Feeling Abducted by CharityHost_org

admax

@DataIdeas-Josh said:
@bdspice Was the content accessible from the big bad web or was there a directory lock?

They are using this panel program...
https://cyberpanel.net/KnowledgeBase/

JoshR

@admax said:

@DataIdeas-Josh said:
@bdspice Was the content accessible from the big bad web or was there a directory lock?

They are using this panel program...
https://cyberpanel.net/KnowledgeBase/

okay. But even still. If the files were under directory lock or not "publicly" accessible then the providers excuse here is null. HOWEVER if the files were openly accessible via the big bad web. Then yes. The provider is in the clear while not ethical but still not as "private" as the OP has mentioned.

admax

@DataIdeas-Josh said:

@admax said:

@DataIdeas-Josh said:
@bdspice Was the content accessible from the big bad web or was there a directory lock?

They are using this panel program...
https://cyberpanel.net/KnowledgeBase/

okay. But even still. If the files were under directory lock or not "publicly" accessible then the providers excuse here is null. HOWEVER if the files were openly accessible via the big bad web. Then yes. The provider is in the clear while not ethical but still not as "private" as the OP has mentioned.

I have now found that I can only log in to download my stored Linux ISO or download it via an FTP account. I'm not sure if it was the same before for OP. These files are located in: public_html.

The panel you access has a domain, ftp.xxx.com, where "xxx" represents the user's name (but this domain does not actually exist). Besides the domain for logging into the control panel, attempts to add other domains cannot be completed.

_MS_

_MS_

gbzret4d

@jure12 said:

@itachikonoha said:

@jure12 said:

@bdspice said:
Hi.
last month i got notification that i won 500gb FTP storage from CharityHost_org.
I though i can store some personal data and clear some space on my storage server. so i transferred 500gb pron to keep it as a cold storage. after one month, i got an email from CharityHost that my server is suspended due to AUP violation.
so i opened a ticket and ask support if it is not possible to store personal pron. if not then please give me time & option to retrieve all data back to old server. they replied it is not possible to unsuspend me even if it is using for personal usages only. and they will give me 1 week for data retrieve if i pay 25$. I just felt they give me free ftp of 500gb space to abduct me by honeytrap. and asking for 25$ is extortion.
i though most of provider allow storing pron for only personal usages if not shared to someone else or commercial usages even if AUP not allowed it. Very Bad Review for CharityHost_org from my experience, because i sent pm to CharityHost_org here and i got same reply. i though as let user he will consider it for one time but he also asked for 25$ .

You didn't read the TOS and this happened to you. When you get something as a gift or when you buy a VPS / Server, always read the TOS first so that you don't have this kind of inconvenience.

https://charityhost.org/terms-of-service/

and

https://charityhost.org/acceptable-use-policy/

I read the ToS and AUP.

Now tell me which clause in ToS or AUP was broken?

... Also, before uploading porn content, you could contact them via chat on their website (they are almost always online) or open a ticket and ask if they allow such material.

We all know that most server vendors do not allow porn material, it's never a bad idea to ask beforehand and make sure they allow this type of material/files on their servers.
@CharityHost_org

He was not hosting it. It was a private storage

gbzret4d

@emgh said:

@rustelekom said:

@Saragoldfarb said:
Will you host vps.gay for me pretty please?

If you will store there content which is restricted in Russia then your service will suspended soon.

@Saragoldfarb said:

@rustelekom said:

@wadhah said:

I'm glad you are here,

Can I store my gay porn collection in your russian servers? Since I can't store them with charityhost anymore

No. In Russia porn strictly prohibited by law. Also every content about LGBT. Prohibited under penalty of criminal punishment.

Will you host vps.gay for me pretty please?

If you will store gay content that is restricted in Russia, your service in Russia may be suspended soon.

Gay content😂

So no safe-space for your toe pics 🫢

techdragon

SpectroHost.com -> CharityHost.org

eb1995

I'm not sure why but the thing that keeps popping up in my head after reading all this is those videos you get in India where someone cleans someone else's eye with their tongue.

I had a vps with them and I thought it's too fast like nothing else is running, made me think they suspend vps when they feel like it. Maybe a stupid thought, but thats what my brain concluded

bdspice

@jure12 said:
I think the moderators should close this post @Arkas . Members are trolling this post for no reason. The main thing is simple, the guy violated the TOS and that's it.

For example, if I create a hacker app on the server to hack everyone I can, in the end the person who RENT me the server catches me and then people on LET ask the seller of the server how he found out that I have a hacker app on the server he rented me and they attack him for that, because he browses in privacy. Come on, please!

You can think in multiverse whatever you want. But fact is moderators shouldn’t close the thread before take the final decision as @DP said earlier. Main thing is the guy (me) violate the tos but provider also violate the tos by invade privacy+asked for money. Thats why this thread come to 20 page.
Your example is irrelevant. Hacking and porn storing isn't same at all.

wadhah

can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

zed

@wadhah said:
can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

Do I have to be an actual provider or can I just pay $200 to access the thread?

rustelekom

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

itachikonoha

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

Sure....

but what you wrote has nothing to do with what I wrote.

mw

@wadhah said:
can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

CH made one post already mentioned in this thread, and a few other providers just replied telling him to "just grow a pair of balls" and that he was warned about this behaviour in September (the screenshots posted in this thread)

wadhah

@itachikonoha said:

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

Sure....

but what you wrote has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Oh you seem to be new in interacting with our good friend @rustelekom , he has been trained exclusively for this exact thing by the russian propaganda machine.

---

@rustelekom said: No, we don't like watching gay videos.

Why? It's fun

mw

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

not reacting to abuse can genuinely be seen as enabling/ complicity in general, but some of what you said about Russia makes me think its even more dystopian than the western propaganda i see

itachikonoha

@mw said:

@wadhah said:
can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

CH made one post already mentioned in this thread, and a few other providers just replied telling him to "just grow a pair of balls" and that he was warned about this behaviour in September (the screenshots posted in this thread)

There was a screenshot? Where???

mw

@itachikonoha said:

@mw said:

@wadhah said:
can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

CH made one post already mentioned in this thread, and a few other providers just replied telling him to "just grow a pair of balls" and that he was warned about this behaviour in September (the screenshots posted in this thread)

There was a screenshot? Where???

page 6, the one quoting my message

DeusVult

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

I mean it's Russia... They even block some Wikipedia articles lol

itachikonoha

@mw said:

@itachikonoha said:

@mw said:

@wadhah said:
can we get a VAR review of the private provider thread? Anything funny? Any user mentioned by name?

CH made one post already mentioned in this thread, and a few other providers just replied telling him to "just grow a pair of balls" and that he was warned about this behaviour in September (the screenshots posted in this thread)

There was a screenshot? Where???

page 6, the one quoting my message

Wow that's a lot that could be taken in.

A big no to charityhost. I wouldn't even touch one even if I get one in giveaways.

angstrom

@bdspice said: Main thing is the guy (me) violate the tos but provider also violate the tos by invade privacy+asked for money.

Perhaps I missed it, but just to clarify, did you make any of your files publicly accessible via http(s) or via anonymous ftp?

wadhah

@DeusVult said:

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

I mean it's Russia... They even block some Wikipedia articles lol

Not only that, the russian government even helps with editing Wikipedia articles for our benefit!

https://www.wired.com/story/russia-edits-mh17-wikipedia-article/

rustelekom

@DeusVult said:

You may be punished for crime if you repost or simply like a post on Telegram, X, or anywhere else. Real cases of crime have already happened to some careless people. And, as far as I've heard, the same policy is used in the UK, France, Turkey, and other countries. Government regulation on the internet is now more strict.

rustelekom

@wadhah said:

Why? It's fun

Due to our culture. That is a personal choice.

DeusVult

@wadhah said:

@DeusVult said:

@rustelekom said:

@itachikonoha said:
hosting is not necessarily distributing

According to our local law, if a host does not react to abuse, he can be claimed as one of the distributors. As a result, his IP address or domain may be blocked by relevant organizations in Russia.

I mean it's Russia... They even block some Wikipedia articles lol

Not only that, the russian government even helps with editing Wikipedia articles for our benefit!

https://www.wired.com/story/russia-edits-mh17-wikipedia-article/

They are so good, right? wow!

DeusVult

@rustelekom said:

@DeusVult said:

You may be punished for crime if you repost or simply like a post on Telegram, X, or anywhere else. Real cases of crime have already happened to some careless people. And, as far as I've heard, the same policy is used in the UK, France, Turkey, and other countries. Government regulation on the internet is now more strict.

yeah and that's wrong; we are seeing a rise of authoritarism around the world... MAINLY Europe

itachikonoha

@bdspice said:

@jure12 said:
I think the moderators should close this post @Arkas . Members are trolling this post for no reason. The main thing is simple, the guy violated the TOS and that's it.

For example, if I create a hacker app on the server to hack everyone I can, in the end the person who RENT me the server catches me and then people on LET ask the seller of the server how he found out that I have a hacker app on the server he rented me and they attack him for that, because he browses in privacy. Come on, please!

You can think in multiverse whatever you want. But fact is moderators shouldn’t close the thread before take the final decision as @DP said earlier. Main thing is the guy (me) violate the tos but provider also violate the tos by invade privacy+asked for money. Thats why this thread come to 20 page.
Your example is irrelevant. Hacking and porn storing isn't same at all.

In order to make a final decision, one key aspect is required.

Did you keep the files in public folder?

Think carefully because if the answer is no, then it may become devastating in terms of reputation for Charityhost.

davide

@rustelekom said:
No, we don't like watching gay videos. And as I said, in Russia, all porn distribution is prohibited.

Usually, responsible organizations quickly send a notification about the distribution of such content. Just like when trying to distribute tools for hacking, phishing, copyright infringement, etc.

What about gay novels? Verboten verboten verboten?

webontop

speaking of which systemfreaks suspend my s3 bucket because it has some porn. When I asked he said I can't store porn on public bucket. They all are the same.. They check clients' data.. has no privacy !!!