New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Check the whois.
This. Basically, when the abuse address fails to get action, angry citizens file complaints with the government. Even as (relatively) small as copyright violation has its own government database that copyright owners can file complaints into for free when DMCA is ignored and they don't sue. Anyone hosting illegal stuff is a fool because the government has built these databases to let complaints stack up for years and then bury the owner.
There's only two endings for bulletproof hosts: they either get out while they still can, or stick around until the government comes knocking.
nothing illegal. 1st amendment. See terrorists cookbook.
If someone has the files i gladly host them public forever to piss off some more agencies. My upstream tolerates everything except CP and anti-Russian propaganda (Minsk DC)y
****> @oloke said:
Yes and @emgh is my cousin
welcome to the family
Not sure what there is to see there aside from it being registered today
How does that change any of what I said? Are you under the impression that, because I said the feds are corrupt liars, I think every single person they accuse is innocent of every crime?
I'll say what I said before: I trust neither party's claims without evidence. Bulletproof hosts are known to lie because they're (often) morally-bankrupt opportunists, and feds are known to embellish or even synthesize facts. Hell, not too long ago, an email host was labeled an international terrorist organization because a few antifa used it.
The com domain has ns from fbi. A domain change wont fit that long, if the server locations are allready known.
Do you honestly think "feds" need to "synthesize facts" on someone clearly admitting for months on end to ignoring police and court requests?
Your he-said she-said argument falls flat when Virtualine quite clearly spells out exactly how they ignore any law enforcement. Someone supporting CSAM really isn't the thread to take a stand in.
It was not about CP
It was about a series of highly criminal acts like phishing, malware, fraud, spam etc - all combined together.
cp was just used as example for providing “additional protection”
For anonrdp.com? Not seeing this
no evidence found to support this statement. They seized Autistici/Inventati after all.
What is "extremist radical paraphernalia" btw?
whois.com and who.is do report
but doing a dig just spits out CF
I see
Though no guarantee this is an actual seizure as anyone can set NS to FBI, no? For example take sellpass(.)io, iirc they set their NS to FBI for a time to exitscam
GIYF
Whois.com uses cached queries but domain doesn't seem to have updated for couple of days.
Live check shows Cloudflare dns and domain resolved to the .st domain.
https://www.politie.nl/nieuws/2026/oktober/28/03-internationale-actie-tegen-bulletproof-hoster.html
Use translate