Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › greenvaluehost or chicagovps? - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

greenvaluehost or chicagovps?

13

Comments

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    no

  • AmitzAmitz Member

    @AnthonySmith said:
    no

    I would like to buy a vowel and solve: NOPE.

  • TermietTermiet Member

    I was one time with gvh, they suck. Enough said.

  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member

    trewq said: Mate, when you use mate to reference someone it makes me read your post in an Australian accent. Cheers.

    I lol'd. Cheers, mate!

  • 0xdragon0xdragon Member

    @DalekOfSkaro said:
    I lol'd. Cheers, mate!

    Now it's the drunk TF2 demoman's accent xD

    Thanked by 2trewq DalekOfSkaro
  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member

    0xdragon said: Now it's the drunk TF2 demoman's accent xD

    lol!

  • iClickAndHostiClickAndHost Member

    Lol, the Nr. 1 search result :D

    That should help you decide.

    Thanked by 1ATHK
  • iClickAndHostiClickAndHost Member

    To be on-topic. @OP, what are your requirements and what is your budget?

  • akzakz Member

    go GVH if you want to have a VM that is offline and doesnt work

    go CVPS if you want a VM thats online and doesnt work

    Thanked by 15Amitz PremiumN qrwteyrutiyoup kkrajk gsrdgrdghd iClickAndHost ATHK atho mint TheLonely Darwin ihatetonyy Rob92 webcraft GIANT_CRAB
  • AmitzAmitz Member

    @akz said:
    go GVH if you want to have a VM that is offline and doesnt work

    go CVPS if you want a VM thats online and doesnt work

    Ha! I lol'ed! :-)

  • MSPNickMSPNick Member

    @akz said:
    go GVH if you want to have a VM that is offline and doesnt work

    go CVPS if you want a VM thats online and doesnt work

    That's brilliant.

  • RocksterRockster Member

    I read a lot of negative things about CVPS, but personally don't have any problems with CVPS yet. Both tickets I opened in last year were answered and resolved promptly and also not some drastic downtimes in NJ yet.
    On the other hand I don't dare to try GVH.

  • MunMun Member

    @CVPS_Chris said:

    Ohh chris, then please explain to me why more shitty hosts, such as yourself and GVH use CC. Why do I constantly have issues with CC based companies. Why did suddenly bluevm loose a whole network of IPS? Why is LET almost never up anymore? All in all, CCs network is actually pretty meh. Nothing really great about it from my many years using them.

    Honestly I have had better experience in the VPS market with WSI/Datashack.

  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member
    edited October 2014

    Mun said: hy do I constantly have issues with CC based companies.

    For the sake of argument, I would give you a VM to see for yourself that not all hosting companies that use/colocate with ColoCrossing are bad :)

    Edit: Free for a month (or maybe a bit more?) so you see for yourself. No strings attached, just to prove a point.

  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member

    @Mun: So PM me if you're willing to take on this offer.

  • VPSRAIDSolutionsVPSRAIDSolutions Member

    @akz said:
    go GVH if you want to have a VM that is offline and doesnt work

    go CVPS if you want a VM thats online and doesnt work

    That actually made my day lol

  • kkrajkkkrajk Member

    Amitz said: Ha! I lol'ed! :-)

    +1

  • LeeLee Veteran
    edited October 2014

    Definately CVPS over GVH.

    I have a VPS in Atlanta with CVPS, it wont win any awards but it's reasonably stable, node reboots without warning now and then but overall ok, I use it for testing things that are not private or uptime is a concern, works just fine for that.

  • KerberosKerberos Member

    @akz said:
    go GVH if you want to have a VM that is offline and doesnt work

    go CVPS if you want a VM thats online and doesnt work

    LOL!!!! Best comment yet.

  • webcraftwebcraft Member
    edited October 2014

    This is GVH's speed at AMS: image

  • AmitzAmitz Member
    edited October 2014

    @webcraft said:
    This is GVH's speed at AMS: image

    Which, to be honest, tells us nothing at all about the quality of their VPS offering there. It just shows a snapshot in time of the network situation of their partner DC. Just like all those

  • programerprogramer Member

    Does any one have the disk i/o test done with GVH recently?

  • webcraftwebcraft Member
    edited October 2014 
    Colormedia Benchmark Version 6.1 (with CPU Benchmark)
Webseite (1): www.colormedia.co
Webseite (2): www.ensky.eu

Allgemeine Informationen

Prozessor :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
Prozessor-Kerne :  4
Taktfrequenz pro Kern:  2400.026 MHz
Arbeitsspeicher : 1536 MB
SWAP : 0 MB
Laufzeit :   1 day, 23:41,

Netzwerk Benchmark

Download Geschwindigkeit:  colormedia (DE): 62.8MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Edis (AT): 985KB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Netcologne (DE): 75.0MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  FSIT (CH): 29.7MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Softlayer (Hong Kong): 6.97MB/s

Festplatten Benchmark

I/O Durchschnittswert: 148.6666 MB/s
Dieser Durchschnittswert wird anhand von 3 durchgeführten Messungen errechnet.

CPU Benchmark

real    0m13.627s
user    0m13.632s
sys     0m0.002s
  • programerprogramer Member

    I had some credit with them dont know how to use it, they are not refunding it forcing me to run with them

  • Rob92Rob92 Member

    @programer said:
    Does any one have the disk i/o test done with GVH recently?

    root@*******:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

    ^C9883+0 records in

    9883+0 records out

    647692288 bytes (648 MB) copied, 540.435 s, 1.2 MB/s

    Ended up stopping it since it appeared to be frozen :/

    Thanked by 1ATHK
  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    @Rob92 said:

    I think that's the lowest I've ever seen on any box ever

  • Rob92Rob92 Member

    To be fair, the results went back to around 20-50MB/s about 10 minutes later.

  • TarballZTarballZ Member
    edited November 2014

    @DalekOfSkaro you and Jon from GVH seem to have allot in common. You're both delusional and you both seem to enjoy eating the same piece of bratwurst. Do you guys compare / exchange notes or something? Because you're about an inch away from following him into ridicule and there is no coming back from that.

    For anyone else wondering what I'm talking about, have a quick glance at this and then compare to the comments that @DalekOfSkaro posts on LET:

    http://goo.gl/fJc2Gh

    [Edit]

    Just found this golden nugget: http://goo.gl/e2MgWM

  • 0xdragon0xdragon Member
    edited November 2014

    @TarballZ said:
    DalekOfSkaro you and Jon from GVH seem to have allot in common. You're both delusional and you both seem to enjoy eating the same piece of bratwurst. Do you guys compare / exchange notes or something? Because you're about an inch away from following him into ridicule and there is no coming back from that.

    For anyone else wondering what I'm talking about, have a quick glance at this and then compare to the comments that DalekOfSkaro posts on LET:

    http://goo.gl/fJc2Gh

    Please refrain from attacking people like this without evidence.

    I'm not quite sure how @DalekOfSkaro is wrong here, he and Jon are completely different people. Maybe you weren't here when Jon was posting, but I was. He posted vile things, most of which were soon edited afterwards. He claimed that his nodes had "100% uptime" and lied countless times. @DalekOfSkaro has been a good contributor and has a clean record on here. Simply offering from CC is not a bad thing.

    Thanked by 1DalekOfSkaro
  • TarballZTarballZ Member

    @0xdragon said:

    I was referring to how stupid some of his posts are. Just read them across multiple threads and judge for yourself. He acts like a drone, especially when it comes to his upstream.

Sign In or Register to comment.