New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
MXroute no longer seeks or welcomes traffic from lowendtalk.com
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Correct. We see usual polarization - people love to take sides, black and white etc. Reality is both parties did not behave well.
You don't need an account to index forum threads?
you do if you want to reply at times
personally i side with the service ive used for awhile now with 0 issues and 0 drama on my site, support is quick and never had a problem
Consumers LITERALLY Consume, its in the name. What else do you want them to do, do you want them to give you/jar foot massage xD?
You are a funny guy and I hope that this comment was sarcasm.
once again, its the people who are using MXRoute who suffer from such things.
People who don't use are still criticizing it though just because of how Sheerly bad it looks. This sounds a bit to me like Stockholm syndrome from your side.
The service provided by jar can be good but Email have to be trustworthy, and you don't want your email provider to do these things that jar is doing.
He would never do that, he's too much in love with money to do that.
Suffer from what 100% deliverability to all inboxes?
I mean literally no different than gmail,proton,outlook,aol
Sounds like you guys where digging for a problem and jar finally gave it to you .
I mean literally no different than gmail,proton,outlook,aol
Please read my last line again to which you have responded: The service provided by jar can be good but Email have to be trustworthy, and you don't want your email provider to do these things that jar is doing.
Only untrustworthy to those who fall to propaganda and one sided arguements
Difficult to listen to a couple of month old account that's just decided to comment here for the first time - unsure you're aware of the full history.
Now i will say, if it comes out he acutally did open and read @WyvernCo emails then yeah I would consider swapping. But if its just a he said she said this and that over a termed package with no refund no interest in falling for the propaganda
My bad unc i forgot you cant be a new member on a site anymore. my bad i wasnt born 10 years earlier to get on the internet and join when the forum opened
How do you know other do not do it? Every provider is run by people...trustworthy can be stretched.
Wrong! Only untrustworthy to those who want privacy.
In all likelihood @jar succumbed to his bad instincts and violated the trust of his customers by peeking into their email messages.
He should never have done that NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER!!!!
This is a VERY SERIOUS MATHER
Just for clarification, what are you actually accusing jar of, and what evidence do you have to back up those claims?
interesting, what do you have going on that is so private? sus.
I agree, to be honest, we can't know for certain if other providers do the same or not but what we do know is that MXRoute/jar is doing this which is worth taking into consideration.
Still seen 0 proof of this
I am not accusing anyone of anything, but what we do know is that jar commented on wyvernco's company which he works which as he says has no relation with his online profile so it seems to some probable that some other factors were at play here.
Another point but even if we discount the fact that jar might've sneak peeked into people's mail for an online internet drama (shaking my head), they then wrote an account with their own name effectively still doxxing wyvernco. He has still doxxed wyvernco which is also an bannable offense in Lowendtalk and an incredibly shitty thing to be done by jar, who sells email service which has to be trustworthy. All of this takes a significant chunk of trust away from many people.
Atleast this is my interpretation of this thread.
Sorry, the reason we're suspicious is since your reg date is three days prior to Jar's "quit" date, the stats say you've visited twice, and jar keeps reviving this fight on other platforms so it would make sense if he did have an alt account.
Alright came out and said he doesnt acutally work there. "well his words"
"search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent"
I mean i havent seen wyverncos name, addy, age, and real employment
I feel if he really went into customers inboxes he wouldnt of gotten it wrong.
Like i said before they are spreading there propaganda of a he said she said
He can be sued for that.
Why do you think that is the most likely thing to have happened?
Given how much of jar's identity is wrapped up in running as technically perfect an e-mail system as possible, I very much doubt it.
If @WyvernCo was actually @jar's customer (which I'm not sure there's actually any evidence for), he'd probably have been able to make the association to his workplace by googling his name from the registration details. If he had access to e-mail from his company, then a TrustPilot review is a very indirect way of utilising that information.
As stated above, he could have made the connection without needing to look into his e-mail, and it's not even obvious that @WyvernCo is even his customer - the threads I linked to earlier, @WyvernCo is promoting Amazon SES and starts criticising mxroute as soon as Jar mentioned it.
So, again, why do you think Jar is looking inside e-mails?
Understandable on that front, but nah im just a user of mxroute ~1 year now and still have yet to find a better mailbox selfhosted and otherwise besides paying the jews at google $12/inbox
Agreed. Taking into considerable has grown into a cest pit but well who cares.
That makes it ok...? As far as jar was concerned, he thought he worked there.
You don't see how that would make it seem pretty shady?
"jews", interesting. Every jew on earth is better and smarter than you.
Lol classic goyim
This is acutally a valid point, But i mean back to the acutal item if he wouldve went into inboxes he wouldnt of gotten it wrong.
Yeah I already said understanable, but ther is no better alt.