Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › HostBrr | 1 Year celebration deals | EPIC EPYC DEALS + Storage | Flash deals - Page 14
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | 1 Year celebration deals | EPIC EPYC DEALS + Storage | Flash deals

1…1112141617…21

Comments

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @sh97 said:
    I think the DDOS protection is too sensitive, maybe @labze can comment on this.
    When I first got it, I noticed the first speed test I do hits 8-9Gbps. Then suddenly I am disconnected. When I reconnect again, speeds are sub 1Gbps and the latency is also increased. On the first day, it would restore pretty fast to normal, but now I think thats not the case.

    Spot on. I had only configured part of one subnet for 10 Gbps as I expected this to be enough to accomodate the demand for quite a while. However, all IPs in this subnet was quickly used. I deployed another subnet and raised a ticket to change the mitigation threshold early friday expecting it to be resolved the same day. Unfortunately still waiting for Aurologic to update this.

    any news on that topic. the download speed is one 227th (down) and one 68th (up) of the advertised 10000mbps.

    Should be better now

    unfortunately still subterranean values! @labze

  • lukast__lukast__ Member

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @sh97 said:
    I think the DDOS protection is too sensitive, maybe @labze can comment on this.
    When I first got it, I noticed the first speed test I do hits 8-9Gbps. Then suddenly I am disconnected. When I reconnect again, speeds are sub 1Gbps and the latency is also increased. On the first day, it would restore pretty fast to normal, but now I think thats not the case.

    Spot on. I had only configured part of one subnet for 10 Gbps as I expected this to be enough to accomodate the demand for quite a while. However, all IPs in this subnet was quickly used. I deployed another subnet and raised a ticket to change the mitigation threshold early friday expecting it to be resolved the same day. Unfortunately still waiting for Aurologic to update this.

    any news on that topic. the download speed is one 227th (down) and one 68th (up) of the advertised 10000mbps.

    Should be better now

    unfortunately still subterranean values! @labze

    Could it be a problem with that specific server or did you also try other test servers (maybe some in Frankfurt)?

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    resultes are far away from the sun (@ehab @Mumbly) ->

    Thanked by 6lukast__ Mumbly ehab n1ghtm4r3x Uchiha COLBYLICIOUS
  • lukast__lukast__ Member

    @hyperblast said:
    resultes are far away from the sun (@ehab @Mumbly) ->

    Maybe open a ticket if you haven't already?

  • MrRobMrRob Member

    I'm sure @labze is solving all the problems, and also like many waiting for the promotions to come back.

    Thanked by 1o202
  • WurminatorWurminator Member

    It's definitely getting better:
    Speedtest.net 6913.02 Mbps 2374.40 Mbps 0.40 ms

    but I/O is still far behind the first days (was 700MB/s-1.1Gb/s):
    I/O Speed(1st run) : 137 MB/s
    I/O Speed(2nd run) : 179 MB/s
    I/O Speed(3rd run) : 148 MB/s
    I/O Speed(average) : 154.7 MB/s

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @Wurminator said:
    It's definitely getting better:
    Speedtest.net 6913.02 Mbps 2374.40 Mbps 0.40 ms

    but I/O is still far behind the first days (was 700MB/s-1.1Gb/s):
    I/O Speed(1st run) : 137 MB/s
    I/O Speed(2nd run) : 179 MB/s
    I/O Speed(3rd run) : 148 MB/s
    I/O Speed(average) : 154.7 MB/s

    Try and restart from the VPS management panel and see if that improves your results. Some changes to the disk setup has been made.

    Disk Speed:
    1st run : 570 MB/s
    2nd run : 706 MB/s
    3rd run : 985 MB/s

    Average : 753.7 MB/s

    Also expected to improve a bit over time. Still seeing high mixed IO usage as the server is being filled.

    Thanked by 1YassGames
  • mghtmght Member

    @labze said:

    @Wurminator said:
    It's definitely getting better:
    Speedtest.net 6913.02 Mbps 2374.40 Mbps 0.40 ms

    but I/O is still far behind the first days (was 700MB/s-1.1Gb/s):
    I/O Speed(1st run) : 137 MB/s
    I/O Speed(2nd run) : 179 MB/s
    I/O Speed(3rd run) : 148 MB/s
    I/O Speed(average) : 154.7 MB/s

    Try and restart from the VPS management panel and see if that improves your results. Some changes to the disk setup has been made.

    Disk Speed:
    1st run : 570 MB/s
    2nd run : 706 MB/s
    3rd run : 985 MB/s

    Average : 753.7 MB/s

    Also expected to improve a bit over time. Still seeing high mixed IO usage as the server is being filled.

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 236.46 MB/s  (59.1k) | 293.64 MB/s   (4.5k)
Write      | 237.09 MB/s  (59.2k) | 295.19 MB/s   (4.6k)
Total      | 473.55 MB/s (118.3k) | 588.83 MB/s   (9.2k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 744.76 MB/s   (1.4k) | 1.78 GB/s     (1.7k)
Write      | 784.33 MB/s   (1.5k) | 1.89 GB/s     (1.8k)
Total      | 1.52 GB/s     (2.9k) | 3.67 GB/s     (3.5k)

    seems still not as good as before after restart

  • mohammaclmohammacl Member

    @labze said:

    hi. any new deals coming????

  • catholicatholi Member

    @labze If I select an anniversary or flash offer, am I able to switch to a different offer later on if I find that I need more resources, or can I only add extra resources to my current plan?

  • bjobjo Member

    This load is quite...interesting.

    Thanked by 1Shot2
  • Shot2Shot2 Member

    @bjo: no error in dmesg?

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited May 6

    even after opening a ticket, restarting the server and informing me that the problem has been solved / or that the values should now be better, the network speed is still subterranean! i'm not used to such lousy values from hostbrr @labze.

  • COLBYLICIOUSCOLBYLICIOUS Member

    @hyperblast said:
    even after opening a ticket, restarting the server and informing me that the problem has been solved / or that the values should now be better, the network speed is still subterranean! i'm not used to such lousy values from hostbrr @labze.

    I am sure @labze will figure it out.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    hope dies last!

  • johndeo983johndeo983 Member

    @hyperblast said:
    even after opening a ticket, restarting the server and informing me that the problem has been solved / or that the values should now be better, the network speed is still subterranean! i'm not used to such lousy values from hostbrr @labze.

    it's actually great for the price

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:
    even after opening a ticket, restarting the server and informing me that the problem has been solved / or that the values should now be better, the network speed is still subterranean! i'm not used to such lousy values from hostbrr @labze.

    I am still trying to figure this out. I do not know much you've setup your server, if not a lot then a rebuild might be worth a try. I have tested several servers now and I cannot replicate these low results.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    used your windows server 2022 template. nothing more setup, blank windows, no other tweaks.

  • maverickmaverick Member

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @sh97 said:
    I think the DDOS protection is too sensitive, maybe @labze can comment on this.
    When I first got it, I noticed the first speed test I do hits 8-9Gbps. Then suddenly I am disconnected. When I reconnect again, speeds are sub 1Gbps and the latency is also increased. On the first day, it would restore pretty fast to normal, but now I think thats not the case.

    Spot on. I had only configured part of one subnet for 10 Gbps as I expected this to be enough to accomodate the demand for quite a while. However, all IPs in this subnet was quickly used. I deployed another subnet and raised a ticket to change the mitigation threshold early friday expecting it to be resolved the same day. Unfortunately still waiting for Aurologic to update this.

    any news on that topic. the download speed is one 227th (down) and one 68th (up) of the advertised 10000mbps.

    It is taking longer than expected due to the issue not being entirely obvious. But I have gathered much information that got sent to Aurologic two days ago. Awaiting resolution from their side as it is likely something incorrectly configured there.

    You should be able to get 1 Gbps no problem. The issue arises if you try and push it further. You can open a ticket so I can limit you to this speed so your connection does not drop then I can remove this once it is resolved.

    Any news from Aurologic?

    Funny thing, I haven't noticed any issues with speed, but packet loss is quite persistant since Apr 25 and seems to be getting worse in time, not better. :(

       Speedtest by Ookla

      Server: IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG - Frankfurt (id: 8040)
         ISP: GHOSTnet
Idle Latency:     0.50 ms   (jitter: 0.12ms, low: 0.36ms, high: 0.81ms)
    Download:  2024.46 Mbps (data used: 2.8 GB)                                                   
                  7.16 ms   (jitter: 5.03ms, low: 0.58ms, high: 45.22ms)
      Upload:  2246.73 Mbps (data used: 2.7 GB)                                                   
                  9.90 ms   (jitter: 27.81ms, low: 0.92ms, high: 252.86ms)
 Packet Loss:     4.9%
  Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/4077e34f-50b2-4da2-819e-5fb71a04c90e

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited May 6

    @hyperblast said:
    used your windows server 2022 template. nothing more setup, blank windows, no other tweaks.

    Reinstall Debian 11 OS and run the speedtests.
    if numbers look good, install Windows Server 2022, RDP into windows and wait for 30 minutes and then reboot.

    After restart, run Windows update.

    Thanked by 1hyperblast
  • gemini90gemini90 Member

    I also use the Windows Server 2022 template, and here is my test result. Choosing the same speed test server. Speed is great.

    Thanked by 1hyperblast
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider

    @maverick said:
    Any news from Aurologic?

    No packetloss on our network, either you have permanent DDoS-Protection on, causing icmp to be ratelimited - you can verify that with a MTR - or there is another real issue ;-)

    Thanked by 2maverick Shade
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:
    used your windows server 2022 template. nothing more setup, blank windows, no other tweaks.

    Reinstall Debian 11 OS and run the speedtests.
    if numbers look good, install Windows Server 2022, RDP into windows and wait for 30 minutes and then reboot.

    After restart, run Windows update.

    hmm...

    ---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
      A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Version            : v2024.04.14
 Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
 Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 9534 64-Core Processor
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2446.324 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 1024 KB
 AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 80.0 GB (3.1 GB Used)
 Total RAM          : 9.7 GB (199.1 MB Used)
 Total Swap         : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 2 min
 Load average       : 0.13, 0.10, 0.04
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-20-amd64
 Virtualization     : KVM
 TCP Control        : cubic
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Primary Network    : IPv4
 IPv6 Access        : ❌ Offline
 IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
 ISP                : GHOSTnet GmbH
 ASN                : AS12586 GHOSTnet GmbH
 ASN (IPv4)         : AS48314 Michael Sebastian Schinzel trading as IP-Projects GmbH & Co.                                        KG
 Host               : Ghostnet FRA
 Location           : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse-HE, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net (Region: EUROPE)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 ISP: GHOSTnet

 Nearest          0.43 ms     7.9%    1887.50 Mbps   5734.18 Mbps   IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG - Frankfurt

 London, UK       13.77 ms    2.1%    715.52 Mbps    2167.00 Mbps   M247 Ltd - London
 Manchester, UK   18.94 ms    N/A     1467.93 Mbps   3676.34 Mbps   Vodafone UK - Manchester
 Dublin, IE       21.33 ms    6.2%    1061.67 Mbps   1234.83 Mbps   Three Ireland - Dublin
 Amsterdam, NL    9.46 ms     7.0%    1332.97 Mbps   3914.20 Mbps   Melbicom - Amsterdam
 Eygelshoen, NL   12.15 ms    12.8%   1598.41 Mbps   1231.81 Mbps   SkyLink Data Center BV - Eygelshoven
 Paris, FR        9.41 ms     N/A     1736.25 Mbps   2635.58 Mbps   ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
 Marseille, FR    FAILED
 Madrid, ES       29.37 ms    7.9%    1537.73 Mbps   820.73 Mbps    Orange - Madrid
 Barcelona, ES    37.06 ms    8.7%    305.17 Mbps    177.48 Mbps    Adamo - Barcelona
 Lisbon, PT       40.47 ms    0.3%    1527.86 Mbps   585.58 Mbps    Edgoo Networks - Lisbon
 Rome, IT         29.31 ms    7.2%    1183.44 Mbps   480.07 Mbps    TIM SpA - Rome
 Milan, IT        17.35 ms    0.5%    861.39 Mbps    986.82 Mbps    Fastweb SpA - Milan
 Zurich, CH       7.69 ms     4.9%    1641.11 Mbps   3193.30 Mbps   Sunrise Communication AG - Zurich
 Frankfurt, DE    1.55 ms     6.9%    1936.12 Mbps   3089.34 Mbps   Deutsche Telekom - Frankfurt am Main
 Berlin, DE       13.34 ms    4.6%    1530.45 Mbps   2064.56 Mbps   Misaka Network, Inc. - Berlin
 Vienna, AT       12.38 ms    6.2%    1500.21 Mbps   3353.66 Mbps   A1 Telekom Austria AG - Vienna
 Budapest, HU     15.90 ms    1.7%    1701.97 Mbps   2061.46 Mbps   ATW Internet Kft. - Budapest
 Gdansk, PL       20.87 ms    0.7%    1380.03 Mbps   2965.53 Mbps   T-Mobile Polska S.A. - Gdańsk
 Warsaw, PL       22.42 ms    1.2%    1223.81 Mbps   1565.64 Mbps   Orange Polska S.A. - Warsaw
 Lviv, UA         33.86 ms    0.0%    1826.66 Mbps   260.49 Mbps    Kyivstar - Lviv
 Kyiv, UA         32.66 ms    3.4%    2195.31 Mbps   454.24 Mbps    O3 - Kyiv
 Bucharest, RO    42.48 ms    0.3%    1531.26 Mbps   666.14 Mbps    Orange Romania SA - Bucuresti
 Timisoara, RO    19.55 ms    0.0%    1665.34 Mbps   355.69 Mbps    Digi
 Helsinki, FI     22.28 ms    5.6%    842.20 Mbps    1512.90 Mbps   Elisa Oyj - Helsinki
 Stockholm, SE    31.85 ms    2.0%    650.64 Mbps    1423.14 Mbps   i3D.net - Stockholm
 Oslo, NO         22.96 ms    0.4%    2161.14 Mbps   676.86 Mbps    Telia Norge AS - Oslo
 Moscow, RU       38.46 ms    0.5%    1768.98 Mbps   338.74 Mbps    MTS - Moscow
 Petersburg, RU   32.73 ms    1.7%    907.70 Mbps    1265.87 Mbps   MegaFon - Saint Petersburg
 Istanbul, TR     55.34 ms    3.1%    1674.70 Mbps   894.17 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul
 Tbilisi, GE      62.09 ms    2.6%    1558.58 Mbps   358.62 Mbps    Silknet JSC - Tbilisi
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 1430.40 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 1671.50 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 58.50 GB
 Total UL Data      : 70.94 GB
 Total Data         : 129.44 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 13 min 22 sec
 System Time        : 07/05/2024 - 06:05:48 BST
 Total Script Runs  : 42651
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.network-speed.xyz/r/1715057749_SKN6NL_EU.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@frankenwald:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-04-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Tue 07 May 2024 06:06:04 AM BST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 15 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9534 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2446.324 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 9.7 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 80.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : GHOSTnet GmbH
ASN        : AS12586 GHOSTnet GmbH
Host       : Ghostnet FRA
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 199.61 MB/s  (49.9k) | 227.84 MB/s   (3.5k)
Write      | 200.14 MB/s  (50.0k) | 229.04 MB/s   (3.5k)
Total      | 399.76 MB/s  (99.9k) | 456.89 MB/s   (7.1k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 401.98 MB/s    (785) | 1.50 GB/s     (1.4k)
Write      | 423.34 MB/s    (826) | 1.60 GB/s     (1.5k)
Total      | 825.32 MB/s   (1.6k) | 3.11 GB/s     (3.0k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 2.28 Gbits/sec  | 14.0 ms
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 3.02 Gbits/sec  | 2.78 Gbits/sec  | 8.32 ms
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 25.7 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 89.0 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 121 Mbits/sec   | 147 Mbits/sec   | 281 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 479 Mbits/sec   | 154 Mbits/sec   | --
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 269 Mbits/sec   | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 81.5 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 649 Mbits/sec   | 907 Mbits/sec   | 148 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1865
Multi Core      | 3197

YABS completed in 12 min 35 sec
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @hyperblast
    That shows data speed is ok for your vps

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @dev_vps said:
    @hyperblast
    That shows data speed is ok for your vps

    yep. i follow your mentionied steps above now.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    the values are a little better but still bad and lousy compared to @dev_vps and @gemini90 . @labze

  • gemini90gemini90 Member

    @hyperblast said:
    the values are a little better but still bad and lousy compared to @dev_vps and @gemini90 . @labze

    Which browser did you use? Google Chrome usually gives a much better speed test result than Firefox.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @gemini90 said:

    @hyperblast said:
    the values are a little better but still bad and lousy compared to @dev_vps and @gemini90 . @labze

    Which browser did you use? Google Chrome usually gives a much better speed test result than Firefox.

    edge = chrome

  • JonesJones Barred

    @jh_aurologic said:

    @maverick said:
    Any news from Aurologic?

    No packetloss on our network, either you have permanent DDoS-Protection on, causing icmp to be ratelimited - you can verify that with a MTR - or there is another real issue ;-)

    Hey, let's have a summer promotion? :D

Sign In or Register to comment.