New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
can you open http://client.hostslim.eu/clientarea.php
DOwn I am here?
got oone mail from hostslim "New Invoice created" just now
but ....how to pay my bill?
what wrong there?
Beware, long text coming in 2 posts:
Distro: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l CPU Info: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz stepping : 7 cpu MHz : 1999.905 cache size : 15360 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 12 core id : 0 cpu cores : 6 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 3999.81 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Disk space: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/simfs 83886080 502552 83383528 1% / tmpfs 524288 0 524288 0% /lib/init/rw tmpfs 524288 0 524288 0% /dev/shm total 84934656 502552 84432104 1% Free: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1048576 186500 862076 0 0 165256 -/+ buffers/cache: 21244 1027332 Swap: 1048576 0 1048576 dd 1Mx1k dsync: 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.66603 s, 403 MB/s dd 64kx16k dsync: 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.27607 s, 130 MB/s dd 1Mx1k fdatasync: 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.09048 s, 514 MB/s dd 64kx16k fdatasync: 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.05404 s, 523 MB/s IOPing I/O: 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=1 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=2 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=3 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=4 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=5 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=6 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=7 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=8 time=0.1 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=9 time=0.2 ms 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=10 time=0.2 ms --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics --- 10 requests completed in 9002.6 ms, 7502 iops, 29.3 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms IOPing seek rate: --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics --- 24032 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 16486 iops, 64.4 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/63.0/0.5 ms IOPing sequential: --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics --- 7301 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 3362 iops, 840.4 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/10.6/0.2 ms IOPing cached: --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics --- 51193 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 343723 iops, 1342.7 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.0/0.0 ms Download Cachefly: 75.0MB/s Download Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA: 17.7MB/s Download Linode, Dallas, TX, USA: 17.7MB/s Download Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.30MB/s Download Linode, London, UK: 4.72MB/s Download OVH, Paris, France: 6.37MB/s Download SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 4.48MB/s Download Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany: 11.1MB/s Download iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia: 893KB/s Download Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA: 533KB/s Download Softlayer, Singapore: 3.41MB/s Download Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA: 15.0MB/s Download Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA: 4.18MB/s Download Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA: 27.9MB/s Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10-209-231-199.scalabledns.com (199.231.209.10) 0.063 ms 0.019 ms 0.024 ms 2 ip2.50-200-2.static.steadfastdns.net (208.100.50.2) 0.362 ms 0.375 ms 0.419 ms 3 * ip45.208-100-32.static.steadfastdns.net (208.100.32.45) 74.323 ms 74.301 ms 4 ae1-133.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.110.29) 0.190 ms 0.228 ms 0.194 ms 5 ae2-30g.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.138) 1.779 ms 1.837 ms 1.752 ms 6 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 1.676 ms 1.539 ms 1.606 ms Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=1.41 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=1.40 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=1.45 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=4 ttl=58 time=1.57 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=1.90 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=1.71 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=7 ttl=58 time=1.66 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=8 ttl=58 time=1.65 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=9 ttl=58 time=1.53 ms 64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=10 ttl=58 time=1.70 ms --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.400/1.601/1.904/0.152 msM
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Process Creation 1 2 3 4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: bigmao: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab059.7 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 12:08:59 up 58 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 21 2012 12:08:59 - 12:36:50 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12390033.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1958.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2555.0 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 377416.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 104010.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 980298.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 592889.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 98088.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6860.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4673.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1626.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 484828.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12390033.7 1061.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1958.4 356.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2555.0 594.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 377416.6 953.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 104010.6 628.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 980298.1 1690.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 592889.8 476.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 98088.8 245.2 Process Creation 126.0 6860.8 544.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4673.1 1102.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1626.1 2710.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 484828.2 323.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 700.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 21 2012 12:36:50 - 13:04:44 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 49170103.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7883.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 9992.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 524528.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138530.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1718982.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2268052.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 252413.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 21324.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12309.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1283.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1579608.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 49170103.9 4213.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7883.1 1433.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 9992.2 2323.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 524528.2 1324.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138530.7 837.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1718982.4 2963.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2268052.5 1823.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252413.7 631.0 Process Creation 126.0 21324.4 1692.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12309.2 2903.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1283.1 2138.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1579608.7 1053.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1701.1M
+1, but Uncle Sal only has shop in Italy. If only they'd open another DC.
Cheaper but high latency from my location. (-_-)
Working fine here.
That 4096mb plan. Which location?
well ,it should be clients.hostslim.eu
seems worng link on www.hostslim.eu top banner with login and register
laf
it `s super fast !
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 10.2022 s, 421 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=64k oflag=dsync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 29.2337 s, 147 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=64k conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 8.5442 s, 503 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4k conv=fdatasync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 8.13189 s, 528 MB/s
cannot believe this
no one dd here just me on this server?
Fire SSD ?
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 10.2022 s, 421 MB/s
Which location?
Los Angeles Node: dc03r02ds30.scalabledns.com
In the same node as @giang and me then.
Hear hear.
then let us see how the next few months
Exactly, mine is in Chicago. It is not 4096 who said that
1 GB but it is not 4 dollars either, it is 4.99, meaning 5.
Uncle Sal scored 3.2k in unix bench, but i can't say this one is really bad, actually it is quite alright for now. About same price as Uncle Sal but has more storage.
For next week I will be in vacation and will leave this on with monitoring see how it goes.
M
Which one is that M?
512 OVZ
M
Let's hope it last.
Uncle Sal scored 3.2k in unix bench, but i can't say this one is really bad, actually it is quite alright for now. About same price as Uncle Sal but has more storage.
For next week I will be in vacation and will leave this on with monitoring see how it goes.
M
Misunderstand, i though you got 6 core. (-_-)
For $15 a year.
I might get one.
The Chicago Server (155ms) has even better ping than the upcoming buyvm in Buffalo (165ms).
Should I do it?
I get 800KB/S or 6400kbit/s on their chicago test file.
I am not sure, so far it goes well, but we will check again in a couple of weeks, usually after the nodes fill performance degrades.
If you need for vpn, try more testfiles around. Ping is not everything, throughput is important, after all a tenth of a second up or down is not much, but if you want to dl big files or watch movies speed is important, much more important than ping.
M
I am really sorry, I wanted to say geekbench...
M
@Maonique
I tried some. Most of the better ones give me about 800KB/s download speed. (my internet connection is max. 1400KB/s or 11mbit/s)
Some provide ~800KB/s then descent to 400 and climb to 1000. And sometimes the go down to 100KB/s but then rise instantly to 1100KB/s.
So which server is better for video streaming and VPN.
A Server that provides pretty constant 800KB/s and drops to 400-500 sometimes.
Or a server that provides a little less often the average of 800 but skips more between 100 and 1100?
I grabbed one of these too (1gb), but it looks like people have posted benchmarks. The only thing I'll add is that it looked like auto-setup once your order is paid, and I had quick response to tickets. Their control panel for the account is Solus, and it has options to enable TUN/TAP and PPP.
Looks pretty sweet so far.
@Soylent
I had an LEB special in their Chicago center, but eventually had to let it go -- as the network slowed down and the VPS wasn't as stable as I would have liked. I gave up after the last time when it was offline almost two days.
!(http://tinypic.com/r/2wgr4oo/6)
Erf... 2 days downtime is certainly enough to "convince" anyone to give up if they really need the VPS...
M
@connercg We moved datacenter facilities in Chicago to 350 E Cermak. Since then, uptime has been rock solid.
Any chance to revive that Xen 80% off deal as your welcome gift to LET members?
Also, on their site they have a 100% monthly uptime SLA, with a free day of service for any .1% below that. It's obviously debatable whether a month of free service is worth 1 day of down time, which gets back to the question of what you're willing to host on a LEB. For me it's a question of why, and how often. 24 hours of down time in a year because of a massive hardware failure or DC screwup or network provider problem is different to me than 2 hours of downtime a month because you don't know how to configure your nodes.
It at least makes me feel better that they're confident enough to make the guarantee up front.
just enalbed TUN/TAP and PPP for PPTP VPN
but cannot connect by my iPhone4 after installing http://board.prometeus.net/myfiles/pptpvpn.sh
the bash script is installed on buyVM,verything`s fine there
anyone helps?
Maybe reinstall and look what error you get ?
While the script is running, or in /var/log after you try to connect.
"It doesn't work" is not enough to troubleshoot, unfortunately
M
no any error
While the script is running, or in /var/log after you try to connect.
"It doesn't work" is not enough to troubleshoot
allright,Iam too lazy to google,just post the problem here to see if anyone met the same problem just like me
Ok now got these :
@ http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x7261.html
@ http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/debugging-linux-pppd-pptp-vpn-problems.html
@ http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/pppd-logging-to-var-log-ppp-log-problem-133098/
I will do more test and debug on the BudegetVM host
thanks anyway