Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › ColoCrossing Network Benchmarks NEEDED - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ColoCrossing Network Benchmarks NEEDED

13»

Comments

  • JoeMeritJoeMerit Veteran

    How about upload speeds to many locations?

  • doughmanesdoughmanes Member

    I left Buffalo first of the year, never looked back. A Black Friday special got me and got me for a whole month of service so I split after Buffalo would randomly crap out 2-5am

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @JoeMerit said:
    How about upload speeds to many locations?

    Haven't tested it yet tbh :-).

    @doughmanes said:
    I left Buffalo first of the year, never looked back. A Black Friday special got me and got me for a whole month of service so I split after Buffalo would randomly crap out 2-5am

    Definitely, they oversell their network a lot.

  • doughmanesdoughmanes Member

    MrGeneral said: Definitely, they oversell their network a lot.

    jbiloh was taking network graphs on here in the past regarding this reoccurring issue

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @doughmanes said:

    Yeah, I hope they'll improve more. We've renewed the server but we expect them to take care of their own network.

  • TheInvisibleOneTheInvisibleOne Member

    @MrGeneral said:
    Yeah, I hope they'll improve more. We've renewed the server but we expect them to take care of their own network.

    They most likely have overloaded switches. Could be a reason why some have better connection speeds while others are complete crap or the NIC's are going bad.

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @cmsjr123 said:
    They most likely have overloaded switches. Could be a reason why some have better connection speeds while others are complete crap or the NIC's are going bad.

    Yes, precisely what I'm thinking... We'll see how it goes.

  • TrafficTraffic Member

    @MrGeneral Network looks much better now compared to a few weeks ago:

    CPU model :  QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency :  1999.999 MHz
Total amount of ram : 8192 MB
Total amount of swap : 8192 MB
System uptime :   0 min,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 32.7MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 35.7MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 50.4MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.70MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.23MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.48MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.78MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 33.1MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 2.57MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 60.4MB/s 
I/O speed :  147 MB/s
    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @Traffic said:
    MrGeneral Network looks much better now compared to a few weeks ago:

    CPU model :  QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
> Number of cores : 2
> CPU frequency :  1999.999 MHz
> Total amount of ram : 8192 MB
> Total amount of swap : 8192 MB
> System uptime :   0 min,       
> Download speed from CacheFly: 32.7MB/s 
> Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 35.7MB/s 
> Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 50.4MB/s 
> Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.70MB/s 
> Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.23MB/s
> Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.48MB/s 
> Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.78MB/s 
> Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 33.1MB/s 
> Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 2.57MB/s 
> Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 60.4MB/s 
> I/O speed :  147 MB/s

    Thank you very much! We have renewed the server but did let them know that we'd only renew it if the network improves, and that happened. Until now the network has been much better and we're looking forward to stick with CC.

    As for the IO speed, try ioping -RD ./

    You'll see close to 10k IOPS! :-)

    Thanked by 1Traffic
  • FredQcFredQc Member
    edited May 2015 
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency :  1600.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 32080 MB
Total amount of swap : 8191 MB
System uptime :   170 days, 17:36,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 27.3MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.77MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 2.07MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.11MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 259KB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.32MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.06MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.91MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 1.27MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 2.47MB/s 
I/O speed :  104 MB/s

    That benchmark was extremely painful to do... meh

    Dedicated box and dedicated 1Gbit in Buffalo, NY

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @FredQc said:
    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
    Number of cores : 8
    CPU frequency : 1600.000 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 32080 MB
    Total amount of swap : 8191 MB
    System uptime : 170 days, 17:36,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 27.3MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.77MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 2.07MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.11MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 259KB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.32MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.06MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.91MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 1.27MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 2.47MB/s
    I/O speed : 104 MB/s

    That benchmark was extremely painful to do... meh

    Dedicated box and dedicated 1Gbit in Buffalo, NY

    Thank you very much! I've got better speeds for now, let's hope it keeps that way

  • TrafficTraffic Member
    edited May 2015

    @MrGeneral said:
    You'll see close to 10k IOPS! :-)


    15086 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 9655 iops, 37.7 mb/s

    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/1.4/0.0 ms

    :)

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • TrafficTraffic Member

    @FredQc said:
    Dedicated box and dedicated 1Gbit in Buffalo, NY

    Dedicated 1Gbit? Then the crime is much worse...

  • FredQcFredQc Member

    I've got the idea to do a service network restart and oh surprise...

    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency :  3501.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 32080 MB
Total amount of swap : 8191 MB
System uptime :   170 days, 18:26,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 78.2MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 57.4MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 39.7MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.13MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 9.93MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.07MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 953KB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.23MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 24.2MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 64.0MB/s 
I/O speed :  104 MB/s

    Offshore speeds is still crap but it's much better all around...

    Don't know why this resolved the low speeds tho

    Thanked by 1Traffic
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    Traffic said: 15086 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 9655 iops, 37.7 mb/s

    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/1.4/0.0 ms

    Muuuuuch better! :-)

    @FredQc said:
    I've got the idea to do a service network restart and oh surprise...

    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency :  3501.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 32080 MB
Total amount of swap : 8191 MB
System uptime :   170 days, 18:26,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 78.2MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 57.4MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 39.7MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.13MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 9.93MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.07MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 953KB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.23MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 24.2MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 64.0MB/s 
I/O speed :  104 MB/s

    Offshore speeds is still crap but it's much better all around...

    Don't know why this resolved the low speeds tho

    Indeed, at least we're now getting better speeds!

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    Slightly offtopic but does anyone know at what speed the CC rate limiting kicks in?

    Looks like I have to limit network port when doing large uploads :(

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @linuxthefish said:
    Slightly offtopic but does anyone know at what speed the CC rate limiting kicks in?

    Looks like I have to limit network port when doing large uploads :(

    I'd love to know that as well!

  • linuxthefishlinuxthefish Member

    @MrGeneral said:
    I'd love to know that as well!

    Sent you a PM ;)

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @linuxthefish said:
    Sent you a PM ;)

    Thanks! Extremely useful! :)

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    It seems CC doesn't let my reseller hand me a direct account so I can help them fixing their own network.

    I'm considering to leave.

  • J1021J1021 Member

    MrGeneral said: I'm considering to leave.

    Just do it and don't look back.

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @kcaj said:
    Just do it and don't look back.

    Considering that, but I'll have a talk with them first.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    MrGeneral said: Indeed, at least we're now getting better speeds!

    Glad you're getting better speeds.

  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    @jbiloh said:

    Sometimes. Right now, not so better speeds. I was denied from having a direct account to CC, to investigate this further. Is there anything you can do?

  • MSPNickMSPNick Member

    Colocrossing seems good at the mo;

Sign In or Register to comment.