits/sec
[  3] 10.0-15.0 sec  8.25 MBytes  13.8 Mbits/sec
[  3] 15.0-20.0 sec  11.2 MBytes  18.9 Mbits/sec
[  3] 20.0-25.0 sec  15.5 MBytes  26.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] 25.0-30.0 sec  18.5 MBytes  31.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] 30.0-35.0 sec  22.6 MBytes  38.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] 35.0-40.0 sec  25.8 MBytes  43.2 Mbits/sec
[  3] 40.0-45.0 sec  29.4 MBytes  49.3 Mbits/sec
[  3] 45.0-50.0 sec  33.4 MBytes  56.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] 50.0-55.0 sec  36.6 MBytes  61.4 Mbits/sec
[  3] 55.0-60.0 sec  40.2 MBytes  67.5 Mbits/sec
[  3] 60.0-65.0 sec  44.0 MBytes  73.8 Mbits/sec
[  3] 65.0-70.0 sec  47.2 MBytes  79.3 Mbits/sec
[  3] 70.0-75.0 sec  51.1 MBytes  85.8 Mbits/sec
[  3] 75.0-80.0 sec  54.5 MBytes  91.4 Mbits/sec
[  3] 80.0-85.0 sec  53.6 MBytes  90.0 Mbits/sec
[  3] 85.0-90.0 sec  55.4 MBytes  92.9 Mbits/sec
[  3] 90.0-95.0 sec  56.2 MBytes  94.4 Mbits/sec
  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    @zsero said:
    @ninzo59 Can you have a look? This network issue has been persistent for almost 2 weeks now. I was waiting to have it fixed, but nothing has changed, except both me and @emilio911 are being told that nothing is wrong with our server. Of course, because the problem is with a network equipment or routing.

    Definitely I cannot work with 1000ms pings..

    Start: 2018-11-29T20:16:22+0000
    HOST: x Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1.|-- 198.27.x.x 0.0% 10 0.6 185.4 0.4 976.9 346.6
    2.|-- be102.bhs-d2-a75.qc.ca 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0
    3.|-- 10.95.81.10 0.0% 10 13.1 2.8 1.0 13.1 3.8
    4.|-- be100-1323.nwk-5-a9.nj.us 0.0% 10 9.1 9.5 9.0 11.6 0.9
    5.|-- UnAssigned170.nyiix.net 0.0% 10 9.3 10.1 9.3 16.2 2.1
    6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    8.|-- 165.227.34.241 0.0% 10 13.4 13.5 13.4 13.9 0.2

  • eoleol Member

    wtf

  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    @zsero said:
    @ninzo59 Can you have a look? This network issue has been persistent for almost 2 weeks now. I was waiting to have it fixed, but nothing has changed, except both me and @emilio911 are being told that nothing is wrong with our server. Of course, because the problem is with a network equipment or routing.

    They just replied the following.

    Hello,

    Thank you for your feedback.

    According to the results of the tests you sent us, we do not really detect latency issues on this server. Your MTR results show that you have a 0.0% packet loss between both destinations, also regarding your ping test, we see that the destination IP is located in New York.

    This can explain why the average time transfer is 7 ms, please note that the time transfer is also affected by the distance between your host and your server.

    We remain available for further assistance.

  • zserozsero Member

    They are telling me the same as well.

    iperf -c proof.ovh.ca -P 5 -r
    shows 750 mbps while
    iperf -c iperf.ovh.net -P 5 -r
    shows 25 mbps.

    My Kimsufi does 90+ in both directions to France.

  • emilio911emilio911 Member
    edited December 2018

    deleted (got mixed up, sorry)

  • zserozsero Member

    It works, select rescue64 and reboot.

    Thanked by 1emilio911
  • sunnygsunnyg Member

    If anyone looking to cancel their STOR-48T or STOR-72T servers give me a shout.

  • zrj766zrj766 Member

    It has not been opened for more than 13 working days, exceeding the opening time marked on the website.π_π

  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    @zsero @ninzo59 I got an email from a "supervisor" who still denies everything. He thinks I'm complaining about the I/O speed and asks me for the 100th time for some tests in "rescue mode".

  • zserozsero Member

    I've let them access my machine in Rescue mode, and shown the results to the French server. They fixed something with the QoS settings of the switch and now it's better. Also, they've given me some sysctl values for tuning the network.

    Right now, I get 33.8MB/s on wget http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip, and I'm generally quite happy now.

  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    @zsero said:
    I've let them access my machine in Rescue mode, and shown the results to the French server. They fixed something with the QoS settings of the switch and now it's better. Also, they've given me some sysctl values for tuning the network.

    I didn't test my server since last week. You think they fixed it for everyone, or just for you?

  • zserozsero Member

    I think probably for everyone.

  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    Right now, I get 33.8MB/s on wget http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip, and I'm generally quite happy now.

    For me, I get 9MB/s on the Black Friday one and 21MB/s on the one I had previously. I'm not sure what to think about this.

  • zserozsero Member

    Try these ones:

    sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem='32768 349520 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem='32768 65536 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_mem='32768 349520 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout='180'
sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog='30000'

    If it's still not good, put it in rescue mode and explain the problem with iperf to france.

  • emilio911emilio911 Member

    @zsero said:
    Try these ones:

    sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem='32768 349520 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem='32768 65536 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_mem='32768 349520 113246208'
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout='180'
sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog='30000'

    Thanks! Does these ones work in "rescue mode" too?

  • zserozsero Member

    Yes

  • emilio911emilio911 Member
    edited December 2018

    @zsero said:
    Yes

    Still no real improvement from those guys. They are still giving me the runaround. Still got lower speeds with Europe and Asia. I'm wondering if they purposely dumped these slow servers on us for "Black Friday".

    wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin (Tokyo, Japan, Asia):

    14,3MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 3.96MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)

    wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin (London, UK, Europe):

    27.9MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 4.66MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)

    wget http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin (Haarlem, NL, Europe):

    98.6MB/s on BHS6 (previous server) and 15.2MB/s on BHS1 (Black Friday server)

  • zserozsero Member

    Right now I get the following values, both servers are in BHS1:

    wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
    old server: 6.26 MB/s
    new server: 603 KB/s

    wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
    old server: 11.1 MB/s (100 mbps line max)
    new server: 2.26 MB/s

    wget http://mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin
    old server: 11.2MB/s (100 mbps line max)
    new server: 4.20 MB/s

    @emilio911, the leaseweb mirror is actually a geolocated IP, probably yours were using wdc1 as well. If you open/wget https://mirror.leaseweb.com/ you'll see what mirror is being used.

  • zserozsero Member

    Now I realised why is bandwidth so expensive on Google Cloud:
    wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin 17.6 MB/s
    wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin 27.3MB/s
    wget http://mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net/speedtest/100mb.bin 173MB/s

  • emilio911emilio911 Member
    edited December 2018

    @zsero said:
    Now I realised why is bandwidth so expensive on Google Cloud:

    How's that? :neutral: It's not that much better than my BHS6 (except for the third one).

Sign In or Register to comment.