Onidel Cloud's Thread - Announcements, Feedbacks and Discussions!

Motion3549

@FAT32 said:

@Motion3549 said:
My compute is up for renewal, and I definitely won't fall for the 'high availability' pitch again.

If it is one of those promo I will be happy to take it from you

Non-promo

onidel

@nexushomeclub said:
Hey guys, lurker here, finally jumping in.

Saw SG just had a restock / opened up some slots. Anyone know what the expansion roadmap looks like for SG capacity? Tempted to grab a couple of boxes, but I'm worried about hitting a wall when it's time to scale up once the current node fills up.

a few more TBs of capacity is on-site waiting for install already - ETA is 1.5 weeks from now.

FAT32

@onidel said:

@nexushomeclub said:
Hey guys, lurker here, finally jumping in.

Saw SG just had a restock / opened up some slots. Anyone know what the expansion roadmap looks like for SG capacity? Tempted to grab a couple of boxes, but I'm worried about hitting a wall when it's time to scale up once the current node fills up.

a few more TBs of capacity is on-site waiting for install already - ETA is 1.5 weeks from now.

So are you visiting SG and should we have a coffee

I can also help on installing it but cant guarantee it doesnt end up having slightly less RAM in the final build

MaxTakeba

@FAT32 said:

@onidel said:

@nexushomeclub said:
Hey guys, lurker here, finally jumping in.

Saw SG just had a restock / opened up some slots. Anyone know what the expansion roadmap looks like for SG capacity? Tempted to grab a couple of boxes, but I'm worried about hitting a wall when it's time to scale up once the current node fills up.

a few more TBs of capacity is on-site waiting for install already - ETA is 1.5 weeks from now.

So are you visiting SG and should we have a coffee

I can also help on installing it but cant guarantee it doesnt end up having slightly less RAM in the final build

Suddenly booking tickets to Singapore.

nghialele

Yachiyo

Good morning! This post from 2024 has resurfaced.

third

@MaxTakeba said:

@Motion3549 said:
My compute is up for renewal, and I definitely won't fall for the 'high availability' pitch again.

I’ll just point out that any provider can have major issues. Any provider.

AWS has had major issues. GCP has also had major issues.

I have confidence that Onidel and their team have learned a lot and the PIR will be very interesting to read, be educational and will take steps to improve and grow.

What will be the test is what they do after that and what they implement. Which again I’m confident that it will be preventative and will improve their already pretty good service (not a customer right now, was but I had 0 issues when I was).

I would trust them.

I get the sentiment that every provider has outages, but jumping straight from 'any provider can fail' to 'I would trust them' feels a bit premature. For customers actively dealing with the impact, trust can't just be granted on good faith—it really comes down to the concrete improvements they actually deliver.
@onidel

onidel

@third said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@Motion3549 said:
My compute is up for renewal, and I definitely won't fall for the 'high availability' pitch again.

I’ll just point out that any provider can have major issues. Any provider.

AWS has had major issues. GCP has also had major issues.

I have confidence that Onidel and their team have learned a lot and the PIR will be very interesting to read, be educational and will take steps to improve and grow.

What will be the test is what they do after that and what they implement. Which again I’m confident that it will be preventative and will improve their already pretty good service (not a customer right now, was but I had 0 issues when I was).

I would trust them.

I get the sentiment that every provider has outages, but jumping straight from 'any provider can fail' to 'I would trust them' feels a bit premature. For customers actively dealing with the impact, trust can't just be granted on good faith—it really comes down to the concrete improvements they actually deliver.
@onidel

while I’m very much appreciated all the good words and trust some of you have for us, I also do not have any issues with (constructive) criticisms and it is completely fair and understandble if questions started to raise about service quality after such an incident like this.

we always standby our products, and when things go wrong, we will look into it, take nessessary actions and then keep delivering. simple as that.

onidel

@FAT32 said:

@onidel said:

@nexushomeclub said:
Hey guys, lurker here, finally jumping in.

Saw SG just had a restock / opened up some slots. Anyone know what the expansion roadmap looks like for SG capacity? Tempted to grab a couple of boxes, but I'm worried about hitting a wall when it's time to scale up once the current node fills up.

a few more TBs of capacity is on-site waiting for install already - ETA is 1.5 weeks from now.

So are you visiting SG and should we have a coffee

I can also help on installing it but cant guarantee it doesnt end up having slightly less RAM in the final build

if smart hands can't do a good job

MaxTakeba

@third said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@Motion3549 said:
My compute is up for renewal, and I definitely won't fall for the 'high availability' pitch again.

I’ll just point out that any provider can have major issues. Any provider.

AWS has had major issues. GCP has also had major issues.

I have confidence that Onidel and their team have learned a lot and the PIR will be very interesting to read, be educational and will take steps to improve and grow.

What will be the test is what they do after that and what they implement. Which again I’m confident that it will be preventative and will improve their already pretty good service (not a customer right now, was but I had 0 issues when I was).

I would trust them.

I get the sentiment that every provider has outages, but jumping straight from 'any provider can fail' to 'I would trust them' feels a bit premature. For customers actively dealing with the impact, trust can't just be granted on good faith—it really comes down to the concrete improvements they actually deliver.
@onidel

Sure. But a good provider is one that can take the heat and bounce back from it. And again I’ve used their services and I can vouch for it. I’ll state the reality pretty clearly, again. Anyone can make mistakes and any company can have a major incident.

End of the day we’re all human.

MaxTakeba

@onidel said:

@third said:

@MaxTakeba said:

@Motion3549 said:
My compute is up for renewal, and I definitely won't fall for the 'high availability' pitch again.

I’ll just point out that any provider can have major issues. Any provider.

AWS has had major issues. GCP has also had major issues.

I have confidence that Onidel and their team have learned a lot and the PIR will be very interesting to read, be educational and will take steps to improve and grow.

What will be the test is what they do after that and what they implement. Which again I’m confident that it will be preventative and will improve their already pretty good service (not a customer right now, was but I had 0 issues when I was).

I would trust them.

I get the sentiment that every provider has outages, but jumping straight from 'any provider can fail' to 'I would trust them' feels a bit premature. For customers actively dealing with the impact, trust can't just be granted on good faith—it really comes down to the concrete improvements they actually deliver.
@onidel

while I’m very much appreciated all the good words and trust some of you have for us, I also do not have any issues with (constructive) criticisms and it is completely fair and understandble if questions started to raise about service quality after such an incident like this.

we always standby our products, and when things go wrong, we will look into it, take nessessary actions and then keep delivering. simple as that.

If I throw this rock over the Tasman will you catch it?