All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
5 safe country where they can host their website for journalists
Finland
Finland, which ranks first in the press freedom index. I propose provider: Creanova.org
Norway
Norway, which ranks second in the press freedom index. Norwegian Internet providers has served a period of WikiLeaks. (Bahnhof Norway.)
Denmark
Denmark, which ranks third in the press freedom index. I propose provider: Meebox.net
The Netherlands
The Netherlands, which ranks fourth in the press freedom index. Dutch internet providers has served a period of WikiLeaks. (CyberBunker, Ecatel.co.uk)
Sweden
Sweden, which ranks fifth in the press freedom index. Swedish Internet provider has to serve a period of WikiLeaks. (PRQ, Bahnhof)
Bonus country: Iceland
Iceland is actually the safest countries for journalists are expensive, but the service here. I propose provider: FlokiNET.is, Orangewebsite.com
Comments
let.blogspot?
Enough with the fucking articles, damnit!
LETers know how to google for it!
I wrote this article myself!
I was always under the impression that USA is one of the better countries to host in when talking about freedom of speech content?
You're not funny. Now go play with your peers.
I assume you're being sarcastic.
USA press freedom index ranking is #49.
Not to mention continuing government surveilance and NSLs. Here's some cut/paste:
NO and DK are certainly not free speech heavens. Neither is FI. Nowhere in the EU in general. NL is mostly fine, but I personally know of a fairly popular journalist based in NL which was directly affected by gov sponsored attacks.
And Iceland... where even porn is illegal and a DDoS could take down half of the country, lol.
Indeed.
This hasn't much to do (directly) with freedom of speech.
@Ole_Juul @Nyr USA remains to be seen what makes every moment.
LOL
In general, people overestimates freedom of speech in the EU.
In my country for example, photographing police is illegal and even journalists get fined for that. You also can't also protest near gov buildings, "disrespecting" a police officer (per his criteria) means a fine, as does not carrying ID doc with you or "attacking" the police with lights (yeah).
Those are just some examples of many. Don't take me wrong, I still like Spain and prefer it to the US, but I wouldn't exactly call the situation here "free speech". And there is still worse in other EU countries.
Many people is laughing at that but he is actually right. Most of the conflictive content in the Internet is actually hosted in the US, as are most of the English investigative journalism websites and many foreign ones too.
Middle East never unfaithful to the USA translates into a bloodbath.
@Nyr is right here, so much controversial content is hosted in the US - and there is no data retention law there. In most EU countries you legally have to keep logs of who access your server (website, mail service, etc) for several months. In the US it seems possible not to log a thing, and seems like (for example) riseup is able to operate just fine not keeping any log...
In the end, like for DMCA, from what I read, the provider seems more important than the country.
It's because they outsourced all logging to the NSA. The USA are a very service-focussed country and save you the hassle of keeping own logs.
Yeah look up the Utah Data Center the NSA operates, the reported figures of that place make all other DC's look amateur. The NSA doesn't need other DC's to store data when they have that monster available.
Please post some examples where the US government has forced people to take political discussion off the Internet.
The KKK, Communist Party of the USA, antisemitism, NAMBLA, all manner of religious extremism, etc - it's all legal in the US with zero censorship.
Arguably, wikileaks? But not through traditional channels. IIRC the US authorities were looking to confiscate the domain & payment gateways who processed donations to wikileaks.
Anyways, I agree with the premise. The USA does not have a major issue of censorship... ultimately if you're doing something on the scale of wikileaks, then prepare to hide in an embassy for a number of years. If you're posting about [president of very small country with no freedom of press] to the detriment of their reputation, best just make sure you're anonymous so you don't somehow disappear.
Piss the right people off in any country, they'll find a way to shut you down.
Wikileaks is fair though the Pentagon Papers would be a counter-example.
https://host1.no/
Depends which content will be posted. If nothing against local government Russia or CIS countries the best place..
Not if the content has anything related to drugs or sex, among others... and Russian law is really difficult and complex anyway.
Yes exactly, but you can got flagged..
Well, peasants are not supposed to be able to look at their superiors. The proper stance is to bow the head in 45-60 degrees angle when they are near. Giving them free stuff is also recommended - you want to be in their good moods.
Freedom of speech in Southern Europe is a joke (no idea about the North).
I know, I know... I personally got harassed/investigated just for taking a photo of some police officers back when it was legal some years ago. It became undesirable that people could show police misbehavior so gov just outlawed it in the name of security.
We also get illegal surveillance relatively often, among other undesirable behaviour from unaccountable security forces, which during the last decades have done things from politician-approved assassinations to providing explosives to known terrorists.
That kind of stuff happens in every single country in the world.
Vatican City doesn't even have a datacenter.
Not sure if Monaco does, though they do have an ISP and with their gambling industry, they probably do.
http://www.monacodatacenter.com/
I colocate my taxes there.
You don't think the nerve center of the Catholic empire and city-state whose existence is basically gambling have surveillance capability??