Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals ! - Page 4
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals !

12467…53

Comments

  • tj111tj111 Member

    Happy Anniversary! @labze

    Thanked by 1mike_nx
  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    Happy 2nd anniversary @labze !
    Any chance to see some DA/Reseller dealz for the flash sales?

  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    @maverick said:

    @maverick said:

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.08 Gbits/sec  | 7.95 Gbits/sec  | 16.4 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.36 Gbits/sec  | 11.7 Gbits/sec  | 8.03 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 859 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 161 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 152 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 2.25 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 886 Mbits/sec   | 679 Mbits/sec   | 193 ms

    And after tuning:

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.12 Gbits/sec  | 8.99 Gbits/sec  | 16.5 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.31 Gbits/sec  | 12.3 Gbits/sec  | 8.13 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 5.25 Gbits/sec  | 3.27 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.47 Gbits/sec  | 5.70 Gbits/sec  | 160 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 152 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.62 Gbits/sec  | 7.42 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 5.01 Gbits/sec  | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 193 ms

    Nice improvement in speed to most distant locations, like Tashkent, Singapore, NYC... Close locations (<20 ms away) haven't improved, 'cause they don't need any special tuning to be fast.

    @Motion3549

    You always need this:

    net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr
net.core.default_qdisc = fq
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0

    Generally, I'm not sure ecn needs to be explicitely disabled, since aparently BBR is not using it, still I do it...

    And then socket buffer tuning:

    net.core.rmem_max = 67108864
net.core.wmem_max = 67108864
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 131072 67108864
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 16384 67108864

    This is what allows high speed transfers on long distances.

    Finally, this won't show on any benchmark, but oh boy does it make a difference if you have a real service that occassionaly sends packets on long distance. Took me a lot of time to see the effect in practice, but once I did, I started always applying it:

    net.ipv4.tcp_slow_start_after_idle = 0

    I guess that's it, networking wise.

    Thank you for the network tuning tips. I think this is all I need for now.

  • zrj766zrj766 Member

    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    Same issue here!

  • yepyep Member

    still waiting
    The following services are pending review by staff. Once approved, they will be activated

  • PineappleMPineappleM Member
    edited April 18

    @labze said:

    Provision time

    Orders are initially activated manually initially.

  • PineappleMPineappleM Member

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Thanked by 1vastness4594
  • lirrrlirrr Member

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    seem like still be able to connect to the server using ipv6
    but ipv4 is dead :D

    Thanked by 1zrj766
  • fuqetfuqet Member

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2599.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 5.8 GiB
Swap       : 1.0 GiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.8.0-55-generic
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
ASN        : AS212341 Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
Host       : Moritz Moeller Workstations
Location   : Mölln, Schleswig-Holstein (SH)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 694.65 MB/s (173.6k) | 5.92 GB/s    (92.5k)
Write      | 696.48 MB/s (174.1k) | 5.95 GB/s    (93.0k)
Total      | 1.39 GB/s   (347.7k) | 11.88 GB/s  (185.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.90 GB/s    (13.4k) | 6.72 GB/s     (6.5k)
Write      | 7.26 GB/s    (14.1k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
Total      | 14.16 GB/s   (27.6k) | 13.88 GB/s   (13.5k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2227                          
Multi Core      | 6431                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23433080

    What provider is it?

  • zrj766zrj766 Member

    @fuqet said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2599.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 5.8 GiB
Swap       : 1.0 GiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.8.0-55-generic
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
ASN        : AS212341 Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
Host       : Moritz Moeller Workstations
Location   : Mölln, Schleswig-Holstein (SH)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 694.65 MB/s (173.6k) | 5.92 GB/s    (92.5k)
Write      | 696.48 MB/s (174.1k) | 5.95 GB/s    (93.0k)
Total      | 1.39 GB/s   (347.7k) | 11.88 GB/s  (185.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.90 GB/s    (13.4k) | 6.72 GB/s     (6.5k)
Write      | 7.26 GB/s    (14.1k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
Total      | 14.16 GB/s   (27.6k) | 13.88 GB/s   (13.5k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2227                          
Multi Core      | 6431                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23433080

    What provider is it?

    computebox

  • sliixsliix Member

    flash dealz when?

  • NET18NET18

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

  • NET18NET18

    @fuqet said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2599.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 5.8 GiB
Swap       : 1.0 GiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.8.0-55-generic
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
ASN        : AS212341 Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
Host       : Moritz Moeller Workstations
Location   : Mölln, Schleswig-Holstein (SH)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 694.65 MB/s (173.6k) | 5.92 GB/s    (92.5k)
Write      | 696.48 MB/s (174.1k) | 5.95 GB/s    (93.0k)
Total      | 1.39 GB/s   (347.7k) | 11.88 GB/s  (185.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.90 GB/s    (13.4k) | 6.72 GB/s     (6.5k)
Write      | 7.26 GB/s    (14.1k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
Total      | 14.16 GB/s   (27.6k) | 13.88 GB/s   (13.5k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2227                          
Multi Core      | 6431                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23433080

    What provider is it?

    https://computebox.de

  • HuiWHuiW Member

    Waiting for flash deal

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • fuqetfuqet Member

    @NET18 said:

    @fuqet said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2599.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 5.8 GiB
Swap       : 1.0 GiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.8.0-55-generic
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
ASN        : AS212341 Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
Host       : Moritz Moeller Workstations
Location   : Mölln, Schleswig-Holstein (SH)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 694.65 MB/s (173.6k) | 5.92 GB/s    (92.5k)
Write      | 696.48 MB/s (174.1k) | 5.95 GB/s    (93.0k)
Total      | 1.39 GB/s   (347.7k) | 11.88 GB/s  (185.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.90 GB/s    (13.4k) | 6.72 GB/s     (6.5k)
Write      | 7.26 GB/s    (14.1k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
Total      | 14.16 GB/s   (27.6k) | 13.88 GB/s   (13.5k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2227                          
Multi Core      | 6431                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23433080

    What provider is it?

    https://computebox.de

    You get better performance but it cost more and you get less bandwidth. So not really that good.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • maverickmaverick Member

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
[...]
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k
    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • fdasfadfdasfad Member

    We want more RAM！！！

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    I would suggest you request a refund. If there is a issue then let me know and I can look into it but it's not the attitude to come and call crap.

    You're seeing a few hundred difference score in only Geekbench 5 and you are acting like it's the worst service ever.

    I don't know why you also day the disks perform poorly. I can enable writeback caching for you and you'll see blazing speeds but then you just risk data corruption if your system unexpectedly crashes.

    Thanked by 17PineappleM beanman109 maverick edrebe NHNHNH000 Blembim Decicus cybertech COLBYLICIOUS MohamadSY lukast__ hyperblast JohnFilch123 dataforest Shade BasToTheMax 2little2lateee
  • PineappleMPineappleM Member

    @labze Any hint on what the flash deals will be? Compute? Storage? Memory? Something else?

    If it’s something I’m not in the market for then it’d save me the hassle of having to refresh frequently.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    @lirrr said:

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    seem like still be able to connect to the server using ipv6
    but ipv4 is dead :D

    PM ticket number please.

    Thanked by 1zrj766
  • maverickmaverick Member

    2 questions regarding:

    @labze said: 1 TB Block Storage available for €2/month ($2.5/month) per 1 TB HDD Storage! (Open ticket to request this)

    if block storage is attached to VPS, can it be later detached (in case customer changes his mind)?

    can block storage be prepaid for a year and enjoy the same discount as VPS, i.e. 20€/year/TB?

    reguards

    Thanked by 4darkimmortal caracal hyperblast BasToTheMax
  • zrj766zrj766 Member

    @labze said:

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    @lirrr said:

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    seem like still be able to connect to the server using ipv6
    but ipv4 is dead :D

    PM ticket number please.

    PMed

  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    Connection loss everyone?

    Thanked by 1darkimmortal
  • lirrrlirrr Member

    @labze said:

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    @lirrr said:

    @zrj766 said:
    My service cannot connect after activation, still waiting for a response.

    seem like still be able to connect to the server using ipv6
    but ipv4 is dead :D

    PM ticket number please.

    sent!

  • emperoremperor Member

    Happy Two year anniversary HostBRR great offers as always . GLWS, we w8ting for the dealz :)

  • darkimmortaldarkimmortal Member

    Is it possible to buy more NVMe storage on the top package?

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • fzlfzl Member

    Happy Anniversary!

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @labze congratulations to another year.

    Here's to many more 🍻

  • gbzret4dgbzret4d Member

    I'm hyped for the flash deals

    Thanked by 1JohnFilch123
Sign In or Register to comment.