Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals ! - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals !

13567…53

Comments

  • SashkaProSashkaPro Member

    Can someone make fio Disk Speed Tests from partition with block storage?

  • easyvmfindereasyvmfinder Member

    GLWS <3

  • faizfaizfaizfaiz Member

    please singapore ?

  • lowendfolklowendfolk Member

    Grabbed one. Any goodies?

  • yepyep Member

    When is the flash sale?

  • cainyxuescainyxues Member

    Happy Birthday Hostbrr, @labze congratz mate <3

  • amaeva080amaeva080 Member

    Happy second Birthday Hostbrr - @labze
    Wishing you continued success.

  • jndjnd Member

    It's very impressive that you celebrate only 2 years in business but already have such nice selection of offers.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @labze said:

    @NaughtyWombat said:
    where is the flash?

    Tomorrow.

    is it tomorrow yet

    Thanked by 1edip
  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    @beanman109 said:

    @labze said:

    @NaughtyWombat said:
    where is the flash?

    Tomorrow.

    is it tomorrow yet

    When?

    Thanked by 2beanman109 vastness4594
  • nyamenknyamenk Member

    Happy anniversary and GLWS <3

  • NaughtyWombatNaughtyWombat Member

    MORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

  • NET18NET18

    Poor performance

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2600.002 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 15.6 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 161.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : dataforest GmbH
ASN        : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
Host       : dataforest GmbH
Location   : Kriftel, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 458.39 MB/s (114.5k) | 3.55 GB/s    (55.5k)
Write      | 459.60 MB/s (114.9k) | 3.57 GB/s    (55.8k)
Total      | 917.99 MB/s (229.4k) | 7.13 GB/s   (111.4k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.34 GB/s     (2.6k) | 3.42 GB/s     (3.3k)
Write      | 1.41 GB/s     (2.7k) | 3.65 GB/s     (3.5k)
Total      | 2.76 GB/s     (5.4k) | 7.08 GB/s     (6.9k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1815                          
Multi Core      | 6581                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23482487
  • JabJabJabJab Member

    deeeeeeeeeals

  • oriendoriend Member

    Happy Anniversary!

  • kobee24kobee24 Member

    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

  • strictlyparmesanstrictlyparmesan Member

    Hope there'll be some epyc VDS deals

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @kobee24 said:
    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

    Yes

    Thanked by 3hyperblast dataforest Flq
  • NET18NET18

    @labze said:

    @kobee24 said:
    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

    Yes

    1. Please clarify whether this batch of servers are classified as VDS or VPS.
    2. What is the reason for the poor server performance? Have you oversold resources excessively?
  • foitinfoitin Member

    Congrats on 2 year anniversary.
    It's only take you two years to become a strong top host candidate :)

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Megathread Squad

    @NET18 said:

    @labze said:

    @kobee24 said:
    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

    Yes

    1. Please clarify whether this batch of servers are classified as VDS or VPS.
    2. What is the reason for the poor server performance? Have you oversold resources excessively?

    lmao

    Thanked by 3lukast__ Protocol903 PineappleM
  • NHNHNH000NHNHNH000 Member

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Thanked by 3beanman109 PineappleM lukast__
  • NaughtyWombatNaughtyWombat Member

    Time for Easter?

  • ZyraZyra Member

    @NET18 said:

    @labze said:

    @kobee24 said:
    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

    Yes

    1. Please clarify whether this batch of servers are classified as VDS or VPS.
    2. What is the reason for the poor server performance? Have you oversold resources excessively?

    xD

    Thanked by 2beanman109 PineappleM
  • Motion3549Motion3549 Member

    @NET18 said:

    @labze said:

    @kobee24 said:
    which datacenter? still dataforest gmbh?

    Yes

    1. Please clarify whether this batch of servers are classified as VDS or VPS.
    2. What is the reason for the poor server performance? Have you oversold resources excessively?
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-01-01                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Fri Apr 18 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2600.002 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 15.6 GiB
Swap       : 4.0 GiB
Disk       : 154.9 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Kernel     : 6.8.0-58-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 301.95 MB/s  (75.4k) | 4.54 GB/s    (71.0k)
Write      | 302.75 MB/s  (75.6k) | 4.57 GB/s    (71.4k)
Total      | 604.71 MB/s (151.1k) | 9.11 GB/s   (142.4k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 2.32 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.44 GB/s     (2.3k)
Write      | 2.44 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.61 GB/s     (2.5k)
Total      | 4.77 GB/s     (9.3k) | 5.05 GB/s     (4.9k)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2797
Multi Core      | 8516

YABS completed in 5 min 3 sec

    looks normal here.

  • lirrrlirrr Member

    if this is poor performance then my other server is just a garbage on the bottom of the ocean lmao

    Thanked by 32little2lateee PineappleM admax
  • maverickmaverick Member
    edited April 18

    @maverick said:

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.08 Gbits/sec  | 7.95 Gbits/sec  | 16.4 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.36 Gbits/sec  | 11.7 Gbits/sec  | 8.03 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.06 Gbits/sec  | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 859 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 161 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 152 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 2.25 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 886 Mbits/sec   | 679 Mbits/sec   | 193 ms

    And after tuning:

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.12 Gbits/sec  | 8.99 Gbits/sec  | 16.5 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.31 Gbits/sec  | 12.3 Gbits/sec  | 8.13 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 5.25 Gbits/sec  | 3.27 Gbits/sec  | 92.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.47 Gbits/sec  | 5.70 Gbits/sec  | 160 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 152 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.62 Gbits/sec  | 7.42 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 5.01 Gbits/sec  | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 193 ms

    Nice improvement in speed to most distant locations, like Tashkent, Singapore, NYC... Close locations (<20 ms away) haven't improved, 'cause they don't need any special tuning to be fast.

    @Motion3549

    You always need this:

    net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr
net.core.default_qdisc = fq
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0

    Generally, I'm not sure ecn needs to be explicitely disabled, since aparently BBR is not using it, still I do it...

    And then socket buffer tuning:

    net.core.rmem_max = 67108864
net.core.wmem_max = 67108864
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 131072 67108864
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 16384 67108864

    This is what allows high speed transfers on long distances.

    Finally, this won't show on any benchmark, but oh boy does it make a difference if you have a real service that occassionaly sends packets on long distance. Took me a lot of time to see the effect in practice, but once I did, I started always applying it:

    net.ipv4.tcp_slow_start_after_idle = 0

    I guess that's it, networking wise.

    Thanked by 22SashkaPro Motion3549 JohnFilch123 _MS_ PineappleM plumberg lukast__ hyperblast cosmossofa nepeus JohnnySac Frameworks OpenNet 2little2lateee gemini_geek gsea4 akhfa gremeyer icry imok nghialele admax
  • HuiWHuiW Member

    Happy Anniversary! @labze

  • ishrakishrak Member

    Happy anniversary! Hope to see some great storage deals

  • NET18NET18

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9655 96-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2599.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 5.8 GiB
Swap       : 1.0 GiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.8.0-55-generic
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
ASN        : AS212341 Stephan Rakowski, trading as CSN Solutions e.K.
Host       : Moritz Moeller Workstations
Location   : Mölln, Schleswig-Holstein (SH)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 694.65 MB/s (173.6k) | 5.92 GB/s    (92.5k)
Write      | 696.48 MB/s (174.1k) | 5.95 GB/s    (93.0k)
Total      | 1.39 GB/s   (347.7k) | 11.88 GB/s  (185.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.90 GB/s    (13.4k) | 6.72 GB/s     (6.5k)
Write      | 7.26 GB/s    (14.1k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
Total      | 14.16 GB/s   (27.6k) | 13.88 GB/s   (13.5k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2227                          
Multi Core      | 6431                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23433080
    Thanked by 1NHNHNH000
Sign In or Register to comment.