Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals ! - Page 6
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals !

1…34689…53

Comments

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    I m use it flex to

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    Thanked by 6NHNHNH000 lukast__ barbaros Blembim maverick Decicus
  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    I see minimal difference.

    u like my intel platinum 8160 @ 2ghz ?

    type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS 192370.77k 720906.83k 1900262.01k 3184907.82k 4048213.33k 4141313.29k

    Don't kill that Pentium. Like @Saragoldfarb killed her RPI while YABSing.

    good idea i have an rpi2 as an NTP server, decided to let to fry

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS       5698.63k     9273.37k    21241.43k    24152.41k    25157.63k    25225.90k

    Do you follow your own Timezone in self hosted NTP server?

    Thanked by 3lukast__ beanman109 Blembim
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    I see minimal difference.

    u like my intel platinum 8160 @ 2ghz ?

    type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS 192370.77k 720906.83k 1900262.01k 3184907.82k 4048213.33k 4141313.29k

    Don't kill that Pentium. Like @Saragoldfarb killed her RPI while YABSing.

    good idea i have an rpi2 as an NTP server, decided to let to fry

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS       5698.63k     9273.37k    21241.43k    24152.41k    25157.63k    25225.90k

    Do you follow your own Timezone in self hosted NTP server?

    let me check

    Thanked by 3barbaros lukast__ Blembim
  • NHNHNH000NHNHNH000 Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    Thanked by 4beanman109 lukast__ Blembim hyperblast
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    I see minimal difference.

    u like my intel platinum 8160 @ 2ghz ?

    type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS 192370.77k 720906.83k 1900262.01k 3184907.82k 4048213.33k 4141313.29k

    Don't kill that Pentium. Like @Saragoldfarb killed her RPI while YABSing.

    good idea i have an rpi2 as an NTP server, decided to let to fry

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS       5698.63k     9273.37k    21241.43k    24152.41k    25157.63k    25225.90k

    Do you follow your own Timezone in self hosted NTP server?

    yes

    Thanked by 4barbaros lukast__ Blembim Decicus
  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    @labze said:
    If you have network issues then please try and restart from the VPS Dashboard. If it persists open a ticket.

    One of the packages was created with the wrong IPv4 config.

    Still no ipv4 connection.

  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    Must be hamster wheel powered server.

    Thanked by 5beanman109 NHNHNH000 lukast__ Blembim maverick
  • barbarosbarbaros Member
    edited April 18

    @Motion3549 said:

    @labze said:
    If you have network issues then please try and restart from the VPS Dashboard. If it persists open a ticket.

    One of the packages was created with the wrong IPv4 config.

    Still no ipv4 connection.

    He said:

    If it persists open a ticket.

    Thanked by 2lukast__ Blembim
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    Thanked by 4NHNHNH000 barbaros lukast__ Blembim
  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    Thanked by 3beanman109 lukast__ Blembim
  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    @barbaros said:

    @Motion3549 said:

    @labze said:
    If you have network issues then please try and restart from the VPS Dashboard. If it persists open a ticket.

    One of the packages was created with the wrong IPv4 config.

    Still no ipv4 connection.

    He said:

    If it persists open a ticket.

    I did though.

    Thanked by 1barbaros
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    Thanked by 5zGato lukast__ Blembim Decicus ariq01
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    C1v potato host yabs anyone

    Thanked by 5barbaros beanman109 lukast__ Blembim Decicus
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Thanked by 3zGato NHNHNH000 lukast__
  • maverickmaverick Member
    edited April 18

    @barbaros said: From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)
    type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS 1206917.75k 3967885.85k 7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    tnx

    @barbaros said: I see minimal difference.

    ditto

    Thanked by 2barbaros Blembim
  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Perhaps you should try Geekbench 3?

    Thanked by 1lukast__
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Perhaps you should try Geekbench 3?

    gb5 is cuming, the SD card swap has been increased to 1GB

    Thanked by 5barbaros lukast__ Blembim Decicus BasToTheMax
  • maverickmaverick Member

    @NET18 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    I see minimal difference.

    I'm not sure why the AES-XTS performance was worse in the GB5 benchmark
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23482852

    go to GB forum and tell them that their software is crap

    ... and apologize to labze for being rude here, when the problem is elsewhere

    Thanked by 3lukast__ barbaros Decicus
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @maverick said: go to GB forum and tell them that their software is crap

    get them to fix GB6 multicore while they're at it please

    Thanked by 5lukast__ barbaros maverick PineappleM Decicus
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Perhaps you should try Geekbench 3?

    cant get 5 or 6 to run even with 2gb of swap and gb4 no arm compatibility this is a disaster

    Thanked by 3lukast__ Blembim Decicus
  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Perhaps you should try Geekbench 3?

    cant get 5 or 6 to run even with 2gb of swap and gb4 no arm compatibility this is a disaster

    This is killing.

    Thanked by 3beanman109 lukast__ Blembim
  • oriendoriend Member

    tfw no flash dealz, only benchmarks...

    Thanked by 1Blembim
  • BlembimBlembim Member
    edited April 18

    @beanman109 said:
    arm

    This is le problemo

    Thanked by 3barbaros beanman109 lukast__
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    im determined to beat this

    Thanked by 3NHNHNH000 Blembim lukast__
  • barbarosbarbaros Member

    @Blembim said:

    @beanman109 said:
    arm

    This is le problemo

    Nice profile pic.

    Thanked by 2Blembim lukast__
  • NHNHNH000NHNHNH000 Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    im determined to beat this

    R I G G E D

    Thanked by 3Blembim beanman109 lukast__
  • NET18NET18

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k

    I see minimal difference.

    I'm not sure why the AES-XTS performance was worse in the GB5 benchmark
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23482852

    go to GB forum and tell them that their software is crap

    ... and apologize to labze for being rude here, when the problem is elsewhere

    Why should I apologize? I used a widely accepted benchmark script and got some unexpected results, so I raised questions. I don't think there's anything wrong with that

  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad
    edited April 18

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:
    im sorry
    but in which case you guys use aes-xts

    this thread to meme how low i can get my numbers

    beat me
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23421120

    it's impossibel but rpi2 yabs cuming soon

    RIP

    that 200MB swap is about to do some work

    gg

    Perhaps you should try Geekbench 3?

    cant get 5 or 6 to run even with 2gb of swap and gb4 no arm compatibility this is a disaster

    Let's try this (RPI Zero (2?) W, trying to run GB5+6)...

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri 18 Apr 13:33:06 CEST 2025

ARM compatibility is considered *experimental*

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 49 days, 15 hours, 39 minutes
Processor  : ARM1176
CPU cores  : 1 @ 1000.0000 MHz
AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 427.9 MiB
Swap       : 4.9 GiB
Disk       : 58.5 GiB
Distro     : Raspbian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.6.51+rpt-rpi-v6
VM Type    : NONE
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

    On another note, Turin really has great performance:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Apr 18 12:37:23 CEST 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 5 days, 13 hours, 23 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2246.622 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 24.9 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-33-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : dataforest GmbH
ASN        : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
Host       : dataforest GmbH
Location   : Kriftel, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 444.57 MB/s (111.1k) | 749.42 MB/s  (11.7k)
Write      | 445.74 MB/s (111.4k) | 753.37 MB/s  (11.7k)
Total      | 890.32 MB/s (222.5k) | 1.50 GB/s    (23.4k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 548.12 MB/s   (1.0k) | 1.28 GB/s     (1.2k)
Write      | 577.25 MB/s   (1.1k) | 1.37 GB/s     (1.3k)
Total      | 1.12 GB/s     (2.1k) | 2.66 GB/s     (2.6k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 7.10 Gbits/sec  | 5.21 Gbits/sec  | 14.0 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.27 Gbits/sec  | 10.1 Gbits/sec  | 8.05 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 91.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 914 Mbits/sec   | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 161 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 883 Mbits/sec   | 141 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 83.4 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 724 Mbits/sec   | 840 Mbits/sec   | 194 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.07 Gbits/sec  | 8.77 Gbits/sec  | 13.9 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.20 Gbits/sec  | 14.9 Gbits/sec  | 7.90 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 560 Mbits/sec   | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 91.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 914 Mbits/sec   | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 161 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 140 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 2.24 Gbits/sec  | 83.4 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 721 Mbits/sec   | 890 Mbits/sec   | 198 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2468                          
Multi Core      | 2473                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11572542

YABS completed in 12 min 39 sec
    Thanked by 5barbaros Blembim beanman109 maverick Decicus
  • BlembimBlembim Member

    @barbaros said:

    @Blembim said:

    @beanman109 said:
    arm

    This is le problemo

    Nice profile pic.

    Thanked by 4barbaros beanman109 Decicus ariq01
Sign In or Register to comment.