Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Impact VPS | NVMe KVM Beta | Rewards for participating

124

Comments

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    @Edmond said:
    @Awmusic12635 looking great so far, going to run some benchmarks on Windows later, the virtio ethernet adapter is working without issues with speeds up to 10gbps!

    I did find one issue while installing Windows, when I was trying to install Windows Server 2016 Standard, it kept failing to boot but the essential version works fine which is what I got now licensed on the thing.
    It's that typical error that just requires a host config change to fix but it's funny that it works for essentials version but not the standard version.

    Can you clarify host config change? Do you mean the IDE / intel drivers instead of virtio?

  • @Awmusic12635 said:
    Wonder if the file should be bigger than 1G for more ramp up

    updated previous post: filename test2GB . I can't seem to pull at higher than 400mbit from Dallas(Incero).

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    @vimalware said:

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    Wonder if the file should be bigger than 1G for more ramp up

    updated previous post: filename test2GB . I can't seem to pull at higher than 400mbit from Dallas(Incero).

    Single or multiple connection?

  • @Awmusic12635 said:
    Single or multiple connection?

    Single HTTP. I currently don't have the 1G servers in the US to try multiple connections. ( I don't want to abuse a $7/year reliable VPN host.)

    Off to sleep. I'll check the Virtualizor bandwidth graph peaks when I wake up.

    Edit: From OVH FS-30T VM in BHS. (wishosting )

    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 2147483648 (2.0G) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
    
    /dev/null                            100%[====================================================================>]   2.00G  34.2MB/s    in 60s     
    
    2018-06-26 23:14:38 (34.3 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    
  • dr server

    /dev/null            100%[====================>]   2.00G  21.1MB/s    in 69s
    
    2018-06-26 17:35:03 (29.8 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    

    vultr (los angeles)

    /dev/null            100%[====================>]   2.00G  27.0MB/s    in 83s
    
    2018-06-26 17:35:33 (24.7 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    

    letbox (los angeles)

    /dev/null            100%[====================>]   2.00G  32.3MB/s    in 1m 51s
    
    2018-06-26 17:36:12 (18.5 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    

    impact vps

    /dev/null            100%[====================>]   2.00G  1.04GB/s    in 1.9s
    
    2018-06-26 17:36:34 (1.04 GB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    
    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • sinsin Member
    edited June 2018

    nm

  • I'm running a small gitlab. No problem so far... The network is awesome. I was not a customer, but I think I will jump on you next offer.

  • saibalsaibal Member

    404 :-(

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    @saibal said:
    404 :-(

    404?

  • saibalsaibal Member

    @Awmusic12635 said:

    @saibal said:
    404 :-(

    404?

    @vimalware's test files are unavailable currently.

  • CrelingCreling Member
    edited June 2018

    Everything is excellent, whether CPU or I/O, but if, I mean, if your target customers include Chinese customers, you may need to try to optimize the network.

    Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
    Speedtest.net    1813.62 Mbit/s    3382.08 Mbit/s      2.021 ms   
    Shanghai  CT     26.21 Mbit/s      29.61 Mbit/s        152.238 ms 
    Kunming   CT     16.24 Mbit/s      12.86 Mbit/s        202.577 ms 
    Chengdu   CT     16.19 Mbit/s      98.89 Mbit/s        683.907 ms 
    Shanghai  CU     5.57 Mbit/s       87.31 Mbit/s        218.936 ms 
    Xi'an     CU     7.53 Mbit/s       98.32 Mbit/s        299.94 ms  
    Chongqing CU     7.16 Mbit/s       55.77 Mbit/s        201.113 ms 
    Xi'an     CM     0.43 Mbit/s       42.79 Mbit/s        381.708 ms 
    Chengdu   CM     0.35 Mbit/s       9.19 Mbit/s         344.765 ms 
    
    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • Party was over :(

  • @saibal said:

    @vimalware's test files are unavailable currently.

    This one is the only one. (wanted to make sure it fit entirely in pagecache)

    http://10gtest.somebits.xyz/test2GB

  • I have found it to be an excellent service, absolutely interested in this going live! The connection is amazing, I have found no issues to report so far.

  • 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2199.992 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 60.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 3955 MB (46 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 1 days, 9 hour 12 min
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.0-4-amd64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 806 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 927 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 955 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 896.0 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         142MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          19.6MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            11.3MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           16.5MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           15.0MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             5.95MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           38.9MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          111MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            6.65MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           10.6MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          11.7MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
    Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           31.9MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           38.9MB/s
    Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           35.1MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           9.01MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           4.85MB/s
    Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    36.0MB/s
    Softlayer, Washington, WA       2607:f0d0:3001:78::2    28.2MB/s
    Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     12.7MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     10.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    15.9MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    

    Pretty good server.

  • Should be great VZ+KVM mixed with VDS :-)

  • vimalwarevimalware Member
    edited June 2018

    So, I decided to test with iperf3 for multiple threads (latest 3.6 stable). (alternatively apt-get install iperf3 for 3.0.x on Xenial/16.04)

    I'm able to max out (or 90%) gigabit from VPS in Leaseweb SGP, Hetzner , Clouvider, Incero Dallas ((uploading data from iperf3 clients. )

    It took me a minute to recall I should've been using the -R flag in iperf3 to test 'pulling' data from iperf3 server on this ImpactVPS KVM.

    Outgoing bandwidth with 8 iperf3 threads seems to cap out at 500mbit900mbit now.
    I'm surprised because it's only 6AM in WestCoast USA.

    I'm including the iperf3 connection string below (8 threads) in case anyone wants to try (iperf(3.6) listening on port 5205 . I can spin up additional iperf3 ports if required; keep your tests 20secs or less. Anything more doesn't seem to make a difference in my testing.)

    iperf3 -c 10gtest.somebits.xyz -R -p 5205 -P 8 -t 15

  • seenuseenu Member

    i am a paying customer for almost 3yrs but missed this to try :(

  • zkyezzkyez Member
    edited June 2018

    @vimalware said:

    iperf3 -c 10gtest.somebits.xyz -R -p 5205 -P 8 -t 15

    From Hetzner DE:

    /dev/null                                                   100%[========================================================================================================================================>]   2.00G  9.33MB/s    in 3m 16s
    
    2018-06-27 16:12:04 (10.5 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    

    Iperf:

    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    [  4]   0.00-15.00  sec  61.4 MBytes  34.3 Mbits/sec  454             sender
    [  4]   0.00-15.00  sec  58.9 MBytes  32.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  6]   0.00-15.00  sec  79.6 MBytes  44.5 Mbits/sec   38             sender
    [  6]   0.00-15.00  sec  77.1 MBytes  43.1 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  8]   0.00-15.00  sec  46.7 MBytes  26.1 Mbits/sec   48             sender
    [  8]   0.00-15.00  sec  44.6 MBytes  24.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 10]   0.00-15.00  sec  58.9 MBytes  33.0 Mbits/sec  153             sender
    [ 10]   0.00-15.00  sec  56.1 MBytes  31.4 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 12]   0.00-15.00  sec   105 MBytes  58.5 Mbits/sec   83             sender
    [ 12]   0.00-15.00  sec   102 MBytes  57.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 14]   0.00-15.00  sec  47.9 MBytes  26.8 Mbits/sec  176             sender
    [ 14]   0.00-15.00  sec  45.2 MBytes  25.3 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 16]   0.00-15.00  sec  46.1 MBytes  25.8 Mbits/sec  282             sender
    [ 16]   0.00-15.00  sec  43.6 MBytes  24.4 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 18]   0.00-15.00  sec  38.5 MBytes  21.5 Mbits/sec  166             sender
    [ 18]   0.00-15.00  sec  36.8 MBytes  20.6 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [SUM]   0.00-15.00  sec   484 MBytes   271 Mbits/sec  1400             sender
    [SUM]   0.00-15.00  sec   464 MBytes   260 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    

    From Level3 US East:

    100%[=================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 2,147,483,648 28.5MB/s   in 71s
    
    2018-06-27 10:15:26 (28.8 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [2147483648/2147483648]
    

    Iperf:

    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    [  4]   0.00-15.00  sec   137 MBytes  76.5 Mbits/sec  308             sender
    [  4]   0.00-15.00  sec   134 MBytes  75.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  6]   0.00-15.00  sec   152 MBytes  85.2 Mbits/sec  184             sender
    [  6]   0.00-15.00  sec   149 MBytes  83.5 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [  8]   0.00-15.00  sec   130 MBytes  72.9 Mbits/sec  263             sender
    [  8]   0.00-15.00  sec   127 MBytes  71.3 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 10]   0.00-15.00  sec   145 MBytes  80.8 Mbits/sec  621             sender
    [ 10]   0.00-15.00  sec   141 MBytes  78.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 12]   0.00-15.00  sec  91.8 MBytes  51.3 Mbits/sec  353             sender
    [ 12]   0.00-15.00  sec  89.4 MBytes  50.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 14]   0.00-15.00  sec  74.9 MBytes  41.9 Mbits/sec  754             sender
    [ 14]   0.00-15.00  sec  72.0 MBytes  40.3 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 16]   0.00-15.00  sec  68.0 MBytes  38.0 Mbits/sec  508             sender
    [ 16]   0.00-15.00  sec  65.3 MBytes  36.5 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [ 18]   0.00-15.00  sec  58.4 MBytes  32.7 Mbits/sec  649             sender
    [ 18]   0.00-15.00  sec  55.5 MBytes  31.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    [SUM]   0.00-15.00  sec   857 MBytes   479 Mbits/sec  3640             sender
    [SUM]   0.00-15.00  sec   834 MBytes   466 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    

    West coast via Telia:

    [  4]  11.00-12.00  sec  6.92 MBytes  58.0 Mbits/sec
    [  6]  11.00-12.00  sec  19.9 MBytes   167 Mbits/sec
    [  8]  11.00-12.00  sec  8.90 MBytes  74.7 Mbits/sec
    [ 10]  11.00-12.00  sec  3.50 MBytes  29.4 Mbits/sec
    [ 12]  11.00-12.00  sec  2.86 MBytes  24.0 Mbits/sec
    [ 14]  11.00-12.00  sec  4.80 MBytes  40.3 Mbits/sec
    [ 16]  11.00-12.00  sec  4.52 MBytes  37.9 Mbits/sec
    [ 18]  11.00-12.00  sec  3.65 MBytes  30.6 Mbits/sec
    [SUM]  11.00-12.00  sec  55.1 MBytes   462 Mbits/sec
    
    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • imokimok Member

    Testing from FDC Servers (Chicago):

    # wget http://10gtest.somebits.xyz/test2GB
    --2018-06-27 10:00:24--  http://10gtest.somebits.xyz/test2GB
    Resolving 10gtest.somebits.xyz (10gtest.somebits.xyz)... 64.110.128.147
    Connecting to 10gtest.somebits.xyz (10gtest.somebits.xyz)|64.110.128.147|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 2147483648 (2.0G) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ‘test2GB.1’
    
    26% [============>                                       ] 570,262,183 16.8MB/s  eta 90s    
    
  • thagoatthagoat Member
    edited June 2018
    [thagoat@beta ~]$ speedtest
    Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    Testing from Subnet Labs LLC (64.110.128.122)...
    Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    Selecting best server based on ping...
    Hosted by CenturyLink, Inc (Seattle, WA) [1.51 km]: 3.453 ms
    Testing download speed................................................................................
    Download: 2176.34 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed..............................................................................................
    Upload: 849.14 Mbit/s
  • Just my luck, sold out.

    Any chance my 50% discount will move over if I switch?

  • imokimok Member
    edited June 2018

    I've run a network benchmark from the locations I use.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2199.992 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 3789 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 1days, 16:36:18
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
    OS                   : CentOS 7.5.1804
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 bits)
    Kernel               : 3.10.0-862.3.3.el7.x86_64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 661 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 764 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 873 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 766 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node name                               IPv4 address    Download speed
    CacheFly                                205.234.175.175 123MB/s
    Go Mach 5 (Psychz), Los Angeles, US     104.216.118.203 67.0MB/s
    FDC Servers, Chicago, US                192.240.104.4   2.42MB/s
    Virmach (ColoCrossing), Buffalo, US     107.173.176.5   3.49MB/s
    Virmach (ColoCrossing), Dallas, US      23.95.41.200    8.24MB/s
    Virmach (ColoCrossing), Los Angeles, US 107.173.34.15   34.0MB/s
    Cloudcone (Multacom), Los Angeles, US   173.82.88.68    52.0MB/s
    Incero, Dallas, US                      162.212.59.218  27.6MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, US                           165.227.194.167 34.2MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, US                           192.241.184.88  33.0MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, US                           174.138.51.137  32.5MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, US                        104.156.244.232 34.0MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, US                   165.227.29.84   86.4MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, US                   107.170.223.15  95.5MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA                    192.99.19.165   2.27MB/s
    Netcup, Nuremberg, DE                   46.38.225.186   14.8MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR                        188.165.12.106  2.99MB/s
    Online.net, Paris, FR                   62.210.18.40    11.6MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX                   169.57.4.116    11.4MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR                   169.57.128.148  4.75MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node name                               IPv6 address    Download speed
    Linode, Atlanta, US                     2600:3c02::4b   31.6MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, US                      2600:3c00::4b   35.9MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG                   2400:8901::4b   8.15MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP                       2400:8900::4b   3.07MB/s
    Softlayer, Paris, FR                    2a03:8180:1301:8::4 13.0MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    

    Having my backup servers in FDC and Virmach, it doesn't look good. Even Netcup is better.

  • EdmondEdmond Member

    @Awmusic12635 said:

    @Edmond said:
    @Awmusic12635 looking great so far, going to run some benchmarks on Windows later, the virtio ethernet adapter is working without issues with speeds up to 10gbps!

    I did find one issue while installing Windows, when I was trying to install Windows Server 2016 Standard, it kept failing to boot but the essential version works fine which is what I got now licensed on the thing.
    It's that typical error that just requires a host config change to fix but it's funny that it works for essentials version but not the standard version.

    Can you clarify host config change? Do you mean the IDE / intel drivers instead of virtio?

    Don't think so, I looked up the error before and I run into it quite often when installing Windows... Let me run the Standard version installer again and take a screenshot of the BSOD.

  • Really smooth.... no issues found so far!

  • The network is very good after BBR enabled.
    I love it.

    Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    Retrieving information for the selected server...
    Hosted by Wowrack (Seattle, WA) [1.51 km]: 2.114 ms
    Testing download speed................................................................................
    Download: 2486.26 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed................................................................................................
    Upload: 2118.39 Mbit/s
    
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   15820853.8   1355.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3052.0    554.9
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4138.5    962.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     576169.7   1455.0
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     159863.5    965.9
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1349683.5   2327.0
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1044853.8    839.9
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      56412.4    141.0
    Process Creation                                126.0       8300.9    658.8
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4512.5   1064.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1002.5   1670.8
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1231960.6    821.3
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         896.6
    
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   32595600.8   2793.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6021.2   1094.8
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7002.1   1628.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     774937.8   1956.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     198677.5   1200.5
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2220684.2   3828.8
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1930349.1   1551.7
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     288031.3    720.1
    Process Creation                                126.0      13509.6   1072.2
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7884.5   1859.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1052.1   1753.4
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2076781.5   1384.5
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1580.1
    
  • quickquick Member

    OOS :/

  • seikanseikan Member

    Up and running for 3 days now. I can't find any issues yet!

  • EdmondEdmond Member

    Anyone got the IPv6 default gateway handy? IPv4 worked automatically but can't figure out the default gateway for IPv6... Should have noted it down before removing Ubuntu from the thing, whoops...

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    Edmond said: Anyone got the IPv6 default gateway handy? IPv4 worked automatically but can't figure out the default gateway for IPv6... Should have noted it down before removing Ubuntu from the thing, whoops...

    A small note it is out of a /48

Sign In or Register to comment.