GreenValueHost September Sale | 6 U.S Locations | High Bandwidth/Cheap IPs, Guaranteed Lowest Prices

jnguyen

@JoeMerit said:
least most performing node eh.. how about you move all the other customers off of it too

We have a hardware upgrade planned for it instead.

Mun

If we calculate it out. a 99.9% uptime in a month is around ~45 minutes of total downtime you can have.

As per the last 15ish days, green value host has not been able to meet that guarantee.

iSky

ticket got no responded, you ask ticket then i open up, now no one handle it

JustJon

Is your SolusVM Down?

Edit: was a cookie problem since you changed the VPS.

DalekOfSkaro

@jnguyen

Good job on the disclosure, I can definitely respect that. If I were shopping, I would actually be willing to give GVH a shot because of the level of honesty in this post.

ihatetonyy

Will you expand out to SJ anytime soon like your comrades-in-arms over at ChicagoVPS?

jnguyen said: we're not going to claim that we're competing against hosts more geared towards quality over quantity (such as RamNode).

Well, this is a welcome change.

jnguyen

@Mun - You are not an existing client and do not have any active services. For all we know those screenshots are photoshopped and/or the person that gave you that has been shut down/suspended/hasn't contacted us.

@iSky - Someone will be assisting you shortly. Posting on LET does not speed up your ticket response/resolution time in any way

@JustJon - No it is not offline.

jnguyen

@ihatetonyy said:
Will you expand out to SJ anytime soon like your comrades-in-arms over at ChicagoVPS?

You mean NJ? Not anytime soon, sorry.

JoeMerit

@DalekOfSkaro said:
jnguyen

Good job on the disclosure, I can definitely respect that. If I were shopping, I would actually be willing to give GVH a shot because of the level of honesty in this post.

What about all his other disclosures which meant jack shit ?

JustJon

New Node:

Testing North America locations
Speedtest from Portland, Oregon, USA [ generously donated by http://bonevm.com ] on a shared 100 Mbps port
    Download Speed: 10.07 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 5.53 MB/sec
Speedtest from Los Angeles, CA, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 10.89 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 9.89 MB/sec
Speedtest from Los Angeles, CA, USA [ generously donated by TeraFire, LLC ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 2.36 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 9.25 MB/sec
Speedtest from Las Vegas, NV, USA [ generously donated by http://hostnun.net/ ] on a shared 200 Mbps port
    Download Speed: 2.91 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 10.18 MB/sec
Speedtest from Dallas, TX, USA [ generously donated by http://cloudshards.com ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 22.35 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 27.19 MB/sec
Speedtest from Chicago, IL, USA [ generously donated by http://vortexservers.com ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 86.36 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 59.15 MB/sec
Speedtest from Beauharnois, Quebec, Canada [ generously donated by http://mycustomhosting.net ] on a shared 1000 Mbps port in / 500 Mbps port out
    Download Speed: 1.33 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 25.18 MB/sec
Speedtest from Buffalo, NY, USA on a shared 1 Gpbs port:
    Download Speed: 88.46 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 86.61 MB/sec
Speedtest from Atlanta, GA, USA [ generously donated by http://hostus.us ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 16.86 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 4.95 MB/sec
Speedtest from Jacksonville, FL, USA [ generously donated by http://maximumvps.net ] on a shared 1 Gbps port
    Download Speed: 10.95 MB/sec
    Upload speed: 7.30 MB/sec

Bench.sh

CPU model :    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3400.003 MHz
Total amount of ram : 256 MB
Total amount of swap : 0 MB
System uptime :   19 min,       
Download speed : (69.0MB/s) 
I/O speed : 1.1GB/s

ihatetonyy

jnguyen said: You mean NJ? Not anytime soon, sorry.

I mean SJ, San Jose, California, a city on the Best Coast of the United States of America.

jnguyen

http://prntscr.com/4i2bo9 <- Latest test on one of our Buffalo nodes.

Mun

jnguyen said: @Mun - You are not an existing client and do not have any active services. For all we know those screenshots are photoshopped and/or the person that gave you that has been shut down/suspended/hasn't contacted us.

I know this person in real life, they have not shut down the server, they have not been suspended, and the server is nearly idle. Only a few, non abusive apps running on it to monitor your 99.9% uptime guarantee. Current load average of the VPS is: 0 0 0

Not to mention when they first got the VPS they couldn't even install MTR because the network was so spotty.

Nekki

My life with GVH since I started using the server a couple of months back; reboots all over the show for a month; then nearly 30 days of constant uptime with decent speeds, and they don't give a monkeys that I'm torrenting 24x7.

Conclusion: fine as a banter box for cheap traffic and pissing about on, goes without saying I wouldn't trust them with anything by my lowest priority personal projects.

jnguyen

@Mun - It shows as a Torrent. It is not uncommon for us to kill torrent processes or shut down the VM if they are causing issues or seem like they would.

If you're not going to name the person or supply any identification to identify the VM, then your post has absolutely no merit because you are not an existing client with an active service and that image could have been easily photoshopped.

JoeMerit

@jnguyen said:
http://prntscr.com/4i2bo9 <- Latest test on one of our Buffalo nodes.

how long will you guarantee performance like that on the node? 1 week? 2 weeks?

Mun

@jnguyen said:
Mun - It shows as a Torrent. It is not uncommon for us to kill torrent processes or shut down the VM if they are causing issues or seem like they would.

If you're not going to name the person or supply any identification to identify the VM, then your post has absolutely no merit because you are not an existing client with an active service and that image could have been easily photoshopped.

First, though it may say torrents, it actually has no torrent apps installed on it. Secondly, you most likely would terminate the client if I gave out the information on what the VM information was. Third, I have better things to do then photoshop.

Finally, instead of making an honest effort into identifying that you may have had issues, you are instead trying to fly anything I say under a radar because you are incapable of taking responsibility for your companies actions.

WebSearchingPro

@jnguyen said:
http://prntscr.com/4i2bo9 <- Latest test on one of our Buffalo nodes.

Ploop compressing the zeros in the dd test. That's effectively measuring your CPU.

jnguyen

@Mun, you likely photoshopped the image because you are refusing to provide any sort of information at all that may assist me with identifying the issue, leading me to believe that an issue never existed and that you're making up lies.

ihatetonyy

jnguyen said: Latest test on one of our Buffalo nodes.

jnguyen

@ihatetonyy - Not bad for our oldest Buffalo node eh?

Mun

@jnguyen said:
Mun, you likely photoshopped the image because you are refusing to provide any sort of information at all that may assist me with identifying the issue, leading me to believe that an issue never existed and that you're making up lies.

As I have already stated once, you most likely would terminate the client if I gave you that information.

Secondly, the issue did exist, and I can tell you it is on one of your SSD nodes in LA. I will not give any more information then that.

Thirdly, for all customers of GVH if you wouldn't mind running an uptime.php file, please PM me and I'll add it to my monitor so that I can better track the downtime of this provider.

ihatetonyy

jnguyen said: Not bad for our oldest Buffalo node eh?

No, not bad at all - I'll give you that. I had times twice where my server randomly shut down and I had to bring it back up myself.

WebSearchingPro

@ihatetonyy said:

Can you run "cat /proc/mounts | grep ploop"

If that's the case, the speeds you are getting are not "real".

ihatetonyy

WebSearchingPro said: Can you run "cat /proc/mounts | grep ploop"

[root@axis ~]# cat /proc/mounts | grep ploop
[root@axis ~]# cat /proc/mounts
/dev/simfs / simfs rw,relatime,usrquota,grpquota 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /dev devtmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755,gid=500 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,relatime 0 0
[root@axis ~]#

WebSearchingPro

@ihatetonyy said:
[root@axis ~]# cat /proc/mounts | grep ploop

Cool, simfs. Not bad in that case.

Mun

WebSearchingPro

@Mun said:

>

Looks like any DD tests you do from /dev/zero are measuring CPU. Ploop runs compression.

The only way I've found to effectively do speed tests on ploop VPS is making a ramdisk with random data and dd'ing from that to a test file. Looks like that 1.2GB/s might not be what people will really get, 400MB/s is more like it.

Mun

GVH IP of container in question. Minus last octet.

Mun

...and would you look at that, even Jon can confirm I am using a server at GVH.